
How AI is changing the way companies listen and build, with Brad Anderson of Qualtrics
This week on the GeekWire Podcast, my guest is Brad Anderson — an engineering and product leader who spent more than 17 years at Microsoft. For nearly five years, he's been at Qualtrics, the experience management technology company, where he's president of products, user experience, engineering, and security.
I've known Brad for a while. In fact I've been a guest on two of his shows back when he was a leader in enterprise mobility and cloud technology at Microsoft, when it was all the rage for executives to have their own video shows.
There was 'Lunch Break with Brad Anderson,' where he drove his guests around the streets of Redmond in his Tesla. And there was 'The Ship Room,' where he talked about the cloud transformation and played games with guests, challenging me to distinguish real startups from fake ones.
Qualtrics, acquired in a private equity deal in 2023, has dual headquarters in Seattle and Provo, Utah.
For this week's show, I went to the Qualtrics Tower in Seattle to talk with Brad about how he thinks about building tech today, and how AI agents are changing the experiences the company creates and measures. He also discussed the importance of security in the AI era. (Qualtrics announced a key security milestone this week.)
In the final segment, I turned the tables on Brad with a game about cloud and AI terms called 'Real or Ridiculous' (see below). Listen to the end to play along.
But first, he reminded me about the random case of mistaken identity that brought us together in the first place, back in the day.
Listen to the episode to hear the story, and continue reading for highlights from his comments, edited for context and clarity.
On the unprecedented pace of AI innovation: 'My team sends out a summary of what changed in the last seven days every single Monday to the engineering team, because it's moving that fast. I've never seen anything like that.'
How AI is transforming customer feedback: 'Worldwide right now, when someone starts a survey, the completion rate is 75%. … With our Gen AI enabled surveys, what we call conversational feedback, it increases to 83%. … When we ask the follow-up question, we get 30 times the number of words back in the second response. And so with generative AI, we've been able to increase the amount of data coming back by 10%, and double the quality.'
On AI's impact on engineering productivity: 'What we're seeing right now is, Cursor is literally generating millions of lines of new code for us. Of course, it's AI generated, human-reviewed, human approved, human corrected. But 45% of all that code that's being generated, we're checking into the product.'
The changing shape of engineering organizations: 'I think, as an industry, there will be fewer entry level [positions]. If a typical pyramid for an engineering organization is that 20%, 15% of their engineers are entry level, that probably goes down by 3% to 5% over the next couple years.'
On trust as the key to AI success: 'If you ask yourself the question, who are going to be the organizations that are going to thrive in this world of AI, I would argue it's going to be the organizations that business leaders trust.'
On using AI to accelerate decision-making: 'I've spent hours and hours inside of ChatGPT just asking questions such as, 'Hey, if you were the president of a 1,500-person organization with revenue in the multiple billions … what would you do if you wanted to significantly increase the capabilities and the skill set of the engineering team in AI? … It may not have all the answers, but boy, it puts things in your mind, it gives you ideas.'
And here's the quiz that I gave Brad in the final segment, which I created with help from ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Listen to the show to hear the answers.
Real or Ridiculous?
Are these cloud and AI buzzwords real industry terms, or just expertly crafted nonsense?
Quantum Cloud Orchestration: A system that manages and schedules workloads for quantum computers hosted in the cloud.
Federated Learning: A machine learning approach where a shared model is trained across multiple decentralized devices or servers, keeping data local.
Cognitive Load Balancing: An advanced load balancing technique that uses AI to predict and distribute network traffic based on the cognitive state of individual users.
Serverless AI Inference: Running AI model predictions without managing the underlying servers, scaling automatically based on demand.
Hyper-Personalized Edge AI Microservices: A highly granular AI architecture that delivers customized intelligent services directly on edge devices, tailored to individual user preferences in real time.
Sentient Cloud Nexus: A fully autonomous cloud infrastructure capable of self-awareness and independent decision-making, optimizing its own operations without human intervention.
Emotion-Centric Journey Taxonomy: A proprietary framework for categorizing user sentiment patterns across multi-channel experience touchpoints, enabling micro-adjustments to brand resonance in real time.
Real or ridiculous? Listen to the final segment to play along and hear the answers.
Subscribe to GeekWire in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.
Audio editing by Curt Milton.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer
We recently published . Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a key American defense contractor when it comes to the aerospace industry. Its fighter aircraft form the backbone of US air superiority. The shares have lost 11.9% year-to-date on the back of a major 10.8% dip in July after its Q2 profit dipped by a whopping 80% on the back of a classified $1.6 billion loss on a classified aeronautics project. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT)'s Q2 revenue of $18.16 billion also missed analyst estimates of $18.57 billion. No wonder Cramer made the following remarks about the firm: 'RTX, by the way, pushed by a number of people, saying that's the defense stock you want to be in, not Lockheed Martin.' Source: Pexels Previously, Cramer had advised viewers to stay long on Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT): 'I like Lockheed Martin too much to tell you to do that. Every time I see Jim Taiclet, I say to myself, why does anyone want to sell that stock with a 3% yield and a great book of business and a terrific CEO? No, you stay long, Lockheed Martin.' While we acknowledge the potential of LMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data