Rupert Murdoch should fight Trump's bogus lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal
Trump is suing Murdoch, News Corp., Dow Jones & Co., The Wall Street Journal's publisher and two reporters who wrote a bombshell article last week about a 'bawdy' Trump-penned birthday note to the late billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump claims the letter is a 'fake,' and his lawyers in the suit accuse the Journal of 'glaring failures in journalistic ethics and standards of accurate reporting.' He wants the defendants to pay at least $20 billion.
Trump posted to Truth Social on Friday: 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' The White House also booted the Journal from the press pool for an upcoming presidential visit to Scotland.
It's not hard to see why Trump thinks this could work. Disney and Paramount, rather than take Trump to court and win (as many legal experts said they would), paid off settlements of $15 million and $16 million, respectively, to end Trump's legal attacks against ABC News and CBS News. Just as some white shoe law firms and universities sheepishly bent the knee when faced with the Trump administration's punitive threats, Disney and Paramount helped solidify a model of corporate cowardice. These companies demonstrated they'd rather just pay off the shakedown artist in the White House than stand up for their news operations or the First Amendment.
A representative with Dow Jones, the Journal's parent company, said in a statement: 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.'
To be sure, that's what they all say at first. But there are reasons for hope that the 94-year-old Murdoch could show more spine than his competitors.
Murdoch's Fox News and New York Post properties — for the most part — have been reliable MAGA cheerleaders in the decade since Trump's 2015 escalator ride announcing he was running for the Republican presidential nomination. But there have been cracks in their Trump devotion. The day after the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, the Post's editorial board put the blame on Trump. Murdoch, for his part, was so outraged at Trump's conduct that he wrote in an email to a Fox News executive that he wanted the network to 'make Trump a non person.'
Obviously, once the Republican base made it clear that there was literally nothing Trump could do that would make it vote for another contender, Fox News once again got in line behind Trump during the 2024 election. But Murdoch seems to understand that The Wall Street Journal is a much different property from a cable news network and a shouty local tabloid.
Murdoch never turned the Journal into a sensationalist, ideologically conservative outlet. Under his ownership, the Journal has maintained its well-deserved reputation for diligent, independent news reporting. And Murdoch knows there's a distinct value to that.
Even the Journal's typically Trump-adoring editorial board has repeatedly decried Trump's shakedowns of media outlets' parent companies. A WSJ editorial from June beseeched Paramount to resist the 'threat of regulatory disapproval' and instead 'win the legal case, vindicate its CBS journalists and the First Amendment, and trust that the FCC has enough integrity to operate as something more than the President's personal protection racket.'
If only Paramount shared the right-wing editorial board's ethical clarity on the matter. Oh, well.
Trump's history of bogus, speech-chilling lawsuits is well-documented. He's been filing them for decades, even once boasting that he knew he'd lose the cases but persisted with them because he knew they would make his perceived enemies' lives 'miserable.'
There are other reasons Murdoch should fight back against Trump's legal thuggery.
A judge last week threw out Trump's nearly $50 million lawsuit against legendary journalist Bob Woodward, and as my colleague Steve Benen noted, 'When Trump sued CNN and demanded $475 million, the case was thrown out; when he sued The Washington Post, the case was thrown out; and when he sued The New York Times, seeking $100 million, the case was thrown out.'
In a thread posted to X, attorney Andrew Fleischman noted some of the reasons Trump's lawsuit against Murdoch and the Journal is a complete mess. These include the fact that Trump's legal team filed the suit in Florida, which has an anti-SLAPP law to protect people menaced by such bogus suits. Fleischman also noted what he says is a procedural error by Trump's legal team that could lead to a dismissal and Trump's paying the Journal's legal fees.
Fleischman's conclusion: 'This lawsuit is meant to punish a newspaper for fair reporting. Any lawyer who tells you it has merit is talking out his ass.'
Murdoch's often factually challenged right-wing media empire has done incalculable damage to the American body politic — and continues to serve as a faithful echo chamber for MAGA rhetoric during Trump's reign of flagrant authoritarianism.
But the nonagenarian billionaire has a chance to stand up to a bully whom he clearly has no great personal affection for, and he has the chance to at least do his part in blocking Trump's rampage on the First Amendment.
This is a legacy-defining moment. If Murdoch stands up to Trump's cancel culture and his defamation suit lawfare — and vigorously defends The Wall Street Journal and its journalists — Murdoch can boast that, at least once, he did the right thing for America.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Arizona senator Ruben Gallego will be the latest Democrat to test out the 2028 waters in New Hampshire
In a press release, Gallego's political team said the senator's visit to New Hampshire 'reflects his core philosophy of going anywhere, talking to anyone, and fighting for working families.' Advertisement Since winning a fiercely contested Senate race last November—outperforming Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris in a state she lost handily—Gallego has actively positioned himself as a figure to watch as Democrats' crop of 2028 presidential contenders gradually comes into focus. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In May, Gallego traveled to Bucks County, Pennsylvania, a key swing county in the most important swing state, for a town hall intended to put pressure on the area's Republican congressman over the party's 'Big Beautiful Bill' to cut taxes and social services. Before heading to New Hampshire, Gallego will travel to Iowa, where the quadrennial caucus is historically the first overall contest of the presidential campaign cycle. On Aug. 8 and 9, he plans to stop at the Iowa State Fair—a rite of passage for presidential hopefuls—and hold a town hall in a Republican-held swing congressional district in eastern Iowa. Advertisement The 45-year old Democrat has insisted that he's not thinking about a 2028 run right now. But he did admit 'of course' he's considered running for the White House someday. As Democrats continue to litigate their 2024 defeat and grapple over how to craft a winning message again, Gallego has invoked his biography—working his way through Harvard, deploying to Iraq as a Marine during the height of the war—to explain what he believes he can add to the discussion. 'I'm the person that has worked those hard jobs and has had to figure out how to make ends meet, how to string a couple paychecks together, to pay rent and everything else like that,' he told NBC News in May, before heading to Pennsylvania. 'And I think people want to hear from Democrats like me.' A growing group of Democrats are beginning to make moves towards the 2028 presidential campaign, with big fundraisers, high-profile speeches, and splashy visits to South Carolina and other early primary states. After the party bypassed New Hampshire's long-recognized first-in-the-nation primary in 2024, potential hopefuls seem to be acting as if the state will reclaim its traditionally influential role in the process in 2028. (State presidential primary dates have not yet been finalized.) Earlier in July, Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota traveled to New Hampshire to campaign with Pappas, and in April, Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois headlined the state Democratic Party's biggest annual fundraising dinner. Sam Brodey can be reached at
Axios
4 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Car buyers aren't waiting for prices to go higher, survey finds
Middle-income Americans have accelerated their car-buying timelines amid worries about rising prices, according to new research shared first with Axios. Why it matters: On-again, off-again tariffs, along with other policy shifts in Washington, are confounding not just auto companies, but car buyers, too. But amid record pent-up demand, many consumers are deciding there's no point in putting off their car-buying decisions any longer. Driving the news: The findings are part of the latest quarterly survey by Santander Holdings USA, which aims to get a pulse on how economic conditions and future price uncertainty are impacting American households. While most middle-income consumers surveyed are worried about prices and feeling pinched by housing costs, they remain resilient, with three-quarters believing they are on the right financial track, Santander found. Between the lines: The findings underscore why vehicle access is so important to families. "Our research finds consumers are taking proactive steps to secure what matters most, especially autos," says Betty Jotanovic, president of auto relationships at Santander Consumer USA. "While they may have to make certain trade-offs, households are focused on maintaining vehicle access and prioritizing it within their budgets." Zoom in: Consumers are closely watching how future price uncertainty could affect their purchasing plans, and they are adjusting expectations accordingly, according to the survey, which was conducted by Morning Consult on behalf of Santander. While 52% had delayed a vehicle purchase over the past year due to cost, 55% are now considering buying in the year ahead, up from 47% in Q1 — and the first time in two years that prospective buyers outnumber those delaying a purchase. Nearly one in five (18%) expedited key purchases in Q2 amid future price uncertainty, with 41% of them buying a car. Higher prices haven't scared them off; if anything, they've motivated buyers to act now. Half of prospective buyers say they are now more likely to take out an auto loan. 48% are more likely to purchase a used vehicle. 42% are more likely to transact in the next three months. The big picture: Industry sales have been on a roller-coaster since President Trump launched his trade war against friends and foes alike. Vehicle sales surged in early 2025 as consumers raced to pre-empt tariffs and policy-driven price increases. As Trump began waffling on his trade policies, however, demand returned to normal. Now, with some of the uncertainty lifting, there's renewed interest among consumers to act fast. What to watch: Look for more sales pitches like the one delivered last week by Tesla CEO Elon Musk during an earnings call with investors. Citing the government's plan to end EV tax credits on Sept. 30, and Tesla's own intention to pare back incentives, Musk urged consumers not to wait.
Business Insider
5 minutes ago
- Business Insider
African students studying in U.S. advised against traveling amid Trump's new immigration policy
The Trump administration's revised immigration policy is raising alarm among African students in the United States, following the introduction of stricter visa conditions that could prevent them from leaving the country until after graduation. The Trump administration's revised immigration policy imposes stricter visa conditions on African students in the U.S. Many students and families express concerns about re-entry difficulties during emergencies or holidays. Students are advised to remain in the U.S. until completing their studies to avoid visa complications. Under the new rules, international students on F-1 visas, particularly those from Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Cameroon, will now receive single-entry visas valid for only three months. African students who make up a growing share of international enrolments are among the hardest hit. In 2023, over 50,000 students from sub-Saharan Africa studied in the U.S., an 18% jump from the previous year This development has triggered concern among students and families about the implications for travel flexibility during emergencies, holidays, or internships abroad. This means students must enter the U.S. within that period, but once inside, they are permitted to remain for the full duration of their academic program. However, if they leave the U.S. before graduation, they risk being unable to return without undergoing a fresh and potentially delayed visa application process. The new visa framework, introduced by the U.S. State Department and effective from July 8, 2025, significantly tightens restrictions for most nonimmigrant and non-official visa categories. For Nigerian applicants, the policy shift is a sharp break from previous norms that allowed multiple-entry visas valid for up to five years. . With the fall semester approaching, many international students now face added pressure to navigate the evolving U.S. immigration landscape, one that may increasingly require them to choose between staying the course or risking denial of re-entry. Experts clarify new U.S. visa rules, dispel misinformation Business Insider Africa reached out to Sasha Ramani, Head of Corporate Strategy at MPOWER Financing, a U.S.-based lender that supports international students, for clarification following rising concern over the new U.S. visa policy, which has caused anxiety among prospective African students and their families. While the policy change has sparked widespread worry on social media and in the press, Ramani says the practical impact on students' academic plans is minimal. ' Nothing significant should change with regard to their educational plans, ' Ramani said. ' The process of obtaining a student visa remains the same. Once students enter the U.S., they are allowed to stay for the full duration of their studies.' Ramani explained that the new visa regulation mirrors rules long applied to countries like Vietnam and stems from the principle of reciprocity —where the U.S. adjusts visa conditions to reflect how its own citizens are treated abroad. Still, he acknowledged the emotional toll of restricted mobility. ' We recommend that students affected by this policy not leave the U.S. until after graduation, ' he added. ' Admittedly, we understand this may limit their ability to see family or attend to other personal priorities during their studies.' In response, MPOWER is expanding its student support efforts, offering free visa preparation courses, mock interviews with former U.S. visa officers, and tailored webinars to help international students navigate the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. ' Many students rely on agents or online forums that may not always provide accurate guidance,' Ramani noted. ' Our goal is to equip students with clear, expert-backed information so they can make informed decisions and stay focused on their academic goals.' He also stressed that fears of travel bans or blanket disqualifications are misplaced. ' We've spoken with students who incorrectly believe their country is now subject to a travel ban. That's simply not true,' he said. 'What's needed now is clarity—not panic.' Ultimately, affected students are advised to enter the U.S. within the three-month visa validity window and remain there until their studies are completed. While this may limit holiday travel, Ramani notes it could also reduce travel costs and help with long-term budgeting. 'The United States continues to welcome talented international students,' he emphasized. ' And with the right preparation, these recent policy adjustments shouldn't stand in the way of anyone's educational dreams. ' While the new visa policy introduces tighter travel restrictions, it should not discourage African students or aspiring travelers from pursuing their educational goals in the United States.
