logo
Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'

Map reveals where it will cost you $40,000 to give BIRTH... as natural-born population risks going 'extinct'

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Americans living in 10 states may have to fork over nearly $30,000 to give birth, shocking new data reveals.
In Alaska, mothers opting for a vaginal birth can expect to receive a bill for $29,000, including both insurance and out-of-pocket costs.
Going with a C-section? That will be an extra $10,000 for moms living in America's 49th state, twice the national average.
For vaginal births, which just over 66 percent of American women choose, New York and New Jersey followed closely behind, both costing about $21,800.
Connecticut and California rounded out the top five priciest states to have a vaginal birth, totaling $20,600 and $20,400, respectively.
And for the 1.2million women in the US who undergo a C-section every year, Maine and Vermont were the two most expensive states behind Alaska, each costing roughly $28,800.
States rounding out the list of most expensive C-sections were Oregon and New Jersey, with price tags of $28,700 and $26,900.
Meanwhile, women giving birth in Mississippi paid the least on average for both vaginal birth and C-sections. A typical vaginal birth in the Magnolia state runs roughly $9,900, while a C-section is about $11,100.
The rankings, compiled by health insurance claims analyst FAIR Health, are based on records from 51billion commercial health insurance claims filed nationwide within the last several years.
All services were considered in-network, meaning insurance covered some of all of the costs and a patient paid the remaining balance.
The costs account for both the portions paid by the patients and by the insurance companies.
Services included vaginal or C-section delivery, anesthesia, ultrasounds, lab work, breast pumps and fetal nonstress tests, which measure a fetus' heart rate and movement in the womb.
The average vaginal birth in the US is $15,200, whereas a C-section costs $19,300.
C-sections tend to cost more than vaginal births because they need more specialized surgical equipment and often require longer hospital stays and more involved post-operative care.
Recent research suggests the cost of childbirth in the US increased 22 percent from 2017 to 2021, a factor potentially driving America's fertility crisis.
The current fertility rate reached a new low of 1.6 births per woman, according to a new CDC report.
This is well below the 2.1 needed to sustain population growth. It's also a sharp decline from 3.5 in 1960 and 2.1 in the 1990s, showing women are having far fewer children than their mothers and grandmothers.
Young Americans have also cited a shifting focus on their careers and climate change as reasons for not having children.
Experts previously told DailyMail.com that while the US has not seen a 'downward trend economically' in the way countries like South Korea, Japan, or Germany have, the effects of depopulation in the US would be 'detrimental.'
They fear depopulation would put a significant strain on the job market and drastically reduce the number of workers in the country. This would drive up the cost of goods.
Dr Abigail Hall, an associate professor of economics at the University of Tampa, told DailyMail.com: 'Economically speaking, depopulation is detrimental for economic growth.'
As the population dwindles, there will be fewer people to pay off the nation's debt. For example, the Heritage Foundation estimates a baby born in 2007 will assume $30,500 in debt. However, a baby born in 2020 will assume $59,000.
Dr Hall said: 'One thing people would probably witness is that it's going to be harder to find people to fill jobs.'
In FAIR Health's analysis, Alaska was the most expensive state for vaginal and C-section births. The former added up to $29,152 while the latter was $39,532.
This could be due to one in five Alaskans living in remote locations, meaning medical supplies and personnel have to be transported by air, driving up costs.
Rural areas also have fewer hospitals to choose from, leading to many increasing costs since there is little competition.
New York, New Jersey and Connecticut all followed closest behind Alaska for the cost of vaginal births. Costs in these states range from $20,600 to $21,800.
The Northeast has a generally higher cost of living and rent than the rest of the country, driving up overall hospital stay and material prices. The area also has a high concentration of academic, renowned medical centers like Columbia, Yale New-Haven and NYU Langone, which tend to charge more.
California, which rounds out the top five most expensive states for a vaginal birth at $20,390, requires insurance companies to cover many maternity-related screenings that aren't mandatory in other states, which tends to drive up overall total cost.
The list varied for C-section births. Following close behind Alaska was Maine with a cost of $28,794. Like Alaska, a significant portion of residents - 61 percent - live in rural areas, limiting their access to a variety of hospitals.
Rural hospitals often have lower patient volumes but still have to pay to keep facilities open, so they typically charge more per patient to afford these costs. The same is true for Vermont, where it costs $28,747 on average to have a C-section.
Oregon and New Jersey rounded out the top five C-section states, totaling $28,708 and $26,896.
Meanwhile, Mississippi was the cheapest state to give birth either vaginally or via C-section. The former costs $9,847 while the latter is $11,110 on average.
More than half of births in Mississippi are covered by Medicaid, according to the latest available data, which significantly lowers overall costs.
Births in Mississippi are also more likely to occur in lower-cost community hospitals without advanced, costly facilities.
Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee also ranked closely behind, with costs ranging from $10,000 to $11,500 for a vaginal birth and $11,500 to $15,000 for a C-section.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bridgwater £17.8m diagnostic centre to improve access to 'vital scans'
Bridgwater £17.8m diagnostic centre to improve access to 'vital scans'

BBC News

time6 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Bridgwater £17.8m diagnostic centre to improve access to 'vital scans'

A hospital trust has moved a step forward in its plans to construct a £17.8m diagnostic centre to improve access to vital NHS Foundation Trust has been given approval by NHS England to construct the facility next to Bridgwater Community Hospital. It said it has now applied for planning permission, which if approved could see the facility open next centre will run a range of services including two CT scanners, two MRI scanners, four outpatient rooms and two echocardiography and ultrasound director David Craig said the centre is "expected to provide almost 25,000 additional scans every year". This will enable the centre to provide the Bridgwater population with routine and specialist cardiac and cancer scanning, alongside clinics. It follows the opening of a community diagnostic centre in Taunton in 2020, as well as the development of a diagnostic centre next to Yeovil Hospital, which is expected to open later this year."This development is fantastic news for people in Bridgwater and will improve access to vital healthcare scans, as well as help us to reduce our waiting times," Mr Craig said."The new centre supports one of the three shifts of the NHS 10 Year Plan, which involves transferring care from hospitals into local communities."Running across seven days a week, it will improve access for people in Bridgwater and the surrounding areas to specialist care, with the centre expected to provide almost 25,000 additional scans every year."

Wes Streeting ‘thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors'
Wes Streeting ‘thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors'

The Guardian

time6 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Wes Streeting ‘thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors'

Wes Streeting thought he had struck a deal with resident doctors to stop a five-day strike in England, only for the British Medical Association to then reject it, sources have claimed. The health secretary believed he had secured a verbal agreement with the co-chairs of the BMA's resident doctors committee for a deal that involved progress on tackling five non-pay issues. Whitehall sources say Ross Nieuwoudt and Melissa Ryan decided the agreement made during face-to-face talks last Tuesday was enough for the suspension of the strike, which started on Friday. The deal would have involved resident doctors – formerly junior doctors – getting access to hot meals when working overnight, having some exam fees paid, receiving funding for equipment such as stethoscopes and getting mess rooms and changes to the way their postgraduate training was organised. But when Nieuwoudt and Ryan relayed the potential deal to the full committee, they were told they could not approve it because it did not address the BMA's demand that resident doctors receive a 29% pay rise over the next few years. 'They were told by the committee that they could only talk about pay and none of this soft stuff matters. Wes was furious. They had come incredibly close to a deal,' a source said. Resident doctors in England receive basic pay of between £38,831 and £73,992, with extra payments worth up to 15% of their salaries for working at weekends. The failure to reach a deal underlines the gulf between the BMA and Streeting. He has refused to reopen negotiations over the 5.4% salary increase he has given resident doctors this year. But the union is adamant it will call off industrial action only if he agrees to talk money. The BMA denied that it was responsible for the failure to strike a deal and blamed Streeting. A spokesperson said: 'We cannot be clearer: it was the government that ended the talks. 'Resident doctors do not want to strike. However, we have been compelled to take action because Mr Streeting's ultimatum, which demanded we call off strikes in exchange for nothing more than further talks was simply not acceptable. 'We want to continue our negotiations with Mr Streeting and strongly urge him to get back around the table with a serious proposal, rather than a handful of platitudes.' NHS bosses warn the strikes could 'snowball' and even continue into next year. They fear that nurses, consultant doctors and other NHS staff might stage strikes too. Sir Jim Mackey, the chief executive of NHS England, told the Sunday Times: 'We know that continued disruption over the coming months could see a snowball effect for patients and for staff. 'We've seen that before and it has take a huge effort over the last year to build momentum back up on reducing waiting lists and times.' His deputy, David Probert, who is also chief executive of University College London hospitals trust, told the same paper: 'This could be a marathon. We could be doing this until Christmas or maybe beyond.' The BMA's 55,000 resident doctor members have a legal mandate to take strike action for six months, until 6 January. Kemi Badenoch has pledged to outlaw strikes by doctors, bringing them into line with the police and army, if she becomes prime minister. 'Doctors hold lives in their hands. No one should lose critical healthcare because of strikes but that's what's happening now', the opposition leader posted on X on Sunday. 'That's why a Conservative government led by me would ban doctors' strikes, just like we do the army and police.'

This fuzzy animal friend may be the key to treating schizophrenia
This fuzzy animal friend may be the key to treating schizophrenia

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

This fuzzy animal friend may be the key to treating schizophrenia

Llamas – likely without red pajamas – may hold the key to treating schizophrenia. The serious brain disorder causes people to interpret reality abnormally, and affects approximately 3.7 million U.S. adults between the ages of 18 to 65 years old, according to the nonprofit RTI International. But the domesticated South American woolly animal might be be able to help. French researchers said this week that they had used llama antibodies, or proteins that help to protect the immune system, to design a tiny fragment of an antibody known as a 'nanobody' that will trigger a neurotransmitter in the brain involved in regulating neural activity. Neurotransmitters are chemical molecules that carry messages or signals from one nerve cell to the next target cell, according to the Cleveland Clinic. No llamas were harmed in the study and researchers can identify nanobodies in a petri dish. In the past, llama antibodies have also proven effective in fighting Covid and other 'SARS-like' viruses. When scientists at the Institute of Functional Genomics injected the molecule into the veins or the muscles, it was able to break the blood-brain barrier and effectively reach brain receptors. The barrier is a a tightly locked layer of cells that defend your brain from harmful substances. Studying the impact of the nanobodies in two tests using mice, the researchers found that they corrected cognitive deficits that were observed. There was an improvement of cognitive function with just one shot, and a prolonged effect over one week. Clinical studies are now required to show that their findings could be a new avenue of treatment for schizophrenia. "In humans obviously we don't know [yet], but in mice yes, it is sufficient to treat most deficits of schizophrenia," molecular biologist Jean-Philippe Pin told Newsweek.. He was a co-author of the research which was published in the journal Nature. Pin said that medications currently given to schizophrenia patients "treat the symptoms well, but less the cognitive deficits." The cause of the chronic condition remains unknown, but the World Health Organization says it is thought that an interaction between genes and a range of environmental factors may be the reason. The exact prevalence of schizophrenia is difficult to measure. Some have tied cases in Canada to cannabis use. Although schizophrenia can occur at any age, people are typically diagnosed between the ages of 16 and 30. Symptoms vary from person to person. There is no cure, but it can be treated through antipsychotic medications, talk therapy, and self-management strategies, the National Alliance on Mental Illness says. The study's authors hope to add this strategy to the list. 'This research confirms the potential of nanobodies as a new therapeutic strategy for acting on the brain, with their use eventually being broadened to include the treatment of other neurological illnesses,' the institute said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store