Venezuelan migrants ask U.S. Supreme Court to halt 'imminent' deportations
In a court filing, lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union said some of the dozens of the men held at the Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Anson, Texas, had already been loaded onto a bus and told they were to be deported.
Shortly after the filing, a government lawyer said he was unaware of plans by the Department of Homeland Security to deport the men on Friday, but there could be deportations on Saturday.
"I've spoken with DHS. They are not aware of any current plans for flights tomorrow but I have also been told to say they reserve the right to remove people tomorrow," Justice Department attorney Drew Ensign told a district court in a separate but related case.
In that district court case, Judge James Boasberg denied an ACLU request to block Trump from deporting suspected members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
The cases raise questions about the Trump administration's adherence to limits set by the Supreme Court. It carries the risk of a significant clash between the two coequal branches of government and possibly even a full-blown constitutional crisis.
The lawyers for the Venezuelans filed with the Supreme Court after failing to get a rapid response from earlier filings on Friday before U.S. District Judge James Hendrix in Abilene, Texas, and the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to block any such deportations.
The ACLU said the men had been handed forms indicating they were classified as members of the Tren de Aragua gang.
At issue is whether the Trump administration has fulfilled the Supreme Court's standard for providing the detainees due process before sending them to another country — possibly to the notorious prison in El Salvador where others are jailed.
It was unclear on Friday how many people were potentially to be deported, and where they might be taken.
The men's deportation would be the first since the Supreme Court told the Trump administration on April 7 that it must provide notice to Venezuelan migrants it is seeking to deport and give them the opportunity to challenge their deportations in court.
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court allowed removals under that law to continue, but specified that "the notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs."
Habeas corpus relief refers to the right of detainees to challenge the legality of their detention. It is considered a bedrock right under U.S. law.
The ACLU filed a photo of one of the notices with the court.
"You have been determined to be an Alien Enemy subject to apprehension, restraint, and removal," read the notice. The recipient's name was obscured, and it was noted that the migrant refused to sign it on Friday.
Elected last year on a promise to crack down on migrants, Trump invoked the law last month in a bid to bypass normal procedures and swiftly deport alleged members of Tren de Aragua, which his administration labels a terrorist group.
Asked about the planned deportations on Friday, Trump said he was unfamiliar with the particular case but added: "If they're bad people, I would certainly authorize it."
"That's why I was elected. A judge wasn't elected," he told reporters at the White House.
Defense lawyers and Democrats in Congress have pressed the administration to demonstrate how it knows the Venezuelans are members of the gang, which is active in human trafficking and other crimes in South America but has a smaller U.S. presence.
"We are not going to reveal the details of counter terrorism operations, but we are complying with the Supreme Court's ruling," Assistant Secretary for U.S. Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement on Friday.
The Supreme Court did not indicate how much notice should be provided. Lawyers around the country have asked that the migrants be given 30 days' notice to allow them to contest their deportations. The Trump administration has not said publicly how much notice it intends to give the migrants.
Judges in Manhattan, Denver, and Brownsville, Texas, have issued temporary orders blocking deportations under the Alien Enemies Act within their district.
On March 15, the Trump administration deported more than 130 alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang to El Salvador, citing the Alien Enemies Act, best known for being used to intern and deport people of Japanese, German and Italian descent during World War II. Many of the migrants' lawyers and family members say they were not gang members and had no chance to dispute the government's assertion that they were.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., swiftly blocked any further deportations under the law. Trump then called for Boasberg's impeachment, prompting a rare rebuke from U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts, who said appeals, not impeachment, are the proper response to adverse court decisions.
Boasberg is now probing whether the Trump administration violated his order to return the migrants, and warned that he could hold officials in contempt of court. An appeals court paused that inquiry on Friday.
The Justice Department's statement that there were no plans for immediate deportations of Venezuelans was made during arguments on Friday in Boasberg's court. The judge had convened the hearing to weigh the ACLU's request for an emergency order blocking the administration from deporting people under the Alien Enemies Act without proper legal notice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Is Set to Cement a Budget-Busting Legacy, Adding to the National Debt
President Donald Trump on Thursday cemented one of the most consequential – and expensive – economic legacies in modern American presidential history, as his Republican allies in Congress approved a second sweeping tax cut that will deepen the nation's fiscal imbalances for years to come. In the president's first term, Trump oversaw a roughly $8 trillion increase in the federal debt, which surged due to his first-term tax cuts and emergency spending approved by Congress during the coronavirus pandemic. Trump's second term began with billionaire Elon Musk in the administration vowing to reduce the federal debt by cutting government spending by more than $1 trillion, following substantial increases to the debt during the Biden administration. But those efforts fizzled as Musk has left the administration, and the second Trump tax cuts are projected to add more than $4 trillion to the national debt, once interest costs and likely policy extensions are accounted for. Taken together, the Trump tax laws mark one of the most significant fiscal expansions in peacetime U.S. history. Economists disagree about the extent to which Trump has exceeded the deficit binge of his predecessors, in part because nobody knows how much revenue the White House will ultimately raise in new tariff revenue. But the One Big Beautiful Bill, which centers on trillions in tax cuts across income brackets, represents the biggest component thus far of the president's deficit-increasing policies. When interest costs and likely extensions are included, the legislation is more expensive than the combined cost of Trump's first-term tax law, the 2020 covid stimulus package, and President Joe Biden's 2021 stimulus plan, said Jessica Riedl, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a center-right think tank. Riedl said that Trump's deficit increases surpass all prior presidents since at least Lyndon B. Johnson, in the 1960s. Other economists, including former Obama official Jason Furman, said George W. Bush probably added more to the deficit overall, though Furman also pointed out that Bush did so while inheriting a budget surplus – whereas Trump took office while deficits were already high. Already, the national debt as a share of the economy was larger last year than it was anytime outside of World War II, the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis or the covid pandemic. Deficit concerns contributed to Moody's downgrading of the U.S. credit rating in May – the third major credit agency to do so – over lack of progress on deficits. 'President Trump has added more red ink than any president since at least LBJ, and he is doing it on top of deficits that had already been soaring,' Riedl said. Biden also added to the national debt, primarily with a $1.9 trillion stimulus package during the first year of his administration. Biden also attempted to cancel roughly $400 billion in student debt, though that effort was later blocked by the Supreme Court. The White House has adamantly rejected economists' criticisms, arguing that the new tax bill does not worsen the nation's fiscal outlook and that the administration's agenda overall improves it. A White House memo last month pointed to more than $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and other programs in the legislation, which amount to the largest spending reductions on the U.S. safety net in modern history. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials have also pointed to the administration's broader strategy, which includes higher tariff revenue, cuts to federal regulations they say will unlock growth, and other spending cuts not yet approved. In total, the White House memo says, these measures will reduce federal deficits by up to $6.9 trillion over 10 years. The memo also contends that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's projections of the deficit impact of the bill are misleading, because they assume the expiration of the 2017 Trump tax cuts. The administration says that assumption isn't politically realistic. On its own, the memo claims, the new tax bill actually reduces projected deficits by over $1.4 trillion over the next decade, in part by spurring additional growth. Budget experts on the left, center and right, as well as on Wall Street, have strongly disputed these claims. Trump's tax law locks in trillions of dollars in revenue losses without equivalent spending cuts, widening structural deficits at a time when the nation's debt is already historically high, these analysts say. While the administration says factoring for economic growth decreases the bill's price tag, the legislation could also cause the Federal Reserve to leave interest rates higher in response to the fiscal stimulus, which would in turn slow the economy. When factoring in economic growth, the Penn Wharton budget model, the Yale Budget Lab and the CBO all found that the House tax bill would become more, not less, expensive. 'This bill is very clear: There are a certain number of tax cuts, there are a certain amount of spending cuts, and they don't offset each other,' said Martha Gimbel, executive director and co-founder of the Budget Lab at Yale. 'No amount of assumptions about the amount of growth we'll get will overcome the reality on the ground.' The implications of these decisions will be felt long after Trump leaves office. Larger deficits will probably constrain the government's ability to respond to future emergencies and place pressure on core federal programs like Social Security and Medicare. With baby boomers retiring and health costs rising, the fiscal space consumed by these tax cuts could crowd out other policy options for years. Under the legislation, the interest payments on the debt will rise to $2 trillion per year, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Furman, who served as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama, pointed out that the Trump tax bill could also make it harder for lawmakers to rein in the debt. In the aftermaths of the Bush tax cuts and those from Trump's first terms, Democrats largely sought to roll back breaks for the wealthy and reallocate some of the savings to deficit reduction or new programs. By contrast, Democrats will want to respond to this new legislation by restoring Medicaid funding, clean energy incentives and other policies repealed by Trump's bill. Those efforts will cost more than the legislation's cut for the rich and corporations, Furman said. Trump's tax bill not only extends existing policies with bipartisan support – a higher Child Tax Credit; a larger standard deduction – but it includes new populist giveaways, including a provision to end taxes on tips and a $6,000 tax deduction for millions of seniors. If those measures are extended, as seems likely, the nation's fiscal imbalance will only grow beyond the bill itself. 'The next Democratic administration will want to make this in some ways fiscally better, but in more ways want to make it fiscally worse,' Furman said. 'It is both worse than current policy and will prove hard to undo.'
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Letter from Nikkei Asia's editor: Asia on edge as Trump tariff pause nears end
Hello from Tokyo. The deadline for the 90-day pause on additional "reciprocal" tariffs unilaterally imposed by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is fast approaching this coming Wednesday. While many countries have been negotiating with Washington to reduce the tariffs that exceed the baseline 10% rate already in place, the outlook remains uncertain -- except for the U.K., which has secured a deal, and Vietnam, which unexpectedly announced an agreement with the U.S. on Wednesday. As the tariff implementation nears, President Trump has intensified his criticism, especially toward Japan. Earlier this week, he declared, "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal," and accused Japan of having "ripped us off for 30, 40 years." The additional 25% tariff on automobiles is already affecting Japanese automakers. With the cost burden becoming harder to absorb, companies such as Toyota Motor and Mitsubishi Motors have decided to raise prices in the U.S. market. To help make sense of the complex and shifting Trump tariffs -- which will have significant effects across Asia -- Nikkei Asia has launched a "tariff tracker." And this coming Tuesday, just ahead of the deadline, our market team will host a live webinar to break down the expected impacts. As for what decisions President Trump -- now widely known as a flip-flopper -- will make by Wednesday, that remains to be seen. Be sure to check back with Nikkei Asia for the latest updates. My suggested reads 1. Less than a year after taking office, Thailand's youngest-ever prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, faces a political crisis. Her suspension by the Constitutional Court on Tuesday has deepened the country's turmoil and underscored the weakening of her Pheu Thai Party, founded by her father, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. 2. Presidents of two of the Philippines' top retailers -- Robinsons Retail Holdings Inc. and SM Investments Corp. -- told Nikkei Asia that while domestic consumers are proving more resilient than expected, they are also becoming increasingly price-conscious and displaying a shift toward more deliberate spending, signaling that retailers will need to adapt to evolving consumer preferences. 3. While China and the U.S. chase ever more humanlike robots, Japan is going down a different path. The onetime leader in humanoid robots, as exemplified by SoftBank's Pepper, is now focusing on more pragmatic applications, like cat-eared waiters and cleaning bots, to address the country's severe labor crunch. As a bonus: They're cute, too. 4. Hong Kong's financial authorities injected massive liquidity into the market to keep the local currency within its pegged band, amid weakness in the U.S. dollar. This pushed borrowing costs in Hong Kong close to zero, enabling investors to exploit the U.S.-Hong Kong interest rate gap through so-called carry trades. As a result, the Hong Kong dollar swung sharply from the stronger to the weaker end of its trading band against the greenback. 5. Japanese baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani is winning global acclaim for his exploits in the U.S. major leagues. American baseball scout Jamey Storvick thinks he may have found Ohtani's Taiwanese equivalent in Lin Sheng-en, a 19-year-old phenom who hails from the Indigenous Amis people and has signed with the Cincinnati Reds. Through the lens This week's top photo pick : Anti-government protesters rally in front of the Victory Monument on June 28 in Bangkok. Thousands gathered to demand Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's resignation over a leaked phone call linked to a border dispute with Cambodia. It was the largest anti-government rally since 2023, adding pressure to the government ahead of a possible no-confidence vote. (Photo by) Check out more of our photo coverage here Wishing you a wonderful weekend! Akito Tanaka Sign up for the weekly Editor-in-chief's picks newsletter here. Follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Cambodia, US Nearing Agreement on Trade, Phnom Penh Says
Among the ASEAN nations, Cambodia is the most potentially exposed to any sudden shift in U.S. trade policy. Cambodia and the United States have agreed to a framework for a trade agreement, the Cambodian government announced today, just days ahead of the Trump administration's July 9 tariff deadline. The announcement came after a virtual meeting between Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol and Sarah Ellerman, the assistant U.S. trade representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. 'In this meeting, both sides reviewed and agreed on the draft Joint Statement on Framework for United States-Cambodia Agreement on Reciprocal Trade, which will be released to the public soon,' the government said in a statement. It added that Prime Minister Hun Manet's government 'will continue to cooperate closely with the United States of America to achieve a mutually beneficial trade and investment relationship.' During President Donald Trump's 'liberation day' tariff announcement on April 2, Cambodia was hit with a 49 percent tariff – the highest of any nation in Southeast Asia. Since then, the Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC) and the Ministry of Commerce have held three rounds of negotiations with U.S. trade officials, the latest of which took place on June 25. However, unlike the cases of Vietnam and Indonesia, the reporting on the trade talks between Phnom Penh and Washington has been vague as to what has been discussed during the negotiations or what the impending framework agreement will involve. Chanthol said recently that Cambodia had submitted a comprehensive set of documents to the U.S. trade authorities. As the Khmer Times reported, 'these include proposed tariff rates, export compliance conditions, and a framework for how U.S. goods would be taxed upon entering the Kingdom.' While Cambodia's trade negotiations with the U.S. have not received as much attention as its neighbors Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand, the potential political impacts of the tariff are perhaps greater here than anywhere else in Southeast Asia. Of all the nations that rely on the U.S. market, Cambodia is the most exposed to any potential change in U.S. trading conditions. The country exported $9.91 billion worth of goods to the U.S., according to Cambodian government figures. This made up around 37 percent of its total exports, and a whopping 24.8 percent of its gross domestic product for 2024. (The U.S. Trade Representative's Office puts the figure for Cambodian exports higher, at $12.7 billion, as compared to $321.6 million in U.S. exports to Cambodia.) This trend has continued in 2025, with Cambodian exports totaling $4.35 billion from January to May – a 27 percent increase compared to the same period in 2024. For 2024, total exports stood close to $10 billion. As such, the imposition of a significant U.S. tariff on Cambodian imports could have a major effect on the country's manufacturing industry, particularly its garment and footwear sectors. During a workers' forum on June 7, Cambodian garment workers expressed their concerns that the 49 percent tariff increase would lead to job losses, worsening working conditions. Long Sophat, a 38-year-old factory worker in the Teuk Thla area of Phnom Penh, told the forum that a cut in garment orders would likely affect the lowest-skilled workers, Camboja News reported. 'I am afraid my boss will invest in other countries, and working conditions will worsen or result in the loss of job and income. I am responsible for my family, and I have bank debts,' she said. According to Camboja News, as of last year, the country had 1,555 factories and enterprises, employing nearly 1 million workers, many of them women from rural Cambodia. Mass layoffs in the Cambodian apparel and garment manufacturing sector, should they eventuate, could well result in widespread hardship and potentially political unrest. Working against Cambodia is the fact that the country has never commanded much attention in Washington – but when it does so, it is often for the wrong reasons. Since the first Trump administration, U.S. officials have become concerned about the country's economic and strategic proximity to China, a concern that has come to center around the Ream Naval Base, the subject of extensive Chinese refurbishment over the past few years. More recently, questions have been raised about the industrial-scale online scamming operations that have planted themselves firmly on Cambodian soil since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. In a report last week, the rights group Amnesty International accused the Cambodian government of being 'complicit' in the scamming operations run mostly by Chinese crime syndicates, which have defrauded billions from victims around the world – including the United States. (The Cambodian government has denied this and similar allegations.) As Trump told Fox News earlier this week, 'We'll look at how a country treats us – are they good, are they not so good – some countries we don't care [about]. We'll just send a high number out,' he said. All of this compares unfavorably with Vietnam, a nation that was hit with a similarly harsh 46 percent tariff on April 2, but which has grown into an increasingly important strategic partner of the U.S. over the past two decades. Given that Vietnam's recently announced trade agreement will still see the country hit with a 20 percent tariff, it is hard to see how Cambodia can get a much better deal, at least without making substantial concessions on non-trade issues of concern to Washington.
