UN Expert Says Firms 'Profiting' From 'Genocide' Of Palestinians
Some of the companies named in her report also raised objections.
Albanese presented her report, investigating "the corporate machinery sustaining the Israeli settler-colonial project of displacement and replacement of the Palestinians", to the UN Human Rights Council.
Companies should stop all business activities and relationships that caused or contributed to rights violations and international crimes, she argued.
In response, Israel's mission in Geneva said Albanese's report was motivated by her "obsessive, hate-driven agenda to delegitimise the state of Israel".
It was "legally groundless, defamatory and a flagrant abuse of office", it added.
Swiss mining and commodity trading giant Glencore, named in the report, also denounced her allegations as "unfounded".
Albanese is the UN's special rapporteur on the rights situation in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.
She described the situation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as "apocalyptic" as she presented the report.
"In Gaza, Palestinians continue to endure suffering beyond imagination," she added.
Businesses from arms makers to supermarkets and universities had facilitated "this machinery of erasure", Albanese told the UN's top rights body.
Some had supplied the financial and general infrastructure for Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian territories, she said.
"All have helped entrench apartheid and enable the slow, inexorable destruction of Palestinian life."
Her presentation Thursday was received with applause in the chamber.
But Albanese has faced harsh criticism, allegations of anti-Semitism and demands for her removal, from Israel and some of its allies, over her relentless criticism and long-standing accusations of "genocide".
While appointed by the Human Rights Council she does not speak on behalf of the United Nations itself.
Albanese told journalists she had contacted all 48 companies named in her report, entitled "From economy of occupation to economy of genocide".
Eighteen had responded and "only a small number engaged with me in good faith", most of them saying "there was absolutely nothing wrong".
"There have been people and organisations who have profited from the violence, the killing," she said.
"My report exposes a system, something that is so structural and so widespread and so systemic that there is no possibility to fix it and redress it: it needs to be dismantled."
Albanese said the first responsibility to take action was on countries, then on companies, then their consumers.
However, "we are part of a system where we are all entangled and choices that we make... have an impact elsewhere", she said.
"There is a possibility for consumers to hold these companies accountable, because somewhat we vote through our wallets."
AFP sought a comment from several companies named in the report. Some did not respond.
Travel platform Booking.com said: "Our mission is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world and as such we believe it's not our place to decide where someone can or cannot travel."
A communications firm representing Microsoft said the tech giant "doesn't have anything to share".
Danish shipping giant Maersk said it disagreed with many of Albanese's assertions.
Maersk "remains committed to following international standards for responsible business conduct", it said.
Since the war between Israel and Hamas began, "we have maintained a strict policy of not shipping weapons or ammunition to Israel", it added.
A Volvo Group spokesman told AFP: "We obviously respect human rights in accordance with the United Nations framework.
"We have no operations of our own, either in Palestine or in Israel, but rather sell through resellers," he added.
Glencore, in its response, said: "We categorically reject all the allegations appearing in this report and consider them unsubstantiated and devoid of any legal basis."
Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack that prompted the Israeli offensive resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 57,130 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers its figures reliable.
Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence has surged in the territory since October 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Will Germany's military spending bring economic growth? – DW – 07/04/2025
The German arms industry is thriving thanks to a major state-run investment program. But will the country's wider economy benefit? March 18, 2025, will go down in Germanhistory as the day when a two-thirds parliamentary majority cleared the way for the country to take on unprecedented debt. German lawmakers approved an infrastructure investment package worth billions, while also lifting the cap on national defense spending. The aim is to provide the necessary funds to make Germany and its armed forces, the Bundeswehr, "ready for war," as Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has repeatedly demanded since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Shortly after he took office as chancellor earlier this year, Friedrich Merz said he wanted to make the BundeswehrEurope's strongest conventional army. This spending spree is great news for companies that build roads and bridges, lay rail tracks and manufacture high-speed fiber-optic internet cables. The German defense industry stands to benefit even more. For decades, the sector had been losing economic importance. Who in Germany, after all, was interested in buying tanks? In 2020, shares in Rheinmetall, Germany's largest arms manufacturer, sold for €59 — by June 2025, they were trading between €1,700 and €1,800 ($2,116) each. Swiss bank UBS has forecast further share price growth, currently estimating a rise to €2,200. These are golden times for German arms manufacturers, with industry top brass insisting that defense spending not only benefits their sector but the economy as a whole. "Defense spending is a gigantic economic stimulus program," Oliver Dörre, CEO of defense contractor Hensoldt, told DW at an event in Frankfurt in March. Lawmakers hope the spending spree will help modernize German industry and boost economic growth. Economists, however, were less euphoric even before parliament agreed the investment package. "The increase in government military spending will give the German economy a boost, but the economic stimulus will be rather moderate," wrote Tom Krebs, an economics professor at the University of Mannheim, in a statement for the Bundestag's budget committee. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Krebs and his colleague Patrick Kaczmarczyk conducted a study examining the extent to which additional government spending will increase Germany's gross domestic product, or total value of economic output. The researchers found that military spending would have a maximum impact of 0.5 — meaning that, in the best-case scenario, €1 of government spending will generate just 50 cents of additional economic activity. Investments in infrastructure, education, child care facilities, day care centers and schools would, however, double or even triple the return on investment. "From an economic perspective, the planned militarization of the German economy is a risky gamble with a low overall economic return," said Krebs. The explanation for this is simple. After a tank is built, it is either parked somewhere or, in the worst case, destroyed in battle. A tank, in other words, does not create any additional economic value. Defense spending is, however, like taking out insurance. You make the payments so that you have protection in case of an emergency. If you don't need the insurance, the money is simply gone. If, on the other hand, the state invests in transport infrastructure, goods can be transported to businesses via these roads, bridges and railways. There, they can be used to manufacture products that are then sold. If kindergartens are built, parents are freed up to work and earn money. Investments in schools mean young people get the education they need for their future. Defense production currently only contributes very little to overall economic growth, although German arms companies have seen orders surge. Rheinmetall, for example, had an order backlog worth some €63 billion ($74 billion) in the first quarter of 2025. Before the start of the Ukraine war, it stood at just over €24 billion ($28 billion). Other German defense companies are also busy, with production at full capacity. But if supply is limited and demand increases, this usually causes prices to are already warning this could happen. Krebs and Kaczmarczyk write that "greater defense spending does more to grow arms companies' profit margins and dividends than improve [Germany's] defense capabilities." Companies currently operating outside the defense sector are also looking to get in on the business, especially those suffering amid Germany's economic malaise. Cologne-based Deutz AG, for example, produces engines for lifting platforms, agricultural vehicles, excavators and other large machines. Due to the weak economy, company sales slumped by some 12% in 2024. Deutz, which also manufactures engines for military vehicles, is now set to significantly expand this previously small line of business. "Defense is a very important and interesting market for us with great growth potential," CEO Sebastian Schulte told DW in March. German carmaker Volkswagen is another example. The company is in crisis and has already cut thousands of jobs, with its Osnabrück plant facing closure. Now, Rheinmetall is looking into whether tanks could be built there instead. These are two examples that show how greater defense spending could benefit the wider economy by offsetting losses, rather than generating additional growth. That said, even companies that are doing well are switching to arms production, with demand surging in the metalworking industry.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Hamas Says Holding Consultations On Gaza Truce Proposal
Hamas said Friday it was holding consultations with other Palestinian groups on a proposed truce with Israel, in a possible sign that it was preparing for negotiations for a Gaza ceasefire. The statement came ahead of a visit on Monday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Washington, where President Donald Trump is pushing for an end to the war. The conflict in Gaza began with Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, which sparked a massive Israeli offensive aimed at destroying Hamas and bringing home all the hostages seized by militants. Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States have seen temporary halts in fighting, coupled with the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. "The movement is conducting consultations with leaders of Palestinian forces and factions regarding the proposal received... from the mediators," Hamas said in a statement early Friday. Hours earlier, Netanyahu vowed to bring home all the hostages held by militants in Gaza, after coming under massive domestic pressure over their fate. "I feel a deep commitment, first and foremost, to ensure the return of all our abductees, all of them," Netanyahu said. Trump said on Thursday he wanted "safety for the people of Gaza". "They've gone through hell," he said. A Palestinian source familiar with the negotiations told AFP earlier this week there were no fundamental changes in the latest proposal compared to previous terms presented by the United States. The source said the proposal "includes a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release half of the living Israeli captives in the Gaza Strip -- thought to number 22 -- in exchange for Israel releasing a number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees". Out of 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during the October 7 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The military said in a statement it had been striking suspected Hamas targets across the territory, including around Gaza City in the north and Khan Yunis and Rafah in the south. Nearly 21 months of war have created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people in the Gaza Strip, where Israel has recently expanded its military operations against Hamas militants. Gaza civil defence official Mohammad al-Mughayyir said Israeli fire killed at least 40 people on Friday, updating an earlier toll of 15. The Israeli military said it was looking into the reports, except two incidents for which it requested coordinates and timeframes. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. Mughayyir said those killed included five who were shot while waiting for humanitarian aid near a US-run site near Rafah in southern Gaza and one who was waiting for aid near the Wadi Gaza Bridge in the centre of the territory. They were the latest in a spate of deadly shootings near aid distribution centres in the devastated territory, which UN agencies have warned is on the brink of famine. At Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis, crowds mourned people killed on Thursday by what the civil defence agency said was shooting close to a nearby aid centre. "I lost my brother in the American distribution centre that they set up to feed people," cried one mourner, Narmin Abu Muammar. "They are killing people, not feeding them." Bereaved mother Nidaa al-Farra said her 19-year-old son Eyad too had been killed while waiting for food. "My son went to get flour and they say: 'Here is the aid, come here.' And when they go, they shoot them." The US- and Israeli-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distanced itself from reports of deadly incidents near its sites. The civil defence official told AFP that eight people, including a child, were killed in an Israeli air strike on the tents of displaced civilians near Khan Yunis. Mughayyir said eight more people were killed in two other strikes on camps on the coast, including one that killed two children early Friday. Contacted by AFP on the earlier toll, the Israeli military said it could not comment on specific attacks without precise coordinates, but noted it was "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities". The Hamas attack of October 2023 resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures. Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 57,130 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. Strikes on Gaza left smoking ruins AFP Mourners massed outside Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis AFP Protesters in Tel Aviv urged Trump to help bring the hostages home AFP Mourners held a funeral procession for Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes in southern Gaza on Thursday AFP
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Why is Iran doubling down on its nuclear program? – DW – 07/04/2025
Tehran seems defiant on its nuclear ambitions despite the recent war. The nuclear program, launched with US help during the Shah era, was always a show of strength. Now, it also symbolizes the regime's resilience. Tehran is officially halting its collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the wake of the recent US and Israeli air strikes. "As long as the security of Iranian nuclear facilities is not ensured, Iran will suspend its cooperation with the IAEA," parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said on state television last week, with President Masoud Pezeshkian signing off on the move this Wednesday. The specifics of the measure, however, remain unclear. For example, it is not yet known how it would affect the IAEA inspectors that remained in Iran throughout the 12-day conflict. The Vienna-based UN agency hopes to gain more information on the state of the three of Iran's top nuclear facilities — in Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz — which were targeted by the US-Israeli bombing. It also unclear if Iran is willing to remain in the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the cornerstone of global arms control, after its facilities were attacked. "The fact that these facilities were attacked while under (IAEA) safeguards, while there is no evidence that they were being used for weaponization, is stirring the debate in Iran about whether the NPT still provides security value," Kelsey Davenport, the Director for Nonproliferation Policy at the Arms Control Association think tank, told DW. Ahead of the Israeli strikes on Iraq, the IAEA warned that Iran was the only nation without nuclear arms that is enriching uranium at nearly weapons-grade levels and that it had enough material for several nuclear bombs. At the same time, however, the IAEA stressed it did not have "any proof of a systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tehran's nuclear program has a long and complicated history going back to the 1950s and Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The US-backed monarch decided to join an initiative launched by US President Dwight Eisenhower known as "Atoms for Peace" which aimed to give other nations — especially the developing ones — access to civilian nuclear technology. Iran took advantage of the offer to build the foundations of its own nuclear program. Tehran also joined the IAEA in 1958, just a year after the UN agency was founded in Vienna. The nuclear program was seen as a prestige project in Iran. The country wanted to boost its production of electricity and eventually produce its own nuclear fuel independently of foreign suppliers while also reducing the consumption of oil and gas. In 1970, Iran signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which allows for civilian use of nuclear energy under the IAEA supervision. The Islamist Revolution of 1979 left Iran in chaos. The US stopped its deliveries of nuclear fuel to the research reactor in Tehran. In 1980, Iraq attacked Iran to take control of its oil fields, sparking an eight-year war. Western companies, including German ones, abandoned their cooperation with the Iran nuclear program. In the early 1980s, rumors began circulating that Iraq was building a nuclear weapon. Israel, who regarded the Saddam Hussein regime as more of a threat than the Iranian mullahs, actually used information provided by the Iranian secret services to bomb Iraq's nuclear reactor Osirak in 1981. After the Iran-Iraq war ended in 1988, Iran started importing technology from Pakistan, China and Russia to enrich uranium and develop its own nuclear fuel. The regime hoped to prove that Iran was capable of pursuing high-tech projects, and its nuclear program became a symbol of the nation's strength. Iranian officials never denied the fact that Tehran also had the capacity to build a nuclear weapon in case of an emergency. Akbar Etemad, the man known as the father of Iran's nuclear program, believed that no country has the right to dictate how other nations pursue its nuclear policy, and he maintained that position even after the Islamist Revolution in 1979. Fereydoun Abbasi, who led Iran's atomic agency until he was killed in recent Israeli air strikes, also publicly stated that Iran needed to be able to quickly reach weapons-grade levels of enrichment if the government demands it. In 2003, IAEA inspectors and satellite surveillance indicated the possibility of Iran pursuing a secret military nuclear program. Germany's foreign minister at the time, Joschka Fischer, convinced his counterparts in the UK and France to start negotiations with Iran, aiming to impose stricter controls of the Iranian nuclear program with the help of the IAEA. After 12 long years of talks, the US, China, Russia and the three European powers came to a comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran knowns the JCPOA. In 2018, however, the US President Donald Trump took his country out of the agreement to get a "better deal." Iran responded by gradually forgoing its commitments and began high-level uranium enrichment in 2019. Today, Iran has about 400 kilograms (over 880 pounds) of highly enriched uranium and many advanced centrifuges used to process the radioactive element. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Despite the US claiming that Iran's nuclear program has been "obliterated," many experts warn that Iran could rebuild its nuclear facilities. "At the end of the day there are some really important things that haven't been hit," Jeffrey Lewis, a non-proliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in Monterey, California, told the US broadcaster NPR. Right now, Iran is very unlikely to compromise, said Iranian-born reporter Mehrdad Farahmand. "Iran sees backing down in a wartime situation as weakness" and this perception is possibly the biggest obstacle to a revival of diplomacy, he said. Looking to the future, Iran's perspective is likely to be shaped by the examples of Libya and North Korea, according to Kelsey Davenport. "It wouldn't be surprising if the advisors around the supreme leader are arguing that Iran needs nuclear weapons to defend itself from further attack," she said. "Iran looks at the example of Libya, where Moammar Gadhafi gave up the country's nuclear weapons program, returned to good standing in NPT, and then later was overthrown by Western-backed forces," Davenport told DW. In turn, North Korean abandoned the Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003, developed its nuclear weapons, and the regime — now lead by Kim Jong Un — remains firmly in power. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
