Five jets shot down during India-Pakistan conflict, claims Trump
The US president did not specify whether the jets were lost by either of the two countries or whether he was referring to combined losses by both sides.
In virtually rejecting Trump's claim of ending the conflict, New Delhi has been maintaining that the two sides halted their military actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the US.
Speaking at the White House during a dinner he hosted for Republican senators on Friday, Trump said: 'You had India, Pakistan, that was going… in fact, planes were being shot out of the air…four or five. But I think five jets were shot down actually…that was getting worse and worse, wasn't it? 'That was looking like it was going to go, these are two serious nuclear countries, and they were hitting each other," he said.
'But India and Pakistan were going at it, and they were back and forth, and it was getting bigger and bigger. And we got it solved through trade. We said 'You guys want to make a trade deal. We're not making a trade deal if you're going to be throwing around weapons and maybe nuclear weapons. Both very powerful nuclear states," Trump said.
He said his administration achieved more in six months than almost any other administration could accomplish in eight years.
'Something I'm very proud of, we stopped a lot of wars, a lot of wars. And these were serious wars," Trump said.
Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim several times on various occasions that he 'helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a 'lot of trade" with them if they stopped the conflict.
India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam terror attack.
The Resistance Front (TRF), a front for Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), had claimed responsibility.
The strikes triggered four days of intense clashes that ended with an understanding on stopping the military actions on May 10.
The US on Thursday designated The Resistance Front as a foreign terrorist organisation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement that the Department of State is adding The Resistance Front (TRF) as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT).
India welcomed the US decision to designate TRF as a designated FTO and SDGT. PTI YAS MPB NSA NSA NSA NSA
view comments
First Published:
July 19, 2025, 09:45 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump warns of 'higher tariffs' if countries fail to open markets to US products
US President Donald Trump has once again warned that countries refusing to open their markets to American products will face even higher tariffs. On Wednesday, several nations, including South Korea, rushed to finalise trade agreements with the US before the August 1 negotiation a strongly worded post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump stated, "I WILL ONLY LOWER TARIFFS IF A COUNTRY AGREES TO OPEN ITS MARKET. IF NOT, MUCH HIGHER TARIFFS! Japan's Markets are now OPEN (for first time ever!). USA BUSINESSES WILL BOOM!"advertisementHis post came just a day after he announced a new trade deal with Japan, which includes a 15 percent "reciprocal" tariff on Japanese goods entering the United States. This new rate is 10 percentage points lower than what had previously been announced. According to Trump, Japan will invest USD 550 billion in the US, with 90% of the profits going to the United GREAT POWER OF TARIFFS: TRUMPTrump also defended his use of tariffs as a negotiation tool. In another post, he wrote: "Another great power of Tariffs. Without them, it would be impossible to get countries to OPEN UP!!! ALWAYS, ZERO TARIFFS TO AMERICA!!!" The president has been arguing that tariffs help create leverage in international trade talks, forcing other countries to remove trade barriers and give US businesses a fair shot in foreign markets. According to Trump, the goal is always to eliminate tariffs altogether—but only when other nations do the approach is putting pressure on countries like South Korea, which is working to avoid the harsh consequences of US tariffs. The Korean government is particularly concerned about proposed 25 percent reciprocal tariffs, as well as separate duties on steel, aluminium, and automobile exports. These sectors form the backbone of South Korea's economy, which heavily relies on House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt backed Trump's remarks during a press briefing. She said, "If not, they will continue to face tariffs and pay a steep price to do business in the United States of America, which remains the best market on the face of the planet."- EndsTune InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
EU, US inch closer to 15% trade deal amid looming tariff threats
The European Union and the United States are heading towards a trade deal that would result in a broad tariff of 15% applying to EU goods imported into the United States. read more The European Union and the United States are nearing a trade agreement that would introduce 15 per cent tariffs on European imports, mirroring a deal struck earlier this week between US President Donald Trump and Japan, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday. While negotiations continue, the EU is also preparing a countermeasure, a potential 93 billion euro ($109 billion) package of retaliatory tariffs with rates reaching up to 30 per cent should talks fail to produce a deal before the August 1 deadline, the report said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Neither the White House nor a European Union spokesperson responded to Reuters' requests for comment. Reuters also said it could not independently confirm the FT report. Earlier on Wednesday, the European Commission reiterated that its priority remains finding a negotiated settlement with Washington to avoid the 30 per cent tariffs President Trump has threatened to impose on EU goods beginning August 1. In 2024, US imports of vehicles and auto parts from Japan exceeded $55 billion, while the figure from the EU stood at 47.3 billion euros ($55.45 billion). By contrast, US-made cars have a limited share in both the EU and Japanese markets.
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliamentary panel faults Centre's move to disengage 7-decade-old NIRDPR
In a scathing attack on the Union government, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayat Raj has faulted the Union Ministry of Rural Development's (MoRD) move to disengage the Hyderabad-based seven-decade-old National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (NIRDPR). The 10th report of the panel, headed by Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, on the functioning of NIRDPR tabled in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (July 22, 2025), raised several pertinent questions on the move to disengage the reputed autonomous organisation which has been known for its expertise in building capacities of rural development functionaries, elected representatives, financial institutions and community-based organisations. In its 35-page report, the panel minced no words in pointing that any move to delink NIRDPR from MoRD represents not only an administrative change but a fundamental shift away from core national priorities. It pointed out that the institution has grown under the aegis of MoRD with global recognition, a highly qualified faculty, vast infrastructure and an expansive reach. Undermines credibility 'Hence, the Committee opines that any disengagement as decided by the government undermines its credibility and authority in policymaking likely to dilute the quality of long-term research and training, divert it into unrelated or short-term consultative activities and sever its intellectual alignment with the rural development ecosystem,' it observed. It did not stop at that and wondered that it was at a loss to understand that such a centre of excellence instrumental in nation building and national development especially in rural areas since the last 70-years, has to be abruptly disengaged by the government with the sole aim of furthering 'minimum government and maximum governance'. The panel opined that disengagement will not reduce government expenditure. Instead, it will shift costs to various agencies with disparate mandates, further increasing the burden on MoRD officers for oversight and coordination. 'Moreover, the financial instability due to disengagement may force the institution to drift away from supporting the flagship programmes/schemes of rural development,' it mentioned in the report. Stating that rather than disengagement, the need of the hour is to forge deeper strategic collaboration between MoRD and NIRDPR through structural reforms, decentralised decision making, adequate allocation of budgetary grant-in-aid and with greater autonomy, allow the institute to thrive and grow within the existing MoRD framework. Keeping in view the immense contribution of NIRD & PR, it wanted MoRD to take the lead and come out with a strategic plan/new roadmap and prevail upon the Department of Expenditure to halt the disengagement and allow the institute to continue and sustain itself. Flags lack of internal review A serious lapse it found was how the disengagement plan submitted to MoRD was neither internally reviewed nor externally validated, making it the work of a single individual rather than a collective institutional vision. 'Infrastructure has been poorly maintained under the guise of cost-cutting, leading to declining training ratings and a diminishing brand image,' the report mentioned and pointed out how the faculty morale is at an all-time low due to ad hoc inter-centre transfer policy, unresolved vigilance cases (non-financial in nature), long-pending promotions through Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) and lack of leadership trust. It did not mince words in stating that the over the past four years, the institute got paralysed by the present administration. Finally, the panel also disapproved the attitude of the present executive council towards the problems being faced by the employees serving and retired who are not able to get their salary/pension in time. In view of the above, the Committee strongly recommend the MoRD to expeditiously constitute a committee under its supervision to oversee 19 administrative and governance matters so as to prevent the situation from going bad to worse. In order to ensure effective leadership and institutional stability, the Committee wanted immediate review and replacement of the current administration, which has failed to maintain faculty trust or organisational coherence and till then grant already extended by the government may be continued. It favoured constitution of a MoRD led Committee to oversee administrative and governance matters at NIRD&PR.
