Opinion - A modern golem: The ‘antisemitism' charge has run amok
According to Jewish folklore, in the late 16th-century the Czech city of Prague was threatened with antisemitic attacks. In response, Chief Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel created an early Jewish superhero in the attic of what has become known as the Old-New Synagogue.
The story goes that the rabbi received a divine order in a dream: 'You shall create [a] Golem from clay and may the malicious anti-Semitic mob be destroyed.' So he fashioned a powerful giant creature called a golem 'out of clay from the banks of the Vltava River and brought it to life through rituals and Hebrew incantations,' per Kayla Green's 'The Golem in the Attic.'
At first, the Golem defended the ghetto's Jews, but, through the rabbi's oversight, the powerful creature ran amok and had to be destroyed.
Responding to the horrific Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks on Israel, large Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League and the Zionist Organization of America have unintentionally created a similar monster — which has similarly run amok.
Within the North American Jewish community, leaders such as ADL's Jonathan Greenblatt and the Zionist Organization for America's Mort Klein have successfully conflated any criticism — however justified — of Israel's Gaza and West Bank policy with antisemitism.
Through creative bookkeeping (as I have written previously) in calculating yearly totals of antisemitic incidents, the ADL counts as equal a trivial event — such as a social media slight — and the Tree of Life synagogue killings in Pittsburgh. The result is ginned up hysteria among American Jews and congressional opportunists.
Serious, worldwide antisemitism is real but is in 'sharp decline' according to a recent Tel Aviv University study, even including criticism of Israel.
By contrast, the ADL recently reported 9,354 U.S. antisemitic incidents in 2024, a 5 percent increase. The group attributed this to an 84 percent rise in campus incidents — but only by counting all pro-Palestinian protests in their tally.
Some Jewish leaders have attempted to tap the brakes on this dynamic of weaponizing antisemitism.
Last month, a murderous arsonist attacked Pennsylvania's governor's residence on the first night of Passover. But Gov. Josh Shapiro (D), likely sensing that those weaponizing antisemitism were about to pounce, tried to apply some much-needed perspective. In a New York Times opinion piece, Shapiro, who is Jewish, wrote that as the police investigation continued, 'people began to ascribe their own beliefs onto what they thought happened — and why.'
Efforts to stifle campus free speech have now become overreach, where any support for the Palestinian people — even peaceful, nondisruptive student protest among those who reject Hamas — is considered antisemitic.
In what some have termed 'the Palestinian exception,' universities have knuckled under to threats, banning peaceful, nonobstructive encampments. Such encampments had previously been permitted for protests against the Vietnam War, South African apartheid, the treatment of Soviet Jews, climate change and, yes, antisemitism.
'Finding a Palestinian flag or keffiyeh innately antisemitic makes no more sense than regarding an Israeli flag or Jewish star as innately Islamophobic,' Lucinda Rosenfeld wrote in the Jewish Daily Forward.
Yet Jewish student and faculty support for Israel's far-right Likud government and the Israeli military are not subject to such new campus restraints. Thus, a debate over disciplining disruptive campus conduct has devolved into the issue of speech content, clearly violating the First Amendment. And the intended chilling effect has emerged.
On May 14, New York University withheld the diploma of Logan Rozas, a student commencement speaker, for denouncing 'atrocities currently happening in Palestine.'
'In general, protest activity is way down this year as compared to last year,' Hillel International CEO Adam Lehman told Jewish Insider. In a significant downside, this has emboldened the Trump administration to attack universities for reasons well beyond antisemitism.
But in the wake of Harvard's rebuke to Trump's threats, the tide seems to be turning.
On April 23, addressing a Holocaust remembrance observance in Washington, Abe Foxman, who ran the ADL for decades, said, 'As a [Holocaust] survivor, my antenna quivers when I see books being banned, when I see people being abducted in the streets, when I see government trying to dictate what universities should teach and whom they should teach.'
On April 25, Deborah Lipstadt, the Biden administration's antisemitism envoy, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that the Trump administration's assault on campus antisemitism has 'gone way too far.'
Also on April 25, five Jewish U.S. senators, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, signed a joint letter to Trump that states, 'We are extremely troubled and disturbed by your broad and extra-legal attacks against universities and higher education institutions as well as members of their communities, which seem to go far beyond combating antisemitism, using what is a real crisis as a pretext to attack people and institutions who do not agree with you.'
On April 28, more than 550 North American rabbis and cantors published a joint letter, accusing the Trump administration of 'abusing' antisemitism 'to divide Jewish Americans.'
On May 1, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), speaking at a Jewish Democratic Council of America summit, said the antisemitism issue 'is being very cynically exploited as the administration seeks to erode civil liberties in the United States.'
Even the ADL's Greenblatt, who initially praised the government's attack on Harvard, now seems to be distancing himself from the monster he helped create.
In a Times of Israel column, he wrote, 'Any actions taken to address campus antisemitism — including the potential withholding of federal funding — must be grounded in clear evidence and conducted in a manner consistent with Title VI procedures and other laws.'
Following Greenblatt's column, the far-left Jewish Voice for Peace, whose chapters have been targets of university discipline for exercising their free speech, wondered, in an editorial, whether the ADL has really 'turned over a new leaf.'
Reliable figures are hard to obtain, but I estimate that about one-third of North American Jews, including many young people, support Palestinian rights, while opposing Hamas; support the existence of a Jewish State in Israel; but also oppose massive civilian casualties in Gaza and settler terrorism on the West Bank. I include myself in this cohort.
However, until now, the roar of a modern golem has drowned out their voices. This monster should be returned to the nation's attic.
Mark I. Pinsky is a Durham, N.C.-based journalist and author. He served as a civilian volunteer attached to the Israeli military in Sinai in 1967.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Malaysian Agency Targets $1 Billion of Late Tycoon's Assets: NST
Malaysia's anti-graft agency is targeting assets worth at least 4.5 billion ringgit ($1 billion) in five other countries belonging to the late tycoon and former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, the New Straits Times reported. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission plans to send a restraining order request to the respective countries using the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 2002, the newspaper cited the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Chief Commissioner Azam Baki as saying.


Hamilton Spectator
8 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Serbian riot police fire tear gas at anti-government protesters demanding an early vote
BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Riot police fired tear gas at anti-government protesters in Serbia's capital on Saturday after they rallied against populist President Aleksandar Vucic to demand an early parliamentary election. The protest by tens of thousands of demonstrators was held after nearly eight months of persistent dissent led by Serbia's university students that have rattled Vucic's firm grip on power in the Balkan country. The huge crowd chanted 'We want elections!' as they filled the capital's central Slavija Square and several blocks around it, with many unable to reach the venue. Several protesters were handcuffed by police, and an officer was seen injured on the ground during the ongoing street battles. It was unclear whether others were injured. As the protest formally ended, the demonstrators threw eggs, plastic bottles and other objects at riot police who were preventing the crowd from approaching a downtown park. At the park, hundreds of Vucic's loyalists have been camping for months to form a human shield in front of his headquarters in the capital. Serbia's Interior Minister Ivica Dacic said participants in the protest attacked the police. He said police used their powers to restore public order and 'arrest all those who attacked the police.' Some of the demonstrators wore scarfs and masks over their faces as they clashed with law enforcement, pulling garbage cans as protection against baton wielding policemen. Tensions were high before and during the gathering as riot police deployed around government buildings. 'Elections are a clear way out of the social crisis caused by the deeds of the government, which is undoubtedly against the interests of their own people,' said a student who didn't give her name while addressing the crowd from a stage. 'Today, on June 28, 2025, we declare the current authorities illegitimate.' At the end of the official part of the rally, students told the crowd to 'take freedom into your own hands.' University students have been a key force behind nationwide anti-corruption demonstrations that started after a renovated rail station canopy collapsed , killing 16 people on Nov. 1. Many blamed the concrete roof crash on rampant government corruption and negligence in state infrastructure projects, leading to recurring mass protests. 'We are here today because we cannot take it any more,' student Darko Kovacevic said. 'This has been going on for too long. We are mired in corruption.' Vucic and his right-wing Serbian Progressive Party have repeatedly refused the demand for an early vote and accused protesters of planning to spur violence on orders from abroad, which they didn't specify or provide evidence of. Vucic's authorities have launched a crackdown on Serbia's striking universities and other opponents, while increasing pressure on independent media as they tried to curb the demonstrations. While numbers have shrunk in recent weeks, the massive showing for Saturday's anti-Vucic rally suggested that the resolve persists, despite relentless pressure and after nearly eight months of almost daily protests. Serbian police, who are firmly controlled by Vucic's government, said 36,000 people were present at the start of the protest Saturday. An independent monitoring group that records public gatherings said around 140,000 people attended the student-led rally. Saturday marks St. Vitus Day, a religious holiday and the date when Serbs mark a 14th-century battle against Ottoman Turks in Kosovo that was the start of hundreds of years of Turkish rule, holding symbolic importance. In their speeches, some of the speakers at the student rally Saturday evoked the theme, which was also used to fuel Serbian nationalism in the 1990s that later led to the incitement of ethnic wars following the breakup of the former Yugoslavia. Hours before the student-led rally, Vucic's party bused in scores of its own supporters to Belgrade from other parts of the country, many wearing T-shirts reading: 'We won't give up Serbia.' They were joining a camp of Vucic's loyalists in central Belgrade where they have been staying in tents since mid-March. In a show of business as usual, Vucic handed out presidential awards in the capital to people he deemed worthy, including artists and journalists. 'People need not worry — the state will be defended and thugs brought to justice,' Vucic told reporters on Saturday. Serbian presidential and parliamentary elections are due in 2027. Earlier this week, police arrested several people accused of allegedly plotting to overthrow the government and banned entry into the country, without explanation, to several people from Croatia and a theater director from Montenegro. Serbia's railway company halted train service over an alleged bomb threat in what critics said was an apparent bid to prevent people from traveling to Belgrade for the rally. Authorities made similar moves back in March, before the biggest ever anti-government protest in the Balkan country, which drew hundreds of thousands of people. Vucic's loyalists then set up a camp in a park outside his office, which still stands. The otherwise peaceful gathering on March 15 came to an abrupt end when part of the crowd suddenly scattered in panic, triggering allegations that authorities used a sonic weapon against peaceful protesters — an accusation officials have denied. Vucic, a former extreme nationalist, has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power more than a decade ago. Though he formally says he wants Serbia to join the European Union, critics say Vucic has stifled democratic freedoms as he strengthened ties with Russia and China. ___ Associated Press writer Dusan Stojanovic contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


CNBC
9 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed
A federal judge on Friday dealt another blow to President Donald Trump's efforts to throw out a defamation lawsuit against him filed by plaintiffs formerly known as the Central Park Five. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone said that Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP law, designed to protect defendants from lawsuits targeting protected speech, does not apply in federal court, rejecting Trump's motion to dismiss the case. "The only issue before the Court is whether Plaintiffs' claims for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") can survive given Pennsylvania's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, otherwise known as its Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Statute," Beetlestone wrote in a 13-page filing. "Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP Statute (a state law) does not apply here, in federal court," she wrote in the filing, adding: "Accordingly, Defendant's Motion shall be denied." Five men who as teenagers were wrongfully convicted in the so-called Central Park Five jogger rape case sued Trump in October, accusing the then-Republican presidential nominee of defaming them. They cited a number of statements Trump made during his Sept. 10 presidential debate against former Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing him of falsely stating that the men killed somebody and pled guilty to the crime. "These statements are demonstrably false," they wrote in their filing against Trump. The five men — Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray and Korey Wise — spent years in prison for the rape and assault of a white female jogger, a crime they were later exonerated of and did not commit. Trump has tried to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against him, but has not been successful. Judge Beetlestone in April also threw out Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him in a different filing.