Colleges could tackle housing and food needs with money in proposed budget
Last year, University of New Mexico researchers, in partnership with the state Higher Education Department, surveyed nearly 10,000 students at colleges and universities across the state. More than half of students, they found, had struggled to access food, especially nutritious food, and stable housing within the prior year — referred to by the researchers as basic needs insecurity.
Some students reported they'd thought about leaving school to get a second job. Others said they had a hard time focusing in class because of hunger or sometimes skipped class to pick up extra shifts.
This story was originally published by New Mexico In Depth
The state budget proposal includes $4.5 million for 'student retention initiatives' at public four-year institutions for the next fiscal year. It also includes $6.5 million for the following year and $9 million for the year after that for those initiatives.
The budget doesn't specify that the funding be used to address students' basic needs, but schools could choose to use it for that purpose, according to Higher Education Deputy Secretary Patricia Trujillo.
'The funding goes to the institutions, and they would make the decision, but with the idea that with all the work that we've been doing in basic needs, they would see that as a critical need in retaining students,' Trujillo said in an interview last week. The agency is also advocating for the funding to be available to both four-year and two-year schools, she said.
The statewide average retention rate, which measures how many students stay enrolled from year to year, for the 2021-2022 academic year was 59%, according to the agency.
While the Opportunity Scholarship makes colleges and universities tuition-free for most residents, New Mexico needs to pay more attention to the 'true cost of college,' Trujillo said.
'Food is more expensive. Housing is more expensive. We're kind of in this up and down. Vehicles are going to be more expensive. Transportation is going to be more expensive,' she said. 'And so when we think about how we continue to support higher education, I think that as New Mexico moves forward, it's really about thinking about what constellation [of policies] are we building to guide New Mexicans to those college degrees?'
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham recommended $8 million over the next fiscal year for basic needs and other student retention efforts, nearly double what's currently in the budget. Her administration continues to push for that full amount, Trujillo said.
At the same time, she added, appropriations are 'only part of the work.' Members of the Basic Needs Consortium, a group made up of the state's colleges and universities, spent time at the Roundhouse this session, Trujillo said, to raise awareness among lawmakers and talk about new ways to better support students.
Editors note: This story was updated to clarify the word 'constellation' reflected that the speaker was talking about a 'constellation of policies,' which she stated earlier in the interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Cities can fight back with guaranteed income programs
Mayors for a Guaranteed Income helped fund a pilot project at Santa Fe Community College. (Courtesy SFCC) If you are like me, you are still reeling from the news that the 'big beautiful bill' (which is unparalleled in its ugliness) received the necessary votes in the U.S. House and Senate, along with the president's signature. Although the U.S. Senate was close (and Dem senators all voted nay) what kind of madness is this? The very notion of passing legislation that dismantles Medicaid; blunts the effectiveness of nutritional assistance; and cuts funding to rural hospitals highlights the degree that a philosophy of philistine self-interest has infiltrated the current political climate. Trepidation over the fallout spreads nationwide. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham says the bill 'will hit New Mexico hard' and state officials have outlined nightmarish scenarios in which more than 88,000 New Mexicans lose Medicaid and more than 58,000 to lose their Supplemental Assistance Program help. 'This is draconian,' Victor Pineda, executive director of the Center for Independent Living in Berkeley, California, which provides quality of life assistance to the disabled, reportedly said. 'The cuts are a direct hit to our ability to help people stay in their homes who will now be forced into homelessness or institutions.' In the meantime, what can help supplement the loss of basic services in underserved communities? What can cities and mayors do? For one thing: They can put more of their remaining resources toward expanding guaranteed income programs. In 2018, Mayor Michael Tubbs of Stockton, Calif. initiated the first guaranteed income program in the USA, which for two years gave $500 every month to 125 low-income residents. A study in the program's aftermath conducted by a team of independent researchers determined that the money significantly improved participants' mental health and financial standing. Tubbs then founded Mayors for Guaranteed Income (MGI), a network of committed cities that have sponsored pilot programs in cities including Madison, Wis.; Pittsburgh, Pa; New Orleans, La.; and Santa Fe, here in New Mexico. In 2021, with an MGI grant, Santa Fe Mayor Alan Webber launched a pilot program that provided $400-per-month stipends to 100 young, low-income Santa Fe Community College students with child-caretaking responsibilities. A 2025 independent study again concluded that rather than fulfilling easy cliches — meaning the assumption the young grantees would waste the funds on alcohol or video games — participants experienced meaningful improvements in key takeaway areas 'This successful program directly addresses the fundamental problem that is holding New Mexico back: poverty.' said Mayor Webber, after the report was released. Today, more than 100 cities have sponsored direct cash payment programs that lasted one year (or preferably two years). In every case, most participants experienced admirable gains in food and housing security. In Santa Fe, participants experienced a 19 percentage point rise in full employment. But why should these results be surprising when 37% of Americans say they fear an unexpected $400 expense? A consistent extra few hundred (in lieu of having an empty bank account) can make a difference, a larger-than-expected step forward. For proponents, an important assurance is that guaranteed income programs come with 'no strings attached.' A family that needs money to pay for school supplies can choose this option; a recipient who knows that buying a car would be a valuable investment can save for that. Guaranteed income programs have been praised for having an 'entrepreneurial' spirit. But I believe the better word for them is 'self-empowering' in that they encourage the underprivileged to value themselves and invest in their own futures. These humble sums of cash directed without stipulations at crisis communities, including immigrant families, students or homeless youth, provide a measurable boost. Related programs stipulate the money is spent toward specific goals, like preventing homelessness. Funding for renters facing eviction is one of the most important ways cities, including Santa Fe, can potentially use targeted funds in a time when homelessness is at its highest level since the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development began keeping statistics in 2007. Here is the rub. These programs abet and enhance the social safety net. They cannot replace it. These programs are a tool: a necessary weapon. Times may become desperate. Cities must fight back.
USA Today
5 days ago
- USA Today
Will Trump's new spending law make college tuition more expensive?
Lending caps and Medicaid cuts in the new reconciliation law will likely raise costs for students nationwide, experts say. WASHINGTON – Vashti Trujillo was hoping to get a master's degree. But she's worried that President Donald Trump just put it out of reach. The president's massive tax and spending law is set to slash the federal student loan programs the 21-year-old junior at Colorado State University Pueblo would likely need to pay for one. Education experts also predict the legislation will put strains on the budgets of many public universities like the one Trujillo attends. That's because the law may push state legislatures to reroute funds from higher education to safety-net programs, such as Medicaid, which the spending law cuts changes could ultimately raise tuition prices for students like Trujillo – or force them to put plans for graduate school on hold to help support family members who've lost their health care. "This bill is attacking all angles of a student's life," she said. Trujillo, who is double majoring in mechatronics engineering and data analytics, is among many U.S. college students wondering whether Trump's first signature legislative achievement in his second term may raise costs for them. The unease isn't just hitting students; it's omnipresent for college administrators. Federal funding is dwindling. The supply of tuition-paying students is starting what will be a protracted decline. And the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies have shaken the college-going prospects of international students, a population many U.S. universities need to survive. Read more: International college students bring billions to the U.S. Here's why that may change. While Trump's big spending measure stabilizes some funding streams for higher education programs, including Pell Grants, it mostly takes money away at a time when even the richest of universities are already under financial strain. In the years to come, new student loan repayment programs created by the law will raise bills for millions of borrowers. Universities will feel a need to shift more support toward graduate students and away from undergrads. Many state legislatures, meanwhile, may deprioritize support for higher education. Still, the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are confident the new budget law will bolster college oversight and, ultimately, lower prices for students. "By establishing loan limits, the bill closes the open spigot of federal subsidies that drive up college costs and burden families," Education Secretary Linda McMahon posted on X after the Senate passed the measure. "The bill also simplifies and streamlines student loan repayment for millions of borrowers." Read more: What will student loans look like after Trump's spending bill is signed? Nathan Grawe, an economics professor at Carleton College, called the spending law "a harbinger of challenges ahead" for higher education. "Whether public or private, colleges and universities are deeply dependent on funding from a federal government, which has spent far beyond its means," he said. Ending Grad PLUS, capping Parent PLUS While they're not coming right away, big changes to the student loan system will begin to impact borrowers in 2026. Parents will soon face new limits on how much they can borrow in federal loans to finance their children's education. (The new cap is $20,000 per year per student, with a $65,000 total limit.) After July 1, 2026, there will be just two repayment programs for anyone who takes out new loans, while some plans for current borrowers will sunset in 2028. There will be new caps on graduate student borrowing, too. And the Grad PLUS program, which for decades has helped students pursue careers in medicine, law and other training-intensive careers, will be unavailable to new students. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, about half of all medical students take out Grad PLUS loans annually, which are based almost entirely on the cost of attendance. Kim Cook, the CEO of the National College Attainment Network, a college access group, said any losses in grad students could have eventual trickle-down effects for colleges' larger financial aid budgets. For the time being, however, Cook said many college counselors are focusing this summer on clearing up widespread confusion about what the law does – and doesn't – impact. Students, she said, don't all seem to understand what forms of financial aid remain in place. "Federal student aid still exists," she said. "Pell Grants still exist." That confusion alone, she said, could prevent some students from going to college at all. Medicaid, SNAP cuts tied to college costs Arguably, the most controversial components of the new law are the reductions in major safety net programs. A roughly $1 trillion funding cut to Medicaid, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will kick millions of Americans off their health insurance, takes effect in 2028. More than 20 million Americans will also lose some or all of their benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Read more: How Trump's tax bill could cut Medicaid for millions of Americans The ripple effects of the Medicaid and food stamp provisions will reverberate across public colleges and universities. In the absence of federal funding, state legislatures will be forced to fill the gaps. As lawmakers look to balance their budgets, savings will be needed elsewhere. When that happens, funding for higher education is often the first thing on the chopping block, said Tom Harnisch, the vice president for government relations at the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. "States are just going to have to make really difficult choices," he said. "And historically, what we've seen is that when they have to make difficult choices, higher education bears the brunt." In Colorado, state lawmakers are already shortchanging colleges' requests for money to help make up for federal funding cuts. But Trujillo, the CSU Pueblo student, doesn't have much time in between her multiple jobs to worry about that. She's the first in her family to attend college. Through Pell Grants, scholarships and state and institutional financial aid, she's managed to avoid taking out any student loans, public or private, so far. She knows a master's degree would probably lead to a higher salary in the engineering field, but the thought of potentially having to rely on private lenders to get one makes her nervous. "I'm very scared of private loans," she said. "I've heard horror stories." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
Axios
10-07-2025
- Axios
Trinity Test-area residents to finally get reparations 80 years later
New Mexicans impacted by the Trinity Test are getting closer to receiving compensation after eight decades of health problems and rare cancers stemming from the world's first atomic explosion. The big picture: President Trump's recently signed the "big, beautiful bill," which includes an extension of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) and, for the first time, covers victims of the Trinity Test. The inclusion comes after the victims fought for acknowledgement and reparations over multiple generations. It also comes before the 80th anniversary of the Trinity Test, which is next week. Zoom in: Under the extension and inclusion, Trinity victims can apply for $100,000 for damages caused by the 1945 bomb test that helped end World War II. RECA, which awarded financial reparations to people who lived downwind of the Nevada Test Site, ended last year but has now been renewed for two years thanks to pressure from Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) The law was originally passed in 1990, but Hispanic residents and Mescalero Apache tribal members, who were next to the 1945 Trinity Test, were never included. Descendants have suffered from rare cancers for generations. Yes, but: The recently passed legislation gutting Medicaid covers many residents in New Mexico, including Trinity victims. The RECA expansion also does not include eligibility for people near Nuclear testing in the U.S. territory of Guam, parts of Arizona, Montana, Colorado and new parts of Nevada. What they're saying: "The two-year extension will not be long enough for us to get everybody enrolled that should be enrolled, and the health care coverage was stripped out," Tina Cordova, co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, said on a call with reporters Thursday. Cordova said she was still grateful and relieved New Mexicans were finally added and that her group will continue to fight for Medicaid restorations. Luján said he's hopeful that his Republican colleagues in the Senate will work with him to reserve some of the Medicaid cuts. "I want to recognize the leadership of Sen. Hawley when we had a chance to begin working on this over the last couple of years." Context: On July 16, 1945, in the New Mexico desert, the U.S. Army detonated an atomic bomb developed at the then-secret community of Los Alamos as part of the World War II-era Manhattan Project. The bomb exploded at 5:29am, and its thunderous roar knocked people from breakfast tables in the historic Hispanic village of Tularosa and sent Mescalero Apache Reservation residents into hiding. Following the test in the Jornada del Muerto desert near Alamogordo, residents often picnicked at the site and took artifacts, including the radioactive green glass known as "trinitite." Residents only learned about the Trinity Test after the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The bomb's aftermath later caused rare forms of cancer for many of the 30,000 people and their descendants in the area surrounding Trinity. Poor Hispanic residents and Mescalero Apache tribal members held bake sales to pay for cancer treatments. The intrigue: Downwinders received renewed public interest in 2023 following the release of the blockbuster "Oppenheimer," directed by Christopher Nolan. The movie follows American scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer as his team races to create the atomic bomb, but it overlooks the aftermath on the people of New Mexico. What we're watching: The U.S. Justice Department is advising the public to wait "for further guidance" before filing a claim, noting on its website that the bill was only recently signed into law.
