UK upper house concludes further examination of Employment Rights Bill
The bill aims at updating and enhancing existing employment rights, making provision regarding pay and conditions in particular sectors, as well as undertaking reforms related to trade union matters and industrial action.
The UK House of Lords has concluded its further examination of the Employment Rights Bill, which aims at updating and enhancing existing employment rights, making provision regarding pay and conditions in particular sectors, and making reforms on trade union matters and industrial action. Proposals around guaranteed hours could threaten the availability of local flexible part-time jobs, BRC observed.
Major topics of the bill include zero hours contracts, fire and rehire, flexible working, unfair dismissal, an official release said.
There were five divisions (votes) on proposed changes to the bill. Members agreed to two amendments on issues regarding giving new union members the choice whether or not to contribtue to a trade union's political fund and reinstating the 50-per cent voting threshold for trade union industrial action, and the democratic risk for lowering that percentage.
A third vote, on removing a clause regarding trade union supervision of picket lines, was a tied result, and so under the procedures of the House, the change was not made.
Two further amendments, on the inclusion of political expenditure in trade union annual returns and government powers to bring proceedings to employment tribunal on a worker's behalf, were voted on but disagreed to by members.
The Third reading, a chance for members to make sure the eventual law is effective, workable and without loopholes, is scheduled for September 3.
'The House of Lords has listened to our concerns, putting forward positive, practical and pragmatic amendments to the Employment Rights Bill which would help to protect the availability of valuable, local, part-time and entry level jobs up and down the country,' Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium (BRC), said.
'To ignore these suggested changes when the bill returns to the [House of] Commons would undermine the government's own plans to get Britain working again as fewer flexible, part-time jobs will be available,' she said.
'Even with these amendments accepted, retailers remain worried about the consequences for jobs from other areas of the bill. The industry has lost 350,000 jobs over the past ten years, and current proposals around guaranteed hours in particular could threaten the availability of local flexible part-time jobs, which support so many people from so many backgrounds into work,' she added, calling for a much more strategic dialogue between employers, unions and the government, to collectively find solutions that will work for everyone.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Delhi Assembly session to begin from August 4, education bill on agenda
The Delhi Assembly session will be held from August 4 to August 8, with the government set to introduce an education bill for discussion, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said on Saturday. Addressing reporters, Gupta also announced that the Assembly would adopt the e-Vidhan Sabha model for the first time, marking a shift to paperless proceedings. "This time the assembly session will start from 4 August and will continue till 8 August. An education bill will be brought in this session, which will be tabled for discussion. For the first time in history, the Delhi Assembly will now be an e-Vidhan Sabha. It will be paperless..." she said. She further said the Centre had extended financial support for the transition to digital functioning. "A 500 kW solar power plant has been installed in the Delhi Assembly. Delhi Assembly is entirely run on solar energy... We have also digitised the Delhi Secretariat. Today, all our files are going as e-files, and signatures are also becoming digital... " Gupta added. The last sitting of the House on August 1 was adjourned amid slogan-shouting by the opposition over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list in poll-bound Bihar. Meanwhile, Union Minister Manohar Lal Khattar in a scathing attack on the opposition over the ongoing sessions stated that they did not allow discussion on public issues in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and their sole intention was only to create noise to obstruct the proceedings in the House. Speaking to the media, Khattar said, "The Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are platforms where the opposition and the ruling side sit together to discuss public issues, but they (the opposition) do not allow discussions; instead, they create noise to obstruct the proceedings of the House, which is their sole intention. Perhaps they think this has a significant impact on the public, but it has the opposite effect on the public because they do not let the House function." "They (the opposition) have no issues to raise, so they disrupt the proceedings... Therefore, they should act with wisdom," he added.
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Newsom may call special California election to decide on new Congressional maps - here's what redistricting means
Gavin Newsom pushes for special California election to redraw congressional maps as Trump's GOP reshapes Texas districts- In a bold and controversial move, California Governor Gavin Newsom is preparing to call a special statewide election in November 2025 to allow voters to approve new congressional maps. This high-stakes maneuver is aimed at countering the Republican redistricting strategy led by President Donald Trump in Texas, which could shift the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. Newsom's proposal is drawing national attention, stirring political debates, and raising legal questions about the future of fair redistricting in America. Newsom wants voters to decide on new congressional maps this November Gavin Newsom is considering a November 2025 special election to put the power of redrawing California's congressional districts directly into the hands of voters. If approved, this would temporarily bypass the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, a voter-approved body responsible for creating fair and nonpartisan political maps since 2010. Instead, new maps would be crafted by the Democratic-majority California Legislature, then submitted to voters for approval. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category healthcare Others Management Design Thinking Technology Data Science Digital Marketing Product Management Public Policy Project Management Operations Management Healthcare Data Analytics Data Science Finance Cybersecurity CXO Artificial Intelligence MCA others Leadership Degree PGDM MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India Starts on undefined Get Details The maps would apply to the 2026, 2028, and 2030 U.S. House elections. After 2030, the current redistricting commission system would be restored, according to Newsom's plan. The governor emphasized that this is a temporary strategic response, not a permanent change to the system. Trump-backed Texas redistricting plan prompts California's counter move This proposal comes in direct response to President Trump's Republican allies in Texas, who are currently pushing for mid-decade redistricting to add up to five new GOP-leaning congressional districts. Texas had already redrawn its districts after the 2020 Census, but now Republicans are aggressively pursuing a second redistricting effort before the 2026 elections to strengthen their hold in the House. Newsom described California's plan as a "counterattack" against what he sees as a deeply unfair and partisan move by Texas Republicans. In a statement to reporters, he said, 'We can't let them play by a different set of rules while we tie our own hands. Democracy can't be one-sided.' Live Events Democrats argue they must fight fire with fire to protect the House With control of the U.S. House at stake in 2026, Democratic leaders are warning that if red states like Texas manipulate congressional maps to favor the GOP, blue states must respond in kind to protect representative balance. Newsom and other Democratic governors have been under pressure to retaliate strategically and prevent a Republican supermajority engineered through redistricting alone. The governor's plan would allow California to potentially gain Democratic-friendly districts to offset GOP gains in Texas. If successful, it could have a major impact on the outcome of the 2026 midterms and help Democrats maintain—or even retake—control of Congress. A special election in California could cost over $200 million The idea of a statewide special election in an off-year like 2025 is not without precedent. California held a high-profile gubernatorial recall election in 2021, which cost taxpayers around $208 million. Newsom acknowledged the high price tag but insisted that protecting democracy is worth the investment. 'This isn't just about California,' Newsom said. 'This is about ensuring every voter in this country is represented fairly and not silenced by gerrymandering power plays in other states.' State officials estimate that a November 2025 special election could cost upwards of $200 million, especially if held alongside already scheduled local elections in various counties. Critics slam the plan as a dangerous attack on nonpartisan redistricting Despite support from national Democrats, Newsom's proposal is facing strong criticism from voting rights advocates and good government groups who argue that tampering with the independent redistricting process, even temporarily, sets a dangerous precedent. The California Citizens Redistricting Commission, created through two voter-approved ballot measures in 2008 and 2010, was hailed as a model for nonpartisan mapmaking. Critics warn that overriding it—no matter the reason—undermines public trust in fair elections and could erode California's reputation for political integrity. 'This is a slippery slope,' said Kathay Feng, a prominent voting rights attorney. 'If we gut the commission every time it's politically convenient, what's to stop future governors from doing the same?' Legal experts warn of constitutional and court challenges ahead To implement this plan, Newsom may need a constitutional amendment or legislative referral, which would require voter approval. Legal experts warn that any attempt to bypass the redistricting commission will face swift legal challenges, potentially delaying or even blocking the new maps from being used in 2026. Election law scholars say California's state constitution provides strong protections for the redistricting commission. Altering that structure, even temporarily, may spark lengthy court battles that could leave congressional races in limbo. Still, Newsom seems ready for the fight. 'Texas isn't following the rules,' he said. 'If we don't stand up now, they will redraw democracy on their terms.' Newsom's 2028 ambitions may hinge on the success of this plan This high-stakes redistricting gamble could have serious consequences for Gavin Newsom's political future. The California governor is widely seen as a potential Democratic presidential contender in 2028, especially if President Trump seeks a second term. If Newsom succeeds in mobilizing voters, winning legal battles, and helping Democrats secure additional House seats, it could position him as a national Democratic hero. But if the plan backfires—either legally, politically, or financially—it may damage his credibility and embolden critics who see the move as partisan overreach. 'This is risky,' said a longtime Democratic strategist. 'But boldness is sometimes what defines leadership. Newsom is betting big on the idea that voters will see this as defending democracy, not undermining it.' Timeline: What happens next in California The California State Legislature is expected to reconvene on August 18, 2025 . Lawmakers will debate the proposal and decide whether to place the redistricting measure on the November ballot. If the plan advances, here's what to expect: Late August 2025 : Final legislative approval of the ballot proposition September 2025 : Draft maps released by the Legislature and public campaign begins November 4, 2025 : Statewide special election held alongside local contests 2026 : If approved, new maps go into effect for congressional elections Meanwhile, advocacy groups on both sides are already preparing media campaigns, legal briefs, and voter outreach as the battle over the future of congressional redistricting heats up in the Golden State. A defining moment for redistricting fairness and national politics Gavin Newsom's move to redraw California's House districts in response to Trump's Republican redistricting playbook in Texas is more than a state political drama—it's a national test of how Democrats plan to respond to partisan gerrymandering. With the balance of power in Congress hanging by a thread, both parties are now openly embracing political map warfare. The big question is whether voters in California, a state long known for championing electoral fairness, are ready to join the fight—and whether doing so will help or hurt the cause of democracy in the long run. As the November 2025 special election approaches, all eyes will be on California—not just as the largest blue state, but as the new front line in America's redistricting battle. FAQs: Q1: Why is Gavin Newsom planning a special election in California in 2025? To let voters decide if lawmakers should redraw congressional maps in response to GOP redistricting. Q2: What happens if California overrides its redistricting commission in 2025? It could allow Democrats to create new districts for 2026–2030 to counter GOP gains.
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
AAP Rajya Sabha MP Ashok Kumar Mittal brings resolution to designate Pak ‘state sponsor of terrorism'
Chandigarh: AAP Rajya Sabha MP Ashok Kumar Mittal on Saturday tabled a resolution in the House to designate Pakistan as a 'state sponsor of terrorism'. The resolution was introduced as part of a parliamentary intervention during the ongoing monsoon session. In a press statement, Mittal said he recounted Pakistan's decades-long policy of using terrorism as a tool of foreign policy. Citing documented instances from the 1947 invasion of Jammu & Kashmir to the recent Pahalgam terror attack, the resolution called for sweeping measures, including diplomatic isolation, economic sanctions, and a review of bilateral agreements like the Indus Water Treaty. The resolution further underscored Pakistan's direct role in key terror incidents that shook India, such as the 2001 Parliament attack, 26/11 Mumbai attacks, 2016 Uri attack, and the 2019 Pulwama bombing, while also pointing to its global footprint in events like the 9/11 attacks and the 2015 Paris carnage. The resolution urged the govt of India to introduce legislation designating Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism and enforce a complete freeze on economic and trade relations. This also includes Pakistan's re-inclusion in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list and further lobbying for their inclusion in the black list. MSID:: 123063295 413 | Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
