More pedestrianisation plans for London's West End
The draft masterplan reimagines architect John Nash's original ambition, set out 200 years ago, to connect St James's Park to Regent's Park, Westminster City Council said.Proposals also include the "greening" of Regent Street, improving pedestrian crossings on the road and removing the central island running along the street.
Geoff Barraclough, cabinet member for planning and economic development at Westminster City Council, said the plans would create "a new network of public spaces"."This is a rare opportunity to reimagine the heart of the West End as a greener, more welcoming and accessible place that works better for residents, visitors and local businesses alike," the Labour councillor said.He said the council was urging everyone who lives in, works in or visits the area to take part in its public engagement.Kristy Lansdown, from The Crown Estate, said the plans would ensure the area was "fit for the future".
The redevelopment plans for Regent Street come after the Mayor of London said plans to pedestrianise parts of Oxford Street will move forward "as quickly as possible".The mayor said there had been an "overwhelmingly positive response" to the separate pedestrianisation plans for Oxford Street, which were needed "urgently".
The future implementation of the proposals, along with the ways in which they are funded, are to be agreed by the council and The Crown Estate in 2026. Members of the public can have their say until 10 August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘It's not fair': Crystal Palace fans march in protest at demotion from Europa League
Furious Crystal Palace supporters have demanded that Uefa reverse its decision to demote the FA Cup winners from the Europa League to the Conference League next season as they staged a protest march outside Selhurst Park on Tuesday evening. It was confirmed last week that Uefa's club financial control body had concluded Palace breached its multi-club ownership criteria, with the south London club expected to appeal to the court of arbitration for sport (Cas) against a decision that their chair, Steve Parish, described as 'probably one of the greatest injustices that has ever happened in European football'. Parish also revealed that the New York Jets owner Woody Johnson has passed the Premier League's owners' and directors' test that should enable him to complete his purchase of John Textor's 43% stake in the coming days. However, with Uefa deeming that move came too late to save them, having ruled that Textor's Eagle Football Holdings Ltd had controlling stakes over both French club Lyon and Palace, a protest organised by supporters' group the Holmesdale Fanatics was attended by hundreds of fans who marched from Norwood High Street to Palace's stadium. 'Uefa: morally bankrupt. Revoke the ruling now,' read a large banner at the front of the march, with another reading: 'Football: created by the poor, stolen by the rich.' 'It's not fair that we've won the oldest Cup competition in the world and then been demoted from the Europa League,' said Palace fan Josh Harness. 'We earned the right to be there and all we can do is show our support for the club. The delay over the decision also means we can't start planning for next season yet because we didn't know what competition we were going to be in.' The group behind the tifos that were on display at the Wembley FA Cup semi-final and final against Aston Villa and Manchester City respectively, the Fanatics had said it was 'time to act' and called on supporters 'of all teams to join us'. 'Those who are disillusioned with the state of modern football, those who are tired of the authorities favouring a small cartel of larger clubs all in the name of profit and those who want to bring football back to the fans, where it belongs,' said a statement announcing the protest. 'We must come together for our voice to be heard around Europe. This will not be an isolated action, but the beginning of the campaign against those responsible for the moral and financial corruption that has plagued the modern game. Let us remind Uefa and the Cas that this ruling can, and should, change.' A petition that calls on Uefa to restore Palace to the Europa League has also been signed by almost 3,000 people since being posted on Friday. Uefa rejected an attempt by Textor and fellow American co-owner David Blitzer – the majority shareholder of Danish club Brondby, who have also qualified for the Conference League – to place their shares in a blind trust because they had missed the March deadline. Use of a blind trust has enabled other clubs with the same owners to play together in a Uefa competition. Sources at the European governing body confirmed that it had cleared both clubs to play in the same competition having deemed that Blitzer does not have a decisive influence at Palace. However, writing on X over the weekend, Parish questioned the logic behind the current system. 'Let's put this 'THEY missed the deadline' nonsense to bed. Let's say Me, Josh, David and everyone other than Eagle football had placed our shares in a 'blind trust' before March 1st. Three random people would have had control of the club since then but by Uefa's interpretation of the rules we would still be out of the Europa League.'
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
No 10 has ‘full confidence' in Navy chief despite Afghan leak
Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman has insisted he has full confidence in the head of the Royal Navy after he was implicated in the Afghan data leak. A Downing Street spokesman said that Gen Sir Gwyn Jenkins was not responsible for the leak, nor involved in sending the spreadsheet – which resulted in many of the names being posted on the internet. The document was sent by a Royal Marine, who was in charge of vetting asylum seekers, to a group of trusted Afghan contacts in the UK. The soldier worked out of the Regent's Park Barracks in central London under the command of Gen Sir Gwyn. They emailed the list twice before the mistake was discovered, and it is unknown whether they remain in post. The incident has poured fresh scrutiny on Gen Sir Gwyn, who was in line to serve as the UK's next national security adviser before the 2024 election was called. The senior officer has attracted some controversy in recent years, including over the accusation that he covered up alleged extrajudicial killings by serving members of the SAS in 2011. It has been reported that after the Government discovered in August 2023 that the Afghan leak had taken place, ministers convened a Cobra meeting in Whitehall and invited Gen Sir Gwyn. It was reported that one minister asked him if either he or Adml Sir Tony Radakin, the Chief of the Defence Staff, should resign. According to reports, he responded: 'Certainly not.' On Tuesday, Sir Keir's spokesman was asked whether the Prime Minister retains full confidence in his naval chief. The spokesman replied: 'He does.' Downing Street added that Gen Sir Gywn had 'no role in any aspect of [Afghan resettlement schemes], including decision-making.' Gen Sir Gwyn, a former commander of the Special Boat Service, was placed in charge of all special forces working in Afghanistan in October 2011 and served in the country for five months, before returning to London to work in Downing Street for Lord Cameron, then prime minister. While working in Afghanistan, he received a report that members of the SAS had carried out extrajudicial killings in the country, in violation of international law. Gen Sir Gwyn referred the matter to his senior officer, but it has since been claimed the matter should have been reported to the Royal Military Police (RMP). In October 2023, Lord Hermer, now the Attorney General, claimed Gen Sir Gwyn had failed to alert the RMP to potential war crimes when he was a commanding officer of the Special Boat Service. The episode was uncovered by an inquiry into alleged murder by SAS officers in Afghanistan, which is ongoing. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said at the time that it was 'not appropriate ... to comment on allegations which may be within the scope of the statutory inquiry'. After leaving Afghanistan, Gen Sir Gwyn served as the No 10 deputy national security adviser, commander of 3 Commando Brigade and Assistant Chief of the Naval Staff – a military desk job in the UK. Between 2021 and 2022, the time of the leak, he was serving as Director Special Forces, the officer with overall command of UK special forces operations. He was accused by a BBC Panorama programme in May of, in that role, personally overseeing the rejection of some 1,585 Afghans who served with the SAS before the UK's withdrawal from the country in 2021. It was claimed that he might have allegedly blocked the applications to avoid witnesses travelling to the UK and appearing before the statutory inquiry, but the MoD said there was 'no evidence' that was the case. Prior to the 2024 election, Rishi Sunak announced that Gen Sir Gwyn would replace Sir Tim Barrow as the UK's national security adviser. However, the appointment was cancelled by Sir Keir when Labour won the election, and Jonathan Powell was announced for the role. In May, Gen Sir Gwyn was named as the Royal Navy's First Sea Lord, replacing Sir Ben Key, who was sacked for having a relationship with a more junior officer.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ofcom chairman defends ‘Orwellian' measures after Trump attacks
Ofcom's chairman has hit back at claims of an 'Orwellian' online crackdown after Donald Trump's White House accused the agency of stifling free speech. Lord Grade, the former Channel 4 chief executive and ex-chairman of BBC and ITV, said new laws aimed at stamping out criminal material and protecting children from online harm did not conflict with freedom of expression, which was the 'beating heart' of Ofcom regulation. The watchdog's tougher policing of online material has attracted the ire of Mr Trump, who has long been a vocal supporter of free speech. During meetings earlier this year, officials in the US state department reportedly raised concerns with UK representatives that the new laws could amount to censorship. However, Lord Grade said the watchdog's decision to investigate, fine or even ban online services which did not comply with the new rules were not 'Orwellian'. 'We are tackling criminal material, such as terrorist content or child sexual abuse. And we are getting the tech companies to protect children both from the illegal, and from content that poses serious risks of harm to their physical or emotional health,' he said in a speech at a King's College on Tuesday, 'Now if anyone believes that either of those aims is misguided, I really cannot agree. Neither one, to my mind, is in conflict with free expression.' 'Domesday for broadcasting' He said Ofcom assessed 10,000 pieces of TV and radio content last year and only 33 breached its rules. Ofcom has adopted new powers as Britain's first internet regulator as part of sweeping laws aimed at tackling material. As part of the powers, new rules forcing tech firms to boost child safety measures will come into force next week. Reddit this week announced new age verification processes to stop under-18s from accessing inappropriate posts. The new rules, which could lead to heavy fines for US tech giants, have taken on extra significance as Britain sought to avoid Mr Trump's tariffs. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has denied they were up for negotiation as part of trade discussions. In his speech, Lord Grade took aim at tech bosses, who he said 'placed a premium on revenue growth' but 'failed to give enough attention to safety'. He added: 'No one, least of all the tech sector, should be surprised that a situation like this has brought about a societal, political, regulatory and global response. But it has. And now, change is happening.' Lord Grade also warned of a 'Domesday scenario' for British broadcasting as they face growing competition from streaming rivals such as Netflix and Disney, as well as TikTok and other social media apps. He said traditional TV channels would have to fight even harder to stay relevant by creating 'moments of essential, national viewing'. 'There are some things that regulation, no matter how modern, cannot do. It can't make people watch what they don't want to watch,' he said.
