Hong Kong advances digital asset hub bid with new bonds
Hong Kong is set to issue its third batch of tokenized green bonds, as part of a broader plan to normalize the issuance of tokenized government bonds in the future and provide incentives for the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs), including exempting stamp duty on the transfer of tokenized exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Speaking at the Hong Kong Digital Finance Awards 2025, Secretary for Finance and Treasury of Hong Kong, Christopher Hui Ching-yu, said that the government had issued green bonds in tokenized form twice already, in 2023 and 2024, and that the third batch of tokenized bonds is being prepared, according to a July 5 report by state-owned Beijing newspaper Wen Wei Po.
Hui added that the Hong Kong government will also promote the tokenization of a wider range of assets and financial instruments to demonstrate the diverse applications of tokenization technology in different sectors, including precious metals, non-precious metals, and renewable energy (such as solar panels).
Hong Kong's race to be a hub
Despite mainland China's reticence to embrace digital assets—other than the digital yuan, the country's government-controlled central bank digital currency (CBDC)—Hong Kong has, in contrast, set itself the task of becoming a digital asset hub for the region.
In January, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), Hong Kong's central bank, launched a new initiative to support local banks as they launch blockchain products, with tokenization being a core focus once the incubator begins. The HKMA described the incubator as a 'new supervisory arrangement' that will allow local banks to 'maximize the potential benefits of DLT adoption by effectively managing the associated risks.'
This was just the latest in several initiatives launched by the HKMA targeting digital assets and blockchain, another being a stablecoin sandbox launched by the central bank in March of last year. The special administrative region continued to ramp up its efforts in 2025. In May, Hong Kong legislators passed the 'Stablecoin Ordinance', making it the first major economy with an act fully dedicated to stablecoins. When it takes effect, in August, it will bring a comprehensive licensing regime, with any entity issuing stablecoins in Hong Kong (or issuing Hong Kong dollar-referenced stablecoins anywhere in the world) henceforth needing to obtain a license from the central bank. Unlicensed issuance or advertising will be a criminal offense.
In addition, issuers must maintain a one-to-one reserve backing with high-quality liquid assets, provide clear redemption rights, and implement robust anti-money laundering (AML) controls. They also set a high bar to entry, with the law mandating paid-up capital of at least HKD25 million ($3.19 million), or one percent of coins outstanding for non-banks, plus a separate pool of reserve assets with a market value equal to or exceeding the par value of outstanding stablecoins, to maintain a robust 1:1 backing.
More recently, in June the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hong Kong's top finance sector regulator, announced plans to permit digital asset derivatives for professional investors, as part of the broader strategy to expand product offerings and reinforce the territory's growing status as fintech hub.
Later in the month, the Hong Kong government released its 'Policy Statement 2.0 on the Development of Digital Assets in Hong Kong,' further underscoring the territory's ambitions. Amongst other measures, it introduced the new 'LEAP' framework that doubles down on stablecoin and asset tokenization policies, as well as unifying its regulatory framework for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
During his speech last week, Hui Ching-yu reportedly highlighted the new policy statement as an example of how Hong Kong has been gradually building a regulatory framework that balances risk management and investor protection, as well as industry development, to promote the sustainable development of the territory's digital asset ecosystem.
In addition to all this, there is the announcement of the impending issuance of a third batch of tokenized green bonds, and Hong Kong appears to be laying down a significant marker for other jurisdictions keen to make the most of the digital asset space.
Watch: Tim Draper talks tokenization with Kurt Wuckert Jr.
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
What these five Chinese car brands did before they made cars
By One in 10 cars sold in Britain last month were made in China, latest figures from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders show. In the past week, three car makers hailing from China have announced they will launch in Britain. But this new period of automotive brings a lot to debate - price wars, the threat of cheap EVs, and security issues for starters. And another gripe people have with new Chinese car makers is many aren't actually car makers. Instead, many are tech brands masquerading as car companies. As opposed to legacy European brands like Audi, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen, these new Chinese companies don't have automotive histories going back over a hundred years. Instead many of them have technology-based roots or in some cases, even more unusual beginnings. We've dug into the pasts of four of China's automotive powerhouses to get to know them a bit better. And we've looked into a fifth that bucks the technology trend, standing proud as a car maker that has always and only made cars. Geely - from fridge parts to EVs... How it started: Geely's origins have a colder start, as the automotive powerhouse began life as a refrigerator parts manufacturer. In 1986, Eric Li founded Huangyan Refrigerator Parts in Taizhou City in the Zhejiang Province of China. For eight years it made refrigerators, freezers and construction and decorative materials. Then in 1994, Huangyan Huatian Motorcycles Factory was established – the predecessor of Geely and the Geely trademark was registered. It wasn't until 1997 that Geely entered the automotive industry. It wanted to produce affordable cars for those on tight budgets, and in doing so it became China's first privately-owned auto manufacturer. How it's going: In 2002, Geely entered into China's top 10 automakers, and by 2010 was in a position to acquire Volvo. Taking 100 percent of the shares of Volvo Car Corporation from Ford, Geely started its Western expansion and quickly snapped up 51 percent of Lotus in 2017, and 9.69 percent of Daimler AG (Mercedes-Benz owner) in 2018. Thanks to these acquisitions Geely Auto was the first Chinese car brand to sell one million vehicles. In 2024, Geely achieved record-breaking sales of almost 2.2 million vehicles – a 34 percent year-on-year increase. Sales outside China increased 21 percent year-on-year, to almost 1.22 million units. And electrified sales grew over 52 percent to almost 45 percent of aggregate sales. Geely will debut under its own name in Britain with the arrival of its EX5 SUV towards the end of the year. BYD – mobile phone batteries to the world's biggest EV maker How it started: BYD was founded in November 1994 by Wang Chuanfu, a Chinese chemist and entrepreneur. He wanted to compete against expensive Japanese battery manufacturers and become a world leader in energy generation, energy storage and rechargeable batteries. In 1996, BYD began manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for modern day smartphones, just as there was a boom in the devices. Throughout the early 2000s, BYD supplied batteries to Motorola and Nokia - at the time two of the biggest players in the mobile phone industry. In 2003, BYD was in a position to sidestep into the automotive industry, acquiring a small car maker called Xi'an Qinchuan Automobile. Its first combustion car, the F3, arrived in 2005, before releasing the plug-in hybrid F3DM in 2008. Warren Buffet invested 10 percent ($230million) and BYD became famous. BYD really took off when it introduced its lithium-ion Phosphate Blade battery in 2020 which increased space utilization by 50 percent and delivered a range boost also of up to 50 percent. How it's going: BYD began exporting outside China in 2010. By 2024, it reached an annual overseas sales figure of 417,204 units – a 71.86 percent increase on 2023. By 2030, BYD aims to sell half its cars outside its native land. In 2024, BYD sold 4,272,145 vehicles globally, marking a substantial increase from 427,302 in 2020. As of March 2025, BYD's sold 11.6 million EVs to date. Tesla on the other hand – who used to be the biggest EV maker in the world - has sold 7.5 million EVs. China's Geely, the owner of Volvo, Polestar and Lotus, is the third biggest EV manufacturer in the world, and yet has just 1.4 million EVs comparatively. BYD is now the largest electric car maker in the world after dethroning Tesla in 2023. Xpeng – search browsers to AI cars How it started: Xpeng is core of the tech-to-car Chinese movement, as it was founded in 2014 as a smart driving technology company. It wanted to redefine the driving experience and use artificial intelligence to craft its EVs. Why did it have this angle? Because it was created by He Xiaopeng, a self-made tech trailblazer who built UCWeb – China's most popular mobile browser. He sold it in 2014 to Alibaba for $4.3billion before pivoting to automotive after being inspired by Tesla and sustainable transport. In 2017, Xpeng revealed its first model, the Xpeng G3, an electric SUV, with deliveries commencing in 2018. Then in 2020, it launched the P7, which made headlines for its AI driving mode. This year Xpeng officially launched in the UK with the G6 all-electric coupe SUV which costs from £39,990. XPeng says 'it is a technology company at heart' and wants to use technology to transform the future of mobility – from road EVs to ones that fly. In this way it is fully embracing its technology origins, not trying to shy away or downplay them. How it's going: In the first half of 2025, Xpeng delivered 197,189 vehicles, already topping its total deliveries for last year which stood at 190,068 vehicles. It's a year-on-year increase of 279.01 percent and marks the eight consecutive month since November 2024 that Xpeng's deliveries have exceeded 30,000 units. As of June, XPeng has entered over 40 countries and regions globally and has set itself a goal that half of future sales coming from overseas markets. Its cumulative sales to date tally up to 752,957. Xiaomi – the smartphone maker turned EV maker How it's going: In June the U7 went on sale and within three minutes Xiaomi said it received 200,000 pre-orders. The orders required a non-refundable deposit of 5,000 yuan (£509) for the vehicles, which are priced from 253,500 yuan to 329,900 yuan. This is unprecedented new vehicle demand in China, where monthly sales of 10,000 units for a single model are a success in its highly competitive EV market. It outdoes annual deliveries of other electric car makers, and could overtake Tesla's sales in China of 480,000 units. The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is already the fastest electric production car to have lapped the Nurburgring in just 7m 04.95s. Chery - the Chinese car maker that started by making cars How it started: Chery is in rare company in the Chinese automotive world because it is, and always has been, a car manufacturer. This will make naysayers rejoice. Chery was founded in 1996 by a group of government officials who established the automotive company to reduce poverty in Anhui and drive wider economic development. Engine-manufacturing equipment was bought from Ford in the UK, and tooling from VW's Seat. Factory construction commenced in early 1997, with the first vehicles rolling off the production line towards the end of 1999. Mass production came a year later. How it's going: It became the first passenger car company in China to export complete vehicles and as of 2024 it sold more cars last year than BMW: Chery shifted a whopping 2.6million units in 2024 - a 38.4 percent increase on 2023. It's been China's top exporter of passenger vehicles for 21 consecutive years. By production, it was China's third-largest automotive maker in 2024. Chery has launched two sub-brands in the UK in the last year, Omoda and Jaecoo, which have already gained two percent market share. This is Money exclusively revealed this week that Chery is coming to the UK this summer under its own brand, with two SUVs going on sale soon. The first will be revealed at Goodwood Festival of Speed.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Abound Credit Union picks Jack Henry Symitar core platform
Jack Henry (Nasdaq: JKHY) announced today that Abound Credit Union has selected the Symitar® core platform and its complementary cloud-based solutions to modernize the banking experience for its more than 130,000 members across Kentucky. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. Founded 75 years ago as a small institution serving 10 Fort Knox employees, Abound Credit Union has grown to $2.4 billion in assets and is now a pillar of southern and central Kentucky communities. The credit union found it increasingly challenging to keep up with members' needs and attract younger generations with its legacy technology and workarounds. It needed a future-ready, flexible technology platform that would support growth without sacrificing the brand's personal connections. Jack Henry's open, cloud-native platform gives Abound a technology foundation that can support the credit union in its next chapter. 'Jack Henry understands our vision and what it takes to cater to our members' diverse financial situations,' said Ray Springsteen, CEO at Abound Credit Union. 'Its open platform seamlessly integrates third-party solutions, enabling members to have the financial services they rely on, while easily adding new capabilities as needs change. This empowers us to focus our resources on serving Kentuckians for the next 75 years and beyond.' Abound will leverage many of Jack Henry's complementary integrated solutions to deliver a more personalized, secure, and convenient experience. For example, Jack Henry Data Hub™ will provide real-time member insights, the Banno Digital Platform™ offers an intuitive digital experience, and the Banno Digital Toolkit™ allows for easy customization and smooth integration with third-party providers. Jack Henry's business banking, payments, lending, and financial crimes solutions also will enhance the credit union's offerings. 'Our technology modernization strategy is designed to empower institutions like Abound to embrace change, drive their own innovation, and deliver value to every member,' said Brynn Ammon, President of Credit Union Solutions at Jack Henry. 'The credit union is leveraging our foundation to create its own banking experience, one that rewards and brings value to a diverse member base. We're honored to help them build a resilient technology plan that will support their growth and further deepen their impact in Kentucky.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Indian regulator orders airlines to check Boeing fuel switches after plane crash report
India's aviation regulator has ordered the country's airlines to examine fuel switches on Boeing aircraft, after a preliminary report on the Air India flight 171 crash in June showed the fuel supply had been cut seconds after takeoff. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation said it had issued the order after several domestic and international airlines began making their own inspections of the locking mechanisms attached to the switches. South Korea was also preparing to order all airlines in the country that operate Boeing jets to examine the switches. A preliminary report, released on Saturday, found both engines of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which crashed, killing 260 people, had been starved of fuel, leading investigators to focus on the fuel switches in the cockpit. There has been online speculation about two competing theories – one of pilot error or sabotage, and one of faulty fuel switch locks – although Air India has cautioned that the investigation is in its early stages and there have been no recommended actions against Boeing. Air India's chief executive, Campbell Wilson, said in a memo to staff on Monday that the report had 'triggered a new round of speculation in the media' after providing 'both greater clarity and opened additional questions'. Wilson added: 'The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over.' The report, by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), cited a voice recording from the flight deck in which it said one of the pilots was heard asking the other 'why did he cutoff?' The other pilot responded that he 'did not do so', according to the report. Both switches were moved back to allow fuel to flow, but the plane was too low and slow to recover. While the report is not intended to provide definitive answers but only lay out basic facts, it has led to theories suggesting one of the pilots had either turned off the fuel to both engines, either by mistake or to deliberately bring down the plane. The Indian Commercial Pilots' Association (ICPA) said it was 'deeply disturbed by speculative narratives … particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide'. 'There is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage,' it said in a statement on Sunday, adding: 'It is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved.' A separate theory is that the fuel switches, which are located just below the thrust levers, could have switched off by themselves. This is usually not possible as they operate independently and need to be lifted up to disengage a lock. Adding to concern around fuel switches, the preliminary accident report had cited a bulletin issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2018 that had recommended the locking mechanisms be checked on multiple variants of Boeing aircraft, including the 787, after the company had received reports that on some 737 models 'fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged'. However, the advisory only made recommendations and did not consider it to be 'an unsafe condition' that needed a mandated inspection. It was also issued in 2018 and related to so many different types of Boeing jets that it would probably have already been flagged if the locks were not working on operating fleets. Steve Giordano, a former airline captain who flies several Boeing planes including the 787, said he did not believe the issues were 'mechanical' or 'airplane related'. 'I'm not convinced it was suicide or intentional,' he wrote on X. 'I'm just convinced that the switches were moved by a human hand.'
