logo
Mexican band accused of glorifying cartels changes its tune

Mexican band accused of glorifying cartels changes its tune

France 2416-06-2025
The band, Los Alegres del Barranco, is accused of condoning crime over a song praising Nemesio Oseguera, head of the powerful Jalisco New Generation Cartel in western Mexico.
In April, the United States, which has designated the cartel as a terrorist organization, revoked the band's visas for displaying images of Oseguera during a concert and last month prosecutors in Jalisco state opened a probe into the group.
In a bid to curry favor with the authorities, the band released a new song on YouTube on Sunday titled "El Consejo" (The Advice).
Its lyrics warn that there are only two avenues open to those who become involved in drug trafficking: "the pantheon (of dead traffickers) or prison."
The Jalisco prosecutor's office reacted positively to the new track, which had garnered nearly 80,000 views on Monday, saying that "by spreading a positive message in a song, there is a possibility that the investigation will be suspended."
However, the band remains under investigation for suspected illicit funding, prosecutors said.
Several Mexican states have cracked down on "narcocorridos," a controversial subgenre of regional Mexican folk music that includes shout outs to drug traffickers.
Earlier this month, the popular Los Tucanes de Tijuana band was fined more than $36,000 for performing songs glorifying drug cartels in the northern city of Chihuahua.
Performers of drug ballads have themselves also been targets of gang violence.
In late May, five members of the group Fugitivo were found dead in Tamaulipas state, days after being hired to perform a concert.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edited video features fabricated audio of Trump 'criticising corrupt Philippine officials'
Edited video features fabricated audio of Trump 'criticising corrupt Philippine officials'

AFP

time19 hours ago

  • AFP

Edited video features fabricated audio of Trump 'criticising corrupt Philippine officials'

The video was shared on Facebook on July 15, where it was viewed 219,000 times. It features Trump speaking into a microphone with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio standing behind him. The US President appears to be saying: "Beautiful people of the Philippines, your country is being robbed by corrupt politicians. They steal your money, betray your trust and sell out your future." The audio continues over footage of an incorrect Philippines' flag -- its red and blue fields have been inverted -- and various nature scenes, with Trump apparently urging Filipinos to "demand justice and take back your nation". The caption reads: "Philippines robbed by corrupt politicians. - Trump." Image Screenshot of the false post taken on July 29, 2025, with the red X mark added by AFP The same video circulated elsewhere on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok Many users appeared to believe the circulating video of Trump was genuine. "Are we not ashamed by what he said?" said one user in Tagalog. "Our politicians are so embarrassing. They chose to be mum about what Trump just said about them," another user said. Though Transparency International, an organisation that monitors corruption worldwide, ranked the Philippines 114 out of 180 countries on its Corruption Perception Index, Trump did not give a speech accusing Filipino officials of being corrupt (archived link). Keyword searches on Google did not find any official reports of Trump making such comments (archived link). Reverse image searches on Google using keyframes from the video found it corresponds to Trump's speech on June 22 announcing US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, published by AFP on YouTube (archived link). The description states Trump announced the attacks after its ally Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on Iran on June 13. The altered clip has been mirrored but Rubio's head movements and Trump's expressions match the AFP video's 44-second mark. Trump in fact says: "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror." Image Screenshot comparison of the false video (left) and the AFP video of Trump's speech (right) The circulating clip also bears signs of manipulation, such as the audio not matching with Trump's mouth movements.

How to tell if a song was made by AI or a human
How to tell if a song was made by AI or a human

Euronews

time2 days ago

  • Euronews

How to tell if a song was made by AI or a human

Is it The Velvet Underground or Velvet Sundown? The fictitious rock group, Velvet Sundown – which comes complete with music, lyrics and album art generated by artificial intelligence (A) – is stoking debate about how the new technology is blurring the line between the real and synthetic in the music industry, and whether creators should be transparent with their audience. Computer software is widely used in music production, and AI is just the latest tool that disc jockeys, music producers and others have added to their production pipeline. But the rise of AI song generators such as Suno and Udio is set to transform the industry because they allow anyone to create songs with just a few prompts. While some people do not care whether they're listening to AI-generated music, others might be curious to know. If you encounter a new song that leaves you wondering whether it's 100 per cent made with AI, there are some methods that could reveal how it was created. Do a background check If you're wondering who's behind a song, try some old-fashioned detective work. The 'most obvious cues' come from 'external factors,' said Manuel Mousallam, head of research and development at streaming service Deezer. Does the band or artist have social media accounts? Lack of a social presence might indicate there's no one there. If they do exist online, examine the kind of content they post, and how long it goes back. Is there any sign that the artist or band exists in real life? Are there any upcoming concerts and can you buy a ticket for a gig? Is there footage of past concerts on YouTube? Has an established record label released their singles or albums? Try going to the source. Song creators often – but not always – publish their generated tunes on the Suno or Udio platforms, where they can be found by other users. The catch is that you'll have to sign up for an account to get access. Users can look up songs by track name or the creator's handle, and browse genres and playlists. But it can still be difficult to spot a song, especially if you don't know the name of the song or creator. Song tags Deezer has been flagging albums containing AI-generated songs, as part of its efforts to be more transparent as it battles streaming fraudsters looking to make quick money through royalty payments. The Deezer app and website will notify listeners with an on-screen label – 'AI-generated content' – to point out that some tracks on an album were created with song generators. The company's CEO says the system relies on in-house technology to detect subtle but recognisable patterns found in all audio created by AI song generators. The company hasn't specified how many songs it has tagged since it rolled out the feature in June, but says up to 18 per cent of songs uploaded to its platform each day are AI-generated. Check the lyrics AI song tools can churn out both music and lyrics. Many serious users like to write their own words and plug them in because they've discovered that AI-generated lyrics tend to be bad. Casual users, though, might prefer to just let the machine write them. Bad rhyming schemes or repetitive lyrical structures might be a clue that a song is not man-made, but it's subjective. Some users report that Suno tends to use certain words in its lyrics like 'neon," 'shadows' or 'whispers'. If a song includes these words, it's 'a dead giveaway' that it's AI, said Lukas Rams, a Philadelphia-area resident who has used Suno to create three albums for his AI band Sleeping with Wolves. 'I don't know why, it loves to put 'neon' in everything'. No easy answers AI technology is improving so quickly that there's no foolproof way to determine if content is real or not, and experts say you can't just rely on your ear. 'In general, it can be difficult to tell if a track is AI-generated just from listening, and it's only becoming more challenging as the technology gets increasingly advanced,' said Mousallam of Deezer. 'Generative models such as Suno and Udio are constantly changing, meaning that old identifiers – such as vocals having a distinctive reverb – are not necessarily valid anymore'.

Video edited with motion graphics software falsely linked to Thailand-Cambodia conflict
Video edited with motion graphics software falsely linked to Thailand-Cambodia conflict

AFP

time2 days ago

  • AFP

Video edited with motion graphics software falsely linked to Thailand-Cambodia conflict

"Thai F-16s scramble urgently, complete counterattack in 20 minutes," reads simplified Chinese text superimposed over a Red Note video shared on July 25, 2025. The video appears to show a fighter jet swooping over a city and firing a missile at a building, causing a huge explosion. Its caption adds: "Breaking! Cambodian military fired rockets at Thai civilian areas twice. In response, Thailand immediately deployed six F-16 fighter jets. They completed the mission, and returned safely within just 20 minutes." Image Screenshot of the false Red Note post captured on July 30, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same clip was also shared on other Chinese social media platforms, including Douyin and Weibo. It surfaced as a long-standing dispute over contested border temples boiled over into open combat on Thailand and Cambodia's 800-kilometre (500-mile) frontier on July 24. After five days of fighting that killed at least 43 people on both sides, the nations agreed to a ceasefire starting from July 29 (archived link). While the Thai military did scramble F-16 jets during the latest conflict, the circulating video does not show an airstrike on Cambodia (archived link). A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the falsely shared video led to several social media posts claiming it showed airstrikes carried out elsewhere, such as during the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The earliest version of the video was posted on the "Unreal vfx" YouTube channel on May 16, 2023 (archived link). In the video's description, the user says it was made with Adobe After Effects -- motion graphics and visual effects software. In response to comments asking if the video showed real-life footage, they said it was motion graphics. Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared video (left) and the YouTube clip posted in May 2023 (right) The user also posted two other videos using the same background with different effects -- one showing the building being struck by a meteor, causing an identical explosion to the one seen in the falsely shared clip (archived here and here). Image Screenshot comparison of the three videos shared by the YouTube user showcasing different visual effects on the same background AFP has also debunked other misinformation related to the conflict between Thailand and Cambodia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store