logo
Should we stop platforming Russian culture?

Should we stop platforming Russian culture?

Yahoo03-04-2025
It's been more than three years since Russia invaded Ukraine. The United States and the European Union rallied behind the country providing financial and military support, while a cultural boycott saw Russia banned from multinational events like Eurovision.
Russian artists and institutions were also boycotted. When London's Royal Ballet put on a performance of 'The Nutcracker' in late 2022, it confirmed its policy wouldn't be to work with those associated with the Russian state, such as the Bolshoi Theatre. Since 2022, strict approaches like these have waned. For example, the controversial Russians at War which debuted at last year's Venice Biennale.
Yet, throughout Europe, Russian culture continues to be enjoyed at large. Russia's long history of literature, classical music and theatre is so enmeshed within the Western artistic canon, that despite some early calls for its boycott, many European institutions have remained behind a position of separating the art from the current political climate.
From the start of the war, Ukraine's position has been a total boycott of Russian art. Now, the government-run fundraising platform, United24, is renewing its efforts, to keep its agenda in the public eye, and it fears Western perception is moving more favourably towards the Russian state.
'While many people believe that culture is outside of politics,' a United24 Media Representative, who didn't want to be named, tells Euronews Culture. 'Russia uses this belief to support the image of the country it needs.'
Related
'Restoration of justice': A Christmas carol defying imperialism
World Theatre Day: With men at war, a Ukrainian theatre stands strong with an all-female cast
Right now, there are two major theatre productions of Anton Chekhov's works in London, 'The Seagull' at the Barbican starring Cate Blanchett, and 'Three Sisters' at Shakespeare's Globe. There's also a production of the great Russian playwright's 'The Cherry Orchard' at Paris' Comédie-Française, and 'The Seagull' is set to run later this year in Berlin's Schaubühne.
It's not just Chekhov. Just last month, a production of Pyotr Tchaikovsky's 'Eugene Onegin' ran at Milan's Teatro alla Scala. Even 19th century writer Fyodor Dostoevsky had something of a renaissance when Gen Z readers discovered his short story "White Nights" last year through a #BookTok trend for the romantic novella.
But a new campaign from United24 says that the continued embrace of Russian culture – and particularly its literature – needs to be further inspected. 'Literature was without question the most effective tool of colonisation of the non-Russian outskirts of the Russian Empire,' the representative says.
Dig deeper into these 'Russian greats' and you find strains of thought that are pervasive in the current nation's belligerence. Whether it is Leo Tolstoy's glorification of the empire or Alexander Pushkin's othering of Ukrainians, United 24 believes these greats can't be read in a vacuum away from the war.
'The works of Lermontov, Chekhov, and Tolstoy clearly depict Ukrainian Cossacks in a negative light. They are portrayed as wild and illiterate, which is both untrue and unsurprising, given their history of fierce resistance to the Russian Empire,' United24 says.
If Russia's literary classics were so great, why have they 'failed to prevent the events that are currently unfolding?' United24 asks. The agency is concerned that through consuming Russian culture, it acts as propaganda.
Its campaign 'Russian culture distracts from Russian crimes' highlights the heavy toll on Ukrainian cultural institutions. Early into the war, the Mariupol Drama Theatre was bombed by Russian forces. At the time, it was being used as a shelter and it's estimated around 600 people were killed.
Both London Chekhov productions declined the opportunity to comment on the topic. However, Ani Kokobobo, Associate Professor of Russian Literature at University of Kansas, argues that we shouldn't turn away completely from Russian literature
'[A] human being living on the surface of the Earth has no right to turn away and ignore what is happening on Earth, and there are higher moral imperatives for this,' she says, quoting Dostoevsky.
'Surely the intentional shelling of children in Mariupol is something Dostoevsky couldn't possibly look away from either,' Kokobobo writes in The Conversation. 'At the same time, nor should readers look away from the unseemliness of Dostoevsky and his sense of Russian exceptionalism.'
For Kokobobo too, it's impossible to shy away from much of the nation's literature that propagates Russian dogmatism of its own greatness. These ideas "are connected to the broader ideology that has fueled Russia's past colonial mission, and current Russian foreign politics on violent display in Ukraine," she says.
If Russian literature wasn't enough to stop the war, inspiration from it may still be crucial to the downfall of Putin's regime. So believed assassinated opposition politician Alexey Navalny, who quoted Tolstoy after his March 2022 trial: 'War is a product of despotism. Those who want to fight war must only fight despotism.'
There is also contemporary Russian culture made by dissidents to take into consideration. For instance, film director Kirill Serebrennikov has faced persecution in his home country moving to Berlin after years under house arrest. He's a staunch critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin, not just for the war, but also for Russia's crippling stance on LGBTQ rights. His most recent film Limonov: The Ballad about the political dissident debuted at last year's Cannes Film Festival.
Similarly, the frequently persecuted punk band Pussy Riot have continued to stoke controversy. In 2022, members were arrested before an attempt to storm the pitch at the World Cup final in Qatar to protest the war in Ukraine.
If we can't fully detach ourselves from Russian culture, United24 argues that people should at least further champion Ukrainian art and give it its due recognition.
'It has much to offer the world, despite its systematic destruction over the last 300 years by the Russian Empire, through which it not only passed with honour but also preserved itself and developed,' the representative says.
'And it is definitely worth preserving for the future. Which, of course, is impossible unless Putin is stopped.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia warns against threats after Trump repositions nuclear submarines
Russia warns against threats after Trump repositions nuclear submarines

Boston Globe

timea minute ago

  • Boston Globe

Russia warns against threats after Trump repositions nuclear submarines

Peskov's remarks, the first official statement from the Kremlin about Trump's move, seemed to distance Russian President Vladimir Putin from Medvedev, a longtime prime minister under Putin who now serves as deputy chairman of the country's Security Council. Advertisement 'On the whole, certainly, we absolutely wouldn't like to engage in such polemics, nor would we like to comment on that in any way,' Peskov said, responding to a question about Trump's announcement of nuclear submarine movements. 'There can be no winner in a nuclear war,' Peskov added. 'This is probably the key premise we rely on. We do not think there is talk of any escalation.' Since ordering the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Putin has often intimated that Moscow could deploy nuclear weapons, while other officials, including Medvedev, and commentators close to the Kremlin have issued hyperbolic threats referencing Russia's nuclear arsenal, which is the world's largest. Peskov's effort to play down the confrontation comes ahead of a likely visit to Russia this week by Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, who has met Putin four times in a so-far-unsuccessful bid to halt Russia's war. Advertisement Trump told reporters Sunday that the submarines are 'in the region.' Last week, responding to Medvedev on social media, Trump denounced the Russian's 'highly provocative statements,' which he said led him to dispatch the submarines 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences,' Trump continued, capping an intensifying exchange. 'I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Medvedev, whose relevance in Russia has waned since he left the prime minister's office in 2020, now often plays the role of social media provocateur. Russia's nuclear arsenal is central to Putin's effort to posture the country as a global power and to reinforce his conviction, shared by many Russian citizens, that Russia can never be defeated in war. On Sunday, Trump said he may send Witkoff to Russia on Wednesday or Thursday at Moscow's request, before imposing new sanctions. Trump has cautioned that the new sanctions would probably not deter Russia's war effort. After Trump last week shortened the deadline for agreement on a cease-fire in Ukraine to Aug. 8, Medvedev warned on social media that every Trump ultimatum was a step closer to war between the United States and Russia. Trump admonished Medvedev to 'watch his words'; then Medvedev responded on Thursday with an emoji of laughter through tears and the nuclear threat, warning Trump of the dangers of the 'Dead Hand.' On Friday afternoon, Trump said he would reposition two nuclear submarines. 'A threat was made … so we just have to be very careful,' he said, referring to Medvedev, adding: 'We're going to protect our people.' Advertisement Peskov distanced himself Monday from Medvedev's rhetoric, saying people should look to Putin instead. 'In our country, foreign policy is formulated by the head of state, President Putin,' Peskov said. He declined to comment on whether the Kremlin would tell Medvedev to tone down his rhetoric. Russia has sharpened its tone toward Trump in recent weeks after US officials indicated he is running out of patience with Putin's reluctance to compromise on his maximalist conditions to end the war, despite key concessions suggested by the United States, including keeping Ukraine out of NATO and allowing Moscow to keep the territory it has annexed illegally in Ukraine. In his meetings with Putin and other Russians, Witkoff has at times appeared to misread the Kremlin's demands, commenting that he saw Russia's retention of the territories it occupies as key to the war's resolution. Putin, however, consistently insists on a broader subjugation of Ukraine, including slashing the size of its military, effectively undercutting Ukrainian sovereignty. On Friday, Putin said in a comment that appeared directed at Trump that Russia's conditions to end the war had not changed and declared that any disappointment about the peace process was due to 'excessive expectations.' Putin said Russia's massive losses in Ukraine — likely this summer to reach 1 million soldiers killed or wounded, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies — were not in vain. 'We do not have a single loss in vain,' he told journalists on Valaam Island in northwestern Russia after visiting a monastery. Since the 2022 invasion, Moscow has calibrated its nuclear threat to deter Western support for Ukraine, in particular deliveries of Western missiles capable of striking deep into Russian territory. Denied those, Ukraine has used drone strikes on distant targets. Advertisement These threats have at times been delivered directly by Putin, but also at other times by senior Russian officials who offer a level of deniability, including Medvedev. Pro-Kremlin analyst Sergei Markov on Sunday wrote that Witkoff's likely visit was the 'last chance' to reach an agreement between Moscow and Washington before Trump's deadline on a cease-fire expires Aug. 8. He wrote on Telegram that Putin may offer a partial cease-fire, ending missile and drone attacks.

Trump escalates nuclear tensions as Russia deadline nears
Trump escalates nuclear tensions as Russia deadline nears

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump escalates nuclear tensions as Russia deadline nears

President Trump is rattling the U.S.'s formidable nuclear saber amid his growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin's refusal to halt the war in Ukraine, just days ahead of Trump's deadline for a ceasefire. Trump last week said he was moving two 'nuclear' submarines closer to Russia in response to threatening rhetoric from a top Kremlin official. On Sunday, he confirmed the vessels were now 'in the region.' It's not clear if Trump is referring to nuclear-armed submarines or nuclear-powered attack submarines, but the confusion adds to the threat, which coincides with the president's Friday deadline for Russia to end the war or face further economic isolation. Experts say it's a risky tactic unlikely to sway Putin, who has stood in the way of the president's campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of returning to the White House. 'I don't see a lot of the benefits or the advantages, given that the Russians know very well that we have, for decades, had nuclear-armed submarines that could target what matters to them,' said Erin Dumbacher, the Stanton Nuclear Security Senior Fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations. 'I see more risk than reward to using statements like this.' While experts don't see an imminent threat, they warn against careless and bombastic statements that could lead to risky miscalculation and confrontation. 'Does this mean that all of a sudden we should all be going to the cellar and locking ourselves in? No,' said former Rep. John Tierney (D-Mass.), who is the executive director of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, in a call with The Hill. 'Of major concern is nuclear rhetoric that could all too easily lead to mistake or miscalculation resulting in catastrophe. Trump's verbal engagement with an essentially powerless Russian politician is inappropriate and unhelpful,' he said in an earlier statement. 'What is needed is a steady hand, not someone who allows his anger at a personal insult to risk escalating to a dangerous situation.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for peace missions, is expected in Moscow later this week to push Putin to agree to a ceasefire. If that fails, Ukraine's supporters are hoping Trump will pull the trigger on 'secondary tariffs' on countries that import oil from Russia, in a bid to choke off the Kremlin's ability to finance its war. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov on Monday downplayed the movement of the U.S. submarines to its nearby waters, saying it does not want to be dragged into a tit-for-tat escalation. 'In general, of course, we would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to comment on it in any way,' Peskov told reporters, according to Reuters. 'Of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric.' Peskov added that Russia does not currently see the movement as an escalation. 'It is clear that very complex, very sensitive issues are being discussed, which, of course, are perceived very emotionally by many people,' he added. Trump announced the move after what he called 'highly provocative statements' from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the deputy chair of the country's security council. Medvedev had criticized Trump's foreign policy and threat of sanctions. Earlier this week, Trump reduced a 50-day timeline for Russia to reach a ceasefire, after repeatedly lashing out at Putin for continued attacks on Ukraine. Medvedev, a frequent anti-Western critic seen as having little decision-making power in the Russian government, said Trump is 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10,' and he warned about the risk of war between 'nuclear-armed adversaries.' He also referenced Russia's 'dead hand' capabilities — a Cold War relic that describes Moscow's ability to launch a nuclear strike even if the Russian leadership is taken out. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences,' Trump responded in a Truth Social post. 'I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump has wielded America's nuclear arsenal in the past, particularly during his attempts to get North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions during his first term. Trump often raised the prospect of nuclear war with Pyongyang, boasting he would unleash 'fire and fury' on the country, and that he had a 'much bigger' and 'more powerful' nuclear arsenal. Trump's latest move to send two U.S. nuclear submarines to circle near Russia is unlikely to cause major concern for Moscow, given that such vessels patrol oceans across the globe daily, experts said. But the heightened rhetoric and concerns for miscalculation are underscoring key gaps in nuclear arms control and nonproliferation efforts. The Russian Foreign Ministry on Monday said it was not bound by a moratorium on short- and intermediate-range missiles, in what Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said was a response to U.S. discussions to deploy long-range conventional missiles to Europe. The missiles were banned under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which Trump pulled out of in his first term in response to Russian violations of the treaty. And the New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia is set to expire in February. The treaty put restrictions on America and Russia's nuclear arsenals and allowed reciprocal inspection and verification. Russia suspended its participation in the treaty in 2023, and the U.S. took countermeasures that effectively suspended American participation, raising concerns among nuclear arms control experts about the next steps. 'I'm not seeing a lot of conversation about what would happen after that, in an effort to restrict or limit or even maintain the current levels,' said Dumbacher, who most recently was a CFR international affairs fellow with the Pentagon. In that role she helped craft language signed on by the U.S. and China that humans, and not artificial intelligence, should control nuclear weapons. Dumbacher pointed out Russia is not a party to that agreement, which speaks to Medvedev's threats of Russia's 'dead hand' capabilities. 'I think every nuclear weapons country should sign on to some sort of confidence building measure like that, where we say we're never going to hand this decision over to a machine,' she said. Even as Trump heightens his rhetoric against Russia, the president has highlighted nuclear arms control as a priority. In a speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos in January, he said he wanted nuclear arms reduction talks with both Russia and China. And Trump boasts of halting fighting between Pakistan and India as averting a nuclear war. Rose Gottemoeller, who served as deputy secretary-general of NATO from 2016-19, noted Trump's success in getting Putin in 2019 to a freeze on all nuclear warheads, as well as his signal more recently that he is not interested in the U.S. building more warheads. 'Today's U.S. political reality mandates that the next arms control treaty has to be wholly owned by President Donald Trump if it is to be successful,' Gottemoeller wrote in an article for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists late last month, pointing out that any new arms control treaty will need the ratification of Congress. 'With the willingness that President Trump has already shown to take on the issue of constraining warheads, the current U.S. administration has the opportunity to forge into new territory on nuclear arms control.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store