
Popular condemnation
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was freed from detention at a US immigration facility last Friday after 104 days of captivity. A graduate student at Columbia University, Khalil – who is Palestinian by parentage – has an Algerian passport and permanent US residence. He was snatched without a warrant from his home in early March as he and his pregnant wife were returning from an evening out. His case attracted widespread popular condemnation. Rights groups accused the Trump administration of violation the sacrosanct First Amendment of the US Constitution which guarantees freedom of speech and assembly.
Amnesty International condemned his arrest and pressed for his freedom. Amnesty's regional director Ana Piquer stated, 'We remain deeply concerned by the escalating use of detention, intimidation, deportation, and disregard to right of due process, to silence protest and chill public debate in the United States. This is not just about one student, it is about the growing pattern of authoritarian practices by the Trump administration that undermine human rights. We urge the US government to end the political targeting of students and other individuals based on their beliefs and to respect freedom of speech. Mahmoud's detention [was] a stark reminder of the human rights that are at stake in the country, and we will continue to monitor his case.'
On his release, he rejoined his wife Noor Abdallah and hugged his newborn son for the first time. However, he is not a totally free man as his immigration case is ongoing and the authorities seized his passport and green card which identifies him as a legal US resident. His movements are restricted to New York and nearby states.
A federal judge in Newark, New Jersey, ordered Khalil's release on bail, asserting, unconditionally: 'He is not a danger to the community. Period, full stop.' The judge accepted his lawyers' contention that his prosecution was politically motivated. Khalil had committed no crime. Officials had charged him with threatening national security by protesting US backing for Israel's Gaza war and accused him of antisemitism although Jewish students demonstrated alongside him at Columbia University and elsewhere.
His high-profile arrest was the most energetically contested of multiple immigration cases levelled against foreign students who took part in these anti-war protests at US universities. Other detainees were either freed or deported from the country. His release could encourage others to fight.
Khalil's release constitutes a blow to the Trump administration's campaign to dictate the US narrative and take questionable or downright illegal actions to stifle dissidence. In addition to branding protests against Israel as antisemitic and against US policies favouring Israel, Trump has nearly closed the Voice of America (VOA) by firing thousands of journalists on its staff. The administration claimed the VOA was 'riddled with dysfunction, bias, and waste. The VOA was established during World War II to counter Nazi propaganda and played the same role during the Cold War between the West and the Soviet Union.
Trump has followed up by cutting funding to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System which serves mainly rural communities. Critics argue the administration is taking this action to limit the public's access to independent reports and liberal, progressive views which challenge Trump's line and actions.
Trump has led the charge against federal, educational, and institutional policies based on identity. These are meant to give opportunities to people of all backgrounds. These policies, dubbed 'diversity, equity and diversity,' remove gender, ethnic, religious, and educational requirements for inclusion in a wide range of activities and ensure equal treatment and pay.
Trump has also issued a travel ban on visitors from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, Yemen, and Sudan, and a partial travel ban on seven more. This ban affects predominantly black and brown people as well as those from Muslim-majority countries. Amnesty accused the administration of racial discrimination, creates hatred, and promotes the idea that citizens from the targeted countries are likely to mount attacks in the US. Amnesty said, 'This arbitrary travel ban also violates the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution and the US obligation to protect [asylum seekers and refugees] under international and national refugee law.'
US Senator Alex Padilla was arrested, thrown to the floor, and handcuffed by law officers for asking a question of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem at a press conference. A judge was arrested in her office for helping a defendant to evade arrest by an immigration team. Masked squads snatch, arrest, and disappear targeted individuals in public and detain those protesting peacefully against his mass roundups of migrants. Trump placed the California National Guard under federal control and deployed 700 marines against largely peaceful Los Angeles demonstrations against his administration's crack down on migrants.
This intervention coincided with the June 14th military parade in Washington to mark the 250th anniversary of the US army, Trump's 79th birthday, and anti-authoritarian 'No King' protests against Trump's authoritarianism which drew five million across the US.
Trump again demonstrated his authoritarian bent on the international plane by ordering and carrying out attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel's war on Iran. While anti-Iran hawks and most lawmakers in Trump's Republican party praised this action, Democrats were highly critical. They argued that he failed to seek congressional authorisation to use military force abroad and insisted on a full, classified briefing on this operation. Some Democrats called for Trump's impeachment.
Photo: AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Gulf Today
4 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Israel halts aid into northern Gaza: Officials; clans deny Hamas is stealing it
Israel has stopped aid from entering northern Gaza but is still allowing it to enter from the south, two officials said on Thursday after images circulated of masked men on aid trucks who clan leaders said were protecting aid, not Hamas stealing it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a joint statement with Defense Minister Israel Katz, said late on Wednesday that he had ordered the military to present a plan within two days to prevent Hamas from taking control of aid. They cited new unspecified information indicating that Hamas was seizing aid intended for civilians in northern Gaza. A video circulating on Wednesday showed dozens of masked men, some armed with rifles but most carrying sticks, riding on aid trucks. Palestinians carry bags of flour distributed by the World Food Programme in Gaza City. AP Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer told reporters that aid was continuing to enter from the south but did not specify whether any supplies were entering in the north. The US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates aid distribution sites in southern and central Gaza, said on X that it was the only humanitarian organisation permitted on Thursday to distribute food in Gaza. A spokesperson said the foundation was exempt from a two-day suspension of humanitarian aid deliveries into the territory. Palestinians carry sacks of flour as they gather to receive aid supplies in Khan Younis. Reuters The Israeli prime minister's office and the defence ministry did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. The Higher Commission for Tribal Affairs, which represents influential clans in Gaza, said that trucks had been protected as part of an aid security process managed "solely through tribal efforts". The commission said that no Palestinian faction, a reference to Hamas, had taken part in the process. People carry a sack as Palestinians gather to receive aid supplies at a distribution centre in Gaza City. Reuters Hamas denied any involvement. Throughout the war, numerous clans, civil society groups and factions — including Hamas' secular political rival Fatah - have stepped in to help provide security for the aid convoys. Clans made up of extended families connected through blood and marriage have long been a fundamental part of Gazan society. ACUTE SHORTAGE Amjad Al Shawa, director of an umbrella body for Palestinian non-governmental organisations, said the aid protected by clans on Wednesday was being distributed to vulnerable families. A woman carries a food parcel distributed by the American Near East Refugee Aid in Gaza City. AP There is an acute shortage of food and other basic supplies after the nearly two-year military campaign by Israel that has displaced most of Gaza's two million inhabitants. Aid trucks and warehouses storing supplies have often been looted, frequently by desperate and starving Palestinians. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid for its own fighters or to sell to finance its operations, an accusation Hamas denies. "The clans came ... to form a stance to prevent the aggressors and the thieves from stealing the food that belongs to our people," Abu Salman Al Moghani, a representative of Gazan clans, said, referring to Wednesday's operation. The Wednesday video was shared on X by former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who claimed that Hamas had taken control of aid allowed into Gaza by the Israeli government. Bennett is widely seen as the most viable challenger to Netanyahu at the next election. Netanyahu has also faced pressure from within his right-wing coalition, with some hardline members threatening to quit over ceasefire negotiations and the delivery of humanitarian aid. At least 118 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since Wednesday, local health authorities said, including some shot near an aid distribution point, the latest in a series of such incidents. Twenty hostages remain in captivity in Gaza, while Hamas is also holding the bodies of 30 who have died. Reuters


Dubai Eye
5 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Rwanda, Congo sign peace deal in US to end fighting, attract investment
Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo signed a US-brokered peace agreement on Friday, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year. The agreement marks a breakthrough in talks held by US President Donald Trump's administration and aims to attract billions of dollars of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. At a ceremony with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington, the two African countries' foreign ministers signed the agreement pledging to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern Congo within 90 days, according to a copy seen by Reuters. Kinshasa and Kigali will also launch a regional economic integration framework within 90 days, the agreement said. "They were going at it for many years... it is one of the worst wars that anyone has ever seen. And I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled," Trump said on Friday, ahead of the signing of the deal in Washington. "We're getting, for the United States, a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo as part of it." Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe called the agreement a turning point. Congo Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner said it must be followed by disengagement. Trump later met both officials in the Oval Office, where he presented them with letters inviting Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame to Washington to sign a package of agreements that Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, dubbed the "Washington Accord". Nduhungirehe told Trump that past deals had not been implemented and urged Trump to stay engaged. Trump warned of "very severe penalties, financial and otherwise", if the agreement is violated. Rwanda has sent at least 7,000 soldiers over the border, according to analysts and diplomats, in support of the M23 rebels, who seized eastern Congo's two largest cities and lucrative mining areas in a lightning advance earlier this year. The gains by M23, the latest cycle in a decades-old conflict with roots in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, sparked fears that a wider war could draw in Congo's neighbours. ECONOMIC DEALS Boulos told Reuters in May that Washington wanted the peace agreement and accompanying minerals deals to be signed simultaneously this summer. Rubio said on Friday that heads of state would be "here in Washington in a few weeks to finalise the complete protocol and agreement". However, the agreement signed on Friday gives Congo and Rwanda three months to launch a framework "to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains". A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday that another agreement on the framework would be signed by the heads of state at a separate White House event at an unspecified time. There is an understanding that progress in ongoing talks in Doha - a separate but parallel mediation effort with delegations from the Congolese government and M23 - is essential before the signing of the economic framework, the source said. The agreement signed on Friday voiced "full support" for the Qatar-hosted talks. It also says Congo and Rwanda will form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. Congolese military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a Congo-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same timeframe.


Dubai Eye
5 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term
The US Supreme Court on the last day of rulings for its current term gave Donald Trump his latest in a series of victories at the nation's top judicial body, one that may make it easier for him to implement contentious elements of his sweeping agenda as he tests the limits of presidential power. With its six conservative members in the majority and its three liberals dissenting, the court on Friday curbed the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, resetting the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. The ruling came after the Republican president's administration asked the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of so-called "universal" injunctions issued by three federal judges that halted nationally the enforcement of his January executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The court's decision has "systematically weakened judicial oversight and strengthened executive discretion," said Paul Rosenzweig, an attorney who served in Republican President George W. Bush's administration. Friday's ruling said that judges generally can grant relief only to the individuals or groups who brought a particular lawsuit. The decision did not, however, permit immediate implementation of Trump's directive, instead instructing lower courts to reconsider the scope of the injunctions. The ruling was authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of three conservative justices who Trump appointed during his first term in office from 2017-2021. Trump has scored a series of victories at the Supreme Court since returning to office in January. These have included clearing the way for his administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face and ending temporary legal status held by hundreds of thousands of migrants on humanitarian grounds. The court also permitted to let Trump's administration withhold payment to foreign aid groups for work already performed for the government, allowed his firing of two Democratic members of federal labour boards to stand for now, and backed his Department of Government Efficiency in two disputes. "President Trump secured the relief he sought in most of his administration's cases," George Mason University law school professor Robert Luther III said. "Justice Barrett's opinion is a win for the presidency," Luther said of the decision on nationwide injunctions. Once again, as with many of the term's major decisions, the three liberal justices found themselves in dissent, a familiar position as the court under the guidance of Chief Justice John Roberts continues to shift American law rightward. The rulings in favour of Trump illustrate that "the court's three most liberal justices are proving less relevant now than at any earlier point in the Roberts Court with respect to their impact on its jurisprudence," Luther said. The cases involving Trump administration policies this year came to the court as emergency filings rather than through the normal process, with oral arguments held only in the birthright litigation. And those arguments did not focus on the legality of Trump's action but rather on the actions of the judges who found that it was likely unconstitutional. "One theme is the court's struggle to keep pace with a faster-moving legal world, especially as the Trump administration tests the outer boundaries of its powers," Boston College Law School professor Daniel Lyons said.