
What Employees Want: Benefits, AI, And The Multigenerational Workforce
That was the entrée approach to employee benefits.
But in 2025, the average is over. The entrée model no longer fits. Employees need and want a buffet selection.
Today's workforce is more diverse in age, life stage, lifestyle, and career trajectory than at any point in history. We're managing 25-year-olds with side hustles and living solo, 30-somethings with student debt and less likely than previous generations to have children, 40- and 50-somethings juggling caregiving of aging parents, and 60- and 70-somethings transitioning into retirement but still wanting to work in some other capacity.
Yet most benefits systems are still designed to serve that historical average. A prix fixe plate, served with good intentions but poorly aligned with reality.
Employees Want Personalization. Most Aren't Getting It.
Only 15% of U.S. workers have access to cafeteria-style or flexible benefits, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the private sector, it's just 11%.
Meanwhile, a Mercer survey found 41% of employees say their benefits don't reflect their real needs. Among workers who say they're satisfied, many consider their package 'good enough' but not ideal. And nearly 70% say that the ability to personalize benefits is important to them.
This isn't just a mismatch. It's a missed opportunity. In today's competition for talent, benefits are no longer only about compensation; they are part of a larger conversation. They are a conversation between the employer and employee where the benefits offered signal if your employer 'gets you' or 'cares about you.'
Multigenerational Workforce, Different Generations, Different Needs
For the first time in modern workforce history, five, sometimes six, generations are working side by side. Similar to medieval alchemists who sought ways to turn different metals into gold, employers must now perform a generational alchemy, transforming multiple generations into an engaged and productive workforce.
Think about it. Gen Z may be interning and onboarding. Gen X and younger Boomers might be leading departments while caring for both kids and aging parents. Millennials are moving into management while paying off student loans and hoping to purchase a home.
Older Boomers and some Silent Generation workers are rethinking retirement as more of a transition than an exit. Many older workers either don't want to leave the workforce entirely or can't afford to do so. However, most employer benefits systems still treat retirement like a switch: you're either in or out. That all-or-nothing approach is leading to loss of talent, knowledge, and trust.
Employer Benefits Moving From An Entrée To A Buffet Model
Some employers are flipping the model. Instead of one-size-fits-all, they're creating buffet-style benefits: modular, flexible, and personalized. Benefits that adapt to where people are. Not just a calculation of how old they are and what the 'average' employee of similar age years ago needed or wanted.
This isn't about being generous. It's about being responsive.
A 28-year-old engineer may want pet care. A 35-year-old designer may want fertility benefits. A 45-year-old shift supervisor may need skills training. A 60-year-old marketing director might seek phased retirement planning or Medicare navigation. A 72-year-old contractor might only want telehealth and wellness benefits.
When everyone is served the same prix fixe plate, someone walks away hungry or walks away entirely.
Real-World Signals: A Benefits Model Is Emerging
Some companies aren't waiting for a demographic wake-up call, they're already rewriting the benefits playbook to match the lives of a multigenerational workforce better. But, in a workforce defined by complexity and generational overlap, 'some' is no longer enough.
At Microsoft, employees who move into phased or part-time roles don't lose their benefits. Instead, the company treats it like a lane change, not an exit ramp. It's a subtle but powerful shift: contribution matters more than classification. That approach allows flexibility without sacrificing institutional knowledge.
AIS Inc., a manufacturer with nearly 40% of its workforce over age 50, made a similar move. When a 73-year-old technician asked to reduce his hours, the company allowed him to keep full benefits. The decision not only retained valuable expertise on the factory floor, it sent a broader message of loyalty and inclusion to workers of all ages.
Travelers Insurance has gone beyond the traditional model of dependent care by partnering with Wellthy to support employees caring for aging parents and relatives. Recognizing that caregiving isn't just for young families, they've built a benefit that aligns with the real pressures many midlife and older workers face.
Other employers are adopting platforms like Virgin Pulse and Foodsmart to give employees greater autonomy offering mental health coaching, nutrition support, and lifestyle stipends tailored to individual needs.
These benefits don't just check boxes. They reflect the real-life needs and wants of today's employees.
The Multigenerational Workforce's Health, Wealth, And Missing Middle
Personalized benefits have long been the dream but rarely the reality. This isn't because employers did not care, but because the cost, complexity, and compliance risks were too high. Traditional systems offered by benefits providers and retirement administrators were built to serve the 'bookends' of work life: health and wealth. Health across careers, wealth for retirement years.
But in between health and wealth are life stages and lifestyles that this approach misses.
In today's multigenerational workforce, the middle matters more than ever. Employees aren't just joining and leaving or saving and retiring. They're caregiving, reprioritizing, upskilling, downshifting, and re-entering. Addressing this dynamic middle is essential not just to recruiting talent, but to retaining talent, and reengaging professionals across the career lifecycle.
AI Meets HR: Is Personalized Benefits the Next Competitive Advantage?
The convergence of AI and the multigenerational workforce holds the power and promise to break the personalization barrier.
AI has long promised personalization, but only recently have we begun to see it take root in the workplace. In a study conducted by the MIT AgeLab in collaboration with Bank of America, human resource leaders across industries shared how artificial intelligence is reshaping their work today—and how they expect it to evolve. Far from fearing a robotic takeover, these HR professionals view AI as a trusted assistant: a tool to save time, reduce administrative burden, and enhance the quality of their decisions.
The study found that AI is already widely used in recruitment, but its potential reaches far beyond hiring. HR leaders anticipate using AI to personalize onboarding experiences, deliver targeted training, and, equally critical, to customize benefits and compensation in ways that better align with employees' diverse life stages and needs. For a workforce that spans college interns to professionals in phased retirement, AI could be the key to unlocking modular, relevant, and timely support across the entire career lifecycle.
The direction is clear: personalization at scale is no longer an aspiration. It's an expectation. And in a multigenerational workforce, using AI to deliver the right benefit at the right time may be the next competitive edge.
For employers and plan administrators, AI could automate compliance, reduce administrative overhead, and enable data-driven decisions at scale. Moreover, plan administrators that offer tools that truly personalize employee experience provide a competitive advantage to compete based on how well they partner with employers to support employees across the lifecycle, not just on measures of clicks and costs.
The result? Personalization becomes not only possible but practical.
If Amazon Can Do It, Why Can't Employers?
Most benefit systems are still optimized for an average world that no longer exists, one with nuclear families, linear careers, and a hard stop at 65. If the workforce has changed, the workplace must change with it.
Call it the Amazon-effect.
In a world where Amazon can anticipate your next purchase and make personalized suggestions in real-time, employees are expecting personalization that reflects similar empathy and engagement from their employers, who are invested in recruiting the best talent, retaining star employees, and re-engaging with those who may be retirement age but remain contributors to the enterprise.
Let's stop serving a one-size-fits-all plate; it's time to serve up a buffet.
We now have the tools, technology, insight, and demand to build a better model: a modular, buffet-style benefits AI-enabled ecosystem that reflects real people in real life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he believes there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down tariffs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953
Listen and subscribe to The Big Idea on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. When Shivam Mallick Shah and Lindsey Davis Stover founded the tequila brand 1953, they wanted to make moves in an industry that was becoming increasingly popular among their own demographic while also opening doors for other women. As the brand proudly states on its website, 1953 is "Founded, Farmed, Distilled, and Led by Women." On Yahoo Finance's The Big Idea podcast, the two entrepreneurs shared how they managed to pull off such a feat in a historically male-dominated industry. (Watch the full episode above; listen-only below.) "I just kind of got down this rabbit hole of where the women in tequila are, unfortunately, really hard to find. So that kind of led us to this idea," Davis Stover, a Texas native, said on the podcast. "We were drinking tequila. Every woman we knew is drinking tequila," she continued. "So we wanted to create a company that was founded, farmed, distilled, and led by women at every single level. Even our name, 1953, is the year women earned the right to vote in Mexico. I think that is just the essence of our company and providing opportunities for women." This embedded content is not available in your region. "People didn't think it was necessary to have a female-led supply chain," Shah said. "They didn't think that it would make a difference in the quality of the product, and they didn't think that, frankly, we could do it. They had a lot of strong opinions on what we could do, and it was different than what we wanted to do." Shah and Davis Stover tackled their mission by completing their search in an "organic way," talking with people who worked at distilleries and farms in Mexico. Eventually, they found Carmen and Adriana, who ran the family-owned distillery that 1953 would eventually use. "Their family has owned this distillery for over a hundred years, and they have trained a female master distiller, Rocio Rodriguez, who signs every bottle," Shah explained. "She had this incredible story of having come to this distillery when she was pregnant. She was trained as a chemical engineer, but she was worried about losing her job. Carmen and Adriana's families decided to build a nursery so she could come to work and bring her whole self, which has, of course, changed her life, but it changed so many people's lives." Though their journey to creating a brand with a strong female focus had its roadblocks, the biggest hurdle was finding a woman-owned agave farm. Traditionally, agave farms in Mexico are passed down from father to son, but Carmen and Adriana helped the entrepreneurs find the farm they partner with today. "We could not find an agave farm owned by women," Shah said. "Carmen and Adriana helped us find a gentleman who only had four daughters. We met with them, and we talked about what we were trying to build. We asked him if he would consider passing his farm down to his daughters if we guaranteed purchase of agave from their farms for 1953." After a family meeting in which the four women discussed the proposition with their husbands and father, they ultimately agreed, deciding to take on the responsibility and risk to help complete 1953's women-led supply chain. "They had grown up on this farm, and they knew it like the back of their hand, but they never saw themselves as CEOs. They never saw themselves as the people in charge of running the farm," Shah explained. "What made them think differently was the high school down the street and all the girls who were in that high school, just like they used to be, and wanting to let those girls know that there was nothing they couldn't do. ... It was a motivation we all shared, and we knew we had an alignment of our values, which told us we were in the right place. And that really completed our supply chain." Every Thursday, Elizabeth Gore discusses real-life stories and smart strategies for launching a small business on The Big Idea podcast. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports
(Reuters) -U.S. railroad customer groups have demanded regulators block or put onerous conditions on the proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Seven associations of shippers have expressed concern the planned deal would significantly increase the power of the merged railroad to raise prices or reduce service standards, the report said. Last month, Union Pacific said it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern in an $85 billion deal to create the first U.S. coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. Reuters could not immediately verify the FT report. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Previously, the transportation division of SMART, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, said it plans to oppose the merger when it comes before the Surface Transportation Board for review. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also criticized the merger saying the deal would push "us even further down the road of dangerous consolidation and monopoly power ... This is a hostile takeover of America's infrastructure."