Grieving dad says NHS not learning from mistakes
A dad whose son died following a series of hospital errors has warned the NHS is still failing to learn from its mistakes after a hike in serious patient safety incidents.
Fraser Morton's baby son, Lucas, was one of six "unnecessary" baby deaths at Crosshouse Hospital in Kilmarnock nearly a decade ago.
The scandal sparked a shake-up of how safety incidents are reviewed but concerns have been raised about the quality and effectiveness of these investigations.
More than 800 safety incidents were reported in the NHS last year - a 41% increase from 2020 - and health watchdogs are now revamping the reporting system to improve scrutiny.
The rise in reported Significant Adverse Event Reviews (SAERs), which include avoidable deaths, comes as the NHS has faced unprecedented pressure since the Covid pandemic.
Mr Morton said he'd seen little of the promised changes, such as the appointment of an independent patient safety commissioner, since the death of his son in 2015.
He said: "In 2016, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said Scotland's healthcare system was marking their own homework when it came to reviews and investigations and we've not made any progress since then.
"Deny, deflect, delay - that's the go-to tactic."
Mr Morton's son Lucas died after a series of failings, including not properly monitoring his heartbeat during childbirth, but the death was not investigated as an SAER.
Only after pressure from the family and a BBC investigation was a fuller review launched with NHS Ayrshire and Arran then admitting Lucas's death was "unnecessary" and issuing the family an "unreserved apology".
Mr Morton added: "It is the lack of independent scrutiny that concerns me.
"Mistakes will always happen, but the NHS is the only high- risk, high-consequence organisation or sector that doesn't have an external regulator, a truly independent regulator you [can] compare to say the rail, airline or nuclear industry."
NHS Ayrshire & Arran declined to comment.
Figures released under freedom of information laws to BBC Scotland show that in 2020/21, a total of 567 SAERs for the most serious of incidents - events which may have contributed to or resulted in permanent harm - were carried out by Scotland's health boards.
By 2022/23 this had risen to 772 and last year the total was 803.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde accounted for 783 of the 2,759 reviews commissioned in this period, followed by NHS Lothian (341) and then NHS Lanarkshire (310).
Alison Fisher has spent years trying to get answer on why the birth of her daughter Fiadh at Glasgow's Princess Royal Hospital did not go to plan.
Details about what went wrong, which include wires missing from a foetal heart monitor, have slowly emerged as she has pushed for more answers.
"I found it so traumatic. It's my first child, it's supposed to be a really special moment, and I just want to understand what happened," she said.
A complaint to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde after the birth of Fiadh in 2021 resulted in an apology and the board said it had taken action to improve care at the hospital.
But Alison, of Kirkintilloch in East Dunbartonshire, then took her case to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO), which is the final stage for complaints about public organisations.
The SPSO took two years to investigate but in 2023 upheld Alison's complaint that the board had failed to provide reasonable care and treatment during her labour.
It also ruled she and Fiadh had not been put at risk.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde had not classed the incident as an adverse event and the SPSO concluded it should have been.
The board initially told the SPSO that a Datix report, the NHS system for recording incidents, had been created for the case but later admitted this was incorrect, and the ombudsman said it should have been produced at the time.
Alison added: "You kind of sit with that and you think, okay, maybe I'm being hard on them. Maybe I'm bashing them, maybe I'm being paranoid, but after two and a half years, you learn you're not being paranoid. You need to trust your instincts."
After her SPSO compliant was upheld, Alison asked NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to carry out a SAER but the board refused saying the case did not meet the criteria and had already been investigated.
Dr Claire Harrow, Deputy Medical Director for Acute Services for the health board, said: "We have apologised to this patient for her experience. We know that some aspects of her care did not meet the standards patients should expect, and we are sorry for that.
"We fully accepted the recommendations made in this 2023 SPSO report, and these have been met in full."
Among the long-standing issues with the SAER system is how health boards categorise incidents and a lack of clarity of what learning from the reports is being shared.
BBC Scotland has spoken to a number of families who have been involved in a SAER who say they felt that they were not being told the full story and the health board was trying to minimise the seriousness of the incident.
An independent review into serious failings with mental health services in Tayside found that the SAER was "perceived by families as a tick-box exercise" and did not get to the root cause of the issues.
In 2019, the Scottish government told HIS to sort out the inconsistencies in reporting approaches taken and ordered health boards to start reporting how many of the most serious SAERs they are commissioning.
HIS has been working on a revamp of the SAER notification system and guidelines which will "enable effective learning at national level" about the harms taking place and achieve greater consistency across the boards in terms of defining which incidents should be investigated.
The new guidelines will expect boards to improve the way patients and their families are involved in reviews and Moira Manson, who leads the HIS adverse events programme, said the new approach will improve patient safety.
She said: "There is progress. Progress isn't at the pace that we would expect but we've had a pandemic in the middle of this.
"The boards are learning from each other's mistakes and what we are seeing is a real willingness from our NHS boards to work together collaboratively to improve the system in terms of adverse events."
Baby deaths report criticises staffing
£90,000-a-year patient safety role remains unfilled
Inquiry call over hospital baby deaths
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Parents face hurdles vaccinating children
Parents are being prevented from vaccinating their children because of obstacles such as difficulty booking appointments and a lack of reminders on what jabs are needed and when, a report suggests. Child health experts say "practical or logistical reasons" are discouraging families more often than fears over the vaccines. Vaccine uptake in the UK has fallen over the last decade, leading to outbreaks of measles and whooping cough. UK health officials say they are committed to working with the NHS to improve vaccine uptake among children. Since 2022, no childhood vaccine in the UK has met the World Health Organisation target of 95% of children vaccinated, which ensures protection of vulnerable people. As a result, measles and other preventable diseases have made a comeback. A commission of experts from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) spent a year looking at why. Dr Helen Stewart, officer for health improvement at RCPCH, said the steady decline in vaccination rates in a wealthy country like the UK was "extremely concerning". But she said vaccine hesitancy, when parents waver over getting their children vaccinated, "is only part of a very complex picture". "The reality is that there are many who simply need better support and easier access to appointments," Dr Stewart said. Although confidence in vaccines is still relatively high, the report found barriers to accessing jabs are why many families don't protect their children. Some of the most common barriers include: difficulties getting through to book appointments at GP surgeries difficulties getting time off work for appointments limited transport options or no parking at GP surgeries not seeing the same GP each time so lack of trust not being able to speak to a GP or nurse to ask about the vaccines lack of reminders for jabs being sent out from GP not enough clear information about what jabs their child needs and when "One of the findings of this new report is that parents have no easy way to check their child's vaccination status," says children's emergency medicine specialist, Dr Stewart. "When I ask if the child is up to date with their vaccinations, the most common response is 'I think so'." Poorer families, some ethnic minority groups and migrant communities are much less likely to be vaccinated, and these inequalities have become more obvious since the pandemic, the report says. It also notes an absence of health visitors often means parents have no one they feel comfortable discussing vaccines openly with. Rise of vaccine distrust - why more of us are questioning jabs The report recommends using NHS apps to improve the experience of booking jabs, investing and expanding vaccination services, and funding health visitors to deliver some of them. It also calls on the development of the 'digital red book' to be finalised so parents can keep track of their children's vaccinations. The NHS website lists the full schedule of vaccinations for children, from babies, up to the age of 15. Dr Julie Yates, deputy director for immunisation programmes at UK Health Security Agency, said plans were in place to improve childhood vaccine uptake by ensuring more flexible appointment booking systems, making vaccines more widely available across different locations, and making access easier in all communities. "Despite the challenges, it is also important to note that parents have high confidence in vaccinations with almost 90% agreeing vaccines are effective," Dr Yates said. Alison Morton, chief executive of the Institute for Health Visitors, said the report presented "a compelling case" to ensure babies and children are protected against serious diseases which can cause so much unnecessary harm. Helen Bedford, professor of children's health at University College London, said improvements needed investment in staff and infrastructure. "Our children have the right to be protected from preventable diseases which can cause illness, disability or even death," she said, adding that a fall in children getting their vaccines had resulted in the deaths of 11 young babies from whooping cough last year. Falling vaccinations among children isn't just an issue in the UK, in 2023 there were nearly 16 million children who had not had any vaccinations, most of them in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccination plea after measles cases rise in Scotland Millions of children at risk as vaccine uptake stalls Measles highest in 25 years in Europe, WHO says
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lip-Filler Disaster Drives Millions to Watch on TikTok
In a spiraling series of TikTok videos posted over 72 hours, a U.K. woman documented her journey of getting her lip filler dissolved, except the procedure did anything but shrink the size of her lips. Instead, she essentially received the equivalent of a bee sting straight to the face. The saga, posted to the woman's account, @berthecn, enthralled social media onlookers, accumulating a whopping 14.7 million views. taken 4 antihistamines, hopefully goes down soon x The reaction was so alarming that the TikToker decided to call 111, the non-emergency phone number for the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK, who subsequently 'sent an ambulance out because it was deemed a potential allergic reaction.' In the Accident and Emergency department, she explained that she 'felt quite dizzy,' and 'almost fainted.' The ambulance ride made one thing clear: This wasn't just an unfortunate reaction—it was a real medical concern that required immediate attention. 'It's really scary,' the TikToker admitted in a clip, the reality of the situation hitting her. seeing as everyone has made me panic Once she arrived at the hospital, the woman was given IV steroids that helped reduce the swelling significantly after a few hours, but she also learned some shocking news. 'I found out that the solution used,' she explains, 'also has an enzyme that bees have in their sting. I've basically discovered that I may be allergic to a bee sting.' This enzyme, hyaluronidase, is used in filler dissolver to break down hyaluronic acid, according to a paper published in the Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology on the safe use of hyaluronidase. (Hyaluronic acid is a substance that naturally occurs in the body and is often used in dermal fillers, as well as many skincare products, thanks to its moisture-retention and elasticity-boosting properties.) The authors say that 'wasp and bee stings contain more than one allergen, including hyaluronidase,' adding that cross-reactivity (when the immune system confuses one allergen for another similar one) can be a factor in these cases. Most people do not experience an anaphylactic reaction to fillers or filler desolvers, with the authors noting that the 'risk is extremely small and is lower than the quoted 0.1-percent incidence,' including delayed reactions and secondary exposure. The good news: Reactions like these, rare and frightening as they are, can usually be avoided. Patch tests are usually recommended when using a dermal filler dissolver that includes hyaluronidase in its formula, with a waiting period of 24 hours to catch delayed reactions. The bad news: Patch test guidelines aren't always followed as recommended. In this case, the woman said that her patch test was administered just a few minutes before her appointment. Despite this, the woman isn't eager to throw blame around for the incident. 'I don't want to fault this practitioner,' she said. 'She just made a mistake.' In an update posted to her account on June 30 (happily captioned with, 'I have my face back!), the woman shared the lessons she learned and insights she discovered about herself through the debacle. She tells her audience the swelling in her lips from the allergic reaction is 'almost fully dissolved.' I have my face back! Now, with her lips (almost) back to normal, she has realized she never needed filler to be happy in the first place, saying, 'I probably had complete body dysmorphia, because when I look at my lips now, I actually think they are beautiful.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Girls and black children face inequalities in transplant treatment, study shows
Sick girls are less likely to be put on the kidney transplant waiting list compared to boys, according to analysis. Academics found that some children in need of a kidney transplant are facing inequalities in their care. Black children are less likely to be put on the transplant waiting list, as are those from more deprived backgrounds, researchers from the University of Bristol found. There are currently 137 children aged 17 and under on the kidney transplant waiting list in the UK. Researchers set out to examine whether inequalities exist in access to kidney transplantation among children in the UK by analysing the UK Renal Registry and NHS Blood and Transplant data between 1996 and 2020. They found that girls were 12% less likely to be put on a transplant waiting list compared to boys. Children from the poorest backgrounds were 33% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to those from the wealthiest. And black children were 19% less likely to be put on the waiting list compared to their white peers. Once children are on the waiting list, the disparities related to gender and income appeared to reduce, but disadvantages for black children persisted. 'We were particularly struck by how early these disparities appear in the transplant process,' said Dr Alice James, lead author of the study. 'It's not just about who gets a transplant, but who even gets considered in the first place. 'Those from black ethnic backgrounds face systemic disadvantages even after being placed on the waitlist, including fewer living donor opportunities.' When looking at kidney transplants given by a living donor within two years of being on the waiting list, the odds of getting a transplant are lower among those from poorer backgrounds and children of black or Asian ethnicity, according to the study, which has been presented to the ESOT (European Society for Organ Transplantation) Congress 2025. Dr James added: 'It is notable – and particularly disquieting – that such disparities are evident even in a paediatric population within a universal healthcare system like the NHS. 'The persistent disadvantage faced by children from black ethnic backgrounds even after wait-listing is especially striking, suggesting systemic or cultural barriers that extend beyond access alone.' On gender inequalities seen in the study, she added: 'The gender disparity in wait-listing, with girls being less likely to be wait-listed, may reflect implicit gender biases in clinical decision-making, differences in parental advocacy, or variation in disease presentation and severity between sexes. 'There may also be social factors influencing clinicians' assumptions about transplant suitability or family engagement in the transplantation process. 'While evidence is limited in paediatric populations, adult studies suggest that women are often perceived as less suitable candidates due to comorbidities or psychosocial factors— perceptions that may inadvertently extend to female children.' Fiona Loud, policy director at Kidney Care UK, said: 'This research is shocking and it's not good enough to see such heartbreaking inequalities so early in life. 'There are around 1,000 children receiving kidney replacement therapy via either dialysis or transplant in the UK. 'This is a relatively small number which should mean we have a real opportunity to change this and make sure we improve things for the future for children and young people. 'But right now it is very hard for families whose children have kidney failure. 'More work needs to be done to explore local barriers and raise awareness of the value and importance of living kidney donation through personalised and community education programmes.' Professor Derek Manas, medical director for organ and tissue donation at NHS Blood and Transplant, which is responsible for allocating organs to people on the list, said: 'These results will help hospital clinical teams across the UK to further understand and mitigate this issue. 'NHS Blood and Transplant does not decide which individual patients are added to the transplant waiting list, but we do manage how organs are allocated to patients and the research found that once patients are on the waiting list, they had equitable access to donations, irrespective of ethnicity or deprivation. 'The transplant community has come a long way in ensuring equity once listed but this study confirms we all have more to do. 'Kidneys also need to be matched and people from the same ethnicity are more likely to be a match. 'There are currently not enough donors from black and Asian backgrounds and we urge people to show their support for donation on the NHS Organ Donor Register and to tell their families they want to donate.' An NHS England spokesperson said: 'The decision to place somebody on the transplant list should never be affected by their gender, ethnicity or family income and this analysis is a stark reminder that, whilst we have made progress on tackling health inequalities, much remains to be done – and this will be at the heart of the 10 Year Health Plan. 'More widely, we know kidney failure disproportionately impacts people from Black African and Black Caribbean heritage so we would always encourage more donors from these backgrounds to come forward, and we have recently launched a new simple genetic blood test for these groups to help reduce the risk of kidney failure.'
