Byju's founders' threat of defamation case an attempt to distract from facts: Glas Trust

Time of India

2 days ago

US-based lender agent Glas Trust has alleged that Byju's founders' plan to file a defamation case is an attempt to distract from the facts after several court orders against them.The legal counsel of Byju's founders, J Michael McNutt, rejected the allegations levelled by Glas Trust, calling it "incomplete and misleading".The counsel of Byju's founders, Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath , on Thursday said they are gearing up to file an over $2.5 billion suit against Glas Trust and others for damage to their reputation and business."Byju Raveendran's latest act of threatening defamation claims against GLAS Trust and the Term Loan B Lenders is a transparent attempt to distract from the facts, coming on the heels of a US federal court holding him in contempt. The fact of the matter is that every court to consider the issues has ruled against Raveendran and his cohorts," Glas Trust said.Glas Trust Company LLC is the trustee for lenders to whom Byju's owes $1.2 billion. Byju's founders have, however, contested Glas Trust claims.Glas Trust now controls Byju's Alpha, which was a special-purpose financing vehicle established by the edtech firm to receive Term Loan B funds.Byju's Alpha has filed a lawsuit against Byju Raveendran, his co-founder and wife Divya Gokulnath, and his consigliere Anita Kishore, alleging that each of them co-orchestrated and executed a lawless scheme to conceal and steal $533 million of loan proceeds.Glas Trust said judgments exceeding $533 million have been entered against Raveendran's allies, "including for their fraudulent conduct"."Raveendran's brother was found by a Delaware federal court to be untruthful and one of the most incompetent directors in Delaware's history. A Delaware federal court stated its intention to make a criminal referral when Raveendran attempted to bribe a witness and had held Raveendran in contempt," Glas Trust alleged.The US lenders' agent said that it has at all times acted within its rights."Mr Raveendran's threats are desperate and meritless, and the irony of Mr Raveendran threatening to sue for defamation when he continues to unlawfully conceal what happened to the missing $533 million should be lost on no one," Glas Trust said.McNutt alleged that GLAS Trust continues to distract from the true situation in India."It is incorrect to claim that US Courts have ruled against Raveendran and his 'co-horts' on the relevant issues. The proceedings in Delaware against Byju have only just commenced, and Byju has not even submitted his response to the complaint," the counsel said.McNutt said Byju Raveendran has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing by any court, in any jurisdiction, and the contempt order against Byju is being contested.He said that the term 'co-horts' is misleading and offensive.McNutt alleged that the order against Think & Learn, its subsidiary and Byju Raveendran's brother (a director of Think & learn who is suspended due to bankruptcy in India) was without any legal representation.Glas Trust initiated legal proceedings against Byju's and its founders in US courts.The agent of US-based lenders also approached the Supreme Court of India to challenge the dismissal of the insolvency case against Byju's by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in an appeal filed by BCCI.The apex court ruled in favour of Glas Trust, and the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) litigation against Byju's is going on.Byju's founders are contesting the case and filed a plea to remove the Interim Resolution Professional, alleging his link with Glas Trust through the consultancy firm EY.