AGC opposes Ilham Tower's judicial review bid against MACC
Senior Federal Counsel Nurhafizza Azizan informed the High Court of the objection during today's proceedings before Judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh.
The court directed both parties to file written submissions by Aug 13, with any replies to be submitted by Aug 20. The hearing is set for Sept 18.
Ilham Tower was represented by counsel Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar. It filed the ex-parte application through Messrs Raj & Sach on June 23.
Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid, widow of former finance minister the late Tun Daim Zainuddin, is listed as one of the company's directors.
The other respondents named were MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki; senior officer Mohd Razi Rahhim @ Rahim; deputy public prosecutor Datuk Ahmad Akram Gharib; the Public Prosecutor; Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim; and the Government of Malaysia.
The company is seeking a declaration that the seizure order or notice issued by the second respondent (Ahmad Akram), on June 4, 2025, under Section 51(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, in relation to the seizure of Menara Ilham at Jalan Binjai, is unlawful and therefore null and void.
It is also seeking a certiorari order to quash the seizure notice along with all related decisions or actions.
In addition, a mandamus order is sought to compel the second respondent, or any officer, employee, agent, or person authorised by him, to cancel the said notice.
The applicant further seeks a court order to stay the enforcement of the seizure notice and all related decisions or actions pending disposal of the judicial review leave application, as well as damages and costs. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Ilham Tower challenges MACC's second seizure over alleged irregularities
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) failed to comply with proper procedure in its bid to seize Ilham Tower for the second time, the High Court heard. Ilham Tower Sdn Bhd, the owner of the building, claimed the second seizure notice issued by the anti-graft body failed to adhere to procedures under Section 51(1A) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. Section 51(1A) of the AMLATFPUAA 2001 requires law enforcement agencies to issue a written notice to the person who owns or possesses any property seized under the Act, informing them of the seizure. The company claimed the MACC also failed to post the notice in a public place as required by law, choosing instead to issue a press statement on the seizure. The company said this in its supporting affidavit to seek leave (permission) to initiate a judicial review to challenge the seizure. "The fourth respondent (MACC) also said that with the seizure of Ilham Tower, all transactions or transfers of ownership involving the building are now prohibited. "This statement is clearly erroneous, as no formal notice was served on the applicant. "The issuance of the second seizure notice is an abuse of process and power. It overlaps the earlier seizure and appears to be an attempt to unlawfully circumvent the 18-month time limit for the first seizure, which expired on June 17. "Although the first seizure notice was issued on Dec 18, 2023, no prosecution or charge has been brought against the late Tun Daim Zainuddin to indicate that the premises are linked to any offence under the MACC Act. "Since the first seizure notice, no evidence has been presented linking the applicant or Daim to any specific offence under the MACC Act 2009, AMLA 2001, or any other law related to money laundering or corruption," the affidavit said. Ilham Tower further argued that the second seizure violates Article 13 of the Federal Constitution, as it deprives the applicant of the right to use and enjoy the property. The company said the seizure has caused a significant loss in rental income, reputational harm as a property owner, and depreciation in the property's value. It added that the prolonged and arbitrary denial of ownership rights – without any charge or prosecution – was not only grossly unfair but also risked rendering the judicial review application futile. Ilham Tower filed the ex-parte application through its legal firm, Messrs Raj & Sach, on June 23. One of the company's directors is the late Daim's wife, Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid. In its application, Ilham Tower named the MACC, its Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, senior officer Mohd Razi Rahhim @ Rahim, MACC deputy public prosecutor Ahmad Akram Gharib, the public prosecutor, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, and the government as respondents. The company is seeking a declaration that the order or seizure notice issued by Ahmad Akram is null and void. The company is also applying for a certiorari order to quash the seizure notice and all related decisions or actions. Additionally, it seeks a mandamus order compelling the second respondent – or any officer, employee, agent, or authorised individual under the second respondent – to cancel the seizure notice. Ilham Tower is also requesting a court order to suspend the seizure notice and all related actions or decisions until its judicial review application is heard and decided by the High Court. The company is also seeking damages and costs.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Zelensky defends contested anti-corruption law changes
President Volodymyr Zelensky said defending Ukraine requires a strong enough law enforcement system. (EPA Images pic) KYIV : Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today defended legislative changes removing the independence of two key anti-corruption bodies, sparking the first major protests in Ukraine since the start of Russia's invasion. 'We all share a common enemy: the Russian occupiers,' Zelensky said after meeting with top law enforcement and anti-corruption officials. 'And defending the Ukrainian state requires a strong enough law enforcement system – one that ensures a real sense of justice,' he added. 'We all hear what society is saying,' he said, promising to 'resolve existing issues'. The bill would place the national anti-corruption bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor-general, who is appointed by the president. After meeting with Zelensky, NABU and SAPO repeated their criticism of the changes and said 'unambiguous legislative steps are required to reinstate the guarantees revoked by parliament'. Zelensky signed off on the widely criticised law yesterday, the same day it was passed by parliament. The law sparked the first major protest in Kyiv since Russian troops invaded in 2022, with over 1,000 people taking part. Large gatherings are banned under Ukraine's martial law. 'Serious step back' While the government says the law will make the anti-corruption agencies function better, its critics say it consolidates power in Zelensky's hands. They also argue it will allow government meddling in high-profile graft cases. The Anti-Corruption Action Center, an NGO, said the law would render the agencies meaningless as Zelensky's prosecutor-general would 'stop investigations into all of the president's friends'. The European Union called the decision a 'serious step back'. NABU began work in 2015, as Kyiv sought to bring the country closer to Europe after a 2014 pro-European revolution. Since its inception, the agency has uncovered widespread graft, including among figures in Zelensky's administration. On Monday, law enforcement conducted large-scale raids at NABU, detaining one employee on suspicion of spying for Russia. Transparency International's Ukraine office called the raids an 'attempt by the authorities to undermine the independence of Ukraine's post-revolution of dignity anti-corruption institutions'. Transparency International ranked Ukraine 105th out of 180 countries in its 'corruption perceptions index' in 2024, up from 144 in 2013. Supporters of the law warn that a political crisis over the legislation could work in Russia's favour by undermining unity in the country. Commenting on the protests at a briefing, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov today said there was 'a lot of corruption' in the country and the issue was 'a sensitive topic' for Ukraine.
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Immigration officer out on bail to face more charges tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: An Immigration Department senior deputy assistant director who claimed trial yesterday to laundering nearly RM1 million will face additional charges tomorrow. Nas Suffian Nasrun, 41, is currently out on a RM100,000 bail after he was slapped with five charges of money laundering involving RM933,295 at the Shah Alam Sessions Court yesterday. The offences were allegedly committed between 2022 and last year. Tomorrow, he is expected to be charged at the Sessions Court, here, with one count under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act.. This was confirmed by Nas Suffian's lawyer, Muhammad Zaim Rosli. On Tuesday, Nas Suffian was accused of being involved in online transactions of the monies from illegal activities from a special pass agent's bank account to his. He was also accused of receiving money and making multiple transactions to transfer it to the bank accounts of his accomplice, who is also an immigration officer, his mother and a company. He allegedly committed the offences at two banks in Kajang and Kota Damanara between July 29, 2022 and Sept 23 last year. Each charge carries a jail term not exceeding 15-years and a fine not less than five times the amount from illegal proceeds or RM5 million, whichever is higher, upon conviction.
