logo
Johnson breaks with Trump, calls for DOJ to release Epstein files

Johnson breaks with Trump, calls for DOJ to release Epstein files

Politicoa day ago
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package.
Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon.
'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.'
The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program.
It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.'
Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP.
Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act.
'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.'
It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version.
MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week.
But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland.
Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair.
What else we're watching:
— Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case.
— Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess.
— Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning.
Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes
Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes

President Donald Trump'smeltdown on Wednesday over what he called the 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax' had quite an impact on social media. The president took to his Truth Social platform and posted a lengthy diatribe in which he referred to speculation about the convicted sex offender's clients as 'bullshit' that his own 'PAST supporters have bought into ... hook, line, and sinker.' He also said Epstein truthers were 'weaklings' who are doing the Democrats' work and insisted, 'I don't want their support anymore!' Trump's post came a day after he claimed the so-called Epstein files were fabricated by former FBI Director James Comey and former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The financier had associated with various politicians, including both Trump and Bill Clinton, and was facing sex trafficking charges before his 2019 death in a New York jail cell. But Trump's DOJ and FBI heads recently stated that no 'Epstein client list' exists, generating even more speculation from the public. Not surprisingly, many people on social media had strong reactions to Trump's post. This might be the craziest Trump post I've ever read. He calls the Epstein files a scam, a hoax, and any of his supporters believe any part of the Epstein files, he doesn't want their support anymore. He labels them weaklings doing the Democrats' work. 🥴 — Hoodlum 🇺🇸 (@NotHoodlum) July 16, 2025 Needless to say, Trump calling it the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax is beyond insulting to the young victims of Epstein's horrible I suppose Epstein Denial is a choice. Trump's choice. — Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) July 16, 2025 He's the weakling. He's protecting pedophiles. I'm glad he doesn't want my support because he's not getting it anymore. — Larry (@LarryECornell) July 16, 2025 From 'We'll release the files on Day One' to 'These files are nonsense' in record time. One of the most shameless 180s in modern presidential history - bragging about transparency, then hoping no one notices/cares about the flip. — Darren Labrum 🇺🇸 (@DLabrum) July 16, 2025 This just goes to show. Supporting Trump is a one way street. You are either 100% with him, or you are against him and he will turn on you in a flash. — Hal_For_NY__ (@HalforNY__) July 16, 2025 It was always weird that Epstein, who Trump hung out with, died while Trump was in office and it somehow was a conspiracy against Democrats. Now it's finally blowing up in the GOP's face and dividing Trump's coalition, as Trump admits in the below post. — Alex גדעון בן װעלװל (@JewishWonk) July 16, 2025 Trump doubled down on the hoax claim during a media event later on Wednesday with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa. 'I know it's a hoax … I call it the Epstein hoax' — Trump is still crashing out over Epstein — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 16, 2025 And people were still skeptical about Trump's claim. You ever notice how every time Epstein gets mentioned, Trump short-circuits?He doesn't say 'it's a tragedy'He doesn't say 'we need answers'He doesn't even say 'it's complicated'He calls it a hoax.A hoax that involved over 100 witnesses, sealed documents, private flights,… — Lucien Wolfe (@LucienWolfe111) July 16, 2025 Trump's clearly not realizing the magnitude of this he campaigned on this and now is telling us to forget about it this will cost him dearly everything from here on out will be clouded by Epstein and his legacy will be that of a president who covered for rich pedophiles — Dr sherri (@Reform_West) July 16, 2025 Trump called his MAGA influencers to the White House, gave them carefully prepped 'Epstein binders,' and told them to push the narrative, on camera no less! They flooded social media parroting his talking points, bragged about inside info, and smeared anyone who questioned it.… — Steve Reichel (@SteveReichel) July 16, 2025 Here we have some MAGA influencers holding up binders of a "democratic hoax" provided by the trump administration. — Keith Edwards (@keithedwards) July 16, 2025 They're are files. Maxwell was convicted because of them. If he's saying it's a hoax, he's all over them... — °jP (@jim_pennington) July 16, 2025 Related... Trump Goes Off On His Own MAGA Base: 'I Don't Want Their Support Anymore!' Joe Rogan Blasts The Trump Administration As Epstein Fallout Grows Right-Wing Media Is Now Falling In Line With Trump On Epstein Trump Says Comey, Biden And Obama 'Made Up' The Epstein Files

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg expected to testify in $8 billion Facebook privacy lawsuit
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg expected to testify in $8 billion Facebook privacy lawsuit

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg expected to testify in $8 billion Facebook privacy lawsuit

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — A $8 billion class action investors' lawsuit against Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and company leaders — current and former — begins Wednesday, with claims stemming from the 2018 privacy scandal involving the Cambridge Analytica political consulting firm. Investors allege in their lawsuit that Meta did not fully disclose the risks that Facebook users' personal information would be misused by Cambridge Analytica, a firm that supported Donald Trump's successful Republican presidential campaign in 2016. Shareholders say Facebook officials repeatedly and continually violated a 2012 consent order with the Federal Trade Commission under which Facebook agreed to stop collecting and sharing personal data on platform users and friends without their consent. Facebook later sold user data to commercial partners in direct violation of the consent order and removed disclosures from privacy settings that were required under consent order, the lawsuit alleges. The fallout led to Facebook agreeing to pay a $5.1 billion penalty to settle FTC charges. The social media giant also faced significant fines in Europe and reached a $725 million privacy settlement with users. Now shareholders want Zuckerberg and others to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8 billion. The first trial witness, privacy expert Neil Richards, testified Monday morning for the shareholders. 'Facebook's privacy disclosures were misleading,' said Richards, a professor at Washington University Law School. On cross-examination by a lawyer for the board of directors, he said he could not say whether the company had violated a 2012 consent order with the FTC. However, when asked about a PricewaterhouseCoopers report published in 2015 that found Facebook's privacy controls to be sufficient, Richards called such reviews 'of limited value' because they are based on information provided by the firm itself. The eight-day case will feature testimony from Zuckerberg and former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg. Others expected to appear on the stand include board member Marc Andreessen and former board member Peter Thiel. It takes place in Delaware Chancery Court, where Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc. is incorporated. A judge is expected to rule in the months after the trial wraps up. Meta took the case all the way to the Supreme Court to try to get it dismissed. Justices heard arguments in November and decided that it was wrong to take up the case in the first place. The high court dismissed the company's appeal, leaving in place an appellate ruling allowing the case to go forward.

Faced with geopolitics and trade war, US companies in China report record-low new investment plans
Faced with geopolitics and trade war, US companies in China report record-low new investment plans

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Faced with geopolitics and trade war, US companies in China report record-low new investment plans

WASHINGTON (AP) — American companies in China are reporting record-low new investment plans for this year and declining confidence in profits, while uncertainty in U.S.-China relations and President Donald Trump's tariffs have become their top concerns, according to a business survey released Wednesday. The companies are also challenged by China's slowing economy, where weak domestic demand and overcapacity in local industries are eroding profitability for the Americans. 'Businesses in China are less profitable now than they were years ago, but risks, including reputational risk, regulatory risk, and political risk, are increasing,' said Sean Stein, the president of the U.S.-China Business Council, a Washington-based group that represents American companies doing business in China, including major multinationals. The survey, conducted between March and May and drawing from 130 member companies, came after the two countries clashed over tariffs and non-tariff measures, including export controls on critical products such as rare-earth magnets and advanced computer chips. Following high-level talks in Geneva and London, U.S. and Chinese officials agreed to pull back from sky-high tariffs and restrictions on exports, but uncertainty persists as the two sides are yet to hammer out a more permanent trade deal. Kyle Sullivan, vice president of business advisory services at the USCBC, said more than half of the companies in the survey indicated they do not have new investment plans in China 'at all' this year. 'That's a record high,' Sullivan said, noting that it is ''a new development that we have not observed in previous surveys.' Around 40% of companies reported negative effects from U.S. export control measures, with many experiencing lost sales, severed customer relationships, and reputational damage from being unreliable suppliers, according to the survey. Citing national security, the U.S. government has banned exports to China of high-tech products, such as the most advanced chips, which could help boost China's military capabilities. Stein argued that export controls must be very carefully targeted, because businesses from Europe or Japan, or local businesses in China would immediately fill the void left by American companies. Silicon Valley chipmaker Nvidia won approval from the Trump administration to resume sales to China of its advanced H20 chips used to develop artificial intelligence, its CEO Jensen Huang announced on Monday, though the company's most powerful chips remain under U.S. export control rules. While 82% of U.S. companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future in China, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty, according to the survey. Also, a record high number of American businesses plan to relocate their business operations outside of China, Sullivan said, as 27% of the members indicated so, up from 19% the year before. In a departure from past surveys, concerns over China's regulatory environment, including risks of intellectual property misuse and lack of market access, didn't make it to the top five concerns this year. That's likely a first, and not for a good reason, Stein said. 'It is not because things got dramatically better on the Chinese side, but the new challenges, often coming from the U.S., are now posing as much of a challenge,' Stein said. Almost all the American companies said they cannot remain globally competitive without their Chinese operations. A survey from the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China in May found that European companies were cutting costs and scaling back investment plans in China as its economy slows and fierce competition drives down prices.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store