India confirms Chinese missiles used by Pakistan in strikes
India has confirmed Pakistan used Chinese-made missiles during the recent cross-border military strikes.
Air Marshal AK Bharti, India's director general air operations, said Indian forces had intercepted and neutralised a range of hi-tech foreign weapons used by Pakistan, including the Chinese-origin PL-15 long-range air-to-air missile and Turkish Byker YIHA III Kamikaze drones.
'You can see the pieces of it on the screen,' AM Bharti said during a media briefing, pointing to the debris of a PL-15 missile recovered from a field in Hoshiarpur, Punjab, bordering Pakistan in northern India.
Pakistan claims it shot down five Indian fighter jets, including three French-made Rafales.
A French intelligence source told CNN that a Rafale jet had indeed been downed during exchanges of fire.
Delhi sidestepped a question on whether it had lost jets, saying instead that all its pilots were safe.
The PL-15, developed by China 's Aviation Industry Corporation, is designed to strike high-value airborne targets at ranges exceeding 200km.
In public, Beijing has so far struck a diplomatic tone on the crisis between two South Asian neighbours that were brought back from an all-out-war through back-channel talks.
But in private, a Chinese delegation travelled to the Pakistani foreign ministry in the middle of the night to celebrate the success of the missile strikes.
India's decision to name China in the recent crisis signals growing alarm in New Delhi over deepening military cooperation between the arch rivals.
The Pakistani and Chinese militaries are hosting joint exercises and sharing common weapon platforms.
The Chinese are also sharing their intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities with Pakistan.
Officers are embedded in the military commands of each other's nations, such as Pakistani officers placed in China's Central Military Commission and Western Theatre Command at Chengdu, which oversees the operational frontier with India.
The PL-15 missile, which has never before been used in combat, is powered by a dual-pulse motor that propels it to hypersonic speeds exceeding Mach 5.
'Because they are very, very fast, they basically have what you call a 'no-escape zone',' said Fabian Hoffmann, a missile technology researcher and fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis.
The confirmation comes just days after Pakistan's army published a YouTube video showcasing its military arsenal, including a Chinese-made JF-17 Block 3 fighter jet, less advanced than the J-10C, equipped with PL-15 missiles. The combination offers 'potent punch', a caption reads.
Analysts believe one of these missiles may have been used to shoot down a Rafale fighter deep inside Indian territory in a long-range 'stand-off' engagement in which neither side crossed the border.
The wreckage of a Rafale was reportedly found near Bathinda in Punjab in northern India.
The apparent involvement of Chinese aircraft in shooting down a Rafale has ricocheted through defence circles – and sent stock in its maker, Chengdu Aircraft Corporation, surging by as much as 20 per cent.
Until now, Chinese weaponry had not been field-tested against Western-made systems like the Rafale.
The Indian Air Force operates a fleet of 36 Rafale F3Rs, the most advanced model of the aircraft.
Hu Jixin, the former editor of the Chinese state-owned Global Times, said the battle showed 'China's level of military manufacturing has completely surpassed that of Russia and France', adding that Taiwan should feel 'even more scared'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Are we safe, if nuclear weapons are here?': trepidation in Norfolk village over new jets
The genteel west Norfolk village of Marham does not seem to be at the forefront of Britain's military might. A dance class is about to start in the village hall, a game of crown green bowls is under way and swallows are swooping around the medieval church tower as wood pigeons coo. 'It's a lovely, quiet little village,' says Nona Bourne as she watches another end of bowls in a match between Marham and nearby Massingham. Like many, Bourne is troubled by the news that this week thrust Marham to the frontline of UK's nuclear arsenal, in the biggest expansion of the programme for a generation. Without consultation, RAF Marham is to be equipped with new F-35A jets capable of carrying warheads with three times the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Bourne said: 'When they spread it all over the news that these planes are going to come here from America with these bombs, it makes you think we're going to be targeted. My bungalow is five minutes from the base.' The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament is planning a protest in Marham on Saturday. Bourne, whose son-in-law used to work at the base, is tempted to take part. 'I might join in,' she says. 'My daughter says we've always been a target here, but I am concerned. If I was younger I'd think about moving, but I'm 83, I'm not going anywhere.' Sisters Becky, 29, and Katherine Blakie, 31, are heading to a friend's house for a plunge in their hot tub. 'I read about the weapons on Facebook,' says Becky. 'It's strange to think they'll be here in little old Marham.' Becky, who works in fundraising, is annoyed that the village was not consulted about the decision. She says: 'Marham and the RAF base are intertwined so we should definitely have had a say.' Katherine, a medical student, says: 'It makes you think, 'Are we safe, if people know nuclear weapons are here?'' At this stage it is unclear where the nuclear warheads will be housed, but new jets to be based at Marham have the capacity to drop them. Wherever they are stored, the fear Marham will be a target is widespread in the village. 'Look what happened at Pearl Harbor,' says Patricia Gordon after finishing her bowls match. 'We'd be obliterated here.' She adds: 'And with Donald Trump's finger on the button, does it matter that we've got nuclear weapons or not?' But her partner, Bruce Townsend, 77, a retired lorry driver, thinks the nuclear deterrent works. He says: 'You can't give up nuclear weapons. Iran, and those countries, know damn well that if they start anything, they'll just get wiped out.' He adds: 'I feel the same about the protest as I did about people who tried to ban the bomb. It's stupid. They can't change it.' It is the men in Marham who seem more relaxed about the prospect of nuclear-armed planes on their doorstep. Chris Joice, a carer who used to work at the base, says: 'We've had F-35s for so many years, and having the next model isn't going to make much difference.' Joice is out walking a friend's dog, Millie, who has an RAF roundel pendant strapped to her collar. He is concerned about the lack of consultation: 'I'm just annoyed that all these decisions go ahead and the common man doesn't have a single word in.' He adds: 'No one needs that kind of firepower. I'd rather people rolled dice to settle their beefs.' Others are more full-throated in their support. Jim Smith, 79, a retired construction worker, remembers nuclear weapons at the base in the 1950s. 'They had them up there in 1958 or 59 when they had the V bombers. It stopped a world war then. And it's no different now.' A man on a bike who would only give his name as John recently retired as a grounds maintenance worker at the base. He says: 'They're never going to attack us. It would be Armageddon if it comes to that. So it doesn't make a shite's worth of difference worrying about it.' He adds: 'I don't mind protest, I'm a biker so I'm all about freedom, but I've got better things to do. People protesting here don't live in the real world, they should worry instead about people sleeping on the streets in King's Lynn.' Colin Callaby, 64, is out picking cherries from a tree in the middle of the village. The cherries, which he plans to turn into wine, are the sweetest he has ever known. 'We're right in the firing line,' he says, 'but if there's going to be a nuclear bomb we're all done for so I'd rather be right underneath it and die instantly than be 50 miles away and take weeks to die from radiation.' He adds: 'It's very sad that mankind has got to spend billions of pounds on mass destruction and we can't do something better with that money. But what can you do?'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ukraine destroys Russian helicopters in latest airfield drone strikes
Ukraine destroyed three Russian attack helicopters in its latest blow to Moscow's air power, Kyiv has claimed. Saturday's pre-dawn strike on the Kirovske base, in occupied Crimea, targeted Russian aircraft, air defence systems and storage facilities for ammunition and drones, according to Ukraine's Security Service. 'Available data indicate the destruction of multi-purpose and attack helicopters Mi-8, Mi-26 and Mi-28, as well as the self-propelled anti-aircraft missile and gun complex Pantsir-S1,' an official told the Associated Press. The Kyiv Independent reported that secondary explosions were heard at the airfield during the night. Russia's defence ministry said more than 40 Ukrainian drones were shot down over western Russia and occupied Crimea overnight and into Saturday morning. Earlier this month, nearly a third of Moscow's strategic bomber fleet was destroyed or damaged in a covert Ukrainian operation using cheaply-made drones that had been smuggled into Russian territory. On Friday Ukrainian drones also struck four Su-34 fighter jets at the Marinovka airfield in Russia's Volgograd Oblast. Preliminary reports indicated that two of the jets were destroyed. Despite recent strikes, Ukraine continues to struggle against Russian advances on the battlefield and mounting aerial attacks, as diplomatic efforts to end the war have faltered. Overnight, Russian drones hit a residential tower in the southern port city of Odesa, killing a married couple and injuring at least 17 others, including three children, Ukrainian officials said. There was no immediate comment from Moscow. Smaller, short-range drones are used by both sides on the battlefield and in areas close to the roughly 1,000km (620-mile) front line. Short-range drone attacks have killed at least 395 civilians and injured 2,635 since the war began in February 2022, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine reported Thursday. It said nearly 90 percent of those strikes were carried out by Russian forces. More than 13,300 civilians have been killed and over 34,700 have been injured in the war, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a report on June 11. Also on Saturday, Andrzej Duda, Poland's outgoing president, visited Ukraine and urged Kyiv to be patient during the transition to Karol Nawrocki, his nationalist successor. Mr Nawrocki won this month's presidential election after a campaign in which he criticised Ukraine and accused Volodymyr Zelensky of 'indecent' behaviour towards allies. He has pledged continued support for Ukraine's defence against Russia, but has signalled a possible shift in Warsaw's stance by opposing Kyiv's entry into Western alliances such as Nato. 'Please be patient,' Mr Duda told reporters at a press conference with Mr Zelensky. 'The world looks different from behind the presidential desk, slightly different from what it looks like to a candidate in elections.' Mr Zelensky said he would 'of course' invite Mr Nawrocki to Ukraine after he assumed office.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
At least 32 people killed after heavy rain causes flash flooding in northern Pakistan
At least 32 people have been killed in Pakistan in recent flash flooding caused by heavy rains, including a family of tourists who died after being swept away by flood waters while apparently awaiting rescue. Videos of the family stranded on a small piece of land as the raging Swat river in northern Pakistan swept them away were shared widely on social media, prompting anger towards the provincial government as eyewitnesses said the family waited helplessly for more than an hour. Flash floods and heavy rains have killed 32 people, including 16 children, in Pakistan in the past 36 hours; 13 were from Punjab province and 19 from the north-west Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where the tourist family died. Sheikh Waqas Akram, the central information secretary of the former prime minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, which is in power in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, said they had suspended four senior officials from the Swat administration and emergency rescue department. Akram said the chief minister, Ali Amin Gandapur, ordered an inquiry and asked that the report be submitted in a week, in documents seen by the Guardian. 'The province conveyed a meeting on flash floods on 21 June,' Akram told the Guardian. 'Soon after the meeting we issued warnings and announced it through speakers in mosques as well. It was done to spread awareness and ask tourists to be away from the riverbank and never step on the riverbed. At least 71 people were booked in cases in violation of the warnings.' He added: 'It was a tragic and unfortunate incident and the tourists were in the riverbed.' When the flash flood occurred, the family from Punjab province were having a picnic breakfast by the Swat river in the Swat district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The family had gone into the river to rescue the children, who had been taking photos, government officials said. According to Akram, at least 17 people were swept away in the flash floods in Swat river – nine bodies of the family have been recovered and one is missing. Four other people were rescued while three are still missing. He said the rescue efforts are continuing. The Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA) later issued an alert saying there were high flood levels and warning people to take precautions. Pakistan, with a population of more than 240 million, is one of the world's most vulnerable countries to the effects of the climate crisis. Climate induced flash floods in 2022, killed at least 1,700 people and affected more than 33 million people. The incident prompted discussion in Pakistan on the climate crisis, provincial governments' role in preventing such incidents, tourists avoiding warnings and allegations of incompetence and corruption in local government. The former climate change minister Sherry Rehman said the tourists in Pakistan no longer respond to colonial-era instructions such as section 144 – which allows district administrations to place bans on activities – and they seem not to heed extreme weather warnings. Rehman criticised poor government signalling on the climate crisis and a lack of coordinated efforts, saying: 'Public resources also fell egregiously short in this tragedy. The PDMA should have mobilised a helicopter to get to the marooned family in time. It's outrageous negligence on their part not to have.' Many social media users criticised the government for failing to rescue the stranded family as eyewitness accounts said the family was stranded for more than one hour without any help. The PDMAs were created after the deadly 2005 earthquake in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and are responsible for responding in a timely way to natural calamities, floods and disasters. The disaster authorities in different Pakistani provinces have been accused of corruption.
