Chagos deal cost is ‘going rate for best defensive real estate', says ex-FO boss
Hitting out at critics who argued the UK should ignore a legal ruling to hand over the archipelago to Mauritius, Lord McDonald of Salford argued this was what 'the powerful and unprincipled do', such as Russia.
The independent crossbencher, a former ambassador who headed the Foreign Office from 2015 to 2020, spoke in support of the agreement in the face of strong objections at Westminster, with opponents branding it a 'surrender' and 'gross folly' funded by the public.
The deal signed last month after long-running negotiations, started under the previous Tory administration, returns sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, but will see Britain lease back the strategically important military base on Diego Garcia.
It follows a 2019 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice, which said the UK should cede control.
As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians expelled from the islands, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million annually during the duration of the 99-year agreement, a total cost in cash terms of at least £13 billion.
The Government, however, estimates the bill will be lower at around £101 million a year, while critics argue it will be much higher.
The deal could also be extended in the future for an extra 40 years, provided agreement is reached.
In a recent report, the House of Lords International Agreements Committee (HLIAC) said although 'not perfect', the treaty must be ratified to avoid legal challenges that could threaten UK control of the military base.
Its members warned Mauritius was 'likely' to resume its campaign to secure a binding judgment on sovereignty against Britain unless the agreement was approved and concluded the Government 'cannot ignore' the risk of an 'adverse ruling' putting Britain's right to run the joint UK-US site in jeopardy.
Speaking at Westminster as peers debated the controversial accord, Lord McDonald said: 'The most damaging blow to any country's international reputation is a justified charge of hypocrisy.
'The United Kingdom stands for the rule of law in all circumstances. We lose credibility when we seek exceptions to this principle for ourselves.'
He added: 'Opponents dislike the expense of the deal.
'Well, we're paying the going rate as a tenant for a base in the wider Indian Ocean, somewhat more than the French in Djibouti, but we're getting more for more.
'Diego Garcia is the best defensive real estate in the whole Indian Ocean.
'Even though £101 million per year is a lot, it's a lot less than the Americans pay to run the base.
'It's a joint base, and we're paying our way in the joint effort.'
Lord McDonald also disputed the agreement would bolster China's presence in the Indian Ocean, arguing that 'our partner in Delhi looms much larger in Mauritian calculations than our challenger in Beijing'.
He went on: 'Confronted by a charge of double standards, some opponents of this agreement shrug their shoulders. They think they can get away with it, tough it out. But that is what the powerful and unprincipled do. That is what Russia does.'
The peer added: 'It gives the UK and our American allies a secure presence in the archipelago for the next 140 years.
'It enhances our security and restores our reputation as a country respecting international law, even when inconvenient and costly.'
But Tory shadow foreign minister Lord Callanan said: 'This agreement amounts to a retreat, a surrender of sovereign territory that serves as a linchpin of our defence architecture at a time when authoritarian threats are rising and alliances matter more than ever.
'Handing control to a government who align themselves ever more closely with Beijing – a regime that actively undermines international norms and our national interests – is not only unwise, it is positively dangerous.
'To compound the error, the British taxpayer is being made to foot the bill.'
He added: 'This whole affair has been a gross folly. There is no strategic gain here, no credible guarantee for the future of Diego Garcia and no reassurance for our allies.
'Instead, we send a message to adversaries and allies alike that British sovereignty is indeed negotiable. It is capitulation and we must reject it.'
Pointing out the Tories in office had opened negotiations to cede sovereignty, Liberal Democrat Lord Purvis of Tweed said: 'The treaty is a consequence of now completing the previous Conservative government's policy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
an hour ago
- WIRED
Nothing's New Phone (3) and Headphone (1) Look Nothing Like You've Seen Before
Phones kind of look same-y. Headphones don't look that visually different either, whether it's a Sony or a Bose. UK-based tech company, Nothing, took it upon itself to change things up again, giving us a smartphone with a design the likes of which we haven't seen before, and headphones that are sure to turn heads. Today, the company announced the Phone (3), its third-generation flagship smartphone, and the Headphone (1) at an event in London. The smartphone starts at $799 for the 256 GB model, and the headphones—made in collaboration with renowned audio brand, KEF—cost $299. That pricing undercuts the competition in both categories. Preorders kick off July 4, with official sales starting July 15. Here's everything you need to know. Courtesy of Julian Chokkattu Nothing founder Carl Pei says the company only has a 0.2 percent market share in smartphones, but it has achieved more than $1 billion in revenue since its founding in 2021. While the company initially delved into mature categories like earbuds and smartphones, Pei says he wants Nothing to 'shift from being followers of the market to lead the way and explore how people interact with technology in the future.' Last year's Ear (Open) was one such risk since it's a relatively nascent category within the broader earbuds market, but it was successful; they're some of our favorite open earbuds right now. Headphones are hardly a new market, but Pei says Nothing wanted to create something radically different as 'current designs on the market are uninspiring.' The over-ear headphones are visually distinct and are a noise-cancelling collaboration with acclaimed British audio brand KEF. I've spent a few days with the gorgeous Headphone (1) and have been impressed with the build and physical controls. A pair of nickel-plated 40-mm dynamic drivers work with acoustic damping technology from KEF to keep everything crisp, clean, and without flabby low-end. They have a clickable volume wheel and an excellent paddle you can push left or right to skip tracks (you can hold it to scrub at speed!). A button on the outside of the earcup activates voice assistants by default, but if you have a Nothing phone, it'll trigger a feature called Channel Hop. This cycles through recent audio apps or favorites, like a Spotify Playlist or your favorite podcasting app. It'll work with 25 apps at launch.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Santander Agrees to Buy Sabadell's UK Unit TSB for £2.7 Billion
By and Jan-Henrik Foerster Save Banco Sabadell SA has agreed to sell its UK unit to Banco Santander SA for £2.65 billion ($3.63 billion), according to people familiar with the matter. Spokespeople for Sabadell and Santander declined to comment.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Anti-Israel band plays victim after being hammered for saying ‘death to the IDF' during music festival
British punk-rap duo Bob Vylan doubled down on their anti-Israel statements on Tuesday after being slammed for uttering them during a performance at the Glastonbury music festival over the weekend. In a post shared to their Instagram page, the musicians declared that they're being "targeted" after being criticized and having their visas removed by the U.S. government for saying "Death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]," and other anti-Israel slogans during their set at the premier British music festival. "We are getting targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up, too," the post stated. "We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people," Bob Vylan continued. "We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use 'unnecessary lethal force' against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza." During their set on Saturday, one of the members of the London-based rap group shouted, "Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]," several times before turning the microphone toward the crowd to get attendees to repeat the chant. Videos from the crowd's view showed several Palestinian flags waving as the performer and attendees shouted back and forth. Elsewhere during the performance, he chanted, "Free, Free, Free Palestine," as well as, "Hell yeah, from the river to the sea. Palestine must be, will be inshallah, it will be free." The anti-Israel chanting went viral on social media, prompting complaints from even the U.K. government. The BBC reported that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the words "appalling hate speech." The BBC, which broadcast the festival live, removed the Bob Vylan set from its iPlayer. The British network also told The Associated Press that it had issued a "very strong and discriminatory language" warning label during its livestream of the event. Festival organizers released a statement on Instagram condemning the stunt. "Glastonbury Festival was created in 1970 as a place for people to come together and rejoice in music, the arts and the best of human endeavour," they wrote. British police in Somerset and Avon even reviewed videos of Bob Vylan's performance to "determine whether any offenses may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation." The U.S. State Department revoked the band's visas ahead of their U.S. tour later this year. A senior State Department official told Fox News Digital Monday, "The secretary of state has been clear – the U.S. will not approve visas for terrorist sympathizers." Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued multiple warnings that the State Department will rescind visas for "terrorists" and those affiliated with them. In their response, the band said the heat on them was a "distraction" from what Israel is doing in Gaza. "We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story, and whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction. The government doesn't want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren't doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving," they wrote.
