Uganda: ‘Gov't will follow law on expansion of Gulu University'
'We follow procedures and it is not because we are frustrating efforts of Gulu University, we are following the law. We are not going to do anything outside the law to gazette or degazette any forest reserves,' she said.
The Minister's remarks were part of her brief statement to Parliament on degazettement of land occupied by Gulu University, during plenary sitting on Thursday, 17 April 2025.
She said that Gulu University, working with both Gulu City Authority and Nwoya district local government has provided alternative land in Nwoya district, which has been converted into free hold title in the names of Gulu University.
'Both the lands have been surveyed including boundary opening and now in the final process of doing valuation in accordance with sections 8 and 11 of the National Forestry and Tree Planting Act, 2003,' said Anywar.
She added that what is left now is for the National Forestry Authority (NFA), Gulu City Authority and Gulu University to complete undertaking the Environment and Social Impact Assessment for both the Gulu Central Forest Reserve and the alternative land in Nwoya.
After the assessment, Anywar said that a report will be submitted to the National Environment Management Authority for approval.
'Subsequently this status shall be submitted to cabinet for approval,' said Anywar.
Hon. Christine Kaaya (NUP, Kiboga district) welcomed the decision by the Ministry to follow the law, and stressed the need for both the university and Nwoya district to carry out the environment impact assessment.
Hon. Denis Oguzu Lee (FDC, Maracha County) also applauded the Ministry for following the right procedures on gazettement and degazettement.
'Cabinet must be mindful that the President [Yoweri Museveni] signed a declaration to end deforestation by 2030, so if you move without using the right procedures, you will be indicting the President before the global community,' he said.
Deputy Speaker, Thomas Tayebwa urged the Minister to expedite the process, saying that the University has already planted trees.
'We need government to assess and see whether indeed we have met the conditions. Minister, help the University so that we expedite the process,' he said.
In 2020, President Museveni directed the then Prime Minister, Ruhakana Rugunda to degazette 70 acres of Gulu Central Forest Reserve for expansion of the University.
Parliament in 2021 passed a resolution approving the degazettement of the land.
The land is expected to host the Faculties of Medicine, Agriculture, Environment, research laboratories and a hostel.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Parliament of the Republic of Uganda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Will nations agree treaty to cut plastic production?
Talks to agree the first global treaty on combating plastic pollution are set to begin on Tuesday, and limiting plastic production is a key point of contention. Dozens of countries, campaign groups and researchers say that legally binding cuts to plastic production, which is running at about 460 million tonnes a year, are the only way to deal with the problem. However, many other nations, including producers of fossil fuels that are used to make most plastics, want the treaty to instead focus on improving the collection and recycling of plastic waste. The discussions in Geneva, scheduled to run until 14 August, are titled INC-5.2 because they are the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee, part of the UN Environment Assembly. More than 170 nations and hundreds of organisations are taking part in the talks, which ended in gridlock over the issue of production limits during the first part of the fifth session, in Busan, South Korea, in late 2024. Beyond waste management Prof Bethanie Almroth, co-coordinator of the Scientists' Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty, which is pressing for production limits, said studies had shown that improved waste management 'will not suffice' in dealing with plastic. 'The amount of plastic being produced is not manageable by the infrastructure that exists or will exist in the future,' said Prof Almroth, a plastic pollution researcher at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. According to figures published by the World Economic Forum, the amount of plastic produced each year could rise to 1.7 billion tonnes by 2060. Prof Almroth said a proposed 40 per cent cut in annual plastic production by 2040, put forward by Rwanda and Peru, would be insufficient to prevent continued plastic pollution. Environmental organisations have previously called for a 75 per cent reduction in production. Economic vs environmental costs Pollution is created across the life cycle of plastic, including during production, so improvements in recycling would not be enough to end environmental harms, according to Prof Almroth. Concerns have been raised over lobbying by fossil fuel and plastic producers at gatherings to finalise the treaty. Prof Almroth said there was disinformation and misrepresentation of scientific findings, making it harder for delegates to come to decisions. She acknowledged that a shift away from fossil fuels and their use to produce plastics would have an economic cost, but said 'the costs of inaction will be greater' and efforts to find alternatives would create new business models. While describing herself as 'realistically optimistic' about the outcome, Prof Almroth said the way that negotiations were proceeding by consensus could derail efforts to cut plastic production. 'There's a risk of watering down negotiations to the point where the treaty might lack effectiveness,' she said. 'Plastic pollution is urgent. Delaying further would allow the problem to grow.' Groups have formed during the negotiations, notably the 'high-ambition coalition', which includes more than 60 nations such as Norway, Rwanda, Peru and the UK that support a legally binding treaty with production limits. By contrast the 'like-minded group', which contains nations such as Saudi Arabia and China, is pressing for a treaty that focuses on dealing with plastic waste. Among the organisations pushing for a treaty that mandates production limits is Greenpeace Mena. Its lead plastics campaigner, Farah Al Hattab, said during a media briefing that plastic was 'strangling our soil, our water, our air'. While calling for 'ambitious objectives' on the reuse of plastics to be adopted, she suggested that a focus simply on ways to improve how plastic waste was dealt with risked the adoption of 'fake solutions'. 'This treaty should be legally binding,' she added. 'Other treaties that are not legally binding have problems with implementation.' In the Mena region, communities could look back to traditions to find ways of cutting out plastic, Ms Al Hattab said. 'We can stop using single-use plastic. Our ancestors used containers from glass and clay,' she said. 'If we promote clean-up initiatives, we can help reduce plastic pollution, but this takes time and money.' An estimated 20 million tones of plastic ends up as waste in the environment each year, according to reports. Studies have shown that this can be harmful to a wide range of wildlife including turtles and seabirds in the UAE. Pieces of plastic waste break down into microplastics, which have been found around the globe, including in polar regions far away from large human populations, and in human tissue. Microplastic impact on health A study published in Nature in July indicated that more than 16,000 chemicals have been used in plastics, at least 4,200 of which could be harmful to humans or the environment. The study reported that potentially harmful chemicals were present even in food packaging. One of the study's authors, Dr Zhanyun Wang, a scientist at Swiss research institute Empa, said when the study was released that to create 'a safe and sustainable circular economy for plastics' it was necessary to simplify their chemical composition. The British Plastics Federation, a UK trade association that represents organisations such as plastics producers and recyclers, said it favoured 'an ambitious treaty that covers the whole life cycle of plastics'. While stating that plastic 'has no place in the open environment', the organisation added that it should continue to be used 'where it provides the best environmental outcome and offers clear benefits'. 'Plastic has a strategically important role in vital infrastructure, such as the distribution of fresh food and water, in developing clean energy and in defence,' the federation said in a statement. While it said it would continue to 'provide every support required' to the British government team at the conference, the federation added that plastic helps to reduce carbon emissions by limiting the weight of transported items and by cutting food waste. 'The treaty needs to be impactful while not hampering the ability of the UK, and the world, to be innovative, achieve net zero and avoid the worst effects of climate change,' its statement added. The federation did not respond to an enquiry about whether it supported limits on plastic production.
The National
6 days ago
- The National
Why solving Iraq's gas problem is crucial for its economy and environment
It was a week of good, bad and ambiguous news for Iraq's natural gas industry. What stood out is the fact that solving its gas problem is the single most feasible and effective thing the government could do for its economy, environment and quality of life. But meddlesome forces stand in the way. On the good side, Iraq signed an agreement with US oil services giant SLB (formerly Schlumberger) to develop the Akkas field on the Syrian border, a large but geologically challenging resource. Iraqi prime minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani inaugurated two new gas processing plants in the Basra province, including one at the Faihaa field, in which Dubai-based Dragon Oil is a partner. And US-based HKN agreed to expand oil and gas output from the Hamrin field in the Salahaddin province. In May, HKN had been awarded a contract to develop the Miran gasfield, while compatriot Western Zagros signed terms for Topkhana. These are two of the largest undeveloped gas accumulations in the Kurdistan region and, indeed, the whole of Iraq. And Sharjah-based Crescent Petroleum is moving ahead with work on Chemchemal, another large gasfield in Kurdistan, while it completes work to expand its long-standing Khor Mor field. Agreement signalled that a logjam between the two main Kurdish political parties had been broken – the Kurdistan Democratic Party, which controls the capital Erbil, the oil sector and most of the government, and the smaller Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, which holds the gasfields themselves and territory through which pipelines have to run. On the bad side, drones launched by unidentified assailants struck several oilfields in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region. Fortunately, and probably by design, no one was killed or injured, and the damage to facilities seems to be limited. But most of the region's oil output has now been closed down as a precautionary measure. One of the two initial targets was the Sarsang field, operated by HKN. The company has been one of the most vocal in pressing its rights in Baghdad, and bringing US political pressure to bear. These bombings are the most widespread and clearly targeted assault on the Kurdish petroleum sector so far. Earlier attacks were sporadic, and mostly consisted of unguided rockets aimed at Khor Mor. One strike killed four workers at the field in April last year, the only deadly incident known of this campaign. Iran-aligned armed groups are well-understood to be the culprits, which used Iranian-model drones, though they denied responsibility. Their aims seem to be to attack American interests, deter alleged ties of the Kurdistan region with Israel, prevent competition to Iranian gas supplies to Iraq, and keep up pressure on Mr Al Sudani's government as it seeks a workable arrangement with Erbil and as federal elections in November loom. In the ambiguous category is Turkey's decision to exit the treaty governing the Iraq-Turkey oil pipeline when it expires next July. The pipeline has been shut anyway since March 2023 when an arbitral judgment went against Turkey. But the main sticking point since then has been the need for an accord between the Kurdistan region and the federal authorities in Baghdad over the rules for oil export, the responsibility for sales, the distribution of revenue, and the contractual position of the oil companies operating in Kurdistan. Ankara seems to favour replacement of the treaty with a more expansive agreement covering gas and electricity as well as oil. That could be good news for facilitating Kurdish gas exports finally, after a decade of discussion. But Turkey is playing a complicated game, including balancing tensions within Iraq, its interests in Syria, which include gas supply and electricity investments, and its gas trade with Russia, Iran and European neighbours. Iraq has struggled to provide adequate electricity to its people since the 1990-91 Gulf War and particularly following the botched US occupation after 2003. This creates discontent as people swelter through ever-hotter summers without adequate air-conditioning. It holds back the development of an economy beyond oil. In turn, a large part of the electricity problem stems from the failure to supply enough gas. Iraq is the world's third worst flarer of unused gas from oil production, behind only Russia and Iran. This causes local pollution and massive greenhouse gas releases. Yet it burns more than 300,000 barrels per day of extra oil for power generation in the summer, causing further pollution and wasting fuel that could be exported. Gas capture has increased in the past few years, but oil production has also grown, so the flaring problem has hardly diminished. Iraq's fast-rising population means the gas and electricity deficits do not narrow either. Supplies of Iranian gas and electricity, vital to help fill the gap, have become increasingly unreliable because of US sanctions and Iran's own worsening shortages. The US has devoted significant diplomatic effort to solving this mess, with mixed motives including the noble – promoting Iraqi stability, well-being and the environment – and the more self-interested, including its campaign against Iran, and boosting the prospects of American companies. The optimal development of gas in Kurdistan and the rest of Iraq is the key that would unlock several other doors. It could foster a more constructive relationship between Baghdad and Erbil. It would improve Iraq's economy and help it move on from over-reliance on oil exports, by providing reliable energy for industry. It is plausible that it would not even harm Iran. Tehran cannot meet its supply commitments to Iraq anyway, because of its own shortfall and because of US sanctions. Its exports to Turkey too are coming under increasing strain. If Iran overcame these problems, Iraq would be ready to continue buying its gas: domestic Iraqi, including Kurdish, supplies will not be enough for years to come, so great is the deficit and the pent-up demand. Turkey would gain from a greater pool of gas which it can combine with its own burgeoning supplies, to on-sell to Europe. Europe too would be aided in its attempts to eliminate its remaining fraction of Russian gas imports. Brussels' lack of realpolitik and its allergy to hydrocarbons unfortunately prevent it from playing the active role it should. Gulf, European, Turkish and American companies may be able to tread a path between Baghdad, Erbil and Ankara. But first, the shadowy figures behind the drone swarm need to be stopped.
The National
26-07-2025
- The National
Political solution without Palestinian statehood is 'cynical and illegal', says ICJ lawyer
With France saying it will recognise Palestine in September, making it the first G7 nation to do so, other countries such as the UK and Germany, which are holding out, have called for a political solution to the Palestine issue. That two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, however, cannot be reached without recognising Palestine as a state, Ardi Imseis, a professor of law at Queen's University in Canada, told The National. Mr Imseis is a former UN official and has represented states before the International Court of Justice, which last year found Israel to be under an obligation to end its unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory and make reparations for the damage caused. "Recognition is a political prerogative of states," he said. They can urge for a political resolution to the problem without recognising one or the other states, Mr Imseis said, although that "does not make sense". "This is because if you have a two-state solution, one would assume you would need to have two states be part of that solution," he said. Under international law, the Palestinian people have the right to self-determination in a state of their own. "This right is peremptory and inalienable," he said. The international community has an obligation to help Palestinians realise that right, he added. "However, if states make the emergence of a Palestinian state contingent on successful negotiations with Israel, then, in effect, that places Israel in a position of holding a veto power over the exercise by the Palestinian people of their right of self-determination," he said. "It's a cyclical, cynical and ultimately illegal policy." Mr Imseis said that Israel was a "bad faith illegal occupier" with no intention to allow the establishment of a Palestinian state. Following France's announcement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at French President Emmanuel Macron and said that a Palestinian state would create a "launch pad to annihilate Israel". France, the US and the UK are three of the five members of the UN Security Council with veto power, if and when the next vote comes to admit the state of Palestine to UN membership. The US used its veto the last time such a vote took place, on April 18, 2024. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is under increasing pressure from 220 Members of Parliament who wrote to him urging him to recognise a Palestinian state, said he does support the move. But, he said, it should be part of a "wider plan" which results in security for Palestinians and Israelis. At least 140 out of the world's 193 members of the UN General Assembly recognise Palestine as a state. In 2012, the General Assembly gave Palestine non-member observer state status. "That means, that within the UN system, the state of Palestine already exists," Mr Imseis said.
