
Neighbors ban together to preserve open space at Washington Square Park during maintenance
As the oldest park in Chicago, it was the landing spot for many people who lost their homes after the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. The space earned the name 'Bughouse Square' in the early 1900s when people would come to the park to stand on soapboxes and crates to give long lectures about their theories, passions and ideologies.
Now, the Near North Side's nearly 3-acre landmark park is frequented year-round by residents and visitors alike — even in the bitter wintertime when the foliage is dead and the ground is snowed over.
But like any green space, the square needs its maintenance and upkeep. City officials say that in recent years, the park's grass has significantly deteriorated and needs to be aerated and seeded. The original plan, initiated by the Washington Square Park Advisory Council, was to close off all four grassy quadrants from September 2025 to spring 2026, making those areas inaccessible to residents for nearly eight months.
But for the residents of the neighborhood — particularly the dog owners — that plan felt disrespectful.
'I was shocked,' Nicole Barron, a local resident, said. 'I'm here two to three times a day. I have a dog and we don't have an outdoor yard, so this is our only outdoor space I can bring my dog.'
The fervent pushback from the neighbors appeared to catch the city by surprise. At a May 14 meeting at the Newberry Library, over a hundred people packed the room to advocate for the city to leave some grassy areas open while the city completes its beautification plan. The city changed course after the meeting and says it will take a phased approach to the aerating and seeding, scheduled to begin this fall.
'Washington Square Park has a formal architectural design that has allowed the Park District to work on one quadrant at a time for the past several years,' Michele Lemons, spokesperson for the Chicago Park District, said. 'We intend to continue this approach this fall by closing access to sections of the park to aerate and seed to restore the park's green areas. This will allow public access to sections of the park while other sections undergo restoration work.'
Lemons said cost for materials and labor are absorbed in routine park operating expenses, but did not respond to a question how much the project will cost overall.
But the threat of the park's closure, even if only temporary, seemed to spark a sense of unity in the neighborhood, reminding dog owners, parkgoers and neighboring schools what the historic park means to them and the community.
'People have been calling me, like, 'the girl that spoke at the dog meeting,' and like recognizing me at the Starbucks nearby,' Courtney Clay, who frequents the park with her cocker spaniel, said. 'And they'll say things like, 'Thank you for saving our park.''
It is also a reflection of how the city's oldest park, which served as the site of Chicago's first gay pride march, has evolved over the years.
The park was deeded in 1842 by developers eager to boost land values in the area. It was at first surrounded by the large homes of the well-to-do, even after the 1871 fire leveled most of the nearby buildings.
Eventually, after the wealthy had moved to the north and east, it became a gathering place for those who lived in nearby rooming houses, hotels and small apartments. And many of those people liked to get on soapboxes and speak their minds. Some famous folks were attracted to this free speech oasis, such people as Carl Sandburg, Emma Goldman and Eugene V. Debs. Others were anonymous anarchists, dreamers, poets, preachers and lunatics. 'Washington Square Park is a special place, but it's not a unique story about how green spaces evolve,' said Taylor Evans Ghosal, who worked on a documentary about the park's history. 'Green spaces and parks in general, they evolve. They evolve and change to fit the communities that surround them, and I think they're just a really interesting microcosm of their community.'
Six Loyola University students have captured the magic of Bughouse Square, the city's oldest park
That was a sentiment echoed by neighbors who frequent the park, some of whom emphasized that the park was not always a gathering place for the immediate community.
'When I came here, there really wasn't a park like it is now. It was pretty scary. It had a lot of trees, but it did not have a fence, and it wasn't really maintained,' said Mary Lou Sydel, who moved to the area in 1985. Sydel, who is part of the Washington Square Park Advisory Council, also noted that when she first moved to the park, it was not frequented by her neighbors.
In the 1990s, Washington Square Park was given landmark status and more people started to invest in the park to make it a more welcoming space. After the pandemic, Sydel noticed a boom in people using the park as a gathering space — particularly those with dogs. Now, nearly every day between 4 and 6 p.m., Sydel finds dozens of people enjoying the space and frequenting it to play with dogs in particular.
Some of her neighbors say that if it were not for Washington Square Park, they would have left the area long ago. That was the case for Rhonda Sanderson, a longtime resident who felt herself become more involved with her neighborhood during the pandemic when she started frequenting the park more.
'If there weren't the dogs at that park, it would not have any kind of atmosphere like it has. It is joyous,' Rhonda Sanderson said. 'People stop their cars to watch dogs play. Tourists walk through here … and they just go, 'Oh my God.' When they sit down, they're so fascinated with the interaction of all of us with the dogs, how we're all friendly and busy.'
At the same time, the proliferation of dogs has caused some tensions in the park, with some neighbors citing issues with off-leash dogs, torn-up grass and a general frustration with how the dogs appear to take over the space at times.
'I'm a dog owner, and I get it. I want to have a place to let my dog run free, but Washington Square Park is not a dog park,' said Willa Lang, executive director of the Chicago Parks Foundation. Lang emphasized that due to the park's landmark status, it is not possible to make the area a dog park.
'Off-leash dog activity significantly contributes to turf damage,' said Lemons, spokesperson for the Park District. 'The Chicago Park District Code states that domestic animals must be continuously restrained by a leash not exceeding six feet in length, except in areas designated as 'Dog Friendly Areas.''
Dog owners who violate leash laws are subject to a $300 fine, according to the city's municipal code. If the violation results in 'severe injury' to another person, the fine could run up to $10,000.
That tension came out at the May 14 meeting, which some owners say have prompted them and others to be more mindful about their behavior at the park.
'Everyone's trying to get along and be mindful that when there's children out there, the dog should be on the leash,' Brian Berg, a local resident who helped get the word out about the initial closure plan, said. 'And so I think everyone's trying to do better, and everybody's got a stake in their park. And I think that's, as a result of being listened to, that's one of the positives that comes out of that, too.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' RFK Stadium Deal Over Team Name
A Washington Commanders jersey displaying President Donald Trump's name sits in the Oval Office of the White House on May 5, 2025, as Trump announced Washington, D.C., would host the 2027 NFL Draft. Credit - Jim Lo Scalzo—EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images 'Our country has far bigger problems! FOCUS on them, not nonsense,' Donald Trump tweeted in 2013. Then-President Barack Obama, Trump said, 'should not be telling' Washington, D.C.'s NFL team 'to change their name.' But now, there is a need to focus on the nonsense, it seems. As President Trump continues to try to turn attention away from scrutinizing his relationship with the late alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, he posted twice on his Truth Social platform on Sunday about the name of the football franchise in the nation's capital as well as that of the MLB team in Cleveland, Ohio. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' he posted. 'There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' In a follow-up, Trump added: 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone. Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians. The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!' (Dolan, a Republican who served five years in the Ohio House of Representatives and eight years in the state senate and whose father purchased the Cleveland baseball team in 2000, ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2022 and 2024.) Amid widespread concern about social injustices across the U.S. in 2020, both the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians decided to change their controversial names out of respect for Native Americans. Washington became the Washington Football Team that year, and in 2022 adopted the name the Washington Commanders, while the Cleveland Indians transitioned to its current name, the Cleveland Guardians, in 2021. Read More: A Linguist's Analysis of the Redskins Defense Trump was never a fan of the name changes, tweeting in 2020: 'They name teams out of STRENGTH, not weakness, but now the Washington Redskins & Cleveland Indians, two fabled sports franchises, look like they are going to be changing their names in order to be politically correct. Indians, like Elizabeth Warren, must be very angry right now!' (Sen. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has been mocked by Trump and other Republicans for her claims of Cherokee ancestry.) Trump's urging of the sports organizations to reverse their rebrandings comes as his second-term Administration has targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in both the public and private sector. Speaking to reporters Sunday, Guardians' president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti said, 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last 4 years and are excited about the future.' The Commanders did not immediately issue a statement, but earlier this year, controlling owner Josh Harris said his team had no plans to change its name again. 'In this building, the name Commanders means something,' Harris said during a February press conference. 'It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates.' It's unclear whether Trump has the authority to upend a deal that the Commanders and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced in April to return the team in 2030 to its former home at the capital's Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium after having moved to Landover, Md., in 1997. Amid years of discussions about redeveloping the storied-but-defunct sports and events campus, Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, signed into law in January a bill that transferred the land of the RFK Stadium from federal to local control for the next 99 years. Still, earlier this month, as some members of the D.C. Council expressed skepticism about the timeline and financing of the mayor's deal with the Commanders, Trump suggested he could intervene if the council doesn't approve it. 'It's a very important piece of property. It's a great piece of property,' Trump said, referring to the RFK Stadium site, 'You know, ultimately we control that. The federal government ultimately controls it, so we'll see what happens.' Contact us at letters@


Fast Company
21 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why ambition is misunderstood—and how to reclaim it
Amina AlTai is an executive coach, leadership trainer, and chronic illness advocate. She has partnered with companies such as Google, Snap, Outdoor Voices, Chief, and Roku, and been featured in goop, Forbes, Well+Good, NBC, CBS, and The New York Times. She is an Entrepreneur Magazine expert-in-residence, Forbes contributor, and was named one of Success Magazine's Women of Influence. What's the big idea? The Ambition Trap gives you greater permission to reclaim ambition on your own terms. Most of us think ambition means doing everything in our power to get what we want, but this approach comes at the price of health, well-being, and upholds oppressive systems. Ambition itself is not a dirty word—we can renegotiate unhealthy assumptions about ambition to engage with it in meaningful and restorative ways. To escape the trap of an endless cycle of overwork that is never enough, ambition must be anchored in our purpose rather than our pain. Below, Amina shares five key insights from her new book, . Listen to the audio version—read by Amina herself—below, or in the Next Big Idea App. 1. We need to redefine ambition. Most of us only know ambition in a dysfunctional sense: a relentless desire to succeed, regardless of the cost. For me to win, someone else must lose, we think. But that's not ambition. Ambition itself is natural and neutral. In its purest form, it's a desire for more life. It's a wish to unfold, evolve, and flourish. Grass wants to grow; trees like to stretch toward the sun; we all want to thrive. The essence of all living beings is to be motivated for more, and as humans, we're the only species that has a choice in how we direct that advancement. So, we must be great stewards of it. Things go sideways when our striving begins to cost us and others health, relationships, peace of mind, and sense of self. This isn't ambition in its neutral, natural form, but in its most painful. 2. There are two types of ambition. Though ambition in and of itself is neutral and natural, there are two ways we usually see it unfold. It can either be painful ambition or purposeful ambition. Painful ambition is the voracious desire to advance, regardless of the costs. Painful ambition has a few trademarks: Unaware of the systems that shape us A narrow mindset Driven to win at all costs Focus on individualism and hoarding power Instrumentalization of yourself and others Toxic positivity Self-imposed urgency Most of us believe that embodying these characteristics means we're being ambitious. But we're actually displaying painful ambition. Painful ambition is driven by our core wounds. According to Lise Bourbeau, those wounds are rejection, abandonment, humiliation, betrayal, and injustice. For each wound we have, we wear a corresponding mask. A rejection wound wears the mask of avoidance. A betrayal wound wears the mask of control. Every one of us emerges from our formative years with an injury of the psyche. It's a human right or passage, even if you come from the best family in the world. When ambition is built upon that wound, it's a house of cards. 'Painful ambition is driven by our core wounds.' When we operate from a place of purposeful ambition, growth is no longer driven by a stinging wound. Instead, we've tapped into our intrinsic purpose and are living in a way that has a positive impact on ourselves and the world around us. We've stopped trying to make life happen to compensate for our pain and instead are unfolding from a place of wholeness. Purposeful ambition has a few hallmarks: Questioning systems that shape us An expansive mindset Driven by purpose Focused on collaboration and using your gifts to help the world Honoring your needs Contentment-based Take aligned action Stepping into purposeful ambition might feel like meeting yourself for the first time. Many of us unknowingly construct our whole lives around our wounds; in fact, we're often celebrated for them. If we didn't take a physical, emotional, or spiritual 'hit' for it, we would likely keep hiding behind them. If I didn't have a health crisis early in my career, I may have kept going the way that I was: overworking from a place of not-enoughness. This 'hit' is the universe inviting us into a new way of being—it's a way of saying Stop. What you're doing isn't working anymore and likely never worked in the first place. This is the moment when we get to put the mask down and peel off the layers of protection. This is when we get to heal that inner child so we can build our lives from the fullness of our true selves versus living and leading from an aching wound. This right here is where circumstances change for the better. 3. Identity and ambition are deeply intertwined. Ambition doesn't exist in a vacuum. It is shaped and constrained by identity. For those from historically underrepresented communities—women, BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, disabled folks—ambition is often a double bind. On the one hand, society expects you to prove yourself. On the other hand, the moment you express visible, unapologetic ambition, you're often punished for it. This is what's known as the ambition penalty: the social, economic, and reputational cost that underrepresented people often face for simply wanting more. A woman asking for a raise may be seen as aggressive. A person of color expressing a bold vision might be called intense or not a culture fit. A disabled entrepreneur with high aspirations may be met with patronizing doubt. These aren't personality flaws—they're systemic dynamics that uphold power imbalances. 'This is what's known as the ambition penalty: the social, economic, and reputational cost that underrepresented people often face for simply wanting more.' The Ambition Trap unpacks how these messages are internalized, leading many to either overperform to gain approval or suppress their ambition entirely to stay safe. Ultimately, reclaiming ambition is more than a personal act—it's a cultural intervention. When those most marginalized are empowered to define and pursue their ambitions on their own terms, the entire system begins to shift. 4. It's not about renouncing ambition, but allowing ambition to come from innate gifts. Many of us are taught to either chase ambition at all costs or reject it altogether, especially if we've felt its toll on health, relationships, or sense of self. I believe that for ambition to be nourishing, not punishing, it needs to center on our gifts. To work in a way that feels like a salve for the soul, expresses who we are, and makes the change we want to see in the world, we need to leverage the best of us. We all have a unique form of brilliance, a rare talent or ability that is specific to us and that we came to this planet to share. For some, it's power skills like deep listening, empathy, and communication. For others, it might be a more tangible skill, such as playing the trombone or excelling in physics. I coach some of the most legendary humans, from Olympic gold medalists to game-changing founders and leaders. There comes a moment in almost every session when my client inevitably says, I'm not a genius or gifted at anything. A lot of us are taught that genius is for a select few, but I believe that's a patriarchal myth that supports some people and aids in the oppression of others. When we bring our brilliance to the world, we can finally drop the hustle and grind and work with our natural flow. 'We all have a unique form of brilliance, a rare talent or ability that is specific to us and that we came to this planet to share.' Another benefit of owning our gifts is that it takes us out of the scarcity mindset. When we believe that genius is reserved for the select few, we fight to compete and be seen. But when we realize we all have unique and exceptional abilities worth sharing, it's clear that there is no competition. We are all in service to one another, and no one is above or below anyone else. 5. Ambition is cyclical. One of the challenges in the way we've come to be in relationship with ambition is that we believe it has a never-ending upward trajectory—that it's more for more's sake, all the time. More money, more power, more achievements. This approach is expensive for ourselves and the planet. Ambition is about cultivation, pacing, replenishing, nurturing, resting, and growth. Ambition goes in cycles, like a perennial flower. It starts with a seedling of desire: I want to grow. We nurture and water that desire by nurturing ourselves. We pace our growth, and inch by inch we rise. We become as tall as we can in each moment, based on our inner and outer states. Our gifts come into full bloom, and we have a seasonal peak. It's glorious. And then the winds shift, and we feel we can grow no more. So, we pause, slow down, and go back underground to prepare ourselves for another season. The cycle repeats over and over again. One of the most important aspects of this reframing of ambition is that it isn't a solo sport. A race to the top alone is a race to the bottom. Ambition is not just about maximizing individual potential. We must work for and lean on each other if we want to live in healthier cultures. We must be riding the waves of cyclical ambition together. Encouraging each other to lean into seasons of growth and seasons of rest.


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN's chief data analyst breaks down how Americans are reacting to Epstein files fallout
CNN Chief Data Analyst Harry Enten looks at public sentiment over the Jeffrey Epstein case and how the government is handling it.