Concern, optimism in N.W.T. at prospect of quicker development with new federal law
A controversial federal bill to fast-track "nation-building" projects has been passed into law and while some northern leaders welcome the opportunity to build, others are more skeptical.
The Senate passed Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, on Thursday afternoon, allowing the federal government to streamline approval processes for some projects and bypass provisions criticized for hindering timely approvals.
But some have expressed worry that the new legislation will override consultation with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities and ignore their right to free prior and informed consent as defined by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
N.W.T. Sen. Dawn Anderson said the act has sparked concern over Canada's commitment to reconciliation.
"The process for consultation does not appear to be substantive in any way, which calls into question the commitment to the [UNDRIP] legislation and Canada's commitment to Indigenous peoples in Canada," she said, speaking with CBC News before the bill passed.
"It erodes trust and relationships between Canada and Inuit and First Nations and Métis people."
Prime Minister Mark Carney has listed the Grays Bay Road and Port Project as one project he'd like to see approved quickly.
The project would see the construction of a 230-kilometre all-weather road that stretches from ice roads in Yellowknife all the way to the Arctic ocean, linking Nunavut to the N.W.T.'s road system.
Earl Evans, chair of Beverly and Qamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board, said there's not enough information about how the road would affect caribou migration, and worries about speeding the approvals process before they know more.
"We're going to have to be very vigilant in how this is done and make sure our input is taken seriously — because caribou is life for the people up here," Evans said.
He recognized the potential economic benefits of the project, and the need for jobs in the region and across the country, but said the stakes of interfering with caribou are high. The Mackenzie Valley Review Board has been travelling to communities to collect feedback on the project.
Evans said he does feel his concerns are being taken seriously.
"But at the same time, when the federal government wants a project done, it gets done," he said.
Meanwhile, at an Arctic development conference in Inuvik, N.W.T., earlier this month, Caroline Wawzonek, the territory's minister responsible for strategic infrastructure, energy and supply chains, spoke to the importance of advocating for federal investment.
She didn't mention Bill C-5 but spoke to the importance of all levels of government working together "at speeds and with levels of partnership we haven't seen before."
She said that development must include traditional knowledge, and that it's not a "nice-to-have," but an essential.
"The homes, the health centres, the schools, the roads that link us, and the energy that powers us — as well as our collaborative and co-management systems of governance — this is what makes our communities sustainable, sovereign, and secure," Wawzonek said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marine Atlantic passengers still waiting for promised rate cuts from new federal government
Passengers waiting for the Marine Atlantic ferry say they're also waiting for Prime Minister Mark Carney to follow through on a promise to cut travel rates. As part of his platform, Carney announced that his government would lower the costs for passengers on Atlantic ferries, including Marine Atlantic, by at least half. He called ferries critical to Atlantic Canada and the national economy in a post on X. Owen Collins, who's from Newfoundland and sailing to Nova Scotia, said rising costs on the ferry have limited his ability to travel. "You come once a year instead, and now maybe it's twice a year, you know, because it's that expensive. It's crazy, really," Collins told CBC News from the ferry terminal in Port aux Basques. Randy Jones of Ontario uses the ferry to access the province for sightseeing. He believes lowering the rate would lower the barrier for many others to do the same. "You have to think about whether you want to go over there with the cost of everything else," he said. "We all want to go someplace, and to get to Newfoundland and just to see the beautiful province, it should be done. It should be dropped." Marine Atlantic ferries also serve as a key entry point for goods and heavy equipment to Newfoundland. Louis Brideau, a trucker riding the ferry from Quebec, said the cost hurts his business. He had planned to depart on Thursday, but delayed his trip a day because it ultimately saved him money. A lower rate would have been much more beneficial, he said. "They keep promising stuff, and … they never do anything, you know? And it's hard on people," Brideau said, adding he feels Carney hasn't lived up to his promises. But Beth Townsend and Abby Nowakowski, from Ontario, made it a point to visit Newfoundland's west coast based on another Carney promise that was followed through on. The Canada Strong Pass, which was announced in April and came into effect on June 20, made admission to Gros Morne National Park free. Townsend hopes the federal government follows through on a cut on ferry ticket prices. "My interpretation of that was that they were kind of catching up and trying to do a lot of things with the new cabinet and everything, and maybe this is something that they're hopefully just going to get to in time," Townsend said. "But hopefully people can hold them accountable." Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Canada's Trump-Fueled Brain Gain
A year ago, when Timothy Snyder and his wife, Marci Shore, both prominent Yale historians, moved to Canada after being recruited to the University of Toronto, they thought it would be a fun adventure. 'I was trying to have a positive midlife crisis,' Professor Snyder said in an interview. By the time they had settled into their new home, the mood in the progressive academic circles that feted them back in New Haven, Conn., was rapidly darkening after the election of Donald J. Trump in November. The Trump administration has put U.S. colleges in its cross hairs, accusing some of cradling haters of America. It has launched policies that threaten to expel international students and jeopardize funding and academic freedoms. Professors Snyder and Shore, along with Jason Stanley, a Yale philosophy professor who also moved to Toronto, have in recent months become outspoken about the Trump administration. They published a widely shared New York Times video opinion piece titled, 'We Study Fascism, and We're Leaving the U.S.' At the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, they joined Brian Rathbun and Nina Srinivasan Rathbun, international relations professors who made a similar move last year from the University of Southern California. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Carney government's ‘nation-building' bill becomes law despite Senate criticism
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial legislation to fast-track 'nation-building' development projects received royal assent and became law after the rushed passage of Bill C-5 through the Senate on Thursday. But the legislative accomplishment — the first government bill to pass in both chambers under the minority Liberal administration elected April 28 — was marred by expressions of outrage from some senators, who criticized the legislation's creation of 'so-called Henry VIII' powers that allow the federal cabinet to override laws and regulations to approve development projects. Some also condemned what they saw as the bill's lack of consultation and requirements to respect Indigenous rights, suggesting the new process could get bogged down in the very opposition and delay that it is designed to avoid. 'Bill C-5 is not reconciliation. It's a betrayal of it,' said Sen. Paul Prosper, a Mi'kmaq lawyer from Nova Scotia, who told the red chamber his office received a deluge of 'racist vitriol' after he spoke about his desire to slow down the legislation that sped through the House of Commons last week with the support of opposition Conservatives. Yet some in that party still had concerns about the legislation. Mary Jane McCallum, a Conservative senator from Manitoba, argued Thursday that the bill gives too much power to the federal cabinet to choose projects, and to decide which laws and regulations are relevant to how they are approved. 'Canada is not a dictatorship, yet the so-called Henry VIII clauses in Bill C-5 bring us dangerously close to the precipice,' she said. After two days of debate, the Senate voted down several amendments that would have sent the legislation back to the House, and passed it as written without a recorded vote Thursday afternoon. It received Royal Assent from Gov. Gen. Mary Simon a short time later. Since introducing and pushing to pass the bill before Canada Day, the Carney government has defended the legislation as a necessary framework to boost economic growth and reduce reliance on the United States that has imposed steep tariffs that Ottawa deems illegal and unjustified. Last week, Carney also promised to host summits with Indigenous leaders in July to ensure there is participation on which proposed projects — from pipelines to ports and mines — are chosen for the fast-track process under C-5. The legislation gives the cabinet wide latitude to fast-track a development project based on 'any factor' it deems relevant. Although it's not written in the legislation, the government has pledged to finish the approval of fast-tracked projects so construction can begin within two years, while the special powers the bill creates are set to expire after five years. On Thursday, Sen. Hassan Yusseff, a former labour leader who advocated for the bill in the upper chamber, echoed the government's rationale that the special process to fast-track major projects — and a separate, less contentious part of the bill to lift federal barriers to trade and labour mobility inside Canada — are necessary because of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. His voice breaking with emotion, Yusseff made the case that the legislation is needed quickly to bolster the Canadian economy and help workers in the industries targeted by Trump's tariffs, from steel and aluminum to the auto sector. 'The men and women who build this country of ours are watching very closely,' Yusseff said. Throughout the day, senators debated the merits of the bill, with some arguing it forces Indigenous groups and environmentalists to trust the government to respect rights and standards, rather than force the government to do so. Some senators, however, said the bill's references to Indigenous rights in the Constitution, as well as the government's insistence it won't fast-track projects without provincial buy-in and Indigenous consultation, mean these concerns can't be addressed through amending the legislation. 'There's no bill we can pass that will guarantee the honour of the Crown,' said Alberta Sen. Patti LaBoucane-Benson. 'I don't think there's anything more we can do to the text of the bill to protect Indigenous rights.' Others, like Ontario Sen. Bernadette Clement, argued Parliament should take more time to improve the legislation and address concerns raised by environmental groups, Indigenous communities, and organizations like the Assembly of First Nations. 'Growing our economy, nation-building — yeah, that's urgent. It requires a timely an efficient response. But it doesn't require the trampling of Indigenous rights and our environmental protections,' Clement said. Marilou McPhedran, a senator from Manitoba, expressed shock that Conservatives and Liberals in the House voted en masse to surrender 'parliamentary sovereignty' to the cabinet under the bill. 'As we watch the results of the C-5 juggernaut roll out and roll over Canada, please remember this key question: are the constitutionally guaranteed rights to equality, to Aboriginal and treaty rights, the first to go with Bill C-5?' she said. The House of Commons made several amendments to the bill that some senators welcomed, including new reporting requirements on how projects are selected, and the creation of a parliamentary committee to oversee how the legislation is being used. The House also added a requirement to publish details of a project at least 30 days before it is named in the 'national interest,' and introduced limits so no projects can be added to the new process while Parliament is prorogued or dissolved. The legislation also requires the minister responsible for the law — currently Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc — to consult with provinces, territories and Indigenous Peoples whose rights 'may be adversely affected' by a project. The Commons inserted a clause that requires the government to get 'written consent' from a province or territory — but not an Indigenous community — if a project falls within an area of its 'exclusive' jurisdiction. Sen. Marc Gold, the government representative in the chamber, said the bill is 'fundamentally about trust' that all groups — including the government — will act in the best interests of Canadians during a time of crisis after an election he said gave the Liberal minority government a clear mandate to pursue rapid economic growth. 'C-5 is indeed extraordinary, and indeed it entails unprecedented trust,' Gold said. 'This is not about any partisan interest, but in the interest of our country.'
