Navy cancels speech by podcaster who planned to reference its ban on more than 300 books
For years Holiday has been giving lectures on the virtues of Stoicism — he hosts a podcast called The Daily Stoic — and planned on speaking to the sophomores this week on the 'theme of wisdom.' But the Navy canceled those plans an hour before he was set to speak, he said in a New York Times op-ed Saturday.
Ahead of his address, he sent over his prepared slides, which included a reference to the academy's removal of 381 books.
In January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending the 'radical indoctrination' in K-12 schools, prompting schools to pull books from classrooms that don't align with Trump's agenda. Although the Naval Academy is a college, in March, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the school to review its books at the Nimitz Library to ensure that it complies with the president's order.
On April 4, the Navy issued a press release listing the hundreds of books that were removed. That list includes How To Be An Antiracist by Ibram X. Kendi and I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou.
According to Holiday, his reference to the book ban made some at the school 'extremely worried about reprisals if my talk appeared to flout' the president's order. He was asked to remove them from his speech; he declined and it was cancelled, he wrote.
The school 'made a schedule change that aligns with its mission of preparing midshipmen for careers of service,' a Navy spokesperson told the Times. 'The Naval Academy is an apolitical institution.'
'I had no interest in embarrassing anyone or discussing politics directly. I understand the immense pressures they are under, especially the military employees, and I did not want to cause them trouble,' Holiday wrote in the op-ed. 'I did, however, feel it was essential to make the point that the pursuit of wisdom is impossible without engaging with (and challenging) uncomfortable ideas.'
He walked through some of his prepared remarks, which included making the point that there was political pressure in the 1950s to pull books from the shelves, but then-President Dwight Eisenhower refrained from doing so.
'My idea is that censorship and hiding solves nothing,' the president told reporters shortly after his 1953 inauguration. Eisenhower then pointed to all of the materials that circulated before World War II that went unread but could have perhaps helped anticipate the tragedies that were about to strike. 'What I am talking about is let's educate ourselves if we are going to run a free government, and let's [not] be afraid of its weaknesses as well as its strength,' he said.
Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf was not among the books pulled from the library, Holiday noted. 'As heinous as that book is, it should be accessible to scholars and students of history. However, this makes the removal of Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings inexplicable,' he wrote. 'Whatever one thinks of D.E.I., we are not talking about the writings of external enemies here, but in many cases, art, serious scholarship and legitimate criticism of America's past.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Being called ‘Jew' offends me. Should it be banned? Who gets to decide?
Regarding 'Trump wants to 'Make Indians Great Again' — by bringing back slurs to a school gymnasium near you' (Open Forum, July 28): Who determines what's offensive? A Washington Post op-ed says 'Jew' is fine, and the Chronicle uses it commonly. I'm Jewish, and I find that offensive. I was called 'that Jew boy' growing up. Is it OK for people of color to use the N-word all the time? Roosevelt Drive may be offensive to Japanese Americans because they had family members who were imprisoned under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's order during World War II. There are so many names offensive to one person and not another. Where does it stop? Maybe just give everything a digital address. James Sandler, Pleasanton Defend higher education By structuring success for immigrants, low-income youth and other underrepresented young people, universities help to build an educated populace. What do all of us have to gain from investment in forward thinking like this? Hopeful, engaged and skillful people in our communities. The institutions and programs now under attack are those that build the capacity of students while spreading affirmative energy into all our lives. When young people in our community achieve and thrive, we are all uplifted and enriched. Shirl Buss, San Rafael Stop the blame game Unfortunately, many of them declare Hamas responsible for Israel's war tactics. Could Hamas really end Israel's siege by releasing the hostages or by surrendering power? Maybe. Maybe Ukraine could end Russia's invasion by severing its alliances with the West. Maybe if Israel had ceased its decades of occupation and violence against Palestinians before 2023, Hamas would not have initiated the Oct. 7 attack. True or not, this kind of victim-blaming is unseemly. We should hold perpetrators of violence — including U.S. and Israeli leaders — responsible for their own actions. Jewish groups blaming Hamas for Israel's campaign of mass murder only succeed in making Jews look grotesque. Harry Chomsky, Albany Tariffs don't add up Let's do the math. U.S. imports of goods in 2024 were $3.3 trillion. A 15% overall tariff would bring in $495 billion. U.S. consumers will pay this tab, not corporations. There were 340 million people in the U.S. in 2024. That's $1,455 per person. The tariffs are a tax on consumers. Low-wage earners spend all their income on goods and services. The investor class spends a small portion of their income on goods and services. Who then benefits the most? Think about it. Barry Shiller, San Francisco Rethink MAGA support Regarding 'Why S.F.'s Democratic sheriff endorsed a MAGA supporter for California governor' (Joe Garofoli, Aug. 1): Perhaps San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto should take a good look in the mirror. He and I are subject to being detained and relocated under the Trump administration, just as his Japanese American ancestors were during World War II. Vickie Downey, Corning Group won't capitulate The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announced Aug. 1 that it would no longer accept any federal dollars to support its programs because of the Trump administration's policies, particularly those regarding diversity, equity and inclusiveness. According to the group, DEI is integral to its mission. I am so proud that my professional organization has taken this stand. I hope that other professional organizations will be brave enough to follow its lead.
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
The curse of America's high-speed rail
is the host of Explain It to Me, your hotline for all your unanswered questions. She joined Vox in 2022 as a senior producer and then as host of The Weeds, Vox's policy podcast. If you're traveling in America, there are plenty of ways to get to where you want to go. Interstate highways make road trips possible. Planes let you go from one side of the country to the other in a matter of hours. But there's one mode of transportation that still eludes the US: high-speed rail. Countries in Europe and Asia have safe high-speed trains that can take you from city to city as fast as 200 miles per hour, while a little more than half of Amtrak trains reach speeds up to 100 miles per hour. So what is the state of high-speed rail in the US? 'Nonexistent and terrible,' says Michael Kimmelman, editor-at-large of the New York Times's Headway, a section that focuses on progress when it comes to the world's biggest challenges. 'The United States has consistently failed to build high-speed rail, and there's been conversation about it for a long time.' Despite the setbacks, it still could be on the horizon. 'There's some glimmer of hope. High-speed rail exists all around the world.' Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What's the deal with the lack of high-speed rail in the US? Why hasn't the country caught up? And will we ever have high-speed trains? That was the question we explored in this week's episode of Explain It to Me, Vox's weekly call-in podcast. Below is an excerpt of our conversation with Kimmelman, edited for length and clarity. You can listen to the full episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. If you'd like to submit a question, send an email to askvox@ or call 1-800-618-8545. How'd we end up falling behind in passenger rail? The story is usually told that we once had a great rail system. The country was connected by the transcontinental railway in the 19th century. And we gave up that advantage. Once the automobile became something that people could afford, and it wasn't just for rich people, people wanted roads, so we invested less and less in trains. We have a million obstacles to progress and very few easy paths. That's part of the story, but there are a lot of other reasons why we failed too, which is that we've become a country that's extremely regulated and that has made it very difficult to build anything big anymore. We have a million obstacles to progress and very few easy paths. Who is getting high-speed rail right? China has built nearly 30,000 miles of high-speed rail just in the past couple of decades. Japan, of course, has a famous high-speed bullet train called the Shinkansen and has had that for decades. And most of western Europe is connected by high-speed rail. It's perfectly normal in Europe to go to your local train station and get on a train that will take you 200 miles an hour to another city. We were supposed to have high-speed rail in the US. What happened to that project out in California that was supposed to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco? Back in the 1980s, Gov. Jerry Brown had this idea that California could use high-speed rail. By the 1990s, California had a plan in place. It took them until 2008 to approve a measure that set aside about $10 billion to construct a high-speed rail, which was going to connect LA and San Francisco. It would take about two hours and 40 minutes to get directly from one city to the other, the cost estimate was around $33 billion, and the completion date was 2020. But by 2018, it was clear this was never going to happen. The cost estimates more than doubled, and they would ultimately triple. When Gavin Newsom, the current governor, succeeded Brown, he spoke about the fact that this was obviously not going to be possible anytime soon. And his big promise was that possibly California might have high-speed rail between Bakersfield and Merced, two cities in the Central Valley that no one had really asked for high-speed rail to travel between. Now, that's pretty unlikely too. The estimated completion date would be sometime in the 2030s perhaps, and at a cost of well over $110 billion. That's California. Is there high-speed rail in other parts of the country? Florida's a good example. Brightline is a privately owned and operated rail line that runs between Miami and Orlando, on what used to be freight line tracks. In short, they didn't have to go through a million of these approval processes to get it done because they kind of already owned the route. California to Vegas is the plan for Brightline 2. It's not just that you have a private investor as opposed to a government; it's also that you have a given route which presents itself that makes economic sense and makes sense for consumers. As a consequence, that may actually happen. And that might be in fact the first genuine high-speed rail in the United States. The safety record of Brightline in Florida is really troubling. Partly it's growing pains transitioning from a freight rail to a passenger train that runs through the middle of cities, but the company bears a lot of the blame. It's clearly a crisis and a learning curve for the company and those Florida communities. How hopeful are you about the future of high-speed rail in the US? I think it is a possibility. The fact that we're having conversations around our inability to get big things done is actually not the same as the conversations we were having five or 10 years ago. You see some signs of that change in California; for instance, the repeal of some of the environmental regulations that have been weaponized to prevent things like high-speed rail, and other things which actually are environmentally good.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
A Public School Enrollment Crisis, and a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon
Hosted by Tracy Mumford Produced by Will Jarvis and Ian Stewart Edited by Ian StewartJessica Metzger and Tracy Mumford Featuring Dana Goldstein Public Schools Try to Sell Themselves as More Students Use Vouchers, by Dana Goldstein Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs, by Alan Rappeport A Nuclear Reactor on the Moon? Come Again?, by Kenneth Chang Trump Administration Will Reinstall Confederate Statue in Washington, by Chris Cameron Chemical Makers to Pay N.J. $875 Million to Settle 'Forever Chemicals' Claims, by Hiroko Tabuchi James Leprino, 'Willy Wonka of Cheese' Who Revolutionized Pizza, Dies at 87, by Michael S. Rosenwald Tune in, and tell us what you think at theheadlines@ For corrections, email nytnews@ For more audio journalism and storytelling, download the New York Times Audio app — available to Times news subscribers on iOS — and sign up for our weekly newsletter.
