Xiaohongshu joins wave of Chinese firms releasing open-source AI models
[BEIJING] Xiaohongshu, also known as Rednote, one of the country's most popular social media platforms, has released an open-source large language model, joining a wave of Chinese tech firms making their artificial intelligence models freely available.
The approach contrasts with many US tech giants like OpenAI and Google, which have kept their most advanced models proprietary, though some American firms including Meta have also released open-source models.
Open sourcing allows Chinese companies to demonstrate their technological capabilities, build developer communities and spread influence globally at a time when the US has sought to stymie China's tech progress with export restrictions on advanced semiconductors.
Xiaohongshu's model, called dots.llm1, is available for download on developer platform Hugging Face. A company technical paper describing it was uploaded on Friday (Jun 6).
In coding tasks, the model performs comparably to Alibaba's Qwen 2.5 series, though it trails more advanced models such as DeepSeek-V3, the technical paper said.
Xiaohongshu is an Instagram-like platform where users share photos, videos, text posts and live streams. The platform gained international attention earlier this year when some US users flocked to the app amid concerns over a potential TikTok ban.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The company has invested in large language model development since 2023, not long after OpenAI's release of ChatGPT in late 2022.
It has accelerated its AI efforts in recent months, launching Diandian, an AI-powered search application that helps users find content on Xiaohongshu's main platform.
Other companies that are pursuing an open-source approach include Alibaba which launched Qwen 3, an upgraded version of its model in April.
Earlier this year, startup DeepSeek released its low-cost R1 model as open-source software, shaking up the global AI industry due to its competitive performance despite being developed at a fraction of the cost of Western rivals. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
37 minutes ago
- Business Times
Ignoring a US$7 trillion financial disaster won't make it go away
IF YOU had the power to prevent not just one Great Depression but two, you probably would not hesitate to use it. But for some (not very mysterious) reason, that is pretty much what we do when we ignore an increasingly hot and violent climate. Two of the biggest myths about climate change are that, one, it is a problem for future generations, and two, trying to alleviate it will hurt economic growth. In fact, climate change is not just a challenge already for those of us lucky enough to be alive today, it is also an economic catastrophe. Ignoring it will be far more costly than fighting it. The latest evidence comes from Bloomberg Intelligence (BI), which this week estimated that climate-related disasters have cost the US economy at least US$6.6 trillion in higher insurance premiums, clean-up spending and other expenses over the past 12 years. Adjusted for inflation, that makes climate disasters already twice as expensive as the Great Depression's US$3.3 trillion in losses over the same time frame, BI estimates. Again, for those who fell asleep in that paragraph: Climate change is already twice as painful economically as the Great Depression. For now, climate costs are only half as expensive as the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent Great Recession, which kept economic growth below its full potential for a decade and immiserated a generation. But climate losses would have to grow by only 2 per cent a year over the next dozen years to become the biggest financial disaster in US history, by BI's estimate. Recent performance suggests 2 per cent per year is a low bar to clear. Annual climate losses have more than doubled from less than US$500 billion in 2013 to nearly US$1 trillion in the past 12 months, BI has found. Average annual growth over the past five years has been nearly 15 per cent. At that rate, climate costs will exceed the Great Recession's initial 12-year toll in just five more years. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up These figures are consistent with the growth in the number of US disasters inflicting at least US$1 billion in damage. The annual incidence of those doubled between 2012 and 2024, noted the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), thanks not only to more destructive storms, but Americans' eagerness to set up house in the country's riskiest ZIP codes. Because disasters magically go away when you do not look at them, President Donald Trump's NOAA has stopped keeping track of this data. But already in 2025, there have been several natural catastrophes that each inflicted more than US$1 billion in losses, including January's Los Angeles wildfires and tornadoes, flooding and other severe weather in the central US. BI's damage estimates, like the NOAA's, are in some ways an undercount. They do not include the many thousands of American lives lost to extreme heat and other natural disasters over the past 12 years. Deaths from wildfire smoke alone could cause US$244 billion in annual economic losses by 2050, a recent working paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) reported. BI's estimates do not account for the profound long-term health effects of wildfire smoke, heat and other growing hazards of a chaotic climate. They also do not include the potential growth lost from dollars being diverted towards rebuilding and insurance, and away from more-productive investments. Economists are still trying to figure out how big the damage could get if the atmosphere heats beyond the 1.3 deg C above pre-industrial averages it has already warmed. Another NBER paper last year estimated that each 1 deg C of heating shaves 12 per cent from global GDP, meaning the 3 deg C path we are currently on would mean a global economy that is poorer by a third. There is still time to limit this damage, but not much. A report this month by dozens of top climate scientists suggests the world has just three years of action left to cap warming at 1.5 deg C, the stretch goal of the Paris climate accords. After that, 2 deg C won't be far away. We need to stop burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible, and make communities more resilient to the disasters already in the pipeline. But global governments remain a 'quantum leap' away from doing what is necessary, the United Nations warned last year. The US, once a leader in the climate fight, has switched teams in President Donald Trump's second term. He and his fellow Republicans in Congress are doing all they can to further enrich the fossil-fuel companies that gave them millions in campaign dollars in 2024. That includes pretending climate change is not a problem, contrary to science and the opinion of the vast majority of US voters. They are doing so in the name of keeping energy prices low for those voters, claiming fossil fuels are cheaper and more secure sources of energy. But to call them 'cheap' or 'secure' requires blurring your eyes to their many physical and financial risks. Those have become too big to ignore. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
China urges Canada to ‘correct wrongdoing' over Hikvision shutdown
[BEIJING] China's commerce ministry on Monday (Jun 30) urged Canada to 'immediately correct its wrongdoings' after Ottawa ordered the Chinese surveillance camera manufacturer Hikvision to cease operation in the country, citing national security concerns. In a statement published on its website, the Chinese ministry vowed to take the 'necessary measures' to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese businesses. 'The government has determined that Hikvision Canada's continued operations in Canada would be injurious to Canada's national security,' Canadian Industry Minister Melanie Joly said on X, adding the decision was taken after a multi-step review of information provided by Canada's security and intelligence community. China's foreign ministry on Monday also expressed strong opposition to Canada's move and said it has lodged stern representations with the Canadian side. The foreign ministry accused Canada of generalising the concept of national security and suppressing Chinese enterprises and urged it to provide a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies. Hikvision, which describes itself as the world's biggest maker of video surveillance equipment, said last year it had exited contracts in Xinjiang through five subsidiaries that were added to a US trade blacklist in 2023. Canada said last year it was reviewing an application to impose sanctions against Chinese surveillance equipment companies, including Hikvision, after rights advocates alleged the firms were aiding repression and high-tech surveillance in Xinjiang. The Chinese government has denied all allegations of human rights abuses in Xinjiang and has criticised or targeted companies for removing Xinjiang firms from their supply chains. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US-based I Squared Capital dumps plans to make separate offer for Hong Kong's HKBN
[HONG KONG] US-based infrastructure investment firm I Squared Capital has withdrawn plans to make a takeover offer for Hong Kong's HKBN, the broadband operator said on Monday (Jun 30), as a competing bid backed by a state-owned entity takes centre stage. The announcement comes over a month after Reuters reported that China Mobile was nearing a deal to take over HKBN with I Squared having dropped out. I Squared already owns Hong Kong-based broadband provider HGC Global Communications, in which China Investment Corp holds a minority stake. However, the Miami-based firm has so far been unable to secure approval from the Chinese sovereign wealth fund to proceed with a formal bid for HKBN, according to the Reuters report. Rival suitor China Mobile built a 15.5 per cent stake in HKBN from buyout company TPG and has offered HK$7.8 billion (S$1.3 billion) for the broadband firm. I Squared was preparing to trump China Mobile's offer of HK$5.23 per HKBN share, which was made in December, but was not keen to pay more than HK$6 apiece, Reuters reported in January. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up HKBN CEO William Yeung said in May it was a 'rumour' that China Investment Corp had vetoed I Squared's plan to present a formal offer for HKBN. The takeover offer from China Mobile was not good enough and HKBN was open to engage with more bidders to get the best value for its shareholders, Yeung had said. 'Despite the HKBN CEO's comments that the China Mobile offer is not good enough, China Mobile has no pressing need to bump if a competing offer fails to materialise,' Smartkarma's Arun George said in a note before HKBN's announcement on Monday. I Squared Capital did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment over why it decided to walk away from making an offer. China Mobile also did not respond to a request for comment. REUTERS
