Top Fiverr Niches That Are Booming Right Now
Below, we'll dive into the top Fiverr niches that are currently booming in 2025 and why they're in such high demand.
With the rise of tools like ChatGPT and Jasper AI, businesses are investing more in AI-assisted content. Many Fiverr buyers are looking for freelancers who can generate engaging blog posts, product descriptions, scripts, and even eBooks using AI. However, human editing and optimization still play a major role, which makes this niche extremely lucrative for skilled writers and editors.
As more small businesses, content creators, and influencers seek affordable yet professional-looking visuals, Canva has become a go-to design tool. Services like creating Canva templates, Instagram posts, Facebook banners, and pitch decks are exploding on Fiverr. If you have a good eye for design, you don't need advanced tools—just Canva and creativity.
Standing out online is no longer a choice; it's a necessity. Freelancers offering social media profile setup and optimization services are witnessing a surge in demand. Buyers are looking for profiles that are not only visually appealing but also SEO-optimized to attract the right audience. LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTok are particularly hot platforms right now.
Even though the crypto market has had its ups and downs, services related to NFTs and cryptocurrency remain highly profitable. Buyers are hiring Fiverr freelancers for crypto market analysis, NFT art creation, whitepaper writing, and blockchain consultations. This niche is perfect for experts with deep technical or financial knowledge.
Podcasting is booming globally. As creators focus on content, they outsource editing, show notes writing, intros/outros, and podcast distribution. Fiverr freelancers who can offer podcast editing with fast turnaround and good audio quality are in high demand.
E-commerce continues to grow, and so does the need for store setup, product listing, SEO optimization, and store management services. Fiverr is now a hub for sellers looking for Shopify experts, Etsy SEO writers, and Amazon FBA consultants. If you know how to optimize online stores, this niche is worth exploring.
Short-form video is dominating digital marketing. Services like TikTok video creation, YouTube Shorts editing, Instagram Reels, and Facebook ad videos are all trending on Fiverr. If you're good with CapCut, Premiere Pro, or even Canva video tools, you can tap into this thriving market.
In a competitive job market, candidates need polished resumes and LinkedIn profiles. Fiverr freelancers offering professional resume writing, career coaching, and LinkedIn optimization are seeing consistent orders. This niche is perfect for those with HR, recruitment, or corporate experience.
If you're a business or personal brand looking to improve your digital presence, Ali Raza offers highly in-demand Fiverr gigs designed to help you stand out. 'I will create eye-catching Canva templates, social media posts, and presentations.'
Whether you're a startup, entrepreneur, or influencer, Ali Raza crafts visually stunning designs tailored to your brand using Canva. His services are perfect for boosting engagement on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and more.
'I will set up social profile pages with proper optimization and SEO content to stand out.'
Your first impression online matters. Ali Raza ensures your social profiles are optimized for search engines and designed to attract your target audience—whether it's LinkedIn, Instagram, or Twitter.
Bio:
Ali Raza is an MBA in Finance with 14 years of experience in the corporate sector as a finance professional. He also provides services in financial analysis, financial modeling, SEC filings data collection and analysis, crypto analysis, crypto trading, and technical content writing.
Explore his Fiverr gigs and elevate your digital strategy with a professional who blends creative skills and corporate expertise seamlessly.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NYC used to be the fashion capital of the world — now you can hardly find a decent clothing store
It's time for class to return New York, New York. Once, a helluva town. The prices stay up but the merchandise is down. Days of old, need shmattas for a wedding, confirmation, bar mitzvah, divorce settlement, you'd just walk in the West 30s and see dudes pushing racks of dresses, coats, suits. Shove names like Gucci, Valentino, Chanel, Dior. That Seventh Avenue chunk was Fashion Alley. So busy that — amble by in your own outfit — some rack-pusher could've even hustled it right off your behind to resell to a pushcart in Venezuela. These movable racks had clothes, shoes, sprinkles, feathers, fashion, flowers — many Washington, DC, thieves ago — that was then IT! Not now. Sayonara. Products aren't in stores. Why? Because there aren't many stores. Because shops aren't paying their bills. Saturation was luxury clientele. Now they're not buying what they did. Handbags? Meh 'Handbags do not always enthuse luxury spenders. Chanel, Gucci, Balenciaga, Valentino, Dior changed their top designers. Sales are down. Money's down. The look is down. Revenue is from a wearable look. That's what's notable. But look at what's wearable today,' so says a designer who formerly dressed the Oscars and Tonys. 'Small brands are even affected. Tees made in China, Vietnam, Uruguay. It's scary. Fashion's not unique, not special, not wanted in the big time. No reason for the consumer to shop. 'VIP society has become casual. Jeans for a thousand dollars? Chanel shirt to go with the jeans — $1,200. 'And European runway garbage isn't wearable. Theirs is your crotch hanging out, butt crack visible, breasts grabbable, designers making your navel into a small potted plant growing feathers. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The onetime personal shopper's been poached. That bar mitzvah or top-of-the-line wedding shopper who went to your home with carte blanche so you needn't suffer dressing room tryouts has switched to everyday Nordstroms. Once the prevail of Saks 5th, Neimans, those high-priced, nose-up-your-behind salespeople who'd hand-carry original Paris creations to a VIP? Gone. Kaput.' Stores closing. The new generation wears garbage. Fast fashion. Guys do T-shirts. Stomachs hang out. Chopped tops, cutoff jeans. They'll spend on food and experiences — not clothing. It's only to look hot on Instagram or TikTok. You have to give consumers a reason to buy. Canadians no longer come. Chinese are buying less. Europeans are down in terms of shopping here. Luxury people aren't customers anymore. Stores are going out of business. No one has style I was in Due restaurant the other night. Throats were in pasta. Behinds were in jeans. Watch, French billionaire Bernard Arnault who already owns LVMH, Dior, Bulgari, Givenchy, Fendi, Tiffany, Celine, Kenzo, Marc Jacobs, Pucci, Loro Piana, Loewe, Guerlain, Sephora, plus another stock of stores, and already owns 57th and 5th's three most famous corners . . . watch. Just watch. WATCH. He'll grab Bergdorf's next. With shmattas' hem lengths today, if a female wants her appendix taken out and doesn't want it to show, they'll have to remove it through her nose. And not only in New York, kids, not only in New York.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
OpenAI: ChatGPT Wants Legal Rights. You Need The Right To Be Forgotten.
As systems like ChatGPT move toward achieving legal privilege, the boundaries between identity, ... More memory, and control are being redefined, often without consent. When OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently stated that conversations with ChatGPT should one day enjoy legal privilege, similar to those between a patient and a doctor or a client and a lawyer, he wasn't just referring to privacy. He was pointing toward a redefinition of the relationship between people and machines. Legal privilege protects the confidentiality of certain relationships. What's said between a patient and physician, or a client and attorney, is shielded from subpoenas, court disclosures, and adversarial scrutiny. Extending that same protection to AI interactions means treating the machine not as a tool, but as a participant in a privileged exchange. This is more than a policy suggestion. It's a legal and philosophical shift with consequences no one has fully reckoned with. It also comes at a time when the legal system is already being tested. In The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI, the paper has asked courts to compel the company to preserve all user prompts, including those the company says are deleted after 30 days. That request is under appeal. Meanwhile, Altman's suggestion that AI chats deserve legal shielding raises the question: if they're protected like therapy sessions, what does that make the system listening on the other side? People are already treating AI like a confidant. According to Common Sense Media, three in four teens have used an AI chatbot, and over half say they trust the advice they receive at least somewhat. Many describe a growing reliance on these systems to process everything from school to relationships. Altman himself has called this emotional over-reliance 'really bad and dangerous.' But it's not just teens. AI is being integrated into therapeutic apps, career coaching tools, HR systems, and even spiritual guidance platforms. In some healthcare environments, AI is being used to draft communications and interpret lab data before a doctor even sees it. These systems are present in decision-making loops, and their presence is being normalized. This is how it begins. First, protect the conversation. Then, protect the system. What starts as a conversation about privacy quickly evolves into a framework centered on rights, autonomy, and standing. We've seen this play out before. In U.S. law, corporations were gradually granted legal personhood, not because they were considered people, but because they acted as consistent legal entities that required protection and responsibility under the law. Over time, personhood became a useful legal fiction. Something similar may now be unfolding with AI—not because it is sentient, but because it interacts with humans in ways that mimic protected relationships. The law adapts to behavior, not just biology. The Legal System Isn't Ready For What ChatGPT Is Proposing There is no global consensus on how to regulate AI memory, consent, or interaction logs. The EU's AI Act introduces transparency mandates, but memory rights are still undefined. In the U.S., state-level data laws conflict, and no federal policy yet addresses what it means to interact with a memory‑enabled AI. (See my recent Forbes piece on why AI regulation is effectively dead—and what businesses need to do instead.) The physical location of a server is not just a technical detail. It's a legal trigger. A conversation stored on a server in California is subject to U.S. law. If it's routed through Frankfurt, it becomes subject to GDPR. When AI systems retain memory, context, and inferred consent, the server location effectively defines sovereignty over the interaction. That has implications for litigation, subpoenas, discovery, and privacy. 'I almost wish they'd go ahead and grant these AI systems legal personhood, as if they were therapists or clergy,' says technology attorney John Kheit. 'Because if they are, then all this passive data collection starts to look a lot like an illegal wiretap, which would thereby give humans privacy rights/protections when interacting with AI. It would also, then, require AI providers to disclose 'other parties to the conversation', i.e., that the provider is a mining party reading the data, and if advertisers are getting at the private conversations.' Infrastructure choices are now geopolitical. They determine how AI systems behave under pressure and what recourse a user has when something goes wrong. And yet, underneath all of this is a deeper motive: monetization. But they won't be the only ones asking questions. Every conversation becomes a four-party exchange: the user, the model, the platform's internal optimization engine, and the advertiser paying for access. It's entirely plausible for a prompt about the Pittsburgh Steelers to return a response that subtly inserts 'Buy Coke' mid-paragraph. Not because it's relevant—but because it's profitable. Recent research shows users are significantly worse at detecting unlabeled advertising when it's embedded inside AI-generated content. Worse, these ads are initially rated as more trustworthy until users discover they are, in fact, ads. At that point, they're also rated as more manipulative. 'In experiential marketing, trust is everything,' says Jeff Boedges, Founder of Soho Experiential. 'You can't fake a relationship, and you can't exploit it without consequence. If AI systems are going to remember us, recommend things to us, or even influence us, we'd better know exactly what they remember and why. Otherwise, it's not personalization. It's manipulation.' Now consider what happens when advertisers gain access to psychographic modeling: 'Which users are most emotionally vulnerable to this type of message?' becomes a viable, queryable prompt. And AI systems don't need to hand over spreadsheets to be valuable. With retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), the model can shape language in real time based on prior sentiment, clickstream data, and fine-tuned advertiser objectives. This isn't hypothetical—it's how modern adtech already works. At that point, the chatbot isn't a chatbot. It's a simulation environment for influence. It is trained to build trust, then designed to monetize it. Your behavioral patterns become the product. Your emotional response becomes the target for optimization. The business model is clear: black-boxed behavioral insight at scale, delivered through helpful design, hidden from oversight, and nearly impossible to detect. We are entering a phase where machines will be granted protections without personhood, and influence without responsibility. If a user confesses to a crime during a legally privileged AI session, is the platform compelled to report it or remain silent? And who makes that decision? These are not edge cases. They are coming quickly. And they are coming at scale. Why ChatGPT Must Remain A Model—and Why Humans Must Regain Consent As generative AI systems evolve into persistent, adaptive participants in daily life, it becomes more important than ever to reassert a boundary: models must remain models. They cannot assume the legal, ethical, or sovereign status of a person quietly. And the humans generating the data that train these systems must retain explicit rights over their contributions. What we need is a standardized, enforceable system of data contracting, one that allows individuals to knowingly, transparently, and voluntarily contribute data for a limited, mutually agreed-upon window of use. This contract must be clear on scope, duration, value exchange, and termination. And it must treat data ownership as immutable, even during active use. That means: When a contract ends, or if a company violates its terms, the individual's data must, by law, be erased from the model, its training set, and any derivative products. 'Right to be forgotten' must mean what it says. But to be credible, this system must work both ways: This isn't just about ethics. It's about enforceable, mutual accountability. The user experience must be seamless and scalable. The legal backend must be secure. And the result should be a new economic compact—where humans know when they're participating in AI development, and models are kept in their place. ChatGPT Is Changing the Risk Surface. Here's How to Respond. The shift toward AI systems as quasi-participants—not just tools—will reshape legal exposure, data governance, product liability, and customer trust. Whether you're building AI, integrating it into your workflows, or using it to interface with customers, here are five things you should be doing immediately: ChatGPT May Get Privilege. You Should Get the Right to Be Forgotten. This moment isn't just about what AI can do. It's about what your business is letting it do, what it remembers, and who gets access to that memory. Ignore that, and you're not just risking privacy violations, you're risking long-term brand trust and regulatory blowback. At the very least, we need a legal framework that defines how AI memory is governed. Not as a priest, not as a doctor, and not as a partner, but perhaps as a witness. Something that stores information and can be examined when context demands it, with clear boundaries on access, deletion, and use. The public conversation remains focused on privacy. But the fundamental shift is about control. And unless the legal and regulatory frameworks evolve rapidly, the terms of engagement will be set, not by policy or users, but by whoever owns the box. Which is why, in the age of AI, the right to be forgotten may become the most valuable human right we have. Not just because your data could be used against you—but because your identity itself can now be captured, modeled, and monetized in ways that persist beyond your control. Your patterns, preferences, emotional triggers, and psychological fingerprints don't disappear when the session ends. They live on inside a system that never forgets, never sleeps, and never stops optimizing. Without the ability to revoke access to your data, you don't just lose privacy. You lose leverage. You lose the ability to opt out of prediction. You lose control over how you're remembered, represented, and replicated. The right to be forgotten isn't about hiding. It's about sovereignty. And in a world where AI systems like ChatGPT will increasingly shape our choices, our identities, and our outcomes, the ability to walk away may be the last form of freedom that still belongs to you.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
