logo
‘It was carnage': Kashmiri border residents shattered by night shelling from Pakistan

‘It was carnage': Kashmiri border residents shattered by night shelling from Pakistan

Russia Today09-05-2025
In the serene village of Mendhar, nestled in the mountains of Poonch district in the southern region of Jammu close to the Line of Control (LoC), a quasi-border between India and Pakistan, the night of tranquility on Wednesday was shattered by intense shelling from across the border. At least 16 civilians, including women and children, were killed and 44 people were wounded.
The residents recalled it as the worst shelling in decades. They woke up to the deafening sounds of shellfire as Pakistani artillery targeted civilian areas along the LOC in multiple locations across Jammu and Kashmir. 'This was a night of grief and terror.'
We did not know what to do as shells were landing everywhere on houses, killing small children, triggering fire,' said Sukhchain Singh, a farmer, whose two neighbors, Amreek Singh, 55, and Ranjit Singh, 48, both shopkeepers, were killed in the shelling. 'We are in grief and mourning, and now we also fear for our lives,' he said.
Analysts have called the assault one of the deadliest in recent years. It was in response to India's 'Operation Sindoor' launched on the night of May 7 and targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan in retaliation for a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgram, Kashmir in April.
Tensions between India and Pakistan have sharply escalated following the attack that left 26 people dead. India, which has long accused Pakistan of aiding militant infiltrations in Kashmir, has signaled that it holds Pakistan responsible – a claim Pakistan denied. The two neighbors have fought several wars since their independence from Britain in 1947 as they both claim Jammu and Kashmir in its entirety.
'We have not seen anything like this in years, though we have been living in the border area for decades now. This was a doomsday. It is the innocent civilians who get caught in the fire; how were the small children to blame who were killed?' said Tahira Bano, another resident who along with her family of five was evacuated to a government school in Poonch town. Poonch town was the worst affected, where locals said that the shelling continued for six hours, sparking fear and terror among residents who were caught unaware. The tension between India and Pakistan had been building for days after the Pahalgam attack, in which 26 tourists were killed by terrorists. India has blamed Pakistan, although Pakistan has denied the charge.
In retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, India launched 'Operation Sindoor', which New Delhi said targeted nine 'terror bases' in Pakistan.
However, Islamabad retorted that 31 civilians were killed in an Indian strike and the attack would be avenged, which has heightened the tensions between the two countries. World leaders have meanwhile appealed for calm between the two nuclear-armed neighbors.
Ajaz Jan, a local legislator, said that the entire town in Poonch had been affected by the heavy shelling from across the border. 'This was like a war zone,' he said.
The videos shared by the locals with RT show a house turned into ruins, dead bodies of children being carried out in vans, and smoke rising high in the air. Residents have yet to recover from the scenes of chaos, with despairing families huddled in makeshift shelters, mourning the loss of loved ones and the destruction of their homes.
❗️Pakistani Artillery Strikes Kill 15 Civilians in Poonch & Tangdhar43 others were injured when strikes hit civilian areas in Kashmir earlier on Wednesday. https://t.co/76rkznV2pnpic.twitter.com/SXyUCOCkoN
'This was a peaceful village, but now there is smoke everywhere,' says Abdul Salam Khatana, 55, another resident. While the Indian army says that they have responded to the ceasefire violations, the civilian population continues to bear the brunt of the escalating tensions all across the border in Jammu and Kashmir.
'We do not know what lies ahead for us. War is not an option; the innocent civilians pay the price. It takes years to build a life on the mountain, and now it has taken seconds to turn everything into ashes,' Khatana said, adding that the locals long for peace.
Mohmad Waseem Malla, a research fellow at the International Centre for Peace Studies New Delhi said that that residents along the LoC are the most vulnerable, being situated directly on the front line.
'There are already so many casualties being reported. Should tensions escalate further, these communities may face not only temporary displacement but also significant restrictions on access to their agricultural lands – an essential source of livelihood,' Malla said.
He added that at this juncture, it remains to be seen how the situation will evolve. 'Nevertheless, India's response thus far appears calibrated, aiming to establish deterrence while preventing a broader escalation.'
Michael Kugelman, the Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center, said that this time the violence is much worse than, for instance, in 2019 when India conducted precision strikes on a terrorist camp in Balakot, Pakistan, following an attack on the military convoy in Pulwama that resulted in the death of 40 personnel. Tensions now are 'already higher up the escalatory ladder than any time in the '19 crisis,' Kugelman said.
While the borders between India and Pakistan have witnessed skirmishes for decades, the roaring guns had mostly fallen silent after the 2003 ceasefire agreement between the two countries. Experts say that the current scale of cross-border shelling has not been seen since the 1971 India-Pakistan War.
Shelling was also witnessed in the northern districts of Uri and Kupwara – two districts close to the LoC. Many civilian homes were damaged and several people were injured, including three children.
The locals have been asked to move to safety by the government. The authorities have also ordered the closure of schools and colleges in many districts of Jammu and Kashmir.
The three airports in the region – Srinagar, Jammu and Leh – have been closed until May 10. There is chaos and uncertainty among the local population, who fear that hostilities could increase and have started hoarding essentials like gasoline. RT spoke to locals in the villages of Gingal, Dachina, and Salamabad, where residents said that many houses caught fire due to the intensity of the shelling.
'The blazing fire was so intense that within seconds it spread, we found no other option but to leave our livestock behind and flee the village,' said a resident of Salamabad in Uri, who has now left his home behind and gone to a shelter in the town. 'We want peace and not war. This is taking a toll on our lives, our mental health is shattered. We feel helpless,' said Irshad Ahmad, a resident of Garkote village in the same district. While the situation remains tense with fear of more escalation, Ahmad said that he hopes that hostilities will end soon. 'We hope that peace comes back and we can return to our homes.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-US ties have weathered many challenges
India-US ties have weathered many challenges

Russia Today

time10 hours ago

  • Russia Today

India-US ties have weathered many challenges

The India-US relationship has 'weathered many transitions and challenges' in the past and is based on mutual respect, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said on Friday. The comments come in response to the US imposing 25% tariffs on imports from India and Donald Trump's threatening to add penalties over and above those due to New Delhi's trade and defense ties with Moscow. 'India and the US share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, robust people-to-people ties,' Jaiswal said. He also spoke of the potential for the defense partnership with Washington. 'We have strong defense ties with the US which have been strengthening over the last several years,' he said. ❗️🇮🇳 Relationships With Other Countries Should Not Be Seen Through Prism Of A Third Country - Russia & India Have A Steady & Time-Tested Partnership- MEA Reacts To Trump's Secondary Tariffs A day after Trump said India and Russia 'could take their dead economies down together,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil 'a point of irritation.' In a response to these comments at the Friday press briefing, Jaiswal said bilateral relationships between two countries should not be viewed in the context of a third nation. 'Our ties with any country are based on their own merit and should not be judged through the lens of our relationship with another country,' he said. Jaiswal also highlighted that India and Russia enjoy a long-standing and robust partnership. The spokesman said India's decisions on defense purchases are driven solely by national security needs and strategic considerations, adding that the country's energy sourcing is guided by market availability and global circumstances.

Trump's onslaught: Why India and BRICS will not bend
Trump's onslaught: Why India and BRICS will not bend

Russia Today

time12 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Trump's onslaught: Why India and BRICS will not bend

US President Trump has rattled Washington's ties with New Delhi to an unexpected degree. Countries, including, India were prepared for rough diplomatic weather after Trump won his second term, but did not anticipate the kind of onslaught he has unleashed on the global system and diplomatic norms. Trump's latest attack on India and the BRICS countries explains this underlying dynamic. The BRICS aspire to play a greater political, economic and financial role in global affairs. This aspiration is based on shifts of economic and concomitant political and financial power towards the so-called emerging powers or middle-income countries. BRICS countries have already begun to use their national currencies in trading with each other as much as possible. The use of draconian financial sanctions on Russia by the West has accelerated this process. Today, almost all trade operations between Russia and China are conducted in rubles and yuan. India too is encouraging the use of its national currency in payment transactions with select countries. A significant portion of the trade between India and Russia is now settled using a rupee-ruble mechanism. Washington cannot use secondary sanctions to prevent countries, including India, from using the US dollar to trade with Russia and then oppose de-dollarization if these countries are compelled to use alternative payment mechanisms. If the US continues to weaponize the dollar, it will inevitably lead to the very 'de-dollarization' that Trump is concerned about. India has officially disowned any de-dollarization agenda – not the least because the US is its biggest trade partner in goods and services. India seeks more investments and technology transfers from the US. In many ways, New Delhi's ties with Washington are the most important for achieving its growth and developmental goals. But that does not preclude India from establishing other partnerships to reduce over-dependence on one country, balance its external relations and hedge against the excesses of US foreign policy. Trump has exacerbated the disruptions caused by Washington's frequent use of sanctions as a political weapon by also weaponizing tariffs. He is convinced that by imposing arbitrarily determined tariffs on imports from other countries he will compel them to enter into negotiations with the US to obtain relief by lowering their high tariffs on American products. But India on Wednesday sent a clear message: it is determined to protect the interests of its own businesses, farmers and people. Trump's use of tariffs as lever, like in the case of Brazil, where he has cited President Lula's treatment of his predecessor Bolsanaro as reason for imposing 50% levies, is being closely monitored by the world's governments. Trump has repeatedly targeted BRICS since his return to the Oval Office. He had threatened the countries with tariffs if they contonie to pledge to create a new common currency or support any alternative to the US dollar. Trump appeared to harbor the illusion that BRICS was 'dead' following his threats – which have now materialized into action. In reality, the BRICS summit held in Brazil this July showed no visible signs of intimidation. On the contrary, such overt displays of American economic coercion may well drive more countries toward alliances that seek to challenge the dominance of any single global power. The administration in Washington appears to lack realism in its assessment of global trends. Trump positions himself as a peacemaker and openly aspires to win a Nobel Peace Prize, while at the same time bombing Iran and assisting Israel in perpetuating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Similarly, threatening China as a BRICS member with 100% tariffs so casually – along with talk of bombing Beijing if the People's Republic were to invade Taiwan – makes little sense, especially given that an interim trade deal has already been reached and further negotiations are imminent. The US cannot reasonably claim that forums like BRICS have no right to determine their own agenda in pursuit of their shared interests. At the same time, the US has walked out of or subverted key international agreements and institutions. It has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Change agreement, the WHO, the UN Human Rights Commission and UNESCO. Trump seems to believe that these organizations cannot function or survive without the presence of the US and its financial contributions. In reality, the US will lose its voice and its leadership in these international forums. The space it vacates will be filled by others, especially China. Beijing has already carved out enormous influence in the UN institutions as it is now the second largest contributor to the UN. With Washington also bullying Europe and thereby damaging Western solidarity, the US absence from these organizations will have even less impact. The more the world learns to manage without the US in these international bodies, the more America's international influence will erode. These US decisions will also accelerate the dispersal of influence at the global level, as other centers of influence develop.

India ‘not keen' on buying F-35s from US
India ‘not keen' on buying F-35s from US

Russia Today

time13 hours ago

  • Russia Today

India ‘not keen' on buying F-35s from US

India told the US in February that it is 'not keen' on buying F-35 stealth fighter jets, Bloomberg reported on Thursday, citing officials familiar with the matter. US President Donald Trump had offered to sell the aircraft to New Delhi when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the White House in February, according to the report. India is keener on a partnership that focuses on joint design and manufacturing, it added. The Indian Foreign Ministry, however, has downplayed the report by the news agency. 'The India-US joint statement following the meeting of the prime minister with the US president on 13 February 2025 mentions that the US will undertake a review of its policy on releasing fifth-generation fighters (such as the F-35) and undersea systems to India,' the minister of state for foreign affairs said in the lower house of parliament on Friday. 'No formal discussions have been held as yet on this issue.' The sale of fighter aircraft to India would reduce a $41.18 billion trade deficit that the US has with the South Asian nation. This week, the US imposed 25% tariffs on imports from India, as the two countries were unable to conclude a trade deal by an August 1 deadline. On Wednesday, Trump said in a post on Truth Social that India would pay an undisclosed penalty in addition to the tariffs for its trade and defense purchases from Russia. During Modi's visit to Washington in February, Trump said the US would like to increase weapons sales to India and would eventually offer its latest fighter jets. 'We'll be increasing military sales to India by many billions of dollars,' the US president told reporters. 'We're also paving the way to ultimately provide India with the F-35 stealth fighters.' In his April visit to India, US Vice President J.D. Vance said the F-35 could bolster the Indian Air Force's defense capabilities. The statement came days after the F-35 and Russia's Su-57 were showcased at the Aero India air show in Bangalore. Defense analysts say the Su-57 has clear advantages over its American rival, including lower cost and tech transfer opportunities, making it appealing to the Indian Air Force, which has long relied on Russian systems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store