Over a third of Brits neglect gum health, survey reveals – how does your mouth fare?
OPEN WIDE Over a third of Brits neglect gum health, survey reveals – how does your mouth fare?
THINK your oral hygiene is up to scratch?
You might want to look beyond your pearly whites.
Advertisement
2
The research was commissioned by the dental brand, in celebration of the brand's 50th anniversary
Credit: Getty
A new quiz tool has been developed to test how well you can spot the signs of healthy — or unhealthy — gums, helping you assess not just your knowledge, but potentially the state of your own mouth.
It follows research which found 37 per cent of Brits neglect their gums – because they only care about having clean teeth.
Commissioned by Corsodyl, the poll of 2,000 adults found 45 per cent don't regularly think about gum health, 37 per cent are only focused on ensuring they have pearly whites after a brush.
Meanwhile, 74 per cent have never considered cleaning at an angle to meet the join between the gum and the tooth.
Advertisement
And 43 per cent only brush for less than 90 seconds on average – with one in 10 (11 per cent) experiencing bleeding gums every few weeks.
The research was commissioned by the dental brand, in celebration of the brand's 50th anniversary.
Dr Kate Fabrikant, from parent company Haleon, said: "The survey shows that we need to continue raising awareness of gum health importance, they are just as essential to our overall oral health as our teeth.
'Attention needs to be paid to brushing your teeth and gums for at least two minutes, twice a day, with a condition specific fluoridated toothpaste.
Advertisement
'There is still a lot of work still to do to achieve good gum health in the UK, and that's why we are empowering individuals make it a bigger priority.
'The gums in our mouths play a crucial role in supporting and protecting the teeth, acting like a cushion and barrier against bacteria.
"Healthy gums keep the teeth firmly anchored, shielding them from infections that could lead to serious dental problems.'
The study also found when it comes to oral hygiene, 76 per cent don't avoid sugary snacks, and 59 per cent never clean their tongue.
Advertisement
While 69 per cent admit they don't do a daily floss – a key technique to ensuring gums remain happy and healthy.
It emerged 32 per cent of those polled via OnePoll.com wouldn't be able to tell if this part of their mouth was in poor health.
And 35 per cent don't know tenderness, swelling (33 per cent), and receding gums (35 per cent) are all tale-tell signs they are in a bad way.
What's more, 34 per cent believe their gums have receded, and 55 per cent have previously known them to bleed.
Advertisement
Dr Kate Fabrikant, from Haleon, added: 'Maintaining optimal gum health is crucial for overall oral hygiene and well-being.
'Healthy gums are typically pink and firm, fitting snugly around your teeth without bleeding, swelling, or pain – while unhealthy gums can lead to gum disease, tooth loss, and even impact heart health.
'Regular dental check-ups, proper brushing with the right toothpaste, and flossing techniques are all essential practices to ensure your gums remain in good health.'
2
Commissioned by Corsodyl, the poll of 2,000 adults found 45 per cent don't regularly think about gum health
Credit: Getty
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
18 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Horrifying ancient meal loved by Neanderthals is a dieter's dream – but would YOU eat sickening dish?
Similar to the historical diets of some indigenous communities, Neanderthals too may have dined on decaying meat FORK-ET THAT! Horrifying ancient meal loved by Neanderthals is a dieter's dream – but would YOU eat sickening dish? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NEANDERTHALS may have feasted on maggot-infested meat as a core part of their diet, according to a new study. But the pungent delicacy was more than simply "starvation rations", said Melanie Beasley, assistant professor of anthropology at Purdue University, Indiana. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Research from Beasley and her team suggests that Neanderthals had a hidden delicacy: maggots Credit: Getty A number of Indigenous communities have viewed putrefied - or fermented - meat as highly desirable. It is easier to digest, meaning the body can better and more quickly absorb nutrients without cooking. Experts have long known that Neanderthals - our extinct human ancestor - were omnivores, eating meat and vegetables like most modern people. But chemical signatures found in Neanderthal remains suggest they ate as much meat as lions. Analysis of their bones found too much nitrogen than what a classic omnivore would have. But hominins simply cannot tolerate eating the high levels of protein that large predators can. When humans eat as much protein as Earth's apex predators – or hypercarnivores – over long periods of time, without consuming enough other nutrients they can develop protein poisoning. Also known as "rabbit starvation", protein poisoning can lead to malnutrition and death. Research from Beasley and her team suggests that Neanderthals had a hidden delicacy: maggots. Similar to the historical diets of some indigenous communities, Neanderthals too may have dined on decaying meat. Stunningly lifelike face of 75,000-year-old Neanderthal woman in her 40s recreated after 'best-preserved' skull found It is this that would have boosted their internal nitrogen levels to hypercarnivore-levels, according to the study. Maggots, which are fly larvae, can be a fat-rich source of food. They are unavoidable after you kill another animal, easily collectible in large numbers and nutritionally beneficial. Melanie Beasley, assistant professor of anthropology at Purdue University, Indiana "We suspected that maggots could have been a different potential source of enriched nitrogen-15 in the Neanderthal diet," Beasley explained in a recent article published in The Conversation. "Maggots, which are fly larvae, can be a fat-rich source of food. "They are unavoidable after you kill another animal, easily collectible in large numbers and nutritionally beneficial." Beasley and her colleagues used data from a forensic anthropology project focused on how nitrogen might help estimate time since death to investigate the possibility. "I had originally collected modern muscle tissue samples and associated maggots at the Forensic Anthropology Center at University of Tennessee, Knoxville, to understand how nitrogen values change during decomposition after death," she said. "While the data can assist modern forensic death investigations, in our current study we repurposed it to test a very different hypothesis. "We found that stable nitrogen isotope values increase modestly as muscle tissue decomposes, ranging from -0.6 permil to 7.7 permil." The researchers found that maggots found in dried, frozen or cached animal foods would have inflated the nitrogen levels in ancient humans during the Late Pleistocene era. Research shows that [nitrogen-15] values are higher for cooked foods, putrid muscle tissue from terrestrial and aquatic species, and, with our study, for fly larvae feeding on decaying tissue. "Neanderthals' cultural practices, similar to those of Indigenous peoples, might be the answer to the mystery of their high [nitrogen-15] values. "Ancient hominins were butchering, storing, preserving, cooking and cultivating a variety of items. "All these practices enriched their paleo menu with foods in forms that nonhominin carnivores do not consume. "Research shows that [nitrogen-15] values are higher for cooked foods, putrid muscle tissue from terrestrial and aquatic species, and, with our study, for fly larvae feeding on decaying tissue." Although maggots may not solely explain the lion-like nitrogen levels in Neanderthals, according to the researchers. It is still unclear how many maggots an ancient human would need to eat to account for so much nitrogen. More research is needed on changes in nitrogen-15 values of foods processed, stored and cooked following Indigenous traditional practices to "help us better understand the dietary practices of our ancient relatives," said Beasley.
Scottish Sun
19 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
The most common side effects of different fat jabs revealed – as researchers find vomiting and nausea top symptom
But health officials warn fat jabs are not a silver bullet and can come with some serious side effects WEIGHT UP The most common side effects of different fat jabs revealed – as researchers find vomiting and nausea top symptom Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FAT jabs do often sound like a magical quick fix to overeating and demanding hunger pangs. But the drugs can leave some users feeling seriously unwell and many in hospital. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Monitoring Facebook posts could be a useful way to spot side effects that might be unknown, scientists say (Credit: Getty) After scouring social media, scientists have found the most common side effects of the popular fat-busting meds. Vomiting, nausea and headaches are the most talked-about side effects of the jabs, according to the new study, which analysed thousands of Facebook posts. The US researchers looked at how people in the US were discussing GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy, Ozempic, and Mounjaro on public pages. They found that gut issues were the most frequently mentioned side effects overall, especially among users of semaglutide (the active ingredient in Wegovy and Ozempic) and tirzepatide (the active ingredient in Mounjaro). Mental health concerns like anxiety and depression were also raised, but far less frequently. The study, published in JMIR Infodemiology, found that vomiting was most often mentioned in posts about Mounjaro, at 3.8 per cent. Meanwhile, Wegovy users mentioned depression more than any other group, with 1.57 per cent of posts referencing the symptom. The drugs, originally developed for type 2 diabetes, have soared in popularity thanks to their dramatic weight-loss effects, with celebs like Oprah Winfrey and Sharon Osbourne singing their praises. But they've also been linked to less glamorous side effects, such as joint pain, fatigue, hair loss, and in some cases, gallbladder problems. Despite the risks, experts say the drugs are still safe and effective for most patients. Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons They help control blood sugar, trigger rapid weight loss, and cut the risk of dying from heart disease by around a fifth in people with obesity or type 2 diabetes. Roughly 1.5million people in the UK are now taking GLP-1 drugs, which have been hailed by some as game-changers in the fight against obesity. In the US, this number is even higher, with over 2 per cent of the population, approximately 4 million people, currently using these medications for weight loss. But health officials warn they are not a silver bullet and can come with side effects. The scientists found these effects varied by brand. Zepbound, a newer tirzepatide drug which is approved in the US but not the UK, was linked more often to high blood pressure, While Ozempic posts mentioned gallbladder issues most. Ozempic is approved for weight loss in the US but is only approved for diabetes in the UK. Scientists from the University of Maryland, who are behind the study, analysed nearly 60,000 unique public Facebook posts uploaded by US users of the medicines between 2022 and 2024, They used cluster analysis to map out which symptoms were often mentioned together. They found that vomiting, nausea and pancreatitis - a condition where the pancreas becomes inflamed - often came hand in hand, while anxiety frequently appeared alongside depression and fatigue. Posts about side effects spiked after major events including the US Food and Drug Administration approving Wegovy for teens, celebrity endorsements, and wider insurance coverage in the US. 2 Despite these increases, the proportion of people talking about side effects actually dropped over time. Scientists say monitoring social media could be a useful way to spot side effects that might be missed or underreported in clinical trials. But they warned that Facebook posts don't tell the full story as symptoms were self-reported, which means they can be exaggerated or incomplete. There is also no way to verify dosage, how long people were on the drugs, or even whether they were using genuine products.
Daily Record
20 hours ago
- Daily Record
'PIP is not for people scrounging money and Brits on benefits are judged too harshly'
Charli M, who regularly speaks out about mental health, shared a video to her followers explaining why people on PIP (Personal Independence Payment) are not "scroungers" A former Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessor has hit back at Brits who label benefit claimants as "scroungers", shedding light on the rigorous process to access the payment. Charli M, known for her candid discussions about mental health on TikTok, revealed she used to work as a PIP assessor and insists there are many misconceptions about the process. In a recent video, she addressed comments on her posts labelling benefit recipients as "fraudsters" and accusing them of "scrounging" off others. She aims to debunk these myths, explaining that stringent guidelines must be met to qualify for the payment, and it's actually "incredibly hard" to secure PIP. The subject frequently sparks debate, particularly when alterations to the payment system occur. Recently, new dates for PIP changes were announced. Charli highlighted that, while there are numerous stories circulating about Brits on PIP, many people lack understanding of how the system operates. She clarified that it's possible to work and claim a disability benefit, a fact often misunderstood. For those unsure about PIP, it's a payment designed to help with additional living costs for individuals with long-term physical or mental health conditions or disabilities, or those who struggle with daily tasks or mobility due to their condition. PIP entitlement is possible even if you're employed, have savings or are receiving most other benefits. Since Charli posted the video, it has sparked a flurry of comments from people sharing their personal experiences. One person commented: "My mum used to be a PIP assessor and I'm a work coach for UC. People don't seem to realise you usually need pretty solid medical evidence in order to get PIP, and it really shouldn't be stigmatised the way it is. "99% of people on these benefits are very much deserving of them." Another added: "Thank you for this. We aren't lazy - far from it. As someone who's been disabled all my life [and] received lots of backlash - I had to fight to get PIP." A third responded: "I get PIP and work, but can only work two days a week due to illness, but I still try my hardest to work. People don't understand." Meanwhile, a fourth also remarked: "PIP is very hard to get awarded." Another person chimed in with: "Thank you for this. I have to keep trying to explain that PIP isn't an out of work benefit." Are you eligible for PIP? According to the Government website: "You can get Personal Independence Payment (PIP) if all of the following apply to you: You're 16 or over You have a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability You have difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around You expect the difficulties to last for at least 12 months from when they started "You must also be under State Pension age if you've not received PIP before. If you live in Scotland, you need to apply for Adult Disability Payment (ADP) instead. "If you're over State Pension age, you can apply for Attendance Allowance instead. Or if you've received PIP before, you can still make a new claim if you were eligible for it in the year before you reached State Pension age." Further details can be found on the website.
