US Justice Department scrambles to defend its about-face on release of Epstein files
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's Justice Department scrambled on Tuesday to answer questions after its leadership concluded there was no evidence to support a number of long-held conspiracy theories about the death of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged clientele.
Conservative influencers from Laura Loomer to Elon Musk have criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel for their findings, which came months after Bondi pledged to reveal major revelations about Epstein, including "a lot of names" and "a lot of flight logs."
"It's sitting on my desk right now to review," Bondi told Fox News in February when she was asked if the Justice Department would be releasing Epstein's client list.
On Tuesday at the White House, Bondi walked that comment back, telling reporters that she was referring to the entire Epstein "file" along with other files pertaining to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. "That's what I meant by that," she said.
She added that the many of the videos in the Epstein investigative file "turned out to be child porn." This material, she added, is "never going to be released. Never going to see the light of day."
The Justice Department's memo on Epstein, released on Monday, concluded that after reviewing more than 300 gigabytes of data, there was "no incriminating client list" nor was there any evidence that Epstein may have blackmailed prominent people.
The memo also confirmed prior findings by the FBI which concluded that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell while awaiting trial, and not as a result of a criminal act such murder.
A subsequent report by the Justice Department's inspector general later found that the Bureau of Prisons employees who were tasked with guarding Epstein failed to search his cell or check on him in the hours before his suicide.
Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, a former conservative podcaster, both previously made statements before working at the FBI about a so-called client list and often suggested that the government was hiding information about Epstein from the American public.
Trump defended them in a Truth Social Post on Monday amid a backlash by his MAGA base, calling them the "greatest law enforcement professionals."
He expressed annoyance when reporters asked him questions about Epstein on Tuesday at the White House during a cabinet meeting, saying, "Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?"
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Andy Sullivan, additonal reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; Editing by Scott Malone and Alistair Bell)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[UPDATED] Rubio: US tariffs aim to rebalance global economic playing field](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FMALAYSIA-US-ASEAN-DIPLOMACY_n01-2_1752151206.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Rubio: US tariffs aim to rebalance global economic playing field](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Rubio: US tariffs aim to rebalance global economic playing field
KUALA LUMPUR: The tariffs imposed by the United States are part of a broader effort to rebalance its economy on a global scale, said its Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio said the move is consistent with President Donald Trump's long-standing belief that the global trade landscape has disadvantaged American workers and industries. Rubio also said Southeast Asian countries are going to receive the letter regarding the tariffs at 'some point', but would receive 'better' tariff rates upon discussions. "The President (Trump) has been clear, even before he was in politics, where he felt that the status of global trade was unfair to American workers and the economy. "This is an effort to rebalance that on a global scale and when all is said and done, many countries in Southeast Asia are going to have tariff rates that are actually better than other countries in other parts of the world and could be beneficial (for them)," he said on the sidelines of the 58th Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting (AMM) today. He said this when asked regarding the discussion held with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim on the tariffs this afternoon. Commenting further, Rubio said that the door for Asian countries to discuss tariffs remains open. "The door remains open to adjustments. In fact, agreements can be reached and we are actively engaging in conversations with multiple countries that are represented here (Asean) on ways to make even further progress. "However, the markets demand certainty, hence, we need to let everyone know what the baseline is starting Aug 1. But these talks continue," he said, adding that there will be talks with Asean countries in the upcoming weeks. Rubio said that the history of the 21st century will also be 'written' in the Indo-Pacific and Southeast Asia regions, where over 6,000 American companies have invested. "These are important partnerships, both economic and defence cooperation partnerships that we are not going to abandon or walk away from. "We are going to continue to build on, we think that is that important. If you look at the demographics of Southeast Asia, this is the youngest part of the world. "You are about to see enormous growth in the labour pool and in workers. This is an exciting time, an extraordinary historic time. "As such, we are excited about what economic cooperation is going to mean in this region and trade is going to be a key component of it," he said. Earlier this week, Trump announced that a 25 per cent import duty on Malaysian goods would take effect from Aug 1. He justified the measure as a way to "protect domestic industries" from what he described as unfair trade practices by several countries. On April 2, Trump announced the retaliatory tariffs, where Malaysia was among the affected countries hit with 24 per cent, although enforcement was deferred by 90 days to allow time for negotiations.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
‘No extensions': Trump locks in August 1 deadline for US tariffs
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would officially extend until August 1 his declared deadline to impose 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of economic partners, indicating that this time he really meant it. The move keeps Trump's negotiating leverage at a boil even as it imposes additional uncertainty on the global economy amid new fears of a trade war. The US president also said during a cabinet meeting Tuesday he would impose a 50 per cent tariff on imported copper and planned to slap long-threatened levies on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Trump added that ties with Beijing have improved. 'We have had a really good relationship with China lately, and we're getting along with them very well,' he said, adding that he was speaking regularly with Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'They've been very fair on our trade deal, honestly,' he added. In the past, Trump has claimed having calls that Beijing declined to confirm. The postponement of a deadline Trump had originally said would be Wednesday came as the '90 deals in 90 days' that his administration vowed to complete has run into severe headwinds, prompting the president to issue 14 unilateral letters on Monday. These notes, all but identically worded, would impose elevated tariffs of 25 per cent or more effective August 1 for major trading partners Japan and South Korea and for smaller economies like Laos and Cambodia, with more missives expected. 'In addition to letters that will be sent today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time, TARIFFS WILL START BEING PAID ON AUGUST 1,' Trump posted on his social media account. 'No extensions will be granted.' Trump has also warned nations that any move to counter Washington would see their US duties increased by an identical amount. But even as he sent out his letters Monday, he told reporters that his new deadline was 'firm, but not 100 per cent firm', adding: 'I would say final – but if they call with a different offer, and I like it, then we'll do it'. The European Union and Japan were reportedly close to reaching trade pacts with the US. Financial markets have dubbed the president's pattern of repeated threats and climbdowns 'Taco', for 'Trump always chickens out'. Trump's declaration follows days of characteristic 'will he or won't he' drama amid his vows that America would 'no longer be ripped off'. Over the weekend, Trump threatened to impose unilateral tariffs of up to 70 per cent by Wednesday and hinted at as many as 10 imminent deals, even as he and his aides previewed a more realistic August 1 date – provided countries negotiated 'in good faith'. Broadening his injection of tariffs into foreign policy as well as domestic politics, the president also said he could apply a 10 per cent duty on Brics countries for their 'anti-American' agenda. Imposing higher duties on US-bound shipments arguably gives Trump a domestic win in line with his 'America first' narrative and bid to rejuvenate US manufacturing. But it is also likely to deepen mistrust among close allies and trading partners, erode US global leadership and, analysts said, undercut the interdependence that has informed much of the post-World War II period – issues of little apparent concern for Trump. The rush to deal in recent days stems from Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement that all US trading partners would be subject to 'reciprocal' tariffs of up to 50 per cent, from the wealthiest countries to the most impoverished. Days later, however, as markets plunged and companies yelped, Trump announced a three-month reprieve, set to expire on Wednesday, during which trading partners – except China – would be subject to 10 per cent higher tariffs pending a deal. Increasingly, as the flood of deals failed to materialise, however, the administration focused on a smaller number of agreements with major economies and take-it-or-leave-it letters for the rest. Trump said that all 100-plus US trading partners would get letters by the original Wednesday deadline. Adding to the confusion, Trump has teed up various sectoral negotiations involving steel, aluminium, autos, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors amid claims of unfair trade and national security concerns. He has also levied punitive tariffs on imports from nations he has linked to illegal migration and illicit fentanyl shipments to the US. 'It is easy to agree on wanting a quick deal – but much harder to agree on what the terms of that quick deal should be,' Nico FitzRoy, a partner at Signum Global, a financial advisory firm, said. Agreements announced in recent weeks – actually more like broad frameworks, analysts said, given the rush and lack of detail – have covered Britain, China and Vietnam. After a May deal with Britain, it appeared that the 10 per cent higher tariffs London had accepted would be the rough benchmark for future agreements. Beijing was next when it agreed to 30 per cent higher tariffs last month, though it was considered a separate category given the complexity of US-China relations and the country's huge historical trade surplus. The announcement last week, however, that Vietnam had agreed to 20 per cent higher tariffs – and 40 per cent for Chinese goods transshipped through the country – has raised concerns that Trump would push for larger average tariff increases. Some analysts now surmise that levels could settle at around half of Trump's peak threats given that the initial tariff for Vietnam was 46 per cent. But trying to predict Trump's next step is complicated by his admission that his 'intuition' is often the main factor in his decision-making. 'These tariffs aren't coming off,' said Henrietta Treyz, a founder of the Veda Partners consultancy, adding that '10 per cent tariffs are the floor, not the ceiling'. Another concern for many anxious delegations cycling through Washington is the risk that, once he agrees to a deal, Trump could turn around and threaten additional sectoral increases. 'Can Trump really be expected to agree to 'promise' trading partners they won't be hit by future tariffs?' asked Andrew Bishop of Signum. Japanese leaders voiced 'regret' on Tuesday at the announced 25 per cent tariffs but expressed hope that Washington and Tokyo would reach a mutually acceptable 'package'. In the coming weeks, look for the White House to roll out headline 'deals' to purchase US products but to 'kick thornier issues around digital taxation, labour standards and phytosanitary standards out into the future', Treyz said. As negotiations have intensified, the broad outline of Trump's playbook has become more evident: keep allies off balance with shifting demands and frequent changes; visibly and publicly threaten their core interests to increase leverage; then release pressure with a deal framed through a narrow economic lens with limited regard to broader foreign policy objectives. The lack of detail accompanying the deals, some promoted as 'historic', has also created room for misunderstanding, accusations and backsliding. After US and Chinese officials reached an agreement in Geneva in May, it quickly came off the rails and required another high-level meeting weeks later in London. In some cases, details only surfaced later: last week, three makers of chip design software, including Siemens, noted that the Trump administration had lifted restrictions on sales to China. Trump and his advisers have repeatedly claimed that tariffs cost 'nothing' and that foreign nations, not American consumers, pay. But a JPMorgan Chase Institute study last week of US companies linked to international trade found that current tariff levels would add some US$82 billion in new costs for mid-sized firms accounting for a third of US private-sector jobs. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Armenia and Azerbaijan hold peace talks in Abu Dhabi, no major breakthrough
BAKU:** The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan engaged in substantive discussions during talks held in Abu Dhabi, marking the most significant direct negotiations yet in efforts to resolve their nearly four-decade conflict. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met for their first formal dialogue since agreeing on a draft peace agreement in March. Both governments confirmed the discussions covered key issues, including the delimitation of their shared 1,000-km border, and agreed to continue negotiations at various levels. A senior Azerbaijani official described the atmosphere as 'highly constructive,' while Armenia noted the talks were 'result-oriented.' A peace deal could reshape the geopolitics of the South Caucasus, a strategic region rich in energy resources and criss-crossed by vital oil and gas pipelines. The area has long been marred by ethnic tensions and closed borders. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in conflict since the late 1980s over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Azerbaijani region with a predominantly ethnic Armenian population that sought independence. Azerbaijan regained control of Karabakh in 2023, leading to the displacement of around 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Both nations now seek a formal treaty to end hostilities. Outstanding issues remain, including Azerbaijan's demand for Armenia to amend its constitution, which indirectly references Karabakh. Russia, which previously stationed peacekeepers in the region, expressed full support for the diplomatic process, hoping it would bring 'predictability, stability and peace to the region.' - REUTERS
