They Lived in a "Secret Mall Apartment" for Years. Now, They're Telling the Story
I first heard the story as a student at Brown University in 2023. It was passed down like an urban legend: Two decades earlier, eight Rhode Island artists set up camp in an off-map crawl space in the Providence Place mall. The group somehow outfitted the undeveloped corner of the colossal (and in-use) structure with the trappings of a home, from a dining table and secondhand couch to a TV set. Sneaking in through pitch-black service shafts, they made the forgotten concrete back room into a covert apartment, going as far as installing a door and running electricity, until they were busted in 2007. Scant news coverage and a few blurry photos were the only proof I could find that the unbelievable story was true.
Two of the occupants, Adriana Valdez Young and Michael Townsend—then married, recent college grads—say that at first, they were simply curious if they could spend an entire day in the hidden section of the busy shopping mall. It spiraled into their group of eight hanging out in the unit on and off over the next four years, filming their escapades and planning art projects. ("When you're really weird, you don't think anything you do is weird," says Valdez Young. "What else are we gonna do?")
Much of that footage made its way into a new documentary about the saga, in theaters (including a screen at Providence Place) as of March 21, after debuting in 2024 at SXSW. Secret Mall Apartment, directed by Jeremy Workman and executive produced by Jesse Eisenberg (who recently did a Tonight Show bit about the film with Jimmy Fallon), splices together the group's point-and-shoot clips with present-day interviews, telling the story of their hush-hush living space and unpacking the wider history of the divisive Providence development.
The early 2000s "secret mall apartment" was born at a time of strife in Providence's real estate market. After more than 150 years of industry driving the local economy, the mid-20th century saw production dwindle, and the city became home to a large community of artists. Then, near the turn of the century, the city's economy shifted again. The abandoned textile mills where these artists lived and worked were demolished, pushing them out. Simultaneously, Providence Place was being built, promising to bring the city into a new era of economic prosperity. Today, the remaining mills are still under threat and Providence Place has an uncertain future, effectively declaring the state-level equivalent of bankruptcy. Ironically, some are now calling for the redevelopment of the massive mall into housing. I spoke with Valdez Young and Townsend about making a home in the mall, the state of Providence real estate, and (surprisingly) how Dwell influenced their secret apartment. Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.
Michael Townsend: I had a habit of jogging past the mall's construction site. I identified a space that didn't fit into my calculus of usefulness. It didn't seem like stores or parking. When Adriana and I went to look, we shimmed in, and miraculously, [the empty nook] was there.
Adriana Valdez Young: The project was about knowing the enemy, but also knowing what the future looked like. If the mall was the ideal version of Providence or the modern American city, then we had this curiosity to better understand how this behemoth worked. And if there was room for us in its future.
MT: The [mall's] advertising campaign had two words: "Defining You." It was everywhere. We embraced it as a challenge and a threat simultaneously. How far will we let this building define us?
AVY: This campaign was, oddly, for nothing, right? It was about defining the future of retail and of the city. The massive square footage of this shopping center far exceeded all the total retail in downtown Providence. There's no need to revitalize your little local economy. Don't worry. We're just taking care of it in one strike. The mall had a Tiffany's. There was a Brooks Brothers. How many people are wearing Brooks Brothers in downtown Providence? Nobody, right? It was an image of a lifestyle that didn't reflect local culture.
When we were developing the apartment and hanging out at the mall as good shopper citizens, I remember [thinking about] the phrase "critique through hyperconformity." What if we did follow the rules and let them all define us? What would that look like?
At some point, I recreated the "Defining You" ads. I bought everything from the mall, staged it, and returned it. It was like $1,000 to get everything you want from one picture. The math does not work when you try to achieve that kind of perfection—maybe for the one percent.
MT: This question gets asked a lot. In my memory of the arrest, one of the clear thoughts I had was, Oh no, now I have to curate the story. Until that point, and I know this may sound ridiculous, but it was just our life. That was just how we lived our life. There were eight artists involved in this project, but we made the decision that Adriana and I would be a good face. The idea of a couple who's trying to make it.
AVY: The shared American narrative.
See the full story on Dwell.com: They Lived in a "Secret Mall Apartment" for Years. Now, They're Telling the StoryRelated stories:
My Dad, Richard Neutra, Through the Lens of a Landmark Psychological Study
What 8 Months of Van Life Taught Me About Making a Home You Love
The Unfulfilled Promise of the Nagakin Capsule Tower
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
3 days ago
- Buzz Feed
Jessie Murph's 1965 Song Backlash — Internet Reactions
Earlier this week, Nashville-born singer-songwriter Jessie Murph made her Tonight Show debut, where she performed her controversial song "1965" from her upcoming album Sex Hysteria. The 20-year-old "Wild Ones" singer's performance made its way onto Twitter (or X), and I think it's safe to say it's certainly left its mark on people. The snippet, originally posted by Pop Crave, has over 23 million views and has sparked several viral tweets in conversation about it. More specifically, people can't stop talking about the song's lyrics. In the Tonight Show clip, Murph sings, "I think I'd give up a few rights, if you would just love me like it's 1965." This, understandably, caused some uproar. This user, citing others arguing that the song is satire, called the lyrics "frankly abhorrent". "and yet sabrina carpenter is the one allegedly setting feminism back," this user said, referencing the recent backlash the :Espresso" singer faced for the cover of her upcoming album, Man's Best Friend, which depicted Carpenter on her knees with an out-of-frame man pulling her hair. The album cover has since been removed from the singer's Instagram page. Another user highlighted lyrics from the song that weren't in the 30-second snippet shared to social media, such as "I might get a little slap-slap, but you won't hit me up on Snapchat," comparing 1960s relationships to those of today. For reference, here are the lyrics to the other verses in the song, with notable lyrics like, "I would be twenty, and it'd be acceptable for you to be forty, and that is fucked up, I know. But at least you wouldn't drive off before I get in the fuckin' door." And, finally, the performance essentially started to become a meme of its own: So, what do you think? Does it totally cross the line in the midst of an administration actively dismantling women's rights, or do you think this whole thing is a case of misunderstood satire and it's a commentary in and of itself? Tell us your take in the comments. You can also watch the full performance for yourself here:
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
CBS' Colbert Axe and Late-Night's Slow Death
Late night hosts are just like us: They vent in group texts too. So it is that CBS Late Show host Stephen Colbert, NBC Tonight Show host Jimmy Fallon, Late Night host Seth Meyers, ABC host Jimmy Kimmel and HBO Last Week Tonight host John Oliver 'commiserate' in a group text, stemming from their strike-era podcast Strike Force Five. More from The Hollywood Reporter Jimmy Kimmel, Elizabeth Warren, Ben Stiller React With Shock Over CBS' Decision to End 'Late Show': "F*** You and All Your Sheldons CBS" Critic's Notebook: The Awful Optics of CBS Canceling 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' 'Late Show' Shocker: CBS Ending Late-Night Franchise in 2026 'It's helpful for us to cross-pollinate the information we're hearing from the people in charge of our networks to make sure it's all checking out with everybody else, and also just to commiserate, because everybody who's doing this, to some degree, obviously remembers a time where things were a little more flush,' said Meyers on the Good One podcast last month. When pressed whether we are in the end of the era of late night TV, Meyers said 'there's always a chance something turns around and all of a sudden it's on the upswing again, but I certainly would bet on there being fewer [late night shows] in the future.' Of course, not even Meyers could have foreseen how quickly the dominoes would fall. The cancellation of the most-watched show in late night TV, Colbert's Late Show, stunned the TV world Thursday, as well as CBS staff. It is a 'painful time' a source says, while another insider describes the staff being understandably 'stunned and devastated.' Even Colbert was surprised. He found out about the decision after Wednesday's taping, and rather than wait to disclose the decision to viewers, opted to reveal it himself a day later, fearing an inevitable leak of the cancellation. 'I share your feeling,' Colbert said, as the crowd in the Ed Sullivan Theater booed after he broke the news. One knowledgable source tells The Hollywood Reporter that they did not believe any of the network late night shows were meaningfully profitable any more, though some deals can be justified by leveraging the hosts in other ways as 'company men' (Kimmel, Meyers and Fallon, for example, appear at events like the upfronts, and Kimmel and Fallon have produced and hosted other shows for their parent companies over the years). The Late Show was also harmed by the fact that Paramount couldn't license it or sell it international markets. The same source predicts that Paramount will put the iconic Ed Sullivan Theater at Broadway between 53rd and 54th street on the market in conjunction with the end of the Late Show, noting that the company has already sold off its Radford and Studio City lots in Los Angeles, and the CBS corporate headquarters building in New York. That will likely be a decision for Skydance leaders David Ellison and Jeff Shell, however. Late night used to command attention from insomniacs, college students and marketers looking to reach an audience that was traditionally younger than primetime. But those days are long gone, and a time where a host had an eight-figure annual contract to host a daily show in a midtown Manhattan theater with 400 seats and a staff that topped 100 seems like a relic of a bygone era. Colbert's contract was set to end after the coming season, perhaps explaining the timing for the decision, as negotiations for a renewal would have begun in earnest soon. As for the rest of the network late-night landscape, ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live! will begin the final season of its current three-year deal in the fall. NBC late-night hosts Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers signed deals last year to continue hosting The Tonight Show and Late Night through 2028, though whether the shows survive in their current iterations until then is less certain today than it was just a few years ago. The youthful audience that once flocked to late night now spends most of their time on social-first video platforms, where a new generation of talent is emerging. And while many of the late night shows have found a meaningful audience on platforms like YouTube by creating original content or repackaging their TV segments, the revenue from those digital sources can't offset the lost dollars from linear TV. 'I think the biggest reach for all of these shows now clearly is — you can call whatever you want — it's YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, social. That's where these shows get reach, and that's where they have their power,' says Gavin Purcell, the former showrunner of NBC's Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon. 'On networks, it's just trickier now, the economics are different.' NBC's Tonight Show is the most popular of the programs on social platforms, with 32.7M YouTube subscribers and 19.2M Instagram followers, followed by Kimmel with 20.7M YouTube subscribers and 4.3M Instagram followers, and The Late Show with 10M on YouTube and 3.7M on Instagram. In terms of linear TV ratings, all of the late night shows are a shadow of their peaks, according to Nielsen data for live +7 and original episodes only: Colbert: 2.47M viewers; Kimmel: 1.75M; Fallon: 1.25M; Meyers: 949K; After Midnight: 652K; and Nightline: 827K. But the ratings don't tell the whole story. According to the media measurement firm iSpot, brands have spent an estimated $32.2 million on advertising on the Late Show this year, while spend on Kimmel and Fallon's shows topped $50 million each. Both ABC and NBC sell packages around their late night shows that are inclusive of digital channels. Either way, it's hard to shake the feeling that the late night talk show format is simply dying a slow death. Former late night hosts have found success elsewhere (Trevor Noah and Conan O'Brien both have significant followings for the interview-driven podcasts), while efforts in streaming have not pierced the popular culture in the same way, even if Netflix's David Letterman series and John Mulaney's experimental talk shows suggest they are trying. One thing is sure: Colbert will have options when he does cede the desk, even if it may not be on 'late night.' Purcell, who now hosts a podcast called AI For Humans on YouTube and other digital platforms, suggests that the future of late night talk shows, and perhaps a viable future for Colbert personally, is embracing the reach of digital media, and creating something new at a smaller, more sustainable scale. The economic model of YouTube has improved to the point where it can sustain a real business. Maybe not one of the scale or scope of the CBS Late Show, but certainly something that rhymes with it, as Hot Ones, Good Mythical Morning and Chicken Shop Date show. 'My big thesis here is that what you're seeing is the slow destruction of the traditional Hollywood pipeline, and you're going to see a lot less big shots, and a lot more individuals taking a shot,' Purcell says. 'Distribution is easy now. That's the thing that's really interesting. What's hard is attention. And the thing that Colbert and that team still do a great job of is commanding attention.' Rick Porter and Tony Maglio contributed to this report. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Colbert's cancellation: A ratings crisis or a political bribe? We investigate
Cue the late-night autopsy. Since Stephen Colbert's announcement last week that CBS would discontinue the "Late Show" and, as a result, his hosting gig, viewers and industry insiders alike have been quick to offer dueling explanations for the shocking shift. In one version, Paramount, CBS' parent company, is bending a knee to President Donald Trump, ousting his frequent critic Colbert to help appease an administration they hope will approve a major merger with Skydance Media before the FCC. In another, Paramount is reading the writing on the wall, as late-night and network television writ large struggle to keep up with streaming. Audiences, after all, seem more eager to hear celebrities spill on podcasts or short-form social media video series than the stuffy, scripted format of an interview show. We ran the numbers on the latter theory, and here's what we found. While Colbert's show is the top rated at 11:30 p.m. ET/PT, it was losing a reported $40 million a year, so Paramount's "purely financial" explanation for the cancellation is at least partly true. Network TV has been receding from the spotlight for nearly a decade, as streaming continues to balloon. As late-night TV becomes more expensive and less profitable every year, ratings sink and costs go up, presenting for the genre an apocalyptic financial bind. YouTube clips may be viral, but they don't make up for the revenue lost as live viewership declines. Colbert, also was perhaps the least-viral of his peers, with hosts like NBC's Jimmy Fallon or ABC's Jimmy Kimmel pushing out more click-happy material to YouTube and social media. Still, Colbert claimed the largest number of viewers. Nielsen ratings show "Late Show" leading the pack so far in 2025 in the 11:35 p.m. hour, with an average of 2.4 million viewers for the first six months of 2025, down from 2.8 million for all of 2022. ABC's "Jimmy Kimmel Live" and NBC's "Tonight Show starring Jimmy Fallon" were far behind in that metric, averaging 1.8 million (down from 1.6 million for the full year 2022) and 1.2 million (down from 1.5 million), respectively. Kimmel is replaced by guest hosts during the summer. Despite Colbert's dominance over his peers, his ratings have dropped steadily year over year. The fact that he has the biggest slice of the pie may then be moot, as the pie as a whole continues to shrink. Notably, "Gutfeld!" Fox News' raunchy, right-wing late-night show hosted by comedian Greg Gutfeld is now the number one show during wee-hours, seeing the rare ratings increase while his left-leaning peers on the other major networks continue to slide. The political juxtaposition may throw a bone to the other side, signaling a different political mood among network television audiences during Trump's second term. Regardless, Colbert's cancellation offers a canary in the coal mine of old-school TV programming – should CBS have had either the political or financial will to keep the "Late Show" on the air, it would have needed to shake up the format eventually, or dramatically cut costs. Back in 2014, Netflix only had three original series. Now the streaming bundling universe has eaten up much of entertainment. No one can predict what TV will look like 10 years from now. But if Seth Meyers, Jon Stewart, the Jimmys, or any other late-night host wants to go for longevity, they'll have to evolve. Contributing: Kelly Lawler
