
Labor is open to fresh options to secure east coast gas supplies. Is it about to make a radical shift?
The government has opened the door to establishing a scheme to reserve east coast gas for domestic use – an idea it criticised when Peter Dutton pursued it at the federal election.
As the consumer watchdog issues fresh warnings about looming supply shortfalls, the climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen, said the federal government would consider 'well-calibrated opportunities to ensure that Australian users get access to Australian gas'.
Regulation of the gas market is complicated to say the least.
The federal government has three mechanisms designed to ensure sufficient supplies of gas for Australian households, business and industry while allowing gas companies to honour LNG export contracts.
The Australian Domestic Gas Security Mechanism – colloquially known as the 'trigger' – is a Malcolm Turnbull-era tool that allows the commonwealth to restrict LNG exports if domestic shortfalls are forecast.
Then there's the code of conduct, which the Albanese government introduced in 2023 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine sent global gas prices soaring. The code currently sets a $12-a-gigajoule price cap for domestic sales, while offering exemptions to companies that commit to extra supply.
Finally, the government has a 'heads of agreement' with major LNG exporters to safeguard domestic supplies.
With reviews into two of those mechanisms due this year, the government has now decided to examine all three at once. And it's leaving open the option of making minor tweaks or wholesale changes.
The idea of forcing companies to 'reserve' gas for domestic users, rather than allowing the bulk of it to be sold on the lucrative export market, has long been touted as a straightforward solution to prevent local supply shortfalls.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) this week warned of a 'deteriorating outlook' for supplies for the east coast in 2025 and 2026, with shortfalls projected from 2028 unless new supply was brought into the market.
Groups such as the Australia Institute argue Australia would have more than enough gas if the largely foreign-owned producers weren't exporting the vast majority of it.
Western Australia has had a gas reservation since 2006, which requires offshore gas producers to set aside 15% of their gas for the domestic market. Queensland has its own version, which means gas developed through certain tenements can only be sold and used in Australia.
But no such regime is in place across the east coast, with the major political parties historically resistant to the market intervention.
That changed ahead of this year's federal election with Dutton promising to create an east coast gas reservation if the Coalition was successful.
Under Dutton's plan, which the opposition is yet to either dump or re-adopt, a 'gas security charge' would be used to incentivise LNG exporters to keep more supplies onshore.
The proposal sparked alarm inside the gas industry, and was ridiculed by experts and dismissed as unnecessary by Labor, which maintained it had already secured substantially more gas through its code of conduct than Dutton's reserve would.
But almost two months on from its thumping election win, Labor has signalled it is open to looking at some form of reservation scheme as part of the new review.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Asked on Monday if producers should prepare for a gas reserve, Bowen noted that 660 petajoules worth of supply had already been locked in via the code of conduct.
'Now, that's not to say there isn't more to do, and [the resources] minister [Madeleine] King and I will look at sensible, holistic, carefully designed, well-calibrated opportunities to ensure that Australian users get access to Australian gas. I think that's reasonable. That's a reasonable request by the Australian people and one that we will continue to work to deliver,' he said.
Bowen all but confirmed any reservation scheme would be limited to new projects, a key difference from Dutton's proposal, which would have captured existing supplies except for those already under contract.
'One thing we won't contemplate is ripping up existing contracts, creating sovereign risk, engaging in behaviours which would see Australia as an unreliable supplier. We won't be doing that,' Bowen said.
A consultation paper published on Monday outlined potential options to regulate supply that ranged from 'minimal change' to 'fundamental reform'.
The 'fundamental reform' option would involve a new framework that required all LNG exports to be approved subject to conditions, including relating to supply and price.
Mark Ogge, a principal adviser to the Australia Institute, said a review was unnecessary when the government already had 'all the tools it needs to ensure Australia has a plentiful supply of gas'.
'The government should not allow any uncontracted gas to be exported unless the Australia market is plentifully supplied with low-cost gas,' he said. 'This is a resource that belongs to Australians.'
The federal opposition said the review could not be used to avoid or stall immediate action to bring down prices or avert gas shortages, without offering solutions of its own.
The Greens said the review must crack down on profiteering by the gas giants.
'Massive gas corporations are exploiting loopholes to make massive profits off Australia's gas,' the Greens environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, said.
Australian Energy Producers, the peak body for gas companies, said the review was an 'opportunity to future-proof the east coast gas market and ensure reliable and affordable gas supply for Australian households and manufacturers'.
Submissions to the review are open until 15 August.
A report will then be handed to Bowen and King to consider the next steps.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
KKR to acquire Australian chicken grower ProTen from Aware Super
July 2 (Reuters) - Private equity group KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab will acquire ProTen, one of Australia's largest broiler chicken growers, from pension fund Aware Super, the parties said in a joint statement on Wednesday without disclosing financial details. ProTen was established in 2001 and currently manages more than 700 poultry sheds across more than 60 farms. The company has been owned by Aware Super since 2018. "KKR has been actively monitoring the agricultural infrastructure space as a high-conviction thematic," Andrew Jennings, managing director and head of Australia & New Zealand infrastructure at KKR, said in a statement. KKR will make the investment in ProTen from its Asia Pacific Infrastructure Investors II Fund, which has grown its assets under management to about $13 billion since it was established in 2019. The deal is expected to close later this year, subject to regulatory approvals.


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - ADNOC's Santos bid is gift to energy transition
MELBOURNE, July 2 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company is taking a risk with its $18.7 billion bid for Australian liquefied natural gas producer Santos ( opens new tab. There's a decent chance that Canberra adds the UAE energy giant's offer, unveiled in mid-June, to a list of blocked attempts by overseas players to buy critical infrastructure Down Under. But Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's administration could instead turn the deal into an opportunity to shore up his country's energy transition. Wannabe acquirers of Australian energy assets have a chequered history. Past governments waved through purchases by Hong Kong companies for power producers – CLP Group's ( opens new tab 2011 acquisition of EnergyAustralia and Chow Tai Fook's 2017 deal for Alinta Energy. But they blocked Shell's (SHEL.L), opens new tab 2001 swoop for Santos rival Woodside Energy ( opens new tab and competing foreign bids in 2016 for Ausgrid – including one from China's State Grid Corp. Santos shares are currently trading almost 13% below the price offered by ADNOC subsidiary XRG, suggesting it may soon be added to the list. There's good reason for the discount. XRG wants Santos as part of its goal to become a global LNG provider. Its target is a major player in a country that has become one of the top three exporters of the fossil gas by selling 80% of its production abroad, where drillers can usually get a higher price. Trouble is, there are worries that Australia's overseas success risks domestic shortages, especially as ageing coal-fired power stations close. One regulator, the Australian Energy Market Operator, routinely estimates when those shortfalls may occur, with 2029 its most recent forecast. That timeline may well be wrong. AEMO's past predictions have not come to pass. The southeastern state of Victoria last month unveiled energy efficiency and home electrification rules that could push back AEMO's latest doomsday scenario by three years. And Albanese's administration is adding a home-battery subsidy programme to bolster its goal of generating 82% of electricity from renewables by 2030. No government, though, wants to be blamed for power outages. That gives the upper hand to Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who ultimately decides, with input from the Foreign Investment Review Board, whether to nod through or nix Santos' offer. He could insist that the bidder guarantee a set amount of LNG for the domestic market as a condition of approving the takeover: ADNOC's deeper pockets could help develop domestic gas supplies faster than a constrained, publicly traded Santos. It'd be a smart insurance policy to have while solar, wind and battery projects ramp up. Follow Antony Currie on Bluesky, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Australian Jewish leaders celebrate as Islamist preacher is banned from making anti-Semitic comments after racist sermons
Australian Jewish leaders have celebrated a win following a legal battle against an Islamist preacher who described their community as 'vile' and 'treacherous'. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric, Wissam Haddad, was accused of racial discrimination in relation to a series of fiery sermons, which have racked up thousands of views online, since November 2023. The preacher, also known as Abu Ousayd, referred to Jewish people as 'vile, treacherous, murderous, and mischievous'. During the landmark case at the NSW Federal Court in Sydney, leaders from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) argued the online lectures were offensive and could incite violence towards Jews. Justice Angus Stewart found on Tuesday that the speeches were disparaging and likely to offend, insult, harass or intimidate Jewish people. 'The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and anti-Semitic,' he said. 'They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group.' ECAJ's co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot stood proudly outside the court after the verdict which 'vindicated' them. 'It confirms that the days when Jewish communities and the Jewish people can be vilified and targeted, with impunity, are a thing of the past,' Mr Wertheim said. '(This case) was about antisemitism and the abuse of those freedoms in order to promote antisemitism. 'If the 300 ancestry groups and 100 faith communities living in Australia today were all free to vilify one another in the way that Mr Haddad vilified the Jewish people, the door would be wide open to chronic racial and sectarian strife. '(This would be) of the kind that has devastated other countries, and the peace and harmony we have generally enjoyed in Australia would be ruined for everyone.' Mr Goot described the preacher as a 'picture of anti-Semitic hatred', adding that he had brought the case to court to protect the Jewish community's safety. 'No community in this wonderful country should be dehumanised in the way that Mr Haddad treated us,' he said. 'Freedom of expression must not be abused by the promotion of hateful antisemitism. 'Those that wish to do so, should know that that conduct will not be tolerated by us.' The ECAJ leaders' case sought the removal of the published speeches, a public declaration of error and an order restraining Mr Haddad from making similar comments in future. Mr Haddad denied breaching anti-discrimination laws and claimed he was delivering historical and religious lectures on events from the Qur'an to contextualise the war in Gaza. He said he was speaking about 'Jews of faith' rather than ethnicity while trying to explain that 'what the Israeli government is doing to the people of Gaza' is 'not something new'. Ruling against the preacher would be tantamount to restricting the free exercise of religious expression, Mr Haddad's lawyer argued. But Justice Stewart rejected the defence on Tuesday and ordered Mr Haddad to remove the speeches. He directed the preacher not to make any further comments that convey similar disparaging imputations. Mr Haddad has also been ordered to foot the legal bill for the ECAJ which the leaders told reporters would be 'several hundred thousand dollars'. The preacher's speeches were delivered during a time of heightened sensitivity after the designated terror group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, sparking Israeli retaliation that has left the Gaza Strip in turmoil. The reporting of the war prompted questions and concerns from Mr Haddad's congregants and at the same time left Jewish Australians feeling unsafe, the court was told.