logo
Kansas advocate warns federal cuts to Medicaid will accelerate maternal deaths

Kansas advocate warns federal cuts to Medicaid will accelerate maternal deaths

Yahoo13-06-2025
From left, Hadiya Toney and Sapphire Garcia appear at Liberation Place, a mutual aid hub that distributes sexual and reproductive health supplies and baby items in Wichita. Toney is community care coordinator at Liberation Place and Garcia is executive director and founder of the Kansas Birth Justice Society. (Submitted)
TOPEKA — More Kansans will die during pregnancy and childbirth as a result of proposed federal cuts to Medicaid, says the leader of a state organization focused on maternal health equity.
A new analysis of cuts contained in the GOP's 'big beautiful bill' under consideration by Congress shows that 13,000 Kansans would lose enrollment in Medicaid, and the state would lose $3.77 billion in federal funding.
Sapphire Garcia, executive director and founder of the Kansas Birth Justice Society, said the gutting of Medicaid funding would decimate perinatal care systems and accelerate maternal mortality. The burden, she said, would fall hardest on those who already face steep inequities — Black, Indigenous, rural and low-income Kansans.
Advocates 'on the front lines of this crisis' already are exhausted, she said.
'We are tired of fighting a system that continues to ignore our pleas while our communities are left grieving unbearable losses,' Garcia said. 'We hold space for families who have buried their babies, their partners, their birthing people — and then we're asked to carry on as if that grief is not the result of policy choices. But it is.'
Garcia's comments followed a panel discussion Thursday organized by the United Methodist Health Ministry Fund. The discussion centered on a recent report on access to maternal health care in Kansas and an analysis by Manatt Health of proposed federal cuts to Medicaid.
The report on maternity care access, which was produced by the Kansas Center for Rural Health with funding from the United Methodist Health Ministry Fund, found that most Kansans don't have local access to inpatient maternity care. Most Kansas counties don't even have an OB-GYN, and only eight counties have more than five OB-GYNs, the report found.
One of the panelists, Beth Oller, family medicine physician at Rooks County Health Center, said it is difficult to get physicians to move to rural areas, where they might have to cover the ER and provide hospice care and other services to support an undeserved community. And most family doctors who graduate residency don't have an interest in providing obstetric care, she said.
For a while, she said, she was one of two OB-GYNs at her health center, and the other wasn't trained for operative deliveries. She spent two years never being off of work because she needed to be available for caesarean sections. Then, the other doctor moved out of state and she couldn't recruit another physician.
As a mother of four, she said, she was 'missing so many things.'
'I was heartbroken when I realized that our maternity unit was going to close,' Oller said. 'However, I couldn't do it anymore alone. I knew it wasn't feasible to keep going that way.'
She said the closest place to Stockton, where she lives, to deliver a baby now is in Hays, about 45 minutes away. Another doctor travels two hours from Salina to provide some prenatal care, she said.
Panelists during Thursday's discussion said access to maternal care is connected to Medicaid, which finances more than 40% of births in the state.
The state's failure to expand Medicaid to serve more low-income families or allocate adequate reimbursement rates for Medicaid services are factors in maternal health deserts and the financial struggles of rural hospitals, they said. GOP leaders in the Legislature for more than a decade have blocked Medicaid expansion, which would have served about 150,000 adults and children and unlocked nearly a billion dollars in annual federal funding. Kansas is one of 10 holdout states that have not expanded the program.
'We need to remember that economics are policy, and policy is a matter of life and death,' Garcia said during the panel discussion. 'The fact that we have not expanded Medicaid has killed birthing people in our state is going to continue to kill birthing people in our state and lead to these poor health outcomes. We need to acknowledge that this is a structural failure of our maternal and health care systems.'
A study published in 2020 by the medical journal Women's Health Issues found that Medicaid expansion resulted in seven fewer maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.
Garcia told Kansas Reflector after the panel discussion that Medicaid expansion is a necessary step toward racial and reproductive justice. But now, she said, the most urgent concern is to protect Medicaid itself.
'If the federal program is slashed, expansion in Kansas becomes meaningless — there will be nothing left to expand,' she said. 'Saving Medicaid must be our top priority, and we also cannot lose sight of the need to expand coverage here in Kansas, where families are still denied basic care due to arbitrary income thresholds and political inaction.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Health insurance companies have a problem — people are using their plans more
Health insurance companies have a problem — people are using their plans more

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Health insurance companies have a problem — people are using their plans more

When medical insurance provider Centene (CNC) opened its books to investors on Friday, the company reported a surprising loss and an uptick in usage. The latter is a broader problem for the industry. In the second quarter, Centene reported an adjusted loss of $79 million and a "health benefits ratio" of 93%. Its benefits ratio, or the amount of its revenue derived from premiums that it pays out for medical care, jumped from 87.6% in the same quarter last year. Moves in that figure can have outsized effects on health insurers' financial performance. "Because of the narrow margins of our health plan business, relatively small changes in our HBR can create significant changes in our financial results," Centene wrote in its Q2 earnings report. And the problem is not isolated to Centene. Elevance Health (ELV), which offers plans including Blue Cross and Blue Shield, reported a similar jump in its "benefit expense ratio" to 88.9% in the second quarter, up from 86.3% in the same quarter last year. Both Centene and Elevance attributed the jump especially to their government-subsidized offerings under the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Molina Healthcare (MOH), which reported Q2 earnings earlier this month, reported a similar outlook, attributing its lowered earnings guidance to the same trend facing other medical insurers. "The short-term earnings pressure we are experiencing results from what we believe to be a temporary dislocation between premium rates and medical cost trend which has recently accelerated,' Molina CEO Joseph Zubretsky said in a statement. Elevance stock dropped by roughly 12% after its report earlier this month, while Molina stock dropped by roughly 8%. Both stocks have remained depressed since. Health Care (XLV) is the worst-performing sector in the S&P 500 this year. Centene stock dropped by roughly 15% in premarket trading after its earnings release before recovering to a positive gain of roughly 6% by the closing bell on Friday. The buoy was led by CEO Sarah London's announcement that Centene was reinstating earnings guidance after pulling this forecast earlier in the month. The company also reported revenue of $48.7 billion, which topped estimates for $44.2 billion, and said it expects to be able to raise the payments it gets from states for Medicaid plans, which would improve its margins. UnitedHealth's MCR challenge The premium-to-cost ratio will be closely watched at UnitedHealth Group (UNH), which refers to this measure as its "medical care ratio" (MCR) and is slated to release Q2 earnings next week. After seeing its medical care ratio rise to 85.1% in the second quarter last year, UnitedHealth is expected to see its ratio jump to 89.3% this year, according to Bloomberg consensus estimates. An increase like that would mean tighter margins and less overhead for a company that already slashed its forecast earlier this year. That news sent its stock price down by 22%, its biggest drop in a single day since 1998. "Management noted care activity trends continue to run ahead of its previous expectations driven by a greater than expected impact at UHC from new members, further acceleration of [Medicare Advantage] utilization and indications of potential broadening trend among adjacent, complex populations," Truist Securities analysts wrote in a May analyst note about UnitedHealth. Closely watched by investors and analysts will also be how UnitedHealth leadership addresses its disclosure Thursday morning that the insurer is facing and complying with a criminal and civil investigation by the Department of Justice over potential fraudulent billing practices in the insurer's Medicare Advantage program. The stock dropped 4.7% through Thursday trading after the disclosure. The probe comes after reporting by the Wall Street Journal earlier this year that documented the potentially fraudulent activity by UnitedHealth, among other medical insurers, which included insurers' staff doctors and nurses adding diagnoses to patients' profiles on top of those documented by the patients' doctors. UnitedHealth may have to answer investor inquiries about the investigation on its earnings call on Tuesday, though these are far from the only challenges facing the insurance giant. According to former federal prosecutor Scott Hogan, the DOJ's Medicare probe will be looking to establish a prolonged pattern of wrongdoing by the insurer. "If everything comes back good for the company, if the department [closes its investigation], I think the company will be able to reassure the marketplace," Hogan, who specialized in fraud investigations, told Yahoo Finance on Friday. Even if UnitedHealth is eventually cleared of wrongdoing, he said, "If the investigation takes next steps, whether it's a lawsuit or prolonged investigation, I don't think there are many companies that desire those kinds of headlines." Jake Conley is a breaking news reporter covering US equities for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X at @byjakeconley or email him at Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Millions could lose health insurance after the ‘Big Beautiful Bill.' Here are three ways states can prevent that.
Millions could lose health insurance after the ‘Big Beautiful Bill.' Here are three ways states can prevent that.

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Millions could lose health insurance after the ‘Big Beautiful Bill.' Here are three ways states can prevent that.

These changes will worsen health outcomes for people who lose coverage while leading to higher costs for both patients and hospitals. It will overburden Advertisement How bad will the damage be? Well, a lot depends on how states respond. By streamlining enrollment systems, investing in community partnerships, and making targeted investments to protect at-risk populations, states can soften the worst effects of this bill, reduce how many eligible people lose coverage, and ultimately ensure millions of people still get the care they need. Advertisement Simplify enrollment so more people can keep their coverage First, states must make it as easy as possible for eligible people to stay covered. States can do this by simplifying their enrollment systems. That starts with expanding automatic verification and leveraging electronic records, like tax data and Social Security information, to confirm eligibility and income status automatically. These steps will reduce paperwork, minimize errors, and ensure that people don't lose coverage because of a missed deadline or procedural mistakes. Massachusetts, for example, is already One area that needs particular attention is Medicaid work requirements. They are currently used in a few states, and the new bill expands this policy nationwide despite When Arkansas implemented such requirements in 2018, To avoid repeating that failure, state legislators should explore adopting broad exemptions for caregivers, students, and individuals with disabilities unable to meet requirements. Reporting systems should be easy to access, mobile and online friendly, and supported by staffed help lines. States can also invest in voluntary job training and community service programs that assist people both in meeting work requirements and gaining valuable skills. Steps like these can reduce coverage losses, offer real support, and strengthen communities. Advertisement States with their own ACA marketplaces should extend open enrollment periods beyond the shorter federal window, giving families more time to understand their options and enroll. Small changes like this can make a big difference, especially for people with limited internet access or nontraditional work hours. Tap community resources to help people navigate the complexities of health care coverage Next, states should better engage local communities, their leaders, and their trusted institutions. Local health providers, advocacy groups, and faith-based organizations can educate people about their rights and offer assistance in navigating the entire enrollment process. In California, the state's health insurance program worked with local libraries to Information sessions at community centers, multilingual assistance, and text message reminders are valuable tools in helping the most vulnerable populations, including legal immigrants who are eligible to meet documentation requirements and avoid unnecessary coverage loss, especially out of fear or confusion. It's part of why health care providers, who stand to lose substantial amounts of money in reimbursements, should lead outreach efforts to ensure that people who are eligible for Medicaid get or keep their insurance. Use targeted investments to strengthen the safety net Finally, targeted investments by states can minimize the impact of health coverage loss. Wholesale replacement of lost federal funds won't be possible. Massachusetts, for example, has used an uncompensated care fund known as the Health Safety Net to support hospitals serving the uninsured, but that fund has become Advertisement States should also consider expanding cost-sharing reductions to lower deductibles and out-of-pocket costs for low-income residents who might otherwise forgo care. Reinsurance programs are another proven tool, and states like At the end of the day, the greatest threat to sustainable health coverage in America isn't paperwork, policy, or a new bill — it is cost. Health care in the United States remains extraordinarily expensive, and the new federal bill does nothing to address it. States could do more to address the root of the problem, including exceedingly high prices and lack of competition among health care providers. Too few states have put much attention on these fundamental issues. The bill is now law, but as with any law, implementation will play a critical role in its impact. States have a lot of leverage and leeway in ensuring that it is implemented in ways that minimize coverage loss, through simplifying hurdles, outreach to communities, and targeted investments that can make a difference. If states do their job right, we can substantially reduce the number of eligible Americans who will find themselves without coverage.

Medicaid changes will hurt family caregivers, experts warn
Medicaid changes will hurt family caregivers, experts warn

The Hill

time15 hours ago

  • The Hill

Medicaid changes will hurt family caregivers, experts warn

Medicaid cuts under President Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will harm family caregivers, experts warn, by reducing access to health care for themselves and the people they care for, which could then lead to more caregiving responsibilities. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will reduce Medicaid spending by roughly $911 billion over the next 10 years and increase the number of uninsured Americans by up to 10 million. Some of those who could lose coverage are among the 8 million — or 13 percent — of family caregivers in the United States who receive their health insurance coverage through Medicaid, according to the National Alliance of Caregiving. 'We are very concerned of the impact of the just finalized Medicaid cuts on the community of family caregivers,' Jason Resendez, president and CEO of the alliance, said during a call with reporters earlier this week. Medicaid recipients will be subject to more frequent eligibility checks, in part, due to revised work requirements for the joint state and federal program. Now, adults between the ages of 19 and 64 will need to work or participate in community service activities for at least 80 hours a month to be eligible for health care coverage under Medicaid. There are some exceptions for parents with dependents as well as for those deemed 'medically frail' or who are pregnant or postpartum, according to the health care policy nonprofit KFF. Many caregivers cannot work outside the home because of the intense care their family members need, or can only work limited hours, which can make fulfilling Medicaid work requirements difficult to impossible. This was the case for Lisa Tschudi, host of caregiving podcast 'Love Doesn't Pay the Bills,' who stayed home full time to take care of her daughter who has ataxic cerebral palsy and epilepsy. 'We really did not have other options,' she said. 'I, many times, tried to line up some non-me care for her during the workday and a job for myself, and I never really got my start in a paid job in that way.' Her daughter's epilepsy was poorly controlled for years as a child and teen, which required her to travel for frequent doctors' appointments on top of taking care of her younger daughter. 'It was a lot to manage,' she said. Work requirements might force some family caregivers to look for outside help, if that is an option, which represents a new expense and, potentially, a new challenge to navigate. 'Even if you can find outside providers to come in … families often find that they are not reliable,' said Elizabeth Edwards, senior attorney at the National Health Law Program. 'Some of that inconsistency of how people show up as providers can mean it's very hard to hold a job.' Family caregivers also already spend huge amounts of time navigating numerous bureaucratic hurdles, and new work requirements will add to the paperwork they have to fill out to prove they are eligible for health care under Medicaid. This extra administrative work also increases the likelihood of errors occurring in the eligibility system, which could delay coverage or prevent some from being enrolled altogether, according to Edwards. That is what happened to many Medicaid recipients in Arkansas and Georgia when the two states implemented work requirements in 2018 and 2023, respectively. More than 18,000 people in Arkansas lost Medicaid coverage over the 10-month period the state rolled out work requirements without increasing employment, according to a KFF analysis. Georgia still has one of the highest uninsured rates in the country at 12 percent, according to the Commonwealth Fund. 'We anticipate [them] not just being faced with these eligibility issues, but family caregivers losing Medicaid coverage because of these additional hurdles that they'll be forced to traverse,' Resendez said. About 11 million family caregivers in the U.S. receive payment for the care they provide, according to Resendez. Those payments primarily come through home and community-based services and consumer-directed programs at the state level. But those programs will likely start to lose funding as states are forced to decide what to fund with fewer Medicaid dollars, experts told The Hill. 'When states have less money and are forced to make decisions, home and community-based services are the first optional benefits to get cut,' Resendez said. Tschudi, as well as her husband and second daughter, are all paid family caregivers under a home and community-based service their home state of Oregon's Medicaid program provides. Without that program, her family would likely have to go back to unpaid caregiving, which would not be financially possible at this time. 'I don't wish it on anyone,' Tschudi said about the struggles that come with unpaid caregiving. 'I really think you leave families in an impossible situation when you don't pay for caregiving.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store