
North Korea says Trump must accept new nuclear reality
North Korea said on Tuesday the United States must accept that reality has changed since the countries' summit meetings in the past, and no future dialogue would end its nuclear programme, state media KCNA reported.
Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who is believed to speak for his brother, said she conceded that the personal relationship between Kim and U.S. President Donald Trump "is not bad."
But if Washington intended to use a personal relationship as a way to end the North's nuclear weapons programme, the effort would only be the subject of "mockery," Kim Yo Jong said in a statement carried by KCNA.
"If the U.S. fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-U.S. meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the U.S. side," she said. DPRK is short for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
North Korea's capabilities as a nuclear weapons state and the geopolitical environment have radically changed since Kim and Trump held talks three times during the U.S. president's first term, she said.
"Any attempt to deny the position of the DPRK as a nuclear weapons state ... will be thoroughly rejected," she said.
Asked about the North Korean statement, a White House official said Trump was still committed to the goal he had for the three summit meetings he held with Kim in his first term.
"The President retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearised North Korea," the White House official told Reuters.
At their first meeting in Singapore in 2018, Trump and Kim signed an agreement in principle to make the Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons. The subsequent summit in Hanoi next year broke down due to a disagreement over removing international sanctions that had been imposed against Pyongyang.
Trump has said he has a "great relationship" with Kim, and the White House has said the president is receptive to the idea of communicating with the reclusive North Korean leader.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
Trump to Attend ASEAN Meetings in October, Malaysian PM Says
Even if confirmed, it is hard to draw conclusions about what it means for the future trajectory of U.S.-Southeast Asia relations. U.S. President Donald Trump is set to attend the next Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit and related meetings in October, Malaysia's prime minister said late last week. Anwar, who currently holds ASEAN's rotating chairmanship, told parliament on Thursday that Trump had accepted his invitation to attend the 47th ASEAN Summit and related meetings during a phone call earlier in the day, during which they discussed the border conflict between Thailand and Cambodia. 'He started by expressing his appreciation to Malaysia for its role in resolving the Thai-Cambodia conflict,' said Anwar, as per Bloomberg. 'I said this is because of the ASEAN unity and their positive attitudes and the cooperation of the U.S. and Trump and China's Xi.' If confirmed – and the White House has not yet announced whether or not Trump will attend – it would certainly be welcome news for Anwar. During his first term in office, Trump attended ASEAN meetings just once, in the Philippines in 2017. Even then, he left before the East Asia Summit (EAS), a regional forum that is the most important event for U.S. presidents during ASEAN's late-year clutch of summits. In 2018, he was represented at the EAS by Vice President Mike Pence; in 2019 and 2020, he was represented by National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien, the lowest level representation since 2011. His Democratic predecessor Barack Obama attended five of the eight EASs during his two terms in office, in 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, and 2016. Joe Biden attended the virtual EAS in 2021, the in-person summit in 2022, but did not attend the 2023 and 2024 summits. First held in 2005, the EAS includes leaders from the 10 ASEAN member states, in addition to Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, Russia, South Korea, and the U.S. The Malaysian state news agency Bernama described Anwar's announcement as a 'diplomatic coup for Malaysia and a testament to Anwar's inclusive leadership.' This was a reference to the discussions that Anwar and Trump had over the Cambodia-Thailand border conflict, which erupted on July 24 in the vicinity of Ta Moan Thom temple. Five days later, the two nations agreed to a ceasefire in Putrajaya, in talks brokered by Anwar, reportedly after Trump applied pressure on both nations to cease hostilities. Bernama quoted Dr. Azmi Hassan, a senior fellow at the Nusantara Academy for Strategic Research, as saying that Anwar 'did not sideline the U.S. when negotiating the ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. He ensured that both the U.S. and China were part of the broader regional conversation.' In the past, whether U.S. presidents have chosen to attend the EAS in person has generally been used in Southeast Asia to gauge how much priority Washington has placed on the region. Certainly, their absence has been seen as a sign of American disinterest or neglect. However, even if the U.S. president attends – and what Trump says on a phone call may or may not mean something in two months' time – it will be hard to draw any binding conclusions from it. Trump's approach to the region since the beginning of his second term has been dominated by his administration's chaotic and volatile tariff policy, which has unsettled policymakers across the region. Even though the country's largest economies were rewarded with relatively 'good deals' during Trump's apparently final tariff announcement on August 1, the unpredictable means that the administration used to negotiate the tariffs, and the uncertainty that still hovers over the question of trade, showed little sensitivity toward the needs and interests of U.S. partners in the region, particularly Vietnam. Even if Trump attends this year's East Asia Summit, the course of U.S. policy in Southeast Asia for the rest of Trump's term will remain opaque at best.


NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
Fired U.S. federal workers may be prey of China
Thousands of US federal workers laid off by President Trump's government may be at risk for recruitment by fake Chinese firms.


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan PM Ishiba States Negative View on Issuing Written Japan-U.S. Agreement on Tariffs; Pushes for Comments on World War II
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba expressed a negative view about issuing a written agreement between Japan and the United States regarding U.S. tariffs during Diet deliberations on Monday. Attendees of the House of Representatives Budget Committee, including the prime minister, held intensive discussions on issues such as Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations. While having a negative stance on a written agreement, Ishiba stressed his willingness to devote himself to lowering tariffs on automobiles, which were not mentioned in an executive order by U.S. President Donald Trump. Regarding measures against high prices, Ishiba indicated his intention to hold discussions between the ruling and opposition parties. During the deliberations, Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan President Yoshihiko Noda expressed concerns about the absence of a written agreement, saying, 'The Trump administration might interpret it broadly, and Japan could continue to be ripped off.' In response, Ishiba said, 'I am most concerned that creating a document will delay the reduction of tariffs.' He then vowed to focus on reducing the tariffs steadily. Ryosei Akazawa, economic revitalization minister who was Japan's chief tariff negotiator, made similar remarks in the Diet deliberation. 'We will urge the United States to take prompt measures to ensure the steady implementation of the agreement,' he said. When Yuichiro Tamaki, Democratic Party for the People leader, asked Ishiba how long he would stay in office, the prime minister said: 'We must see whether businesses will suffer any disadvantages as a result of the Japan-U.S. agreement. So I can't say for certain how long that will be.' The deliberations then shifted to measures to combat prolonged high prices. Noda suggested talks between the ruling and opposition parties on the introduction of tax credits with benefits, which would combine consumption tax cuts and benefits. Ishiba agreed to hold discussions and said, 'I would like to find an opportunity to discuss social security as well.' On corporate and group donations to political parties, Noda called for discussions to find common ground based on a proposal put together by Komeito and the DPFP. Ishiba was positive about the idea saying, 'It is very meaningful for the leaders of the first and second parties [the LDP and the CDPJ] to discuss this issue.' The ruling and opposition parties have agreed to abolish the provisional gasoline tax rate by the end of the year, and their talks on the matter have begun. 'The government will do everything it can to achieve this steadily and promptly,' Ishiba said in response to a question from LDP member Takashi Yamashita. Meanwhile, Ishiba said it was important for him to release comments expressing his view on World War II for the 80th anniversary of the war's end this year in order 'not to allow memory of the war to weather away.'