logo
2 men executed on same day: Anthony Wainwright in Florida, Gregory Hunt in Alabama

2 men executed on same day: Anthony Wainwright in Florida, Gregory Hunt in Alabama

Yahoo11-06-2025
Two men were executed in the U.S. on Tuesday in what is now the nation's fourth double execution of the year.
Florida executed Anthony Wainwright by lethal injection just after 6 p.m. ET for the 1994 rape and murder of 23-year-old Carmen Gayheart, a married mother of two and nursing student who was kidnapped in broad daylight in a grocery store parking lot.
Less than an hour later, Alabama used the controversial nitrogen gas method to execute Gregory Hunt for the 1988 rape and murder of 32-year-old Karen Lane, a woman he had been dating for a month.
"It seems to me there's enough days in the year that executions shouldn't have to be stacked on top of each other," said the Rev. Jeff Hood, a death row spiritual adviser who has witnessed nine executions and said he had to make an "unfathomable" choice between whether to be in person to support Wainwright in Florida or Hunt in Alabama.
He chose to be in the death chamber with Wainwright.
The double executions - meaning inmates who were put to death on the same day but in different states - mark the nation's 20th and 21st executions of 2025. They come as the U.S. is on pace to put more inmates to death this year than any other in the past decade, though the nation is still far from its busiest execution year ever: 98 in 1999.
Here's what you need to know about the executions.
'A remarkable development': States expanding their execution methods to firing squad, more
Alabama executed Hunt by the controversial nitrogen gas method at the William C. Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore, and he was pronounced dead at 6:26 p.m. CT. It was the fifth nitrogen gas execution in the state since January 2024, and the sixth in the nation overall.
When the curtains to the death chamber opened, Hunt was strapped to a gurney, wrapped in a white sheet and had a mask over his face, according to Alex Gladden, a witness to the execution for the Montgomery Advertiser, part of the USA TODAY Network.
At 5:57 p.m., Hunt began gasping and lifted his head. Then his entire body began convulsing. He lifted his head again two minutes later before his head fell back and he groaned loudly, Gladden observed.
Hunt's head continued to move and he kept gasping for several minutes before he appeared to take his last breath at 6:04 p.m. His left fist remained clenched long afterward.
Witness accounts from the previous four nitrogen gas executions in Alabama describe "suffering, including conscious terror for several minutes, shaking, gasping, and other evidence of distress," Louisiana Chief District Judge Shelly Dick wrote in an opinion that temporarily blocked the nitrogen gas execution of Jessie Hoffman in her state in March.
That violates constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment, inmate advocates say. The states using the method defend it as effective and constitutional, and one official in another state considering approving the method recently said that it may very well be painful, according to reporting by the Ohio Capital Journal.
'The Constitution doesn't guarantee a pain-free death," said Lou Tobin, executive director of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association, the Journal reported. 'We don't want to cause them unnecessary pain. ... But whatever they experience as part of an execution pales in comparison to the pain and suffering that they've inflicted on their victims.'
Hunt, 65, was convicted of the "savage" rape and murder of Karen Lane, whom he had been dating for a month on Aug. 2, 1988.
Hunt acknowledged killing Lane, saying it was a crime of passion driven by jealousy, but denied raping her − a contention refuted by the Alabama Attorney General's Office.
"Make no mistake, this night is not about the life of Greg Hunt," Lane's family said in a statement after witnessing the execution. "This night is about the horrific death of Karen Sanders Lane, whose life was so savagely taken from her. Karen was shown no mercy. She was not given a second chance. Karen was shown no grace."
They added that the execution "also not about closure or victory" but "represents justice and the end of a nightmare that has coursed through our family for 37 long years."
Florida executed Wainwright by lethal injection, marking the state's sixth execution this year, more than any other state.
Wainwright, who was pronounced dead at 6:22 p.m. ET, was convicted of the rape and murder of Carmen Gayheart, a married mother of two young children who was attacked in broad daylight in a grocery store parking lot in Lake City, Florida, on April 27, 1994.
"To the family of Carmen Gayheart, I hope my death brings you peace and healing," Wainwright said in his last statement, according to his spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeff. Hood.
Wainwright slammed his attorney as "Florida's worst" and the court system in Florida as "broken."
"Please continue the fight. Because I can promise you they are not going to let up," he said to those fighting the death penalty. "They will continue to murder if we continue to let it happen."
Wainwright spent most of his last words addressing his fiancée, Samantha Wainwright (who is using his last name).
"You are the love of my life. I'm so blessed we found each other. The years we have spent together have been beyond wonderful, they've been downright magical," he said. "Love is stronger than death and I know our love will last for eternity."
Gayheart's sister, Maria David, told USA TODAY that at the time of Gayheart's murder, she had just moved her family into the dream home they built themselves in the tiny northern Florida town of Fort White.
"She loved animals, she loved people, she loved her children, she loved her husband," David said. "She was building something beautiful."
David planned on being front and center at Wainwright's execution for "accountability" and because her heartbroken parents couldn't. Her father died in 2013, and her mother died in 2023.
"I look a lot like my sister," she said ahead of the execution. "I'm hoping that he sees a glimpse of Carmen one more time before he goes to where he's going."
In his appeal filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, Wainwright's attorneys argued, among other points, that the Florida Supreme Court failed to consider new evidence that the 54-year-old suffered from "transgenerational exposure to Agent Orange through his father's combat service in the Vietnam War."
About Wainwright's state of mind approaching his death, the Rev. Jeff Hood said that he was "very afraid of being executed.
Who was Carmen Gayheart? Mom murdered after grocery store run was building a beautiful life
Tuesday's double execution is far from unprecedented. It happened three times already this year and twice in 2024.
May 20, 2025: Indiana executed Benjamin Ritchie for the 2000 fatal shooting of Officer Bill Tomey, who had just turned 32 the previous day and was a married father of two girls. Later that day, Texas executed Matthew Johnson for the murder of 76-year-old Nancy Judith Harris, a beloved grandmother he set on fire.
March 20, 2025: Oklahoma executed Wendell Grissom for the murder of 23-year-old Amber Matthews in front of her best friend's two young daughters in 2005. About nine hours later, Florida executed Edward Thomas James for the 1993 murders of 58-year-old Elizabeth "Betty" Dick and her 8-year-old granddaughter, Toni Neuner, who was raped.
Feb. 13, 2025: Florida executed James Dennis Ford for the savage murders of two young parents, Gregory and Kimberly Malnory, in front of their toddler daughter in 1997. An hour after Ford's death, Texas executed Death Row inmate Richard Lee Tabler for fatally shooting four people in what he described as a fit of rage in 2004.
Sept. 26, 2004: Oklahoma executed Emmanuel Littlejohn for the 1992 shooting death of beloved convenience store owner Kenneth Meers, despite a recommendation from a clemency board that his life should be spared. Later that day, Alabama executed Alan Eugene Miller for the 1999 shooting deaths of his three coworkers, whom he believed were spreading rumors about his sexuality.
Sept. 24, 2004: Missouri executed Marcellus Williams for the 1998 killing of a former newspaper reporter named Lisha Gayle despite his strong claims of innocence and over the objections of both a key prosecutor in the case, the victim's family, and three Supreme Court justices who said they would have granted him a stay. Less than an hour later, Texas executed Travis James Mullis for killing his 3-month-old son, Alijah, in 2008.
Experts say the scheduling of two executions on the same day appears to be purely coincidental, largely because most executions are held between Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Contributing: James Powel, USA TODAY, Alex Gladden, the Montgomery Advertiser
Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusat.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Double execution: Anthony Wainwright, Gregory Hunt put to death
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy
Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Famous for his fearless bravado as a pro wrestler, Hulk Hogan won one of his most notable victories in a Florida courtroom by emphasizing his humiliation and emotional distress after a news and gossip website published a video of Hogan having sex with a friend's wife. A 2016 civil trial that pitted the First Amendment against the privacy rights of celebrities ended with a jury awarding Hogan a whopping $140 million in his lawsuit against Gawker Media. Though both parties later settled on $31 million to avoid protracted appeals, the case put Gawker out of business. It also ensured Hogan, who died Thursday at age 71, and his legal team would have a long-term impact on media law. The case showed that, in certain circumstances, celebrities could persuade a jury that their right to privacy outweighs the freedom of the press — even when the published material was true. The case put media outlets on notice that 'the public doesn't necessarily like the press,' especially when reporting intrudes into intimate details of even public figures' private lives, said Samantha Barbas, a University of Iowa law professor who writes about press freedoms and First Amendment issues. She said it also emboldened celebrities, politicians and others in the public spotlight to be more aggressive in suing over unflattering news coverage — as seen recently in President Donald Trump's pursuit of court cases against the Wall Street Journal, ABC and CBS. 'I think the lasting effect of the Hulk Hogan case was it really started this trend of libel and privacy lawsuits being weaponized to kind of take down these media organizations,' Barbas said. Hogan wept hearing the verdict in a case that was 'real personal' Hogan, whose given name was Terry Bollea, sued Gawker for invading his privacy after the website in 2012 posted an edited version of a video of Hogan having sex with the wife of his then-best friend, Florida-based radio DJ Bubba The Love Sponge Clem. Clem gave his blessing to the coupling and recorded the video that was later leaked to Gawker. Hogan insisted he was unaware the intimate encounter was being filmed. The former WWE champion testified that he was 'completely humiliated' when the sex video became public. Hogan's lead trial attorney, Ken Turkel, recalled Thursday how his muscular, mustachioed client cried in court as the jury verdict was read. 'To him the privacy part of it was integral. It was important,' Turkel said. 'Eight-year-old kids were googling 'Hulk Hogan' and 'Wrestlemania,' and they were getting a sex tape. That was hurtful to him in a real personal way.' The three-week trial was closely followed far beyond the courtroom in St. Petersburg, Florida, as thousands of wrestling fans, First Amendment watchers and others stayed glued to their screens as the trial was streamed live online. Salacious details emerged about Hogan's sex life as jurors and spectators viewed. images of him in thong underwear. Other testimony focused on how New York-based Gawker practiced journalism differently than traditional news outlets. And Hogan explained to the jury about the difference between his wrestling persona and his private life. Jury rejected that First Amendment protected publishing sex tape The jury ultimately rejected arguments by Gawker's attorneys that Hogan's sex tape was newsworthy and that publishing it, no matter how distasteful, was protected speech under the First Amendment. 'Now more people, including judges, understand that it's possible to sue someone for revealing something truthful, as long as that something is deeply personal and its publication is highly offensive,' said Amy Gajda, a Brooklyn Law School professor who followed and wrote about the case against Gawker. News outlets still have broad legal protection for publishing information about public figures, even things that would generally be considered private, Gajda said 'As long as there is news value in what is published and the media can argue that effectively, they can get a privacy case dismissed very early on,' she said. ___ Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy
Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Boston Globe

time5 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Advertisement The case put media outlets on notice that 'the public doesn't necessarily like the press,' especially when reporting intrudes into intimate details of even public figures' private lives, said Samantha Barbas, a University of Iowa law professor who writes about press freedoms and First Amendment issues. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up She said it also emboldened celebrities, politicians and others in the public spotlight to be more aggressive in suing over unflattering news coverage — as seen recently in President Donald Trump's pursuit of court cases against the Wall Street Journal, ABC and CBS. 'I think the lasting effect of the Hulk Hogan case was it really started this trend of libel and privacy lawsuits being weaponized to kind of take down these media organizations,' Barbas said. Advertisement Hogan wept hearing the verdict in a case that was 'real personal' Hogan, whose given name was Terry Bollea, sued Gawker for invading his privacy after the website in 2012 posted an edited version of a video of Hogan having sex with the wife of his then-best friend, Florida-based radio DJ Bubba The Love Sponge Clem. Clem gave his blessing to the coupling and recorded the video that was later leaked to Gawker. Hogan insisted he was unaware the intimate encounter was being filmed. The former WWE champion testified that he was 'completely humiliated' when the sex video became public. Hogan's lead trial attorney, Ken Turkel, recalled Thursday how his muscular, mustachioed client cried in court as the jury verdict was read. 'To him the privacy part of it was integral. It was important,' Turkel said. 'Eight-year-old kids were googling 'Hulk Hogan' and 'Wrestlemania,' and they were getting a sex tape. That was hurtful to him in a real personal way.' The three-week trial was closely followed far beyond the courtroom in St. Petersburg, Florida, as thousands of wrestling fans, First Amendment watchers and others stayed glued to their screens as the trial was streamed live online. Salacious details emerged about Hogan's sex life as jurors and spectators viewed. images of him in thong underwear. Other testimony focused on how New York-based Gawker practiced journalism differently than traditional news outlets. And Hogan explained to the jury about the difference between his wrestling persona and his private life. Jury rejected that First Amendment protected publishing sex tape The jury ultimately rejected arguments by Gawker's attorneys that Hogan's sex tape was newsworthy and that publishing it, no matter how distasteful, was protected speech under the First Amendment. 'Now more people, including judges, understand that it's possible to sue someone for revealing something truthful, as long as that something is deeply personal and its publication is highly offensive,' said Amy Gajda, a Brooklyn Law School professor who followed and wrote about the case against Gawker. Advertisement News outlets still have broad legal protection for publishing information about public figures, even things that would generally be considered private, Gajda said 'As long as there is news value in what is published and the media can argue that effectively, they can get a privacy case dismissed very early on,' she said. Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy
Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Associated Press

time6 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Hulk Hogan's sex tape lawsuit had a lasting effect on cases involving celebrity privacy

Famous for his fearless bravado as a pro wrestler, Hulk Hogan won one of his most notable victories in a Florida courtroom by emphasizing his humiliation and emotional distress after a news and gossip website published a video of Hogan having sex with a friend's wife. A 2016 civil trial that pitted the First Amendment against the privacy rights of celebrities ended with a jury awarding Hogan a whopping $140 million in his lawsuit against Gawker Media. Though both parties later settled on $31 million to avoid protracted appeals, the case put Gawker out of business. It also ensured Hogan, who died Thursday at age 71, and his legal team would have a long-term impact on media law. The case showed that, in certain circumstances, celebrities could persuade a jury that their right to privacy outweighs the freedom of the press — even when the published material was true. The case put media outlets on notice that 'the public doesn't necessarily like the press,' especially when reporting intrudes into intimate details of even public figures' private lives, said Samantha Barbas, a University of Iowa law professor who writes about press freedoms and First Amendment issues. She said it also emboldened celebrities, politicians and others in the public spotlight to be more aggressive in suing over unflattering news coverage — as seen recently in President Donald Trump's pursuit of court cases against the Wall Street Journal, ABC and CBS. 'I think the lasting effect of the Hulk Hogan case was it really started this trend of libel and privacy lawsuits being weaponized to kind of take down these media organizations,' Barbas said. Hogan wept hearing the verdict in a case that was 'real personal' Hogan, whose given name was Terry Bollea, sued Gawker for invading his privacy after the website in 2012 posted an edited version of a video of Hogan having sex with the wife of his then-best friend, Florida-based radio DJ Bubba The Love Sponge Clem. Clem gave his blessing to the coupling and recorded the video that was later leaked to Gawker. Hogan insisted he was unaware the intimate encounter was being filmed. The former WWE champion testified that he was 'completely humiliated' when the sex video became public. Hogan's lead trial attorney, Ken Turkel, recalled Thursday how his muscular, mustachioed client cried in court as the jury verdict was read. 'To him the privacy part of it was integral. It was important,' Turkel said. 'Eight-year-old kids were googling 'Hulk Hogan' and 'Wrestlemania,' and they were getting a sex tape. That was hurtful to him in a real personal way.' The three-week trial was closely followed far beyond the courtroom in St. Petersburg, Florida, as thousands of wrestling fans, First Amendment watchers and others stayed glued to their screens as the trial was streamed live online. Salacious details emerged about Hogan's sex life as jurors and spectators viewed. images of him in thong underwear. Other testimony focused on how New York-based Gawker practiced journalism differently than traditional news outlets. And Hogan explained to the jury about the difference between his wrestling persona and his private life. Jury rejected that First Amendment protected publishing sex tape The jury ultimately rejected arguments by Gawker's attorneys that Hogan's sex tape was newsworthy and that publishing it, no matter how distasteful, was protected speech under the First Amendment. 'Now more people, including judges, understand that it's possible to sue someone for revealing something truthful, as long as that something is deeply personal and its publication is highly offensive,' said Amy Gajda, a Brooklyn Law School professor who followed and wrote about the case against Gawker. News outlets still have broad legal protection for publishing information about public figures, even things that would generally be considered private, Gajda said 'As long as there is news value in what is published and the media can argue that effectively, they can get a privacy case dismissed very early on,' she said. ___ Bynum reported from Savannah, Georgia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store