logo
US sanctions Mexican banks for allegedly laundering money for drug cartels

US sanctions Mexican banks for allegedly laundering money for drug cartels

The US Treasury has slapped three Mexican financial institutions with sanctions, accusing them of laundering millions of dollars for cartels that are furthering the distribution of fentanyl into the US.
It is a move, under the Trump administration's new fentanyl sanctions authority, that officials say will block certain money transfers between the sanctioned banks and US banks.
The banks, CIBanco and Intercam Banco, as well as brokerage Vector Casa de Bolsa, "have collectively played a longstanding and vital role in laundering millions of dollars on behalf of Mexico-based cartels" US deputy Treasury secretary Michael Faulkender told reporters on Wednesday, local time.
He added the financial institutions were "facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl" and would now be "effectively cut off" from doing business with US financial institutions.
While the sanctions do not block property or cut off all global US dollar-based activities, as other Treasury sanctions have, they do prohibit US transactions with their locations in Mexico, a US Treasury official noted.
Although US sanctions against individuals and companies for links to Mexican organised crime groups are fairly frequent, measures against financial institutions are far less common.
The Mexican Finance Ministry said in a statement it was notified of the investigation and asked the US Treasury for evidence of illicit activity links to CIBanco, Intercam and Vector, but it received no "conclusive information".
Vector categorically rejected "any accusation that compromises its institutional integrity", it said in a statement.
It added that it reiterated its full willingness to collaborate with Mexican and US authorities to clarify the situation.
Intercam similarly "categorically" denied "any connection between this institution and any illicit practice".
CIBanco did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Experts said the move, although targeting relatively small institutions, could have significant impact on Mexico's financial system given the interconnectedness with the United States.
Luis Manuel Perez de Acha, a tax lawyer and money laundering expert in Mexico City, said the accusations were a "bombshell".
"The entire financial system passes through the United States, so they are practically left without operations," he said.
Vanda Felbab-Brown, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a specialist on organised crime, said the sanctions were "enormously impactful".
"This is a bold move. Being cut off from the US financial system is a death blow," she told Reuters.
"These are hardly the biggest banks in Mexico, but they are not small entities."
"These are medium-level banks," Ms Felbab-Brown said.
However, she said the sanctions were unlikely to "make any kind of dent in the financial flows of Mexican criminal groups".
According to the Treasury orders, CIBanco helped facilitate money laundering for a number of cartels, including the Jalisco New Generation, Beltran Leyva and Gulf.
Officials said the bank "facilitated procurement" of chemicals used to make fentanyl from China by processing over $US2.1 million in payments for the materials.
Vector was accused of facilitating money laundering for the Sinaloa and Gulf cartels, including $US1 million in payments for fentanyl chemicals.
The Treasury officials also said the Sinaloa Cartel used Vector to send bribes to former Mexican security secretary Genaro García Luna, who in October was sentenced to more than 38 years in prison by a New York court for the charges.
They estimated that transactions exceeded $US40 million.
The Trump administration has announced it is cracking down on Mexican cartels and fentanyl trafficking despite movement of the drug along the US border and overdoses within the country declining.
AP/Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

eSafety Commissioner linked to global attempt to ‘throttle' free speech
eSafety Commissioner linked to global attempt to ‘throttle' free speech

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

eSafety Commissioner linked to global attempt to ‘throttle' free speech

Sky News host James Morrow brutally roasts eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant for her efforts to censor free speech online. 'Well, have I got a truth bomb for you this week – it's all about a devastating report that has just dropped out of Washington, DC, with extraordinary new information about the Australian government's efforts to censor what you can say and do and think online,' Mr Morrow said. 'Specifically, the alleged links between … Julie Inman Grant, Australia's eSafety Commissioner as she is officially known, or as we call her on Outsiders the e-Karen, and a shadowy US-based online advertising cabal which a US House Judiciary Committee Interim Report says set out to throttle advertising dollars from websites and social media platforms, particularly Elon Musk's Twitter, that dared to allow free speech and conservative ideas to flourish.'

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese knew US would strike Iran but not when, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese knew US would strike Iran but not when, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal

Sky News AU

time11 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese knew US would strike Iran but not when, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was aware the US was planning strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities but did not know the exact timing, Sky News Sunday Agenda can reveal. The US strikes hit key Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan last weekend, before President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Mr Albanese then waited more than 24 hours to issue an explicit statement of support for the strikes, after initially calling for 'dialogue' and 'de-escalation'. It was not until after a meeting of the National Security Committee of Cabinet that Mr Albanese fronted the media and confirmed Australia backed the US action. Critics have seized on the delay as evidence of hesitancy and weakness in Canberra's alliance with Washington. Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor said the government was exhibiting 'anti-US alliance' sentiments, due to lacklustre support for the strikes. 'This was the right thing for the United States to do, Israel was entirely entitled to take action against Iran,' Mr Taylor told Sky News on Thursday. 'It was well within the rights of Israel to do what it did … the United States has played a very deft hand in the approach it's taken on this." Former prime ministers Scott Morrison and Tony Abbott also weighed in, arguing that Mr Albanese should have immediately and publicly endorsed the strike. 'If you're in the United States and you take an action like this… you'd want to know your allies were with you 100 per cent,' Mr Morrison said. Mr Albanese has defended the government's handling of the situation, noting that Australia is 'not a central player' in the Iran-Israel conflict. 'We run an orderly, stable government,' he told reporters, repeatedly declining to comment on intelligence matters. 'We are upfront, but we don't talk about intelligence, obviously. But we've made very clear this was unilateral action taken by the United States.' At the same time, the broader Australia–US relationship has come under renewed scrutiny, amid calls for the Albanese government to lift defence spending. The United States and NATO allies committed last week to increasing defence spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035. While Defence Minister Richard Marles attended the NATO summit, Mr Albanese stayed in Australia, declining to attend after rumours he may go in order to meet President Trump. Australia has committed to defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP - well below NATO's new target and the 3.5 per cent requested directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'Well, we have increased our defence investment,' Mr Albanese said on Friday. 'What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need - that's what we're investing in.' Government sources have privately expressed scepticism about the NATO targets, suggesting some countries inflate their defence figures by including roads and other infrastructure costs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store