Australian collector buys Princess Diana's ‘caring dress' for $520,000
Renae Plant – who manages an archive of 2700 Diana pieces as well as the virtual Princess Diana Museum – fell to the floor crying after placing the final US$400,000 bid (plus US$120,000 in fees) for the Bellville Sassoon dress designed for then-prince Charles and Diana's 1988 tour of Australia to mark the bicentenary.
The floral day dress was expected to sell for between US$200,000 and US$300,000 according to pre-auction documents. It received its nickname after Diana wore it repeatedly to visit hospitals across the world, including in Nigeria, Brazil and Spain, says designer David Sassoon.
On the website for The Princess Diana Museum, Plant says she met the royal couple as a teenager during their 1983 and 1988 tours, and shook hands with the princess while she was wearing the dress at St Andrew's Cathedral in Sydney.
'When Diana saw me she reached up over the crowd and shook my hand!! As you can imagine, that was a dream come true, and definitely the beginning of a long journey … a lifelong passion for the Princess,' Plant wrote.
'Over the years, people have asked why Diana is so important to me. Here's why: Diana stood for change … She was the first royal to remove her gloves and shake the public's hands. That was huge. She brought much-needed attention and sympathy to the AIDS crisis, helping to diminish the fear and stigma associated with the disease … I can think of no one who has the same positive effect on the world that Diana did during the short time she was alive.'
Plant also operates the Princess and the Platypus Foundation – named after a ceramic platypus she says Diana dropped in 1983, which Plant still has today – a charity that raises money to acquire and maintain pieces for the museum, and donate to charities in Diana's honour.
Earlier in June, the museum's Instagram page posted a fundraising callout to raise money for the dress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
He has turned suffering into an art form – but does that make it good?
Richard Moore claims, half-jokingly, that his film about performance artist Stelarc has been more than 40 years in the making. But that doesn't mean Suspending Disbelief – co-directed with John Doggett Williams – is the definitive work about the man, born Stelios Arcadiou in Cyprus 79 years ago, who became globally famous in the 1980s and '90s for 'suspensions' in which he dangled from ropes attached to metal hooks pierced through his skin. 'We're not trying to do a piece that examines how important he is,' demurs Moore, a former director of the Melbourne International Film Festival. 'We're doing a homage to his career, to his spirit of exploration and curiosity, to his longevity in the Australian art scene – to the fact that here is a guy who's grown up in the western suburbs of Melbourne and gone on to become one of the better-known performing artists on the international circuit. It's a salute to him and his personality and his cultural output over a very long time.' Moore first encountered a Stelarc performance in 1982, when the artist was suspended, naked (as was his wont) from the limbs of a massive gum tree in Canberra. For Moore, who was then working in theatre, the sight of Stelarc's body twitching as his limbs froze up was instantly fascinating. 'It was the ritual element of it, the theatrical side of it. These are images that will burn into your retina and never, ever leave you – and I'm grateful to Stelarc for that.' Decades later, Moore met Doggett Williams, whom he describes as 'an inveterate collector of footage', including of Stelarc's performances over the years. There was an archive at ACMI, too. And Stelarc had 'eight boxes [of footage] in his house, on all these formats known and unknown to man, stuff we've never seen before'. The seeds of a career-spanning filmic survey were in place. Suspending Disbelief doesn't offer much insight into Stelarc himself. It's far more focused on the work than the man. And, says Moore, that's a deliberate response to what has become standard practice in the endangered realm of the arts documentary. 'We seem to be drifting towards the hagiography mode,' says Moore. 'I look in horror at a program like the ABC's Creative Types... all those personalities are wonderful, they're celebrities. But art is also dirty and painful, it hurts and it's messy and it's chaotic. And we wanted to make a counter to that style of reporting.' Arguably, no film about Stelarc could ever do differently. His career – which dates back to the late 1960s – has always revolved around the body. There were early experiments in tracking its internal functions, the famous suspensions – embraced by a generation of younger fans today as pioneering efforts in body modification and self-mutilation – and the later (and ongoing) efforts to transcend the limits of the corporeal form through integration of technology, robotics and AI into the physical shell. There's not a lot of hand-holding in the film, but there are a few signposts that serve as pointers for further research for the curious – the briefly glimpsed reference to the Fluxus art movement, for instance, and the emergence of the body itself as a medium for art. To that end, there's footage of fellow Australian Mike Parr's infamous performance at the Venice Biennale in 1977, in which he appeared to chop off his own arm (the severed limb was, in fact, a prosthesis packed with meat, and attached to the end of Parr's actual foreshortened arm, with which he was born). It is remarkable, and appalling, and arrives without warning – and Moore makes no apologies for its inclusion. 'It's incredible footage, and it illustrates a point for us about the European body-art movement,' he says. 'But how do you warn people about it? Do you warn people about it? Do you say, 'oh, the sequence that's going to happen now is actually artificial, it's not a real arm'? But John and I agreed, we wanted the shock value.' Loading Scenes like this are meant to be disturbing, both in the film and in the moments captured in it. 'They hark back to images of crucifixion or public hangings,' Moore says of Stelarc's suspensions, as well as the broader body-art movement. 'There's something deep down and slightly nasty and scary about them. It's blood and pain, something subterranean.' But, many people will ask, is it art? 'Of course it is,' he insists. 'If he'd done it in his bedroom and just kept it there, it probably wouldn't be. Because he's made it so public, shoved it in our faces and made us look at it, it becomes art. 'Whether you like it or not,' he adds, 'is a different question.'
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
He has turned suffering into an art form – but does that make it good?
Richard Moore claims, half-jokingly, that his film about performance artist Stelarc has been more than 40 years in the making. But that doesn't mean Suspending Disbelief – co-directed with John Doggett Williams – is the definitive work about the man, born Stelios Arcadiou in Cyprus 79 years ago, who became globally famous in the 1980s and '90s for 'suspensions' in which he dangled from ropes attached to metal hooks pierced through his skin. 'We're not trying to do a piece that examines how important he is,' demurs Moore, a former director of the Melbourne International Film Festival. 'We're doing a homage to his career, to his spirit of exploration and curiosity, to his longevity in the Australian art scene – to the fact that here is a guy who's grown up in the western suburbs of Melbourne and gone on to become one of the better-known performing artists on the international circuit. It's a salute to him and his personality and his cultural output over a very long time.' Moore first encountered a Stelarc performance in 1982, when the artist was suspended, naked (as was his wont) from the limbs of a massive gum tree in Canberra. For Moore, who was then working in theatre, the sight of Stelarc's body twitching as his limbs froze up was instantly fascinating. 'It was the ritual element of it, the theatrical side of it. These are images that will burn into your retina and never, ever leave you – and I'm grateful to Stelarc for that.' Decades later, Moore met Doggett Williams, whom he describes as 'an inveterate collector of footage', including of Stelarc's performances over the years. There was an archive at ACMI, too. And Stelarc had 'eight boxes [of footage] in his house, on all these formats known and unknown to man, stuff we've never seen before'. The seeds of a career-spanning filmic survey were in place. Suspending Disbelief doesn't offer much insight into Stelarc himself. It's far more focused on the work than the man. And, says Moore, that's a deliberate response to what has become standard practice in the endangered realm of the arts documentary. 'We seem to be drifting towards the hagiography mode,' says Moore. 'I look in horror at a program like the ABC's Creative Types... all those personalities are wonderful, they're celebrities. But art is also dirty and painful, it hurts and it's messy and it's chaotic. And we wanted to make a counter to that style of reporting.' Arguably, no film about Stelarc could ever do differently. His career – which dates back to the late 1960s – has always revolved around the body. There were early experiments in tracking its internal functions, the famous suspensions – embraced by a generation of younger fans today as pioneering efforts in body modification and self-mutilation – and the later (and ongoing) efforts to transcend the limits of the corporeal form through integration of technology, robotics and AI into the physical shell. There's not a lot of hand-holding in the film, but there are a few signposts that serve as pointers for further research for the curious – the briefly glimpsed reference to the Fluxus art movement, for instance, and the emergence of the body itself as a medium for art. To that end, there's footage of fellow Australian Mike Parr's infamous performance at the Venice Biennale in 1977, in which he appeared to chop off his own arm (the severed limb was, in fact, a prosthesis packed with meat, and attached to the end of Parr's actual foreshortened arm, with which he was born). It is remarkable, and appalling, and arrives without warning – and Moore makes no apologies for its inclusion. 'It's incredible footage, and it illustrates a point for us about the European body-art movement,' he says. 'But how do you warn people about it? Do you warn people about it? Do you say, 'oh, the sequence that's going to happen now is actually artificial, it's not a real arm'? But John and I agreed, we wanted the shock value.' Loading Scenes like this are meant to be disturbing, both in the film and in the moments captured in it. 'They hark back to images of crucifixion or public hangings,' Moore says of Stelarc's suspensions, as well as the broader body-art movement. 'There's something deep down and slightly nasty and scary about them. It's blood and pain, something subterranean.' But, many people will ask, is it art? 'Of course it is,' he insists. 'If he'd done it in his bedroom and just kept it there, it probably wouldn't be. Because he's made it so public, shoved it in our faces and made us look at it, it becomes art. 'Whether you like it or not,' he adds, 'is a different question.'
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Leo Sayer returns to Mandurah Performing Arts Centre for first solo Aussie tour in six years
Leo Sayer is coming to Mandurah for his first Australian tour in six years. Leo Sayer is coming to Mandurah for his first Australian tour in six years. Credit: John Eaden After his latest sold-out UK and Ireland tour, music legend Leo Sayer's Still Feel Like Dancing! Australia tour will hit the Mandurah Performing Arts Centre stage on September 11. As an international chart-topper throughout the late 70s and 80s, the British-born singer has called Australia home for most of the millennium and said he was excited to perform in intimate theatres nationwide for the first time since 2019. Camera Icon The British-born 80s icon will come to Mandurah Performing Arts Centre on September 11. Credit: John Eaden 'We intentionally choose smaller scale venues because it feels nice to perform intimate theatres,' he said. 'I'm very happy doing these places because there's a real shared experience between the audience and the band. There's no clever tricks, no backing tracks, no dancers, just the interplay of the musicians which is nice for audiences to come up close and see.' Sayer said concerts today were very different to how the icons of the 70s and 80s used to do it. Camera Icon Sayer said he's excited to strip things back for an intimate performance with his band. Credit: John Eaden 'Not to sound critical but I think technology has come in and changed a lot; there's great artists out there today whose shows are more manufactured than what we were doing,' he said. 'There's so much between you and an audience at a big show and sometimes it's too much. 'The efforts have to come from the acts themselves and for us it's time standing still; we're still doing the things we did all those years ago and it's nice that it hasn't evolved.' Performing top hits like Thunder In My Heart, More Than I Can Say and tour namesake You Make Me Feel Like Dancing, Sayer promised a hit-packed, high-energy evening not to miss. Tickets are available on the Leo Sayer website or the MPAC website.
