Jury in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial asks to review Cassie's evidence
The panel of eight men and four women asked for Cassie's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on security camera footage.
They also asked to see Cassie's evidence about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex.
In addition, the jury asked for Cassie and stripper Daniel Phillip's evidence about her jumping into his lap at a New York City hotel after, as Mr Phillip testified, he suspected Combs had been slapping and slamming her around an adjacent room.
'Her whole entire body was shaking, like she was terrified,' said Mr Phillip, who was at the hotel for a sexual encounter with Cassie some time between 2012 and 2014.
He told the court that he asked Cassie, the R&B singer whose real name is Casandra Ventura, why she was with Combs if he was hitting her and beating her. He said he told her she was in real danger.
He added that Cassie 'basically tried to convince me that it was OK, 'it's OK. I'm fine, I'll be OK''.
The jury's evidence request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Arun Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday.
Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count.
Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more.
On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict.
Defence lawyers say prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle. If anything, they say, his conduct amounted to domestic violence not federal felonies.
The 55-year-old could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Andrew Scott channels Pedro Pascal's head-turning Cannes Film Festival look as he flexes his biceps in a fitted vest top at a magazine launch dinner
Andrew Scott channeled Pedro Pascal as he flexed his biceps in a vest top at the IMAGINE Magazine Launch Dinner at Bistrotheque in London on Tuesday night. The Irish actor, 48, turned heads with his muscular physique on show, rocking a cropped grey sleeveless shirt. He completed the bold look with skinny blue jeans and crisp white loafers as he posed up a storm for the cameras. The star appeared in good spirits at the event and also took time to have snaps with pal and fitness entrepreneur Connor Minney. Andrew's look bore a striking resemblance to Pedro Pascal's bold red carpet outfit at Cannes Film Festival earlier this year, where US star, 50, made waves in a black muscle tank. Fans couldn't get enough of his playful behavior — or his arms — at the Palais des Festivals during the photo call for his new film Eddington. Andrew Scott (left) channeled full Pedro Pascal (right) energy as he flexed his biceps in a vest top at the IMAGINE Magazine Launch Dinner at Bistrotheque in London on Tuesday night. One fan even shared a photo of Pedro with his arm around Emma Stone and wrote, 'My new religion is pedro pascal's arms.' 'Pedro Pascal had been massively serving at #CannesFilmFestival so far,' another X (formerly Twitter) user wrote, adding that 'the other men don't stand a CHANCE!' A third added, 'Every time someone invalidates me for finding a 50 year old man hot, Pedro Pascal validates me by showing up even sexier and hotter than the day before.' Also known for his sensational style, Andrew stole the show at the Golden Globes dressed head to toe in tiffany blue in January. The Irishman, who was nominated for best performance by an actor in a limited or anthology series for Netflix's Ripley, turned heads in the standout number as he confidently posed for pictures. Wearing a suit jacket, matching trousers, shirt and tie, Andrew ensured all eyes were on him as he made his way into the Beverly Hilton Hotel. Beyond the bold colour choice, Andrew kept things simple in the shoe department with some black lace ups and finished his ensemble with a pearl bracelet. As he took to the carpet, fans couldn't hold back on their thoughts, with many gushing over his appearance. They wrote: 'andrew scott smiling that's it #GoldenGlobes'; 'Andrew Scott looks like a paint swatch. However I WILL give him points for wearing something than all black (which a lot of men on the red carpet seem incapable of doing). #GoldenGlobes'; 'why are all the men at the golden globes not giving? like the closest we have to a serve is andrew scott's tiffany blue suit and that's it'; 'That shade is recognizable to brides around the globe as Jordan Almond Blue. But Andrew Scott is not a mere snack at the wedding reception. He's moving units at the Toyota dealership down the street'; 'Love this blue on Andrew Scott. #GoldenGlobes'; 'Andrew Scott looking handsome in this light blue dress.' Inspired by Patricia Highsmith's Tom Ripley novels, Ripley follows Andrew as the cunning con artist who is hired by an American businessman to bring his wayward son back from Italy. However, the seemingly simple task spirals out of control, leading Ripley into a tangled web of lies and murder as he fights to evade capture and maintain his façade.
Rhyl Journal
5 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Jury reaches verdict on four out of five counts in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial
The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defence team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. Judge Arun Subramanian said he had received a note at 4.05pm indicating the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. Judge Subramanian noted that juries had a right to deliver a partial verdict, but he said that given that deliberations had only started on Monday, he would rather they continued for now. The jury was eventually dismissed for the day. Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defence table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly. Meanwhile, prosecutors were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers. Assistant US attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what is known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse. Racketeering conspiracy — count one on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise', but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offences, such as kidnapping and arson. The charge falls under Rico — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act — which is best known for being used in organised crime and drug cartel cases. The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights'. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Ms Ventura's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Ms Ventura's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. The jury's testimony request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday. Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count. Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict. Defence lawyers contend that prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Combs, 55, could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges. After pleading not guilty, Combs chose not to testify as his lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of witnesses called by prosecutors, including some of Combs' former employees who took the witness stand reluctantly only after being granted immunity.
South Wales Guardian
5 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Jury reaches verdict on four out of five counts in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial
The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defence team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. Judge Arun Subramanian said he had received a note at 4.05pm indicating the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. Judge Subramanian noted that juries had a right to deliver a partial verdict, but he said that given that deliberations had only started on Monday, he would rather they continued for now. The jury was eventually dismissed for the day. Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defence table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly. Meanwhile, prosecutors were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers. Assistant US attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what is known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse. Racketeering conspiracy — count one on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise', but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offences, such as kidnapping and arson. The charge falls under Rico — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act — which is best known for being used in organised crime and drug cartel cases. The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights'. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Ms Ventura's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Ms Ventura's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. The jury's testimony request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday. Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count. Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict. Defence lawyers contend that prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Combs, 55, could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges. After pleading not guilty, Combs chose not to testify as his lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of witnesses called by prosecutors, including some of Combs' former employees who took the witness stand reluctantly only after being granted immunity.
