The very simple tweak to your exercise routine that could 'significantly' improve body fat loss
It's all to do with the order of your workout. When I go to the gym, I tend not to have too much of a plan, but may do any combination of cardio (rowing machine, treadmill, stationary bike etc) and strength training exercises (lifting weights and bodyweight exercises). However, it turns out that simply tweaking my routine so I always do the latter first could be most beneficial, according to a study published in the latest issue of the journal of Exercise Science and Fitness.
The research was conducted by Dr Zhixiong Zhou, a researcher at the Capital University of Physical Education and Sports in Beijing. Along with his colleagues, he challenged 45 overweight men aged 18-30 to follow one of three approaches for 12 weeks.
One group did strength training (a mix of weighted bench press, deadlifts, biceps curls and squats) before cardio (30-minute indoor cycling) three times a week, while a second group completed exactly the same workout, but with the cardio element before the strength training. They were all given fitness trackers to monitor their daily.
A third control group stuck to their usual daily habits.
There was no surprise that after three months, the two groups who had been exercising regularly lost weight and gained lean muscle tissue. However, what was surprising was the discovery that lifting weights first had significant advantages when it came to fat loss.
'Our findings suggest that resistance training optimises fat loss when conducted prior to aerobic exercise,' Zhou told The Australian. Not only did the weights-first group lost more body fat overall, but they also lost more visceral, which settles around major organs and it strongly linked to cardiovascular diseases.
The weights-before-cardio group also displayed better muscular endurance and strength by the end of the trial. 'Overall, there were improvements in physical fitness when weights preceded cardio, particularly in terms of enhanced muscular and explosive strength,' Zhou says. 'It implies that resistance training, when performed as a warm-up prior to aerobic exercise, offers superior preparation for the body and facilitates a general enhancement in physical fitness over time.'
So why is doing weights before cardio the most beneficial when it comes to losing body fat? One possible explanation is that if you do cardio first your level of fatigue is so high that you can't put maximum effort into strength training afterwards. I certainly know that if I start a workout off with a 20-minute run I'm going to be an exhausted, sweaty mess for the rest of the gym session. But from now on I'll definitely head to the weights bench first, then the treadmill, and then try not to go home via the next door café
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Horror as 'Frankenstein' drug that's FORTY TIMES stronger than fentanyl wreaks havoc across the US... and kids are buying it on their phones
Doctors and law enforcement are warning of a deadly surge in a so-called 'Frankenstein' opioid 40 times stronger than fentanyl that could wreak havoc across America. Nitazenes, a class of synthetic drugs pouring in from China, are up to 2,000 times more potent than heroin, meaning that a tiny dose can kill.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Paying people to eat healthily and to exercise doesn't work
Paying people to eat healthily and to exercise does not work, a government study has found. A five-month trial in 2023 recruited people in Wolverhampton to download the Better Health app and engage in healthy behaviours in exchange for financial rewards. Participants got points for taking part in challenges such as 'Let's get moving', 'Step it up', 'Snack attack' and 'Say no to fried food'. Rewards for engaging included gym passes, supermarket coupons, high street gift vouchers and cinema tickets. But government analysis of the study revealed that financially incentivising people with various exercise and diet-related goals was ineffective. People did not exercise more, did not lose more weight and did not eat healthier, the analysis by the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities found. It also did not improve calorie intake, sleep, mental health and motivation to change physical activity and diet. More than 28,000 people in the West Midlands signed up for the scheme and more than 7,000 of those completed the five-month trial. Data show that more than half a million pounds was given out to participants in rewards, equating to around £71 per person, on average. The study found exercise increased by around one minute a day and people walked just 42 more steps. These were not statistically significant. There was a small increase in fruit and vegetable intake of around two portions extra a week, but no improvement in the amount of saturated fats and sugars consumed. The study found that people who were paid more money in the trial, around £130 per person, did see more benefits than those in lower-paid arms of the trial. Women, poorer people, white people and those over 41 also saw marginally more benefits than others. Critics have said the trial was a poor use of taxpayers' cash and called for a smarter approach to public health going forward. Officials are understood to be reviewing the results and using both the positive and negative findings to make judgements on any future trials or policies. Dr Chris Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the Institute of Economic Affairs, told The Telegraph: 'It would seem that you can't get people to live healthier lives even if you pay them. 'The impact of this multimillion-pound experiment on people's food choices and physical activity has been extremely trivial. 'It is good that the Government is testing ideas like this with rigorous research, but the results are in and this initiative is clearly not cost effective.' Shimeon Lee, policy analyst at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'This has been an absurd use of money, and it's crystal clear that this pilot should never have been embarked on in the first place. 'Every government seems to be obsessed with trying to shrink waistlines and not concerned enough about wasting taxpayer cash. 'Ministers should get the Government out of the work of social engineering and focus on delivering front-line services as effectively and efficiently as possible.' The Government is shifting to a prevention first approach to health and in particular in tackling the obesity epidemic which is said to be costing the NHS more than £6 billion a year. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, announced a £280 million investment from Lilly, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, in October and this included the first real-world trial of weight-loss jabs on worklessness, productivity and reliance on the NHS.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
China may be looking to draw a new ‘Nine Dash Line' in the Arctic
Once China begins operating in a stretch of sea, reclaiming it often proves an uphill battle – just ask the Philippines or the Vietnamese or anyone else entangled in Beijing's unyielding 'Nine Dash Line' campaign to snatch the South China Sea. Now that same playbook seems to be unfolding in the frozen expanses of the Arctic, where China's polar icebreaker Xue Long 2 has been spotted in international waters north of Alaska, signalling a continued push into the High North that could reshape global maritime dynamics. Xue Long 2, China's first domestically constructed polar vessel, left from Shanghai for its summer 2025 research expedition and crossed into Arctic territory around July 22. Designed to be able to break through ice up to 1.5 metres thick, the ship has been conducting operations in sensitive areas, with indications that two more Chinese icebreakers are en route to join the effort. There's a pattern here. China stakes out a presence – ostensibly scientific, often co-operative. Then comes more equipment. Then military protection. Then grey-zone harassment. Eventually, the region becomes 'disputed', often indefinitely. The Arctic, long considered neutral ground, could well be the next frontier in this silent creeping strategy.
