
Here's how states can cushion the blow of Trump's ‘big, beautiful' bill
For those of us who have worked with government for years, we know at the core of civic tech is a simple idea: When government builds programs with real humans in mind, we get systems that are more trusted, more effective and, ultimately, more efficient.
But this bill is a step in the wrong direction — instead of streamlining government services, it strips them away.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, an estimated 10 million people will stop receiving Medicaid and approximately 2 million people will be prevented from receiving food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP. Low-income families will be disproportionately impacted even if they did everything right — worked hard, played by the rules, and struggled to make ends meet.
The question now is how states can implement these new policies in a way that does the least amount of harm for people who rely on critical government services.
The civic technology community has been working for more than decade to make government work better through the use of digital technology, from simplified applications to making flexible cash available to families. As CEO of Code for America, I have seen first-hand the importance of implementation — not just policy — in shaping the lives of everyday people.
In our work with red states and blue states alike, we've learned — and demonstrated — that it is possible to design government services that work better, cost less and deliver improved outcomes for people — something everyone can stand behind.
In the coming months, states will have to grapple with new paperwork requirements, increased caseloads and less federal funding support. Even in this moment of policy uncertainty, states have the power to choose implementation approaches that uphold human dignity while achieving genuine efficiency. This is the better way forward. One that sees the people behind the paperwork and designs for them, with empathy rather than as obstacles to overcome.
First, to improve cost savings, states should proactively review and, when possible, renew people eligible for Medicaid. Like any program with eligibility criteria, there is a renewal process for people to continue to receive Medicaid. However, this process is often burdensome and complex, causing people to be cut off from benefits and having to re-apply. Re-enrollment is more time consuming and expensive than a regular renewal, leaving state administrators, caseworkers and clients with more work.
Instead, states like Minnesota and Colorado have found success with 'ex parte' renewals, a process by which a state automatically renews benefits using existing, available data. In Minnesota, 'ex parte' renewals reduced the time it took for caseworkers to process a renewal from 70 minutes to 11 minutes per case. And in Colorado, this process has saved caseworkers more than 200 hours every month — an estimated $66 million in cost savings for the state.
Second, states should design applications that are simple, use plain language and are mobile-friendly. When the federal government expanded the Child Tax Credit during the pandemic, the IRS worked quickly to automate its delivery by leveraging existing data instead of manually processing applications for 60 million children. For families who didn't qualify for automatic benefit delivery, a free, simplified tax filing tool called GetCTC helped nearly 200,000 families claim a collective $685 million. The tool created an accessible front door by asking simple questions to collect only the data required by the IRS. The whole process could be completed on a mobile device in less than 15 minutes.
States shouldn't overlook accessible, scalable solutions that are cost-effective and efficient. Technology solutions don't have to be expensive or flashy to work. Something as simple as text message reminders can have a profound impact by reducing administrative burdens and saving caseworkers valuable time.
For example, Louisiana developed LA'MESSAGE, a text message reminder service across four benefit programs: Medicaid, SNAP, Women, Infants and Children and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The state used text messaging to send reminders and guidance to benefit recipients at key points throughout the enrollment and renewal process. This led to a 37 percent increase in renewals for SNAP and 67 percent increase in renewals for Medicaid.
In Boulder County, Colo., state agencies used text messaging reminders to reduce missed interviews — one of the most common reasons for benefit denials — by 10 percent. This meant caseworkers made fewer calls with no answer and received fewer calls to reschedule missed interviews.
The work isn't always easy, but it's worth doing. Every simplified application, every automated renewal, every text reminder that helps someone keep their healthcare is a victory. At a time when trusting institutions feels fragile, these acts of service matter more than ever. Because when we build government services that actually serve people, we don't just create programs — we restore faith in the possibility that our institutions can be a force for good in people's lives.
This is the way we transform not just government, but democracy itself. And we will continue to work toward nothing less.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Centene (CNC) Falls on Investor Caution Over Q2 Earnings
We recently published . Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) is one of the worst-performing companies on Thursday. Centene Corporation saw its share prices touch a new all-time low on Thursday as investors turned even more cautious following one of its counterparts' disappointing earnings performance tied to its Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) services. At intra-day trading, Centene Corporation (CNC) dropped to its lowest 52-week price of $28.92 before slight buying persisted toward the end to push its share prices to $29.14. Investors appeared to have unloaded positions ahead of the company's second-quarter earnings results, after its counterpart, Elevance Health, reported a 24.2-percent drop in net income during the second quarter of the year. Additionally, Elevance Health updated its outlook to reflect elevated medical cost trends under the ACA and slower rate alignment in Medicaid. A doctor holding a clipboard in a hospital ward, discussing patient treatment plan with the nurses. Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) likewise offers Medicaid and ACA services. Earlier this month, the company withdrew its 2025 earnings forecast due to an expected slump in its revenues from commercial plans under the ACA or Obamacare. While we acknowledge the potential of CNC as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Most Favorable Pollster Has Approval Rating Negative for First Time
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has fallen into negative territory even in polling conducted by one of his most consistently favorable firms. A new survey from Big Data Poll, long seen as a bellwether for pro-Trump sentiment, shows the president with a slightly underwater approval rating for the first time, signaling potential erosion of support within his core base. Why It Matters The polling comes after Trump had seen an uptick in approval ratings in several polls following an earlier plunge to an all-time low for his second term after protests in Los Angeles and airstrikes in Iran. But new polls indicate Trump's approval rating is slipping. If the trend continues, Democrats could regain ground they lost last cycle, reshaping the 2026 midterms and the broader balance of power heading into 2028. President Donald Trump walks through the White House to the East Room on July 16, 2025. President Donald Trump walks through the White House to the East Room on July 16, 2025. Evan Vucci/AP What To Know The latest survey, conducted July 12 to 14, shows 48 percent of voters approve of Trump's performance, while 49 percent disapprove—a net rating of -1. It marks the first time Trump has registered underwater in the firm's polling since he reentered office. The downward trend marks a sharp contrast to earlier in the year. In May, Big Data Poll had Trump narrowly above water at +1 (48 percent approve, 47 percent disapprove). That figure was already a notable drop from January, shortly after Trump returned to office, when the pollster recorded one of his strongest ratings: 56 percent approval and 37 percent disapproval, a net positive of +19. Much of the decline appears to be driven by a decrease in support among independents. Just 37 percent of independents now approve of Trump's job performance, while 56.6 percent disapprove. Demographic shifts offer a more complex picture. Trump's approval among voters ages 30–49 remains relatively strong, and he has seen a bump in support from Americans with at least a four-year college degree, a group that has historically been skeptical of him. However, this progress is offset by a steep decline among younger voters aged 18–29, who have become increasingly disillusioned in recent months. Approval ratings among older voters have remained relatively stable: those aged 65–74 have largely remained unchanged since May, while voters aged 75 and older have shown a marginal improvement. Nonetheless, the deterioration suggests that frustrations with the administration's policy focus and messaging, especially after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, foreign policy decisions like the bombing of Iran, and the fallout over the Epstein files, are cutting into Trump's appeal beyond his core base. Meanwhile, broader public sentiment about the country's direction has also become more pessimistic. The gap between those who say the U.S. is on the right track and those who believe it's headed in the wrong direction widened slightly in July, returning to double digits after months of improvement. Just 39.4 percent now say the country is headed in the right direction, while 50.8 percent say it's on the wrong track and 9.8 percent remain undecided. The reversal is notable because this traditionally bleak indicator had been trending more positively under Trump's second term—until now. "Voters, specifically part of the president's partisan base and independents, believe the administration is focusing too much on issues that matter little to them, and dismissing issues that do," Big Data Poll Director Rich Baris said in a statement. "Fair or not, that's how they feel and those feelings will need to be appreciated and their concerns addressed if he hopes to recover." "The White House clearly lost the messaging war over the One Big Beautiful Bill and that's in no small part due to those achievements being overshadowed." It comes as polls have shown Trump's approval rating in decline, hitting an all-time low. That includes Newsweek's tracker, which shows Trump's net approval rating at an all-time low of -11 points, with 43 percent approving and 54 percent disapproving. Individual polls also showed Trump's ratings dropping. The most dramatic drop came from YouGov's poll, which saw Trump's approval rating fall from -5 in early July to -17 in the latest survey conducted from July 9 to 13 (39 percent approval, 56 percent disapproval). The Economist/YouGov poll, conducted over a similar period, also showed deterioration. Trump's net rating slipped to -14 (41–55), down from -11 earlier this month. Even Echelon Insights, which has at times offered more favorable numbers for the president, showed his position weakening, with approval falling from -4 to -8 (45–53). Ipsos/Reuters, meanwhile, showed Trump holding steady at -13 (41–54), unchanged from early June. Quinnipiac's poll remained relatively unchanged but still underwater, holding at -14 (40–54). CNN/SSRS, which has consistently been among Trump's worst-performing pollsters, reported a net -16 in its previous wave; the latest results, at -18 (42–58), suggest little movement. Similarly, the new poll from Quantus Insights showed no gain from the previous wave, holding steady at -2 (48–50), suggesting a ceiling may be forming even among Trump-leaning pollsters. One of the few bright spots came from Morning Consult, where Trump improved slightly from a -6 net rating to -3 (47–50). AP-NORC also showed marginal movement in Trump's favor, rising from -21 to -18 (40–58), though the president remains deeply unpopular in that survey.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
ObamaCare insurance costs expected to spike next year: Analysis
People who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could see a major spike in their premiums next year, at the same time enhanced subsidies that most people rely on are set to expire. According to an analysis of preliminary filings by KFF released Friday, insurers are planning an average premium increase of 15 percent in 2026, the largest hike since 2018. The analysis is based on filings from more than 100 insurers in 19 states and Washington, D.C. That's a sharp rise from recent years. For the 2025 plan year, for example, KFF found that the median proposed increase was 7 percent. Most ACA insurers are proposing premium increases of 10 to 20 percent for 2026. But more than a quarter are proposing premium increases of 20 percent or more, KFF found. No insurers have requested rate decreases for 2026, whereas in recent years at least some insurers did decrease premiums. Insurers said they wanted higher premiums to cover rising health care costs, like hospitalizations and physician care, as well as prescription drug costs. But they are also adding in higher increases due to changes being made by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress. For instance, KFF found many insurers cited the likely expiration of enhanced premium tax credits as a reason for increased premiums. Those subsidies, put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs that Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. If Congress takes no action, premiums for subsidized enrollees are projected to increase by over 75 percent starting in January 2026, according to KFF. Companies said they will raise premiums by an additional 4 percent more than they would have if the enhanced tax credits were renewed. More than 24 million Americans are enrolled in the insurance marketplace this year, and about 90 percent — more than 22 million people — are receiving enhanced subsidies. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 4.2 million people are projected to lose insurance by 2034 if the subsidies aren't renewed. According to federal data, the average monthly premium was $113 last year due to the subsidies, compared with $162 in 2020. When premiums become less affordable, the first people to drop out of the market are those that are healthier. With fewer people enrolled, experts have said insurers would have to spread the costs among a smaller group of sicker people, meaning premiums will be higher.