
Fight over fish in Lesotho's Katse Dam
Seafo, a fisher from Likheleng village in the Ha Lejone area, says a vehicle from the Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) stopped near where he was fishing with four others. Police officers came out of the car and asked the men what they were doing.
'We responded that we were fishing. They asked what we were using, and we said hooks. They told us they would torture us if they found nets with us.'
'They mistook one of the lines for a net, began beating us with sticks, and left us there,' he said.
Katse Dam was built as part of Phase One of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, through which Lesotho exports water to South Africa, earning M3.5-billion (R3.5-billion) annually in royalties. But the local fishers, who have traditionally caught yellow fish and trout to sell to passersby, say they are battling to survive.
'Mathabo Thibeli's case is one of the few that ever came to court. A few years ago, Thibeli says, she was arrested by armed soldiers in a boat. With guns pointed at her, she was accused of stealing from the government. 'They ordered me to leave the net. The soldiers used their guns to assault me,' she said. 'The net was heavy as I had caught so much fish. They beat me with sticks and gun butts on my back while I pleaded that I was just trying to support my family.'
She and another villager were kept in a police cell for three days. 'We were charged and fined M100 each, which we paid, and we were freed.'
In other cases, fishermen say they are beaten, their fish are confiscated and then they are sent home.
RESTRICTIVE FISHING LAWS
Molise Mare, a community councillor from Likheleng village, grew up fishing in the Malibamatšo River, now submerged under Katse Dam. He remembers that at first the dam's construction improved their lives. 'With the new road infrastructure, urban buyers came for our fish. We raised prices, made profits, and people built houses,' he told GroundUp.
But the prosperity was short-lived. 'Everything changed when the LHDA imposed restrictive fishing laws,' Mare said. 'We were told we could only catch two fish a day. That was a blow for us because fishing was our livelihood.'
Refiloe Ntsohi, the LHDA Senior Officer responsible for Biodiversity, said the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (Reservoirs) Fishing Regulations govern fishing at Katse Dam. The regulations, based on national fishing laws, prohibit commercial fishing, impose daily catch limits, and regulate fishing tools. 'The regulations allow only four fish per household per day,' she said.
The daily quota was intended to ensure households had enough to feed their families, she said. But due to growing demand for fish in Lesotho, some villagers have begun selling their catch outside the dam's catchment area and some are now using fishing nets to catch large quantities of fish. 'Those with resources use nets to catch more, threatening the fish population. This also denies others who can't afford nets the opportunity for sustainable subsistence fishing,' said Ntsohi.
She said there are rumours that some Chinese buyers are supplying nets to local fishers to increase their haul. 'With unregulated net use, even the most productive fish groups are being caught. This puts the entire fish population at risk of extinction,' Ntsohi said.
LHDA Environment Manager Palesa Monongoaha denied any abuse by soldiers or police. Fish patrols were conducted by boat to identify and confiscate illegal nets, she said, accompanied by security forces, she said.
Monongoaha said women officers on patrols sometimes encountered hostility from men. Stones had been used to block the road one woman officer was using. 'Since then, we've requested backup from security forces during patrols,' she said.
'We use whichever is available at the time, either police or soldiers. But we have never received any reports of human rights violations or torture.'
She said all patrols are documented, and no reports have ever mentioned gunshots or abuse. 'Most of the time, we use boats and do not chase after people who run away. We also do not use vehicles for patrols,' she said.
'If anyone had been tortured by soldiers, it would have been reported. I say that with confidence,' Monongoaha added, suggesting that some of the complaints may come from people whose net-fishing operations have been disrupted. 'It is simply not true that they were tortured,' she insisted.
'Only two soldiers accompany patrols,' she said. 'It's not like there's a heavily armed troop. It now appears as if we have a bad relationship with the fishers, but that is not the case. We hold regular meetings and training sessions on subsistence fishing.'
Monongoaha acknowledged that there had been court cases involving illegal fishing, where fish were handed to the police as evidence. However, she said court rulings had not been effective, so the LHDA had stopped pursuing legal action.
Obtaining permits to fish is costly and difficult, the local fishers say.
Pheello Seafo of Likheleng said a return trip from Malibamatšo to Katse at the LHDA offices for a permit costs M120. He said a two-week licence is M100, while a month's licence costs M200. 'It's hard to afford these fees when we are prohibited from selling fish and have no other jobs,' Seafo said.
The harsh terms push villagers into illegal fishing, or force them to give up fishing altogether.
Thibeli had a permit, but she says she was beaten and arrested for exceeding the daily limit with a net. 'We need to sell fish to survive, and nets help us catch more,' she said.
In 2019, Tomosolo Thibeli says, he survived multiple assaults and gunfire incidents while fishing. 'One morning, when an LHDA vehicle appeared, we had to run and hide,' he told GroundUp. 'Shots were fired, but we ran for our lives.'
A few days later, Thibeli says, soldiers and police captured him and two boys from his village while they were fishing again. 'They forced us to crawl on our knees up and down the hill, beating us as we crawled over sharp stones,' he said. 'My knees have never been the same. The pain worsens in winter.'
The two others have given up fishing, but Tomosolo Thibeli refuses to do so. 'I won't leave my home or resort to stealing while my village has these resources,' he said. 'I will die fishing in this dam.'
'Matsekuoa Thibeli says she has been fishing since 2018 and could make up to M1,500 in a day. 'One time the police came. We ran away, leaving our fish by the road. They took the fish with our containers and left.'
Villagers also accuse LHDA employees and police of seizing their fish only to keep it for themselves. Confiscations reportedly spike before major weekends and holidays as the police and LHDA employees go home.
Responding to allegations that LHDA staff had confiscated fish for personal consumption last year, Ntsohi said there had been no patrols in the area last year. 'So, it can't be true if people claim this happened last year.'
SCRAMBLE FOR FISH BONES
The struggle for access to fish has driven villagers to fight over fish bones and fish heads discarded by SanLei Premium Trout, a commercial fish farming company at Katse Dam. These remnants have become a vital protein source for many.
SanLei chief executive Dewald Fourie told GroundUp that the company had provided over 880,000 'high-protein fish heads to the surrounding communities' worth M434,000 in 2024.
But the handouts from SanLei have led to violence. In 2023, a fight over fish heads turned brutal when a villager was stabbed.
'There's never enough for everyone,' said Malieketso Ramokoatsi, a village committee member. 'People grab as much as they can without considering others who are more vulnerable.'
'There was an unfortunate incident in 2023 when some villagers fought among themselves for a share of the fish heads and bones. It was so bad that one of them got his belly cut open with intestines left out,' said Ramokoatsi.
SanLei's compliance officer, Relebohile Ntoi, confirmed the violent incidents. 'One of our drivers distributing fish heads was even threatened with a gun when trying to organise orderly distribution of fish heads and bones at Khohlo-Ntšo … There were fights everyday with some having not got anything while others filled over ten buckets,' Ntoi said.
As part of their licence requirement to farm in Katse Dam, Ntoi said the LHDA required them to submit a community benefit strategy and, 'in that strategy, we included fish heads distribution'. She said instead of throwing away the fish heads, 'we decided it would be a good source of protein for the community in this catchment for people who can't afford protein'.
Initially distributed daily at the SanLei plant, the fish heads were later delivered to villages on a rotating schedule as Ntoi says the crowds of villagers who came for the fish were disrupting SanLei's operations. To avoid further fights in the villages, the fish heads are delivered to schools.
Monongoaha confirmed that the distribution of fish heads is part of SanLei's community strategy. 'Nutritionists say the fish head is the most nutritious part, so instead of throwing them away, we said they should be distributed to combat malnutrition in the catchment,' she said.
She said SanLei attaches a monetary value to the fish heads in their reports on community benefits. 'As the only company in Lesotho doing primary fish processing, they produce many fish heads—more than the market can absorb,' she said.
Asked whether LHDA was concerned that communities were not receiving whole fish, Monongoaha said, 'Let's put it this way: SanLei is a business and their sole purpose is to make profit,' she said, saying expecting SanLei to give out whole fish would be like 'asking a hotel owner to feed the community for free on certain days'.
Responding to complaints that local people can no longer fish freely as they did before the dam's construction, while foreign companies profit, Monongoaha said, 'These companies do not harvest naturally occurring fish from the dam. They import eggs, hatch them, and keep the fish in cages. If there is any restriction on traditional fishing, it is not related to the companies. In fact, the dam has created a favourable environment for fish to multiply.'
Monongoaha said the LHDA monitored the fish population in Katse and Mohale dams. 'We've been collecting data for over 14 years now. The aim is to attract investors who can partner with local communities to fish sustainably, so that the fish can be sold and benefit the local people,' she said.
But villagers like Litaba Khanare are not convinced. 'Foreign businesses benefit from our waters, while we are left with nothing,' he said. 'If our government cared, it would support community-run fish projects to benefit us directly.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
National Gambling Board boss quits after forensic audit
The National Gambling Board's chief strategic adviser Caroline Kongwa has resigned. She earned R3.4-million last year. Caroline Kongwa, the chief strategic adviser of the National Gambling Board (NGB) for the past six years, resigned earlier this month after being informed of the findings of an independent audit. The NGB regulates the almost R60-billion gambling industry in South Africa. Audit firm TSU Investigation Services found that performance bonuses paid to Kongwa during her tenure 'were not approved in line with the NGB performance management policy and [are] thus deemed irregular expenditure'. TSU also found that expenditure relating to 'international travel' by Kongwa 'can be deemed irregular expenditure'. Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau responded to several written parliamentary questions by DA MP Toby Chance. As to whether 'disciplinary and criminal complaints' were being considered as a result of TSU's investigation, Tau said: 'Following receipt of the investigation report, the minister has appointed legal representation to advise him on the way forward. The minister is currently engaging with legal counsel on the course of action.' Kongwa was appointed joint administrator with Tumelo Baleni after the NGB's CEO resigned in April 2014. This came after the NGB was placed under administration and its board suspended by former minister Rob Davies following a forensic audit into maladministration and wasteful expenditure. All the board members resigned. The NGB has been without a board for 11 years. Baleni resigned in 2015. In response to another question from Chance, Tau said: 'The process of selecting members to serve on the National Gambling Board is under way and has not yet been concluded.' Tau's spokesperson, Kaamil Alli, did not reply to questions from GroundUp after an earlier undertaking to respond by last Friday. Kongwa's initial appointment as a joint administrator was extended several times. Despite some internal opposition, she was appointed chief strategic adviser in 2019, a position that did not previously exist. Kongwa was paid a total of R3.4-million in 2024 (including bonuses and perks). This was R800,000 more than she was paid in 2023. For context, in 2024, South Africa's deputy president was paid R3.16-million and ministers R2.68-million, excluding perks. Besides her 2024 salary of R2.5-million, other payments she received included a 13th cheque of R212,825 and a performance bonus of R510,781. In 2023, she was paid R2.6-million, including a R196,945 13th cheque and performance bonuses totalling R212,283. Kongwa's response Kongwa responded to GroundUp: 'I can confirm I tendered my resignation. The reasons for my resignation are personal and private and not for public consumption or publication in your story. 'The rest of the issues you raise are official matters and I employ you to directly engage and seek reply from both the DTIC [Department of Trade, Industry and Competition] and the NGB to verify if what your source has told you is the truth.' 'The DTIC and NGB should and are more than capable and accountable to answer for their own statements and deal with official Government business which they make public or report to Parliament. 'I unfortunately am not able to assist you any further. I hereby reserve my rights to sue if any misrepresentations are made in your publication.' Whistle-blowers A whistle-blower, who asked to remain anonymous because they feared punishment for speaking to the media, told GroundUp last year: 'I have submissions dating back to 2018 where some senior officials in the DTIC were raising reservations to some of the decisions by the then Minister [Davies], one of which was the creation of the position of a chief strategic adviser for a specific person, the current Accounting Authority [Kongwa].' Another whistle-blower, who also requested anonymity for fear of retribution, shared a letter sent to the DTIC in 2023 about the fact that Kongwa had been at the helm of the organisation ever since the dissolution of the board in 2014. The letter states: '[I]t appears that there is no interest or agility from the side of the DTIC to appoint a Board of Directors for the entity'. This had led to 'a serious gap in governance and has created a sense of authority and power by the person who has been the accounting authority [Kongwa]'. DM


Daily Maverick
5 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Milestone conviction in multibillion ‘cum-ex' tax fraud tightens noose around Investec
A central figure in the epic 'cum-ex' tax fraud scheme was convicted in June after cooperating with prosecutors. At the height of the scheme, Dr Kai-Uwe Steck advised Investec and others on how to claim fraudulent tax refunds from European governments. Investec has acknowledged what it calls the 'historical involvement' of its employees, but denies wrongdoing. The conviction of German lawyer and financial engineer Dr Kai-Uwe Steck, a key player in Europe's largest tax fraud scheme, may intensify scrutiny of Investec Bank's allegedly major role in financing and profiting off fraudulently procured tax refunds worth millions of euros. AmaBhungane has reported extensively on the 'cum-ex' scam, which drew in a number of banks and other financial service providers around the world. The basic mechanism of the scam was to claim tax refunds on dividend tax that was never paid. This required large amounts of upfront funding, which Investec provided to some key fraudsters. Read more about the complex mechanics of the scheme here. On 3 June, the Bonn Regional Court sentenced Steck to one year and 10 months in prison, suspended for three years. He was convicted on five counts of tax evasion related to cum-ex transactions. Steck played a central role in setting up multiple fund structures that were used in the scheme, as well as complex offshore payment systems to launder the illicit profits. According to the court ruling, Steck admitted that dividend tax refunds were obtained without actual tax payments. He personally earned €23-million (about R448.5-million) from these trades. Steck cooperated extensively with German authorities, helping to recover more than €660-million (about R12.87-billion) in fraudulent tax refunds. As part of his probation, he is required to continue repaying millions of euros. Both Steck's conviction and his continuing cooperation with authorities could have repercussions for Investec – if not legal, then most certainly reputational. A massive leak of documents around the fraud that formed the basis of our previous reporting on the story included extensive evidence of the involvement of Investec's UK and Ireland arm, as well as some direct interactions between Investec staff and Steck. Investec's investment in cum-ex AmaBhungane previously reported in a three-part series that Investec was also involved in facilitating deals where US pension funds were used for similar cum-ex scams. We additionally revealed that Investec supported infamous trader Frank Vogel's company MF Finance with up to €12.7-billion (about R263-billion) between 2011 and 2015. One particularly revealing detail in the leak is a meeting that took place on 19 January 2010 at the Frankfurt offices of the now-defunct law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf in Germany. According to documents seen by amaBhungane, Investec's then-head of equity finance in Dublin, Loman Gallagher, and deal structurer Michael Byrne attended the meeting alongside Steck, convicted cum-ex figure Hanno Berger and representatives of Zeta Financial Partners, a boutique advisory firm that worked on tax arbitrage structures. The leaked documents describe the 'cum-ex nature' of the trades being 'openly discussed from the onset', with all parties 'very familiar' with the mechanisms. The documents also indicate that some guarantees and decisions were discussed with, or escalated to, Investec's head office in Johannesburg, implying high-level awareness of the deals. Our investigation suggested that Investec had been acting with the apparent approval of senior Investec managers, including now-deceased executive director Alan Tapnack. Among the leaked documents there is also a legal opinion that Investec commissioned from Steck. Following Steck's conviction, amaBhungane sent questions to Investec, including whether the January 2010 meeting took place as described, whether Gallagher and Byrne had sought or received approval from the bank's leadership, and whether any employees had since been charged or subpoenaed. The bank did not answer specific questions, instead referring amaBhungane to its March 2025 financial statements and a press release issued on 14 September 2024. Per the financial statements: 'The group also holds a provision that reflects the estimate of financial outflows that could arise as a result of investigations concerning historical German dividend tax arbitrage transactions.' The size of this provision is not, however, disclosed to shareholders. Investec does admit though that its 'historical involvement in German dividend tax arbitrage transactions (cum-ex) continues to pose a significant risk. Ongoing investigations by the Cologne Public Prosecutor and the German Federal Tax Office create uncertainty around the ultimate financial impact, potentially affecting provisions and disclosures in the financial statements. While the group is cooperating with authorities, the ongoing investigations and potential for civil litigation create significant uncertainty.' For South Africans, the unfolding scandal matters not just because of Investec's prominence, but also because it raises broader questions about the governance practices of financial institutions operating across borders. Steck's sentencing is one of many. His cooperation, along with the mounting legal momentum in Germany, may yet lead to more prosecutions and further disclosures. For Investec, the legal risk remains unresolved. Its financial statements acknowledge a 'significant risk' and 'uncertainty'. But the reputational damage – and questions about ethical accountability – may prove even harder to contain. Whether Investec acted knowingly or recklessly is now the question that regulators, courts and perhaps the public will be forced to confront.


Daily Maverick
6 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Nine Wasted Years: State Capture and the failure to implement the Zondo Commission's recommendations
The Zondo Commission provides a valuable framework to eradicate State Capture and we must begin implementing its recommendations. We simply cannot afford another nine wasted years. This year marks nine years since advocate Thuli Madonsela released the ' State of Capture ' report and three years since the 'State Capture Commission' came to an end. R1-billion was spent on the State Capture Commission, yet we still have no significant progress in addressing State Capture cases. What we do have is multiple excuses from institutions tasked with implementing the commission's findings and recommendations. The Civil Society Working Group on State Capture has been tracking the implementation of the findings of the commission, and what we have found is a generally lacklustre approach to addressing State Capture. How can we expect corruption and State Capture to be eradicated if we are failing to implement the most basic of recommendations that were set out in the commission's report? The Zondo Commission The Zondo Commission, led by Former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, was a commission of inquiry into allegations of State Capture, corruption and fraud in the public sector, including organs of State. It came about from the findings of former public protector Madonsela, who looked into allegations of crooked appointments of Cabinet ministers, directors and awarding of state contracts and other benefits. Her key recommendation was the appointment of a judicial commission of inquiry headed by a judge. The terms of reference of the Zondo Commission were very broad in scope, with the commission being appointed to investigate matters of public interest concerning allegations of State Capture, corruption and fraud. The commission found that State Capture did indeed take place between 2009-2018, the so-called 'nine wasted years' of the Jacob Zuma administration. The commission made extensive recommendations, some specific and focused and others much broader and far-reaching, including recommendations for the investigation and potential prosecution of some individuals and reform of various government processes and institutions. During this year's State of the Nation Address, President Cyril Ramaphosa revealed some of the progress being made in addressing State Capture. According to Ramaphosa's address, the SIU and Asset Forfeiture Unit had recovered R10-billion in State Capture-related cases. Ramaphosa also said that Parliament would introduce two key pieces of legislation relating to State Capture, one on combating money laundering and the other on protecting whistle-blowers. What is being done to ensure State Capture is addressed? Asset Recoveries The commission recommended coordinated action from various law enforcement entities including the Asset Forfeiture Unit (AFU), the Independent Police Investigate Directorate (Ipid), the Hawks, the Financial Intelligence Centre, South African Revenue Service (Sars), Reserve Bank, and the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to achieve the recovery of monies lost to State Capture. The progress in recoveries is very slow – only R10-billion has been recovered from State Capture investigations. The money that the state spent that was tainted by State Capture amounted to R57-billion, with Eskom and Transnet's fraudulent contracts making up the biggest chunk. Of this money, the Guptas received R15-billion. Some estimate that the true cost of State Capture and corruption during that period is in fact R500-billion. So the recoveries are a really small fraction of the cost of State Capture and corruption. Combating money laundering At the end of 2022, Parliament passed the General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Act, to avoid the 'greylisting' of South Africa by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). This was an important move toward ensuring financial transparency. However, the challenge is ensuring the beneficial ownership register is functional, accurate and accessible. This year, the President said South Africa would strengthen the legislation with further legislative and systemic improvements. It should include these elements. Whistle-blower protection Most of the evidence from the Zondo Commission came from whistle-blowers, and the commission was very clear in its recommendations relating to whistle-blowers, detailed in Part I Volume 4. However, to date, the whistle-blower legislation framework remains incomplete. In July 2023, the Department of Justice released a discussion document outlining proposed reforms. While the document includes several commendable proposals aligned with the Zondo Commission recommendations and civil society submissions, it fails to consolidate the existing complex and inconsistent legal framework, which remains a major obstacle for whistle-blowers. Additionally, it dismisses the idea of offering incentives to whistle-blowers. Civil society has argued that the proposed legislation is inadequate, and the outcome of the legislation to be introduced remains uncertain. Parliament The commission highlighted how parliamentarians failed in their duty to hold the executive accountable and prevent State Capture. Despite the commission's damning findings, MPs continue to neglect their responsibilities, prioritising party loyalty over the public good. Once again, we see most MPs not implementing the commission's recommendations and essentially not recognising the importance of the process to strengthen democracy. Many seem unaware that they play an important oversight role over the Presidency and the appointment to SOEs and legislative reform. Outa has closely monitored parliamentary activities and believes that Parliament's ongoing failure to combat State Capture and entrenched corruption remains a major threat to democracy. Some of the accused in the State Capture Commission, like Lucky Montana, Brian Molefe and Siyabonga Gama, are serving as MPs in Parliament for the uMkhonto Wesizwe party. Cedric Frolick, David Mahlobo and Malusi Gigaba serve as MPs for the African National Congress (ANC). These MPs oversee the institutions they are accused of collapsing and oversee the implementation of the Zondo Commission recommendations. Only a small number, such as Zizi Kodwa, have been held accountable, though with limited consequences. Criminal Justice System (National Prosecutions Authority) Most of the recommendations of the Zondo Commission were for further investigations and prosecutions. No high-profile politician or corporation has been successfully prosecuted. Even with enough evidence, the NPA has failed to prosecute major State Capture cases like Prasa, Transnet and Eskom. Moreover, the collapse of the extradition of the Gupta brothers and the implosion of the Nulane case raise serious concerns around the NPA's effectiveness in handling State Capture cases. The bungling of high-profile State Capture cases is unfortunate, because it shows that elites can get away with impunity because the state is failing. What should we be doing? Without fully addressing State Capture at all levels, we continue a cycle of establishing commissions of inquiry without making the systemic change needed for non-repetition. We need to ensure that State Capture is fully addressed. For this to happen, all state parties need to come on board and do their part. As for civil society, we will continue to apply pressure to state institutions and corporations to take accountability and redress their role in State Capture. The Civil Society Working Group on State Capture will continue tracking the implementation of Justice Zondo's recommendations, and we will be coordinating campaigns on whistle-blower legislation and keeping an eye on the upcoming NDPP appointment process. We simply cannot afford another nine wasted years. We need to spotlight the anniversary of the Zondo Commission to track the progress of State Capture and to keep the conversation concerning State Capture on the national agenda. The true impact and cost of State Capture will never be understood. Its severe impact will continue to be felt by the most vulnerable in our society for years to come. The Zondo Commission provides a valuable framework to eradicate State Capture, and we ought to begin implementing its recommendations now. DM Letlhogonolo Letshele is a campaigner at Open Secrets and represents Open Secrets and the Civil Society Working Group on State Capture. Open Secrets is a non-profit organisation which exposes and builds accountability for private-sector economic crimes through investigative research, advocacy and the law. To support our work, including the investigations that go into the Unaccountable series, visit Support Open Secrets.