logo
The DNC's cash crunch deepens as new filings show Republicans with a huge advantage

The DNC's cash crunch deepens as new filings show Republicans with a huge advantage

Yahoo21-06-2025
The Republican Party's main fundraising arm has nearly five times the cash on hand of its Democratic rival, new campaign reports show, underscoring the troubles faced by the Democratic National Committee and its embattled chairman, Ken Martin.
The RNC entered June with about $72.4 million in cash reserves, nearly five times the $15 million stockpiled by the DNC, as the two parties gear up for gubernatorial races this fall and next year's costly midterm elections for Congress.
The wide gap – revealed late Friday in filings with the Federal Election Commission – follows a tumultuous few months for Martin and the DNC that included a public feud with the party's former vice chair. The party's cash crunch is serious enough that party officials have weighed seeking a line of credit to help it stay afloat, a development first reported by The New York Times.
Earlier this week, two union leaders who were longtime DNC members resigned from the party's leadership, shortly after vice chair David Hogg departed his post following months of acrimony with Martin.
Democratic fundraisers interviewed by CNN say the string of bad news has undermined Martin and the DNC at a time when Democrats need a forceful voice to counter President Donald Trump and the Republicans who control all the levers of power in the federal government.
One current DNC member said Democrats need be more 'aggressive' on messaging and increase coordination between Democrats' legal and political strategies. To fundraise, they said, Democrats need to be clear about what message the money is promoting.
'I wouldn't feel comfortable picking up the phone and asking for money,' the DNC member said. 'What's the message? What's the elevator pitch?'
But party observers also acknowledge that any change in the DNC's chairmanship is unlikely given Martin's longtime ties to party members and strong base of support among state party chairs. Martin, who won his chair race overwhelmingly on the first ballot, has also nominated some of his allies to key committee roles while allowing other slots to be filled by DNC caucus members. That's led to some DNC members – including several who backed his opponents – with less prominent positions.
DNC officials insist the party's finances are in good shape – relative to the same period in 2017, the year after Democrats lost to Trump the first time. And on Friday evening, they touted the money raised since Martin's ascension to the role in February as the most collected in the first four months of a new chairmanship.
Right now, the committee is relying heavily on small-dollar donors – which officials point to as a sign of grassroots' backing for the party and its policies.
More than 65% of the funds the DNC collected from individual contributors through the end of May came in amounts of $200 or less, compared to about 47% of individual donations to the RNC, the new filings show.
'What matters is winning elections, making Democrats competitive everywhere, expanding our tent, and putting our party on the right path,' Martin said in a statement. 'This is only the start, but it's a record-setting start that allows Democrats to meaningfully invest in every part of the country.'
But the months of public intraparty feuding have clearly taken a toll.
In April, then-vice chair David Hogg announced that he planned to help primary incumbent Democrats he deemed 'asleep at the wheel' – breaking with Martin's pledge to enshrine officer neutrality in the party's bylaws.
Earlier this month, Hogg opted not to seek re-election to his position after the committee voted to redo his and another officer's election over an unrelated procedural issue. Days before that vote, a recording was leaked in which Martin said the feud had hurt his ability to do his job.
'I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility, so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin said to Hogg in the leaked recording of a private May 15 DNC officer meeting, as reported by Politico. 'And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to.'
Then, this week, news broke that two labor leaders – American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten and AFSCME president Lee Saunders – had departed the DNC. The two alluded to disagreements with Martin's leadership as reasons for leaving.
Martin has strong ties with the state party chairs who make up a significant portion of the party's more than 400-person membership. As chair, he's campaigned in several down-ballot races, and the DNC announced it would send an additional $5,000 a month to states.
Those investments have helped bolster his support with state party leaders. Even critics who say he hasn't done enough on fundraising or message acknowledge his efforts to build up the party's infrastructure.
At the same time, strong messaging and infrastructure require strong fundraising.
Martin and his allies have argued that the drama surrounding Hogg and the departure of the two top union officials is a distraction. The core mandate of the DNC, they say, is to win elections, which the party has done consistently this year. Democrats in state and local races have overperformed in more than 30 races and special elections, flipping some Republican-held state legislative seats and winning key contests like April's Wisconsin Supreme Court race.
'He is rolling up his sleeves. He is getting to work. He is focusing on the goal at hand,' Maria Cardona, a longtime DNC member and CNN political contributor, said of Martin. 'There have been, clearly, internal distractions which have been tough to deal with, but that has not taken away his focus from winning.'
Cardona acknowledged that donors may be less willing to give to Democrats after 2024's election losses right now but said that's a natural consequence of electoral defeat. She expressed confidence that donors would come around.
'Donors are exhausted, donors are frustrated, donors are pissed off, right? They gave $2 billion last cycle, and we didn't win. So I understand that,' Cardona said. 'That's normal. That is something that happens every cycle, especially when you lose.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will likely talk "over the next number of days" after the U.S. imposed a 35% tariff on goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, a Canadian official said on Sunday. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister in charge of U.S.-Canada trade, told CBS News' "Face the Nation" that he believes there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down tariffs. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953
Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Women call the shots across the supply chain at tequila brand 1953

Listen and subscribe to The Big Idea on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. When Shivam Mallick Shah and Lindsey Davis Stover founded the tequila brand 1953, they wanted to make moves in an industry that was becoming increasingly popular among their own demographic while also opening doors for other women. As the brand proudly states on its website, 1953 is "Founded, Farmed, Distilled, and Led by Women." On Yahoo Finance's The Big Idea podcast, the two entrepreneurs shared how they managed to pull off such a feat in a historically male-dominated industry. (Watch the full episode above; listen-only below.) "I just kind of got down this rabbit hole of where the women in tequila are, unfortunately, really hard to find. So that kind of led us to this idea," Davis Stover, a Texas native, said on the podcast. "We were drinking tequila. Every woman we knew is drinking tequila," she continued. "So we wanted to create a company that was founded, farmed, distilled, and led by women at every single level. Even our name, 1953, is the year women earned the right to vote in Mexico. I think that is just the essence of our company and providing opportunities for women." This embedded content is not available in your region. "People didn't think it was necessary to have a female-led supply chain," Shah said. "They didn't think that it would make a difference in the quality of the product, and they didn't think that, frankly, we could do it. They had a lot of strong opinions on what we could do, and it was different than what we wanted to do." Shah and Davis Stover tackled their mission by completing their search in an "organic way," talking with people who worked at distilleries and farms in Mexico. Eventually, they found Carmen and Adriana, who ran the family-owned distillery that 1953 would eventually use. "Their family has owned this distillery for over a hundred years, and they have trained a female master distiller, Rocio Rodriguez, who signs every bottle," Shah explained. "She had this incredible story of having come to this distillery when she was pregnant. She was trained as a chemical engineer, but she was worried about losing her job. Carmen and Adriana's families decided to build a nursery so she could come to work and bring her whole self, which has, of course, changed her life, but it changed so many people's lives." Though their journey to creating a brand with a strong female focus had its roadblocks, the biggest hurdle was finding a woman-owned agave farm. Traditionally, agave farms in Mexico are passed down from father to son, but Carmen and Adriana helped the entrepreneurs find the farm they partner with today. "We could not find an agave farm owned by women," Shah said. "Carmen and Adriana helped us find a gentleman who only had four daughters. We met with them, and we talked about what we were trying to build. We asked him if he would consider passing his farm down to his daughters if we guaranteed purchase of agave from their farms for 1953." After a family meeting in which the four women discussed the proposition with their husbands and father, they ultimately agreed, deciding to take on the responsibility and risk to help complete 1953's women-led supply chain. "They had grown up on this farm, and they knew it like the back of their hand, but they never saw themselves as CEOs. They never saw themselves as the people in charge of running the farm," Shah explained. "What made them think differently was the high school down the street and all the girls who were in that high school, just like they used to be, and wanting to let those girls know that there was nothing they couldn't do. ... It was a motivation we all shared, and we knew we had an alignment of our values, which told us we were in the right place. And that really completed our supply chain." Every Thursday, Elizabeth Gore discusses real-life stories and smart strategies for launching a small business on The Big Idea podcast. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports
Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rail customers urge regulators to block Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern deal, FT reports

(Reuters) -U.S. railroad customer groups have demanded regulators block or put onerous conditions on the proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Seven associations of shippers have expressed concern the planned deal would significantly increase the power of the merged railroad to raise prices or reduce service standards, the report said. Last month, Union Pacific said it would buy smaller rival Norfolk Southern in an $85 billion deal to create the first U.S. coast-to-coast freight rail operator and reshape the movement of goods from grains to autos across the country. The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said. Reuters could not immediately verify the FT report. Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Previously, the transportation division of SMART, the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, said it plans to oppose the merger when it comes before the Surface Transportation Board for review. Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also criticized the merger saying the deal would push "us even further down the road of dangerous consolidation and monopoly power ... This is a hostile takeover of America's infrastructure."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store