Rights defenders denounce US sanctions on UN expert on Palestinians
FILE PHOTO: UN Special Rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese gives a press conference at the UN City in Copenhagen, Denmark February 5, 2025. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS/File Photo
GENEVA - Human rights defenders rallied on Thursday to support the top U.N. expert on Palestinian rights, after the United States imposed sanctions on her over what it said was unfair criticism of Israel.
Italian lawyer Francesca Albanese serves as special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, one of dozens of experts appointed by the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council to report on specific global issues.
She has long criticised Israeli treatment of the Palestinians, and this month published a report accusing over 60 companies, including some U.S. firms, of supporting Israeli settlements in the West Bank and military actions in Gaza.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Wednesday Albanese would be added to the U.S. sanctions list for work which had prompted what he described as illegitimate prosecutions of Israelis at the International Criminal Court.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk urged Washington to reverse course.
"Even in the face of fierce disagreement, U.N. Member States should engage substantively and constructively, rather than resort to punitive measures," he said.
Juerg Lauber, the Swiss permanent representative to the U.N. who now holds the rotating presidency of the Human Rights Council, said he regretted the sanctions, and called on states to "refrain from any acts of intimidation or reprisal" against the body's experts.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business S'pore to launch new grant for companies, expand support for workers amid US tariff uncertainties
Singapore Spike in piracy, armed robbery cases in straits of Malacca and Singapore in first half of 2025
Singapore Singaporean fugitive charged over alleged drug trafficking, faces death penalty if convicted
Singapore KTPH trials 'smart diapers' for adult patients to prevent skin conditions, relieve burden on nurses
Singapore PSP's CEC renewal shows its commitment to being a reasonable alternative choice, says Stephanie Tan
World 'Do some homework': 6 key exchanges between US Senator Duckworth and S'pore envoy nominee Sinha
Singapore Singapore launches centre to drive sustainable aviation in Asia-Pacific
Multimedia 60 objects to mark SG60: Which is your favourite?
Mariana Katzarova, who serves as the special rapporteur for human rights in Russia, said her concern was that other countries would follow the U.S. lead.
"This is totally unacceptable and opens the gates for any other government to do the same," she told Reuters. "It is an attack on U.N. system as a whole. Member states must stand up and denounce this."
Russia has rejected Katzarova's mandate and refused to let her enter the country, but it has so far stopped short of publicly adding her to a sanctions list.
Washington has already imposed sanctions against officials at the International Criminal Court, which has issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister for suspected war crimes in Gaza. Another court, the International Court of Justice, is hearing a case brought by South Africa that accuses Israel of genocide.
Israel denies that its forces have carried out war crimes or genocide against Palestinians in the war in Gaza, which was precipitated by an attack by Hamas-led fighters in October 2023.
"The United States is working to dismantle the norms and institutions on which survivors of grave abuses rely," said Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch.
The group's former head, Kenneth Roth, called the U.S. sanctions an attempt "to deter prosecution of Israeli war crimes and genocide in Gaza".
The United States, once one of the most active members of the Human Rights Council, has disengaged from it under President Donald Trump, alleging an anti-Israel bias. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 minutes ago
- Straits Times
What happens if Trump fires Fed Chair Jerome Powell?
Find out what's new on ST website and app. US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has been in President Donald Trump's crosshairs for failing to heed his calls for lower interest rates. Mr Donald Trump's relentless pressure on Mr Jerome Powell is once again roiling markets and raising questions about what would happen next if the president fired the embattled Federal Reserve chair . Such a move would be a first in US history and would almost certainly trigger a landmark lawsuit that would grip both Washington and Wall Street and ultimately be decided by the US Supreme Court. The latest turmoil erupted July 16 amid reports that Mr Trump was expected to move soon against Mr Powell, who's been in the president's crosshairs for failing to heed his calls for lower interest rates. Mr Trump pushed back on the reports, saying Mr Powell's ouster was 'highly unlikely, unless he has to leave' due to 'fraud'. That was a reference to cost overruns for renovations at the Fed headquarters, which Mr Trump and his allies have been zeroing in on as a potential reason to fire Mr Powell 'for cause'. Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act, the law that governs the central bank, says members of the Fed's Board of Governors, of which the chair is one, can be 'removed for cause'. Whether cost overruns amount to such wrongdoing would be a novel matter for the courts. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA launches anti-vaping checks near 5 institutes of higher learning Opinion The workplace needs to step up on mental health to match Singapore's efforts at the national level Business Market versus mission: What will Income Insurance choose? Singapore Singapore Zoo celebrates reptile baby boom, including hatchings of endangered species Life First look at the new Singapore Oceanarium at Resorts World Sentosa Business Singapore key exports surprise with 13% rebound in June amid tariff uncertainty Opinion AI and education: We need to know where this sudden marriage is heading Singapore Coffee Meets Bagel's Singpass check: Why I'll swipe right on that What would likely happen next if Mr Trump fired Powell? The firing would take effect right away, but Mr Powell could immediately sue, most likely in Washington federal court, and ask for an injunction reinstating him while the litigation moves forward. Both sides would file briefs outlining their arguments, giving Mr Powell an opportunity to portray his firing as unjustified. The judge could hold a hearing before issuing a decision on the injunction. The outcome might hinge on whether Mr Powell sways the judge that he – and the Fed – would suffer 'irreparable harm' during the case if the status quo weren't maintained. The ruling on the injunction would be crucial because it could be months or longer before a judge rules on the merits of the case. If Mr Powell's request for an injunction were denied, his firing would remain in effect and the Fed vice-chair would serve as chair. That post is currently held by Mr Philip Jefferson. Mr Jefferson was nominated to the Fed board by then-president Joe Biden in 2022. Mr Powell was nominated as chair in 2017 by Mr Trump, during his first term as president. If the injunction were granted, Mr Powell could remain in office while the case moves forward. Either side could appeal, meaning a federal appeals court panel would weigh in, potentially followed by the Supreme Court. A Supreme Court decision on an injunction in all likelihood would resolve the case. Although the losing side could continue litigating the case, the chances of the justices effectively reversing themselves later on would be small. What would the Supreme Court likely do if the case got there? The Supreme Court indicated in May that Mr Trump can't simply fire Mr Powell without any grounds. In letting Mr Trump oust officials at two other agencies without having to give a justification, the court majority said the decision didn't mean the president wielded similar authority at the Fed. The court called the central bank a 'uniquely structured, quasi-private entity'. Still, the ruling left open the possibility that Mr Powell could be fired for cause. And Mr Trump's Supreme Court track record is likely to put him in a strong position should the case land there. The court's conservative supermajority has repeatedly declined to second-guess Mr Trump's judgments, conferring broad criminal immunity on the president in 2024 and then granting a barrage of requests to let policies of his that are under legal challenge take effect in 2025. 'They are getting out of Trump's way,' said Boston University law professor Jed Shugerman, who is an expert on presidential power. Even if lower court judges or the Supreme Court finds Mr Trump unlawfully fired Mr Powell, it's not clear he'd be able to stay in his job, said Associate Professor Jonathan Shaub, an executive power expert at the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law who has served under Democratic presidents in the White House and Justice Department. He pointed to two indicators. First, in a June 27 ruling in the legal fight over Mr Trump's policy restricting birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court narrowed the authority of federal judges to provide 'equitable relief', which is a court-ordered remedy requiring a party to do or stop doing something, rather than paying money to settle a lawsuit. Second, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote an opinion earlier in 2025 suggesting it wasn't appropriate for courts to reinstate high-level officials. What would a legal case hinge on? It would depend on what reason or reasons Mr Trump gave. If the president were to take the 'for cause' route, accusing Mr Powell of mismanaging the Fed headquarters renovation , the case might hinge on the details of that project and who made the decisions that led to the cost overruns. Laws that describe 'for cause' generally define the term as encompassing three possibilities: inefficiency; neglect of duty; and malfeasance, meaning wrongdoing, in office. There's no consensus on what the terms, which gained prominence in Congress more than a century ago, mean specifically. A judge would have to decide, based on arguments from both sides, whether Mr Powell's role in the renovation cost overruns amounted to any of the three. But clear legal precedents would be few and far between. The Supreme Court has never considered whether a president had adequate grounds to dismiss an official for cause. 'We've never tested this kind of statute before, and certainly not in the context of the Fed,' said scholar Adam White, who focuses on the Supreme Court and the administrative state at the American Enterprise Institute. A report by Columbia Law School lecturers Jane Manners and Lev Menand said that inefficiency in this context has been described as 'wasteful government administration caused by inept officers', while malfeasance in office has been characterised as a 'wrongful act committed in the execution of one's duties that caused injury to others'. Neglect of duty, they said, indicated a 'failure to perform one's duties in a way that caused injury to others'. It would be up to the courts to decide how the 'for cause' standard applied to any lawsuit by Mr Powell. What's the issue with the Fed's renovation project? The Fed is in the midst of the first large-scale renovation of its two main buildings in Washington since they were built in the 1930s. The central bank has said the project is designed to reduce costs over time by consolidating the bank's operations. The renovation plans were first approved by the Fed's board in 2017. Since then, the price tag has swollen. According to Fed budget documents for 2025, the overall cost estimate for the project has risen to US$2.5 billion (S$3.2 billion), compared with US$1.9 billion in 2023. The bank attributes the increase in the estimate mainly to design changes that were a result of consultations with review agencies, differences between estimated and actual costs, and unforeseen circumstances such as finding more asbestos than anticipated. A number of Mr Trump allies have seized on the renovation in an apparent effort to build a case to justify firing Powell. Mr Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Administration has alleged, without providing details, that Mr Powell lied about the specifics of the project during a June 25 Senate hearing. Mr Pulte has asserted this would warrant removing Mr Powell 'for cause' and called on Congress to investigate. A Fed official said that Mr Powell's statements were truthful. Mr Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, said in a July 10 social media post that the renovation project was 'an ostentatious overhaul'. Mr Trump has said that Mr Powell should be investigated for fraud related to the renovations. At Mr Powell's request, the Fed's Inspector General has launched an investigation of the project's cost increases. How quickly could a new permanent chair take the helm if Powell is removed? A new, permanent chair would need to be nominated by Mr Trump and confirmed by the Senate, a process that typically takes some weeks if not months. In the interim, the Federal Reserve Act states that the vice-chair 'shall serve in the absence of the Chairman'. What would Powell's dismissal mean for interest rates? Removing the Fed chief wouldn't necessarily solve Mr Trump's main beef with the central bank. He wants lower interest rates, but a new chair couldn't deliver that alone. Rates are set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which is currently headed by Mr Powell. The FOMC has the ability to elect its own chair. That position has typically been held by the Fed chair, though it can be held by any one of the other 18 policymakers on the committee. All 19 members participate in FOMC meetings and 12 vote. That means a new chair would have to win over the other members with a reasonable case for cutting rates. How would financial markets react to Powell's dismissal? Investors value the Fed's status as an independent organisation. Without it, the central bank's pledge to keep inflation in check lacks credibility. And expectations for higher inflation can drastically shift the price of financial assets. Within 30 minutes of a Bloomberg report that Mr Trump would likely fire Mr Powell, the S&P 500 index of US stocks fell 1 per cent, the yield on the 30-year US treasury bond rose 10 basis points, and the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index declined 1.2 per cent. Bloomberg Economics' Anna Wong said that if Mr Trump actually moves to dismiss the Fed chair, it would result eventually in slower economic growth, higher unemployment and sticky inflation. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 minutes ago
- Business Times
French prosecutors demand Fiat face trial in diesel scandal
[PARIS] French prosecutors have demanded Italian car maker Fiat face trial on fraud charges over the emissions-tampering scandal that struck German giant Volkswagen, a source told AFP on Wednesday. It is the fourth trial demanded in France against major car makers after cases against Volkswagen and the French companies Peugeot-Citroen and Renault. A source close to the case who asked not to be named told AFP on Wednesday that the Paris prosecutors' office made the demand on June 30 accusing Fiat of aggravated fraud. The source said the Italian company is accused of selling Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Jeep vehicles fitted with diesel engines that 'frequently exceeded the regulatory threshold for nitrogen oxide emissions', highly dangerous to humans, between 2014 and 2017. The scandal has caused waves in the global car industry since September 2015, when Volkswagen admitted tampering with millions of diesel vehicles to dupe pollution tests. A German court in May convicted and handed prison sentences, some suspended, to four former Volkswagen managers over their part in scandal. Filing their case against Volkswagen in February, French prosecutors said nearly one million French customers had to pay for servicing and repairs after the emissions breach was revealed. AFP
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia in a tight spot as pressure builds to reject Trump's ‘alpha male' pick as ambassador
No date is set for the Senate vote, but Mr Adams is expected to be approved. KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysia's government is facing mounting calls to reject a self-styled 'alpha male' influencer picked by President Donald Trump to be US ambassador, in what could risk damaging ties at a critical time of tariff talks between the two countries. The White House has proposed 40-year-old author and outspoken political commentator Nick Adams to the Senate as its nominee for ambassador to Malaysia, triggering concerns in the Muslim-majority nation over Adams' views on Islam and support for Israel's military campaign in Gaza, among other sensitive topics. No date is set for the Senate vote, but Mr Adams is expected to be approved, with the Republican-held Senate green-lighting every Trump nominee since he became president in January. Mr Adams, a naturalised US citizen originally from Australia, has an outsized persona on social media and is known for his appeal among young males in the 'manosphere', an online space for men's issues. He lists interests including a love for hot dogs, steak, muscle cars, and restaurant chain Hooters, where servers wear revealing uniforms. In posts on online platform X, Mr Adams has railed against alleged efforts to 'teach Islam in schools' and described those expressing solidarity with Palestinians as supporters of terrorism. The posts have sparked outrage in Malaysia, which has a majority of mostly Muslim ethnic Malays alongside significant ethnic Chinese and ethnic Indian minorities of other faiths. Malaysia has also long supported the Palestinian cause, with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim rejecting what he described as Western pressure to condemn Palestinian militant group Hamas. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA launches anti-vaping checks near 5 institutes of higher learning Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Business Singapore key exports surprise with 13% rebound in June amid tariff uncertainty Business Market versus mission: What will Income Insurance choose? Life First look at the new Singapore Oceanarium at Resorts World Sentosa Opinion AI and education: We need to know where this sudden marriage is heading Singapore Coffee Meets Bagel's Singpass check: Why I'll swipe right on that Singapore Jail for man who fatally hit his daughter, 2, while driving van without licence The youth wing of Anwar's People's Justice Party said this week it would submit a memorandum of protest to the US embassy in Kuala Lumpur against Mr Adams' proposed appointment as envoy, adding any rejection 'should not be misconstrued as hostility but rather seen as a necessary measure to safeguard the integrity of bilateral relations'. Mr Mohamed Sukri Omar, a member of Islamic opposition party PAS, said in a statement the appointment would be 'an open insult towards the sensitivities of the Malaysian people', while a group representing 20 pro-Palestine organisations in Malaysia urged the government to reject Mr Adams . Malaysian government spokesperson Fahmi Fadzil said on July 15 that Mr Adams' appointment had not yet been raised in cabinet, which has the authority to accept new diplomatic appointments. Mr Shahriman Lockman of Malaysia's Institute of Strategic and International Studies, said protests from Muslim groups and ruling bloc allies could be too politically costly for Mr Anwar's government to ignore, although Mr Adams may be a useful conduit during trade talks due to his perceived closeness to Mr Trump. Refusing Mr Adams could also provoke retaliation from Mr Trump at a time when Malaysia faces pressure to make trade concessions in exchange for lowering a potentially hefty 25 per cent US tariff , he said. 'There's no elegant solution here. It's damned if you do, damned if you don't,' Mr Shahriman said. Mr Adams' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In an X post on July 10, he thanked Mr Trump for the nomination, describing it as 'the honour of a lifetime'. Mr Trump described Mr Adams on Truth Social as 'an incredible Patriot and very successful entrepreneur, whose love of, and devotion to, our Great Country is an inspiration'. When contacted for comment, the US embassy in Kuala Lumpur pointed to remarks made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a visit to Malaysia last week. Mr Rubio said he supported Mr Adams' nomination and looked forward to his confirmation. 'Tone matters' Former diplomats say Malaysia was unlikely to reject Mr Adams' appointment outright, but could make its objections known through informal channels or by delaying its approval. 'That would send a subtle but clear diplomatic signal: we value the bilateral relationship, but we also expect a standard of decorum, cultural sensitivity, and respect appropriate to such a posting,' said Dr Ilango Karuppannan, a retired former Malaysian ambassador who was once deputy chief of mission in Washington. While concerns over Mr Adams' appointment were unlikely to have a direct impact on trade negotiations, 'the broader tone of the bilateral relationship always matters,' he said. 'A smooth, professional handling of this nomination can help ensure those trade discussions stay on track, while an avoidable public clash might risk unnecessary complications,' Dr Karuppannan said. Former Malaysia Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah, a member of the largely ethnic Malay opposition bloc Perikatan Nasional, said Malaysia should stand firm in upholding its values despite Mr Adams' relationship with Mr Trump. 'Yes it would be good to have a US ambassador who is very close to Trump... but you cannot compromise on certain principles,' he said. Professor Tricia Yeoh, an associate professor at the University of Nottingham Malaysia, said Mr Adams' success as envoy would be highly dependent on his ability to win the trust of Malaysia's political and policy leadership. 'If the comments he has previously made on social media are accurate depictions of his position on sociopolitical matters, he might find it challenging to do so, especially if he intends to make these positions publicly and explicitly known,' she said. REUTERS
