KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period.
Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years.
Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily.
As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great.
But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years.
More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years.
If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045.
Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate.
I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals.
However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings.
There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes.
Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases.
A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence.
I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme.
If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age.
But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings.
According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+.
The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050.
Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037.
According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person).
From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points.
It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037.
So we know we have a problem.
It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour.
Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test.
KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes.
But the total figure is flattering.
There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000.
Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades.
That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though.
We need to be saving more, not less.
Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction.
However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions.
The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms.
Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to.
If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why.
Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there.
Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Surcharge Ban Will Benefit Consumers, Retail NZ Says
Banning surcharges will improve the retail experience for customers but risks prices being increased to cover the costs of accepting credit card payments, Retail NZ says. 'Retail payments are a contentious and complex area for retail businesses. We are pleased the Government has listened to our calls for changes in the system, to enable retailers to provide better customer experiences,' Retail NZ Chief Executive Carolyn Young says. The changes will mean retailers cannot add surcharges to in-person domestic debit and credit cards. However, businesses will still be able to add surcharges to online sales, pre-paid and international credit cards. The changes are expected to come into force by May 2026 at the latest. Removing surcharges from in-store purchases is a positive move for domestic consumers, but the wider issue of pricing will need to be considered, Ms Young says. 'Retailers continue to face costs to accept debit and credit card payments and these costs will likely be added to product prices in future,' she says. The surcharge ban will likely see an accelerated decline in EFTPOS payments by consumers. EFTPOS payments do not incur any fees to retailers. As consumers change from using EFTPOS to contactless debit and credit cards, there will be a corresponding increase in the fees paid by retailers, so the benefits in the reduction of the interchange fee will be short-lived, especially for SMEs. A 2024 survey of Retail NZ members found that only 25.6% of respondents applied surcharges. Almost half of retailers calculated a rate that covered their costs, while 39% took advice from their terminal provider or relied on information from their bank statement. About 5% looked at what other retailers are charging. Members told us that the complexity of the Merchant Payment System prevented them from fully understanding the charges and fees they pay. These fees include interchange fees, scheme fees, switch fees, other external costs, internal costs and an acquirer margin. Considerable work will be needed to ensure that terminals have the ability to distinguish between domestic debit and credit cards, and commercial or international credit cards, and charge differential surcharge rates, Ms Young says. Retail NZ's position is that all cards should be treated equally. Retail NZ also wants certainty around the Commerce Commission's ability to monitor and enforce both the new interchange fees and the ban on surcharging. The Commerce Commission will need to ensure that the fees being charged to merchants reflect the new legislation, that the savings are passed on to retailers and that other fees are not increased. 'We will be seeking more detail on the surcharge changes, particularly around commercial credit cards which are not mentioned in today's announcement, and possible future changes to online transactions. We look forward to continuing to engage with the Government as it progresses these changes,' Ms Young says.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Nicola Willis criticised for cost of living ‘sermon' during post-Cabinet press conference
'Spending more, taxing and borrowing more as Labour and other parties advocate for, didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future,' Luxon said. Finance Minister Nicola Willis during the post-Cabinet Press conference at Parliament. Photo / Mark Mitchell 'The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double down on our economic plan,' he said. Hipkins called Willis' and Luxon's address a 'sermon' that showed the pair was out of touch with the daily reality of New Zealanders. Although the party said they were going to get 'New Zealand back on track' as per their election campaign slogan, Hipkins claimed 'across the board, New Zealanders can see the country is going backwards.' 'Yet Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis just say – 'oh, that's all part of the plan, we've got this' – they haven't got it. 'Things are getting worse for the vast majority of New Zealanders and no amount of spin from them is going to change the reality that things are getting worse for New Zealanders under their leadership. 'I think we should start calling them Fisher and Paykel because they've got more spin than a front load washing machine.' Tax relief was a major part of National's 2023 election campaign amid flaring inflation and a cost of living crisis. The party campaigned on a series of policies aimed at helping the 'squeezed middle', including adjusting tax rates, increasing tax credits and FamilyBoost. These policies came into effect in July last year. Willis said today the average household is $1,560 better off after the Government's tax relief package. 'We have also introduced FamilyBoost, which with the latest expansion gives families up to 40 per cent off their childcare costs. 'We have removed the Auckland fuel tax, introduced 12-month prescriptions, increased the rates rebate for 66,000 seniors and increased Working for Families payments.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon arriving for the post-Cabinet Press conference. Photo / Mark Mitchell Luxon stressed that a year and half into the term, he and his party were still fixated on improving the economy and the cost of living. Things were still tough for many families but the economy was 'expected to grow on average 2.7% per year creating 240,000 jobs over the next four years. 'In the short term we are pulling every lever we can to help Kiwi families with the cost of living.' The Government also announced the scrapping of surcharges at the till, such as when a customer uses PayWave or their mobile phone to make a payment. 'New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges every year. That's money that could be saved or spent elsewhere.' Luxon also said the changes the Government were making to construction would help reduce costs for businesses and New Zealanders. Earlier in the day, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden announced she would review safety rules for scaffolding, saying she had received many complaints from the construction industry that current regulations were too complex and expensive. Van Velden was light on the details of what specifically would be reviewed, but said officials would consult on proposed new rules that would give people a selection of safety options depending on how dangerous the job was. 'If it's not very risky, they will not need to use expensive scaffolding. 'For example, they will be considering whether a ladder could be used instead of scaffolding for a simple roof gutter repair or minor electrical maintenance when working at height.'
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Madison Burgess-Smith and Mike Williams Part 1
Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Madison Burgess-Smith and Mike Williams. Starting off, the Panel hears how homelessness and rough sleeping is on the rise across the country and then they discuss the government's move to ban on-card payments in-store, saving shoppers from being stung with surprise fees when paying with contactless technology. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
