Musk's xAI increased Tennessee gas turbines without permits, community groups say
The Southern Environmental Law Center and local groups have called on the health department to cease operating all the turbines till the company complies with the critical Clean Air Act and local protections.
Reuters could not independently verify the allegations, and the Environmental Protection Agency, Shelby County Health Department and xAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
"The dozens of turbines operating outside the datacenter likely make xAI the largest industrial source of the smog-forming pollutant NOx in Memphis," Southern Environmental Law Center said in a statement.
The data center's expanded turbine operations and resulting emissions require xAI to obtain a "major source permit", yet the company operates the equipment without any regulatory authorization, the group added.
The massive surge in power consumption of AI-supporting data centers in the United States is driving an increase in the usage of fossil fuels as clean-energy deployments struggle to keep up.
Billionaire Musk had dubbed the Tennessee data center, which powers the firm's Grok chatbot, as "the most powerful AI training cluster in the world" last year.
The environmental law group said xAI's 35 gas turbines have a capacity of 422 MW, comparable to the Tennessee Valley Authority's Brownsville gas power plant, which has a capacity of 425 MW.
It had said in August that xAI's Memphis data center had installed nearly 20 gas turbines with a combined capacity of about 100 MW.
The Greater Memphis Chamber said in December that xAI planned to expand its Memphis supercomputer to house at least one million graphics processing units.
In late March, the AI firm acquired Musk-owned X in a deal that values the social media platform at $33 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
WeTransfer says files not used to train AI after backlash
WeTransfer has confirmed it does not use files uploaded to their service to train artificial intelligence (AI) file sharing company had received lots of criticism from customers on social media after changing its terms of service, which some interpreted as allowing it the right to use files for AI training.A WeTransfer spokeswoman told BBC News: "We don't use machine learning or any form of AI to process content shared via WeTransfer, nor do we sell content or data to any third parties."The firm has now updated its terms, saying it has "made the language easier to understand" to avoid confusion. WeTransfer said the clause was initially added to "include the possibility of using AI to improve content moderation" and to identify harmful appears to have been changed in late June or early July, according to snapshots taken on the Internet terms had said WeTransfer could use content for purposes "including to improve performance of machine learning models that enhance our content moderation process".It also included the right for WeTransfer to "reproduce, distribute, modify," or "publicly display" files uploaded to the users on social media interpreted this as WeTransfer giving itself the right to share or sell the files uploaded by users to AI working in the creative industries, including an illustrator and an actor, posted on X to say they used the service to send work and were considering changing to alternative said it updated the clause on Tuesday, "as we've seen this passage may have caused confusion for our customers."The clause in the terms of service now says: "You hereby grant us a royalty-free license to use your Content for the purposes of operating, developing, and improving the Service, all in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy."The rival file-sharing platform Dropbox also had to clarify it was not using files uploaded to its service to train AI models, after social media outcry in December 2023. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
OPEC says world economy may do better in second half of year
LONDON, July 15 (Reuters) - OPEC said the global economy may perform better than expected in the second half of the year despite trade conflicts and that refineries' crude intake would remain elevated to meet the uptick in summer travel, helping to support the demand outlook. In a monthly report on Tuesday, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries left its forecasts for global oil demand growth unchanged in 2025 and 2026 after reductions in April, saying the economic outlook was robust. "India, China, and Brazil are outperforming expectations so far, while the United States and the Eurozone are experiencing a continued rebound from last year," OPEC said in the report. "With this, the second-half 2025 economic growth may turn out better than currently expected." The OPEC+ producer group, comprising the 12 OPEC members plus allies including Russia, is pumping more barrels to regain market share after years of cuts to support the market. The report also showed that in June, OPEC+ pumped 41.56 million bpd, up 349,000 bpd from May. This is slightly less than the 411,000 bpd hike called for by the group's increase in its June quotas.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Elon Musk's Tesla on trial after car on autopilot kills woman as she's stargazing
Lawyers for the plaintiff argue the autopilot should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign, and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour A rare trial against Elon Musk's car company has begun over the death of a university student after a runaway Tesla sent her flying 75 feet through the air. Lawyers for the plaintiff argue that the EV maker's driver-assistance feature, Autopilot, should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign, and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour in the April 2019 crash. Tesla lays the blame solely on the driver, who was reaching for a dropped mobile phone. 'The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver.' The driver, George McGee, was sued separately by the plaintiffs. That case was settled. Now, a jury trial case is being heard in Florida over whether Musk's car company is liable. A judgment against Tesla could be especially damaging as the company works to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on US roads by the end of next year. A jury trial is rare for the company, whose suits over crashes are often dismissed or settled, and this one is rarer yet because a judge recently ruled that the family of Naibel Benavides Leon can argue for punitive damages. The judge, Beth Bloom of the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, issued a partial summary judgment last month, throwing out charges of defective manufacturing and negligent misrepresentation against Tesla. But she also ruled that plaintiffs could argue other claims that would make the company liable and ask for punitive damages, which could prove costly. 'A reasonable jury could find that Tesla acted in reckless disregard of human life for the sake of developing their product and maximising profit,' Bloom said in a filing. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way, including a parked SUV that Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, had gotten out of near Key West, Florida, to look up at the sky. The Tesla rammed the Tahoe at high speed, causing it to rotate and slam into Benavides, tossing her into a wooded area and killing her. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuit's allegations and said it expects drivers to follow vehicle warnings and instructions in the owner's manual and comply with laws. Tesla's manuals warn owners that its cars cannot drive themselves and that they must always be ready to intervene. Plaintiff lawyers argue that Tesla should have geofenced its Autopilot so it only worked on the big roads it was designed for, and drivers couldn't use it on smaller roads, such as the rural one where Benavides was killed. They also say data and video evidence show the Autopilot did detect the Tahoe but then failed to warn the driver, as they claim it should have done. Tesla has since improved its driver-assistance and partial self-driving features, but still faces lawsuits and investigations over what critics say is a gap between its exaggerated depictions of how well they work and what they can actually do. Government auto safety regulators recalled 2.3 million Teslas in 2023 because Autopilot failed to sufficiently alert drivers if they weren't paying attention to the road. They then investigated the company last year for saying it fixed the problem, though it was unclear if it actually did. Musk has also continued to make public comments suggesting Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' technology, a more advanced version of Autopilot, allows cars to drive themselves despite regulators' warnings not to. They say it could lead to overreliance on the systems, crashes and deaths. That technology has been involved in three fatal crashes and is under investigation of its ability to see in low-visibility conditions such as sunlight glare or fog. Tesla is promising a much more robust self-driving technology to power its robotaxis with no one behind the wheel. A taxi test run in Austin, Texas, appears to have gone mostly well, though there were scattered problems, such as when one cab went down the opposing lane.
