High Court reserves judgment in cases taken over super-junior ministers
The cases brought by Kerry Sinn Féin TD, Pa Daly and People Before Profit-Solidarity TD, Paul Murphy point to a section of the Irish Constitution which limits the number of government members to 15 – including the taoiseach – and provides that they meet and act as a collective authority.
Advertisement
Following the conclusion of submissions in both cases on Friday, High Court president Mr Justice David Barniville, on behalf of the three-judge divisional court, reserved judgment in the actions.
'Ministers of State attending Cabinet', or super-junior ministers, are appointed by the government on the nomination of the taoiseach. Super-junior ministers participate at government meetings but do not vote.
At present, there are four super-junior ministers attending Cabinet: Fianna Fáil's Mary Butler (who is also chief whip), Hildegarde Naughton of Fine Gael, and Noel Grealish and Seán Canney of the Regional Independent Group. They are not parties to the cases.
Closing the State's defence to Mr Murphy's action in the High Court on Friday Catherine Donnelly SC said aspects of the case were uncertain and incoherent, and said the case 'rests entirely' on a series of 'obscure distinctions'.
Advertisement
One of these distinctions, Ms Donnelly said, was one drawn between the attendance of the chief whip, attorney general and secretary general at Cabinet, and the attendance of ministers of state, Mr Donnelly said.
The first group, Mr Murphy's side contends, assists in Government deliberations in accordance with the Constitution, while the ministers of state participate in deliberations in breach of the Constitution, Ms Donnelly said.
Ms Donnelly submitted this was an 'unsustainable distinction'.
Counsel also said Mr Murphy's side was asking the court to distinguish between political influence exercised by ministers of state outside the Cabinet room, and same exercised within the Cabinet room.
Advertisement
Political influence outside the Cabinet room, however far-reaching, is constitutional, but inside the room, political influence is unconstitutional, according to Mr Murphy's side, Ms Donnelly said.
Ms Donnelly said the court was being asked by Mr Murphy to make a ruling based on the subjective experience of how a minister of state 'might feel', referencing former super-junior minister Finian McGrath's evidence in the case.
Mr McGrath, who served as Minister of State for Disability between 2016 and 2020, told the court this week he was treated as a 'full minister' while attending government meetings and that he on occasion succeeded in blocking or amending Cabinet decisions.
Ms Donnelly said the case turned on whether or not participation in Government meetings outweighed other clear, uncontested and definitive distinctions between super-junior ministers and senior Government ministers.
Advertisement
Closing Mr Murphy's case, John Rogers SC, appearing with barristers Paul Gunning and Mollie Higgins and instructed by KM solicitors, said super-junior ministers' participation in the 'unit' of Government 'offends' the Constitution.
Mr Rogers said there was clear evidence of active participation by ministers of state in the Government of taoisigh Enda Kenny and Leo Varadkar between 2016 and 2020. He said it was their case that this practice was continuing in the current Government.
He said the State did not produce any evidence challenging the assertion of ministers of state's participation at Cabinet.
Mr Rogers said their side approached the case on the basis that a Government needs a chief whip, a secretary general, and attorney general to attend Government meetings. '[It's a] matter of practicality that these officers are in the [Cabinet] room until they're asked to leave,' he said.
Advertisement
The participation of super-junior ministers 'fractures' the collective authority of the Government, a clearly defined unit, he submitted.
'It's only the Government that should attend where there are actions of collective responsibility ... there should not be participation in that process by junior ministers – they're not the Government,' he said.
He rejected Ms Donnelly's labelling of Mr McGrath's evidence as subjective, asserting Mr McGrath engaged in 'participation of a high order' during his time as a super-junior minister.
Mr Rogers said John Callinan, the secretary general to the Government, was unable to point to an authority stipulating super-junior ministers attend Government.
He said the process by which the Taoiseach and senior Government ministers are nominated and approved by Dáil Éireann, in accordance with the Constitution, constituted a unique value for the people that should be protected.
He said it seemed the State's case came down to an entitlement of the taoiseach to invite who he wishes to attend and participate in Government. Mr Murphy's case challenges this, Mr Rogers submitted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump claims Jaguar Land Rover is in 'turmoil' after rebrand
Donald Trump has claimed Jaguar Land Rover is in 'absolute turmoil' after the company's 'totally disastrous woke ' rebrand. The US President labelled the British car maker's recent advert, which featured brightly dressed models, as a 'total disaster' and 'stupid'. Trump was scathing of Jaguar as he compared the firm's fortunes to those of clothing brand American Eagle in a rant on his social media platform Truth Social. ' Sydney Sweeney , a registered Republican, has the "HOTTEST" ad out there. It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are "flying off the shelves",' he wrote. 'Go get 'em Sydney! On the other side of the ledger, Jaguar did a stupid, and seriously WOKE advertisement, THAT IS A TOTAL DISASTER! The CEO just resigned, and the company is in absolute turmoil. 'Who wants to buy a Jaguar after looking at that disgraceful ad. Shouldn't they have learned a lesson from Bud Lite, which went Woke.' Trump ended the post by saying that 'being woke is losers'. It was announced last week that Jaguar Land Rover CEO Adrian Mardell is to retire at the end of this year. Mardell, 64, has been at the company for more than three decades including the last two years as chief executive during one of the most transformative periods in the firm's recent history. Arguably his biggest involvement has been his role in Jaguar's controversial 'woke' rebrand and shift to an electric-only premium car brand from 2026. Last month JLR said it was axing 500 management roles , which are going as part of a voluntary redundancy programme for managers in the UK. A spokesman said: 'As part of normal business practice, we regularly offer eligible employees the opportunity to leave JLR through limited voluntary redundancy programmes.' Sales of the luxury car manufacturer appear to have nose-dived following its controversial move to scrap its iconic 'growler' big cat logo in November. The firm's rebrand saw it replace the well-known badge in favour of a geometric 'J' design - which lovers of the brand raged looked like the logo on a handbag clasp. And as the firestorm surrounding the famed car maker's change continues to engulf it , sales at Jaguar Europe have plunged a staggering 97.5 per cent. But the British car marque has insisted the reason for the freefall in sales is not because of a lack of support or an image overhaul - but because it has stopped making older models as it focuses on its relaunch with an all-electric offering. Defending the news, the firm said it was 'pointless' to compare figures for 2024 and 2025, as 'Jaguar is not currently on sale in the UK' while it goes through its 'sunset period' of radical change. A spokeswoman for Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) said: 'Jaguar's transformation towards a new portfolio of pure-electric vehicles was announced as part of the Reimagine strategy in 2021. JLR always envisaged a period when the current range would "no longer be on sale" before the introduction of the new Jaguar collection. 'Production of XE, XF, F-TYPE, I-PACE and E-PACE all came to an end in 2024 as part of that transition. This strategic "sunset" of the product range is going to plan and will allow Jaguar to transform and reposition the brand for the future. 'Comparing Jaguar sales to 2024 is pointless as we are no longer producing vehicles in 2025 with low levels of retail inventory available. Jaguar's rebranding is not related to a sales decline.' Jaguar has not announced an official date for when its new fleet of high-end electric motors will hit the forecourt. It stopped sales of current Jaguars on November 11 as it prepared for its next generation of luxury vehicles to arrive. Defending the campaign late last year, JLR's Managing Director Rawdon Glover told the Financial Times: 'If we play in the same way that everybody else does, we'll just get drowned out.'
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Auschwitz museum orders visiting Israeli soldiers to remove flags
A delegation of Israeli soldiers visiting the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum have been ordered to remove national flags during an annual ceremony. In what is believed to be the first time such an order has occurred at the event, the 'humiliating' incident was blamed on 'antisemitism and an attempt to reshape the historical narrative' by a member of the delegation. The group of 180 Israel Defence Forces (IDF) personnel and security officers were visiting as part of the long-standing Witnesses in Uniform programme, which aims to uphold the memory of the Holocaust through exposure to historic sites. It took place at the site of the former extermination camp run by Nazi Germany. Some 1.1. million people, primarily Jews but also Poles, Roma and Sinti and Soviet prisoners of war were murdered at the camp close to what is now the Polish city of Oswiecim.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Civilization collapse now 'inevitable' after chilling patterns in past empires are uncovered
The collapse of human civilization is now seen as inevitable, according to a research who said 5,000 years of history have exposed clear and alarming patterns. Dr Luke Kemp of the University of Cambridge found inequality, environmental damage, reckless leaders and fragile systems lead to ancient collapse, and every warning sign is currently flashing. ' We can't put a date on Doomsday, but by looking at the 5,000 years of [civilization], we can understand the trajectories we face today, and self-termination is most likely,' he told the Guardian. Kemp's new book, Goliath's Curse, details the rise and fall of ancient powers, including imperial China, Rome and the Classical Lowland Maya. While those collapses were often regional and survivable, Kemp said the next one will be global, and devastating. His research found that every fallen empire shared the same fatal traits, including top-heavy regimes dominated by elites, fueled by inequality and held together by violence. He referred to these societies as 'Goliaths,' vast, brittle power structures built on hoarded grain, monopolized weapons and populations trapped in place with nowhere to run. 'History is best told as a story of organized crime,' Kemp said. 'It is one group creating a monopoly on resources through the use of violence over a certain territory and population.' A research analyzed the rise and fall of more than 400 empires throughout history, uncovering alarming patterns that he said are visible today Kemp analyzed the rise and fall of more than 400 societies, coming to the theory that inequality kills civilizations. As elites extract wealth from the masses and destroy the environment, societies become hollow shells, vulnerable to war, disease and collapse. And it's not simple greed driving the fall, he said, but a small number of individuals exhibiting the 'dark triad' of narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. These toxic traits, found in past ruling classes, are now surfacing in global leadership, The Guardian reported. Kemp named Donald Trump as the narcissist, Vladimir Putin as the psychopath, and Xi Jinping as the Machiavellian, claiming the most powerful leaders on Earth now embody the very traits that historically trigger collapse. One of the most consistent red flags Kemp found through hundreds of collapsed societies was extreme inequality. In ancient empires, wealth and power became concentrated among a small elite while the majority were left impoverished and burdened. Kemp said today's widening wealth gap and corporate monopolies mirror that pattern, eroding social cohesion and weakening resilience. Another alarming parallel was humanity's total dependence on complex, global systems. In the past, people could return to hunting or farming when governments fell. Now, most humans rely on fragile global supply chains, if they collapse, everything collapses, Kemp warned. Environmental destruction was also following the same trajectory. Historical collapses were often preceded by regional climate shifts of just 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Scientists now project a global rise of 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit or more, along with massive deforestation and resource depletion. Kemp also warned the next collapse could be far more violent as in the past, power struggles were fought with swords or muskets. That is because the the modern world has more than 10,000 nuclear weapons, and far more destructive technology. Kemp outlined three reasons why the next collapse could be far more devastating than anything humanity has faced before. First is elite violence. In the past, power struggles were fought with swords or muskets. Today, world leaders have access to more than 10,000 nuclear weapons. Second is our dependence on complex systems. Ancient populations could return to farming or hunting to survive. But modern societies rely heavily on fragile global supply chains, if they fail, we fall with them, he shared. Third is the scale of the threats themselves. Historical climate shifts typically involved a one-degree change. While past collapses sometimes led to better conditions, healthier, taller, and freer populations after empire fell, Kemp warns that today's single, globalized system leaves nowhere to hide.
