Vitol paid out $10.6 billion to shareholders in buybacks in 2024
Vitol's $10.6 billion in buyback payments were up from the $6.4 billion it paid in 2023 - extending its highest ever.
Buybacks rose in 2024 as a continuation of record earnings even though profits started to drop from all-time highs.
Vitol made around $8-8.5 billion in net profit last year, down from $13 billion in 2023 and $15 billion in 2022.
Vitol and rival global commodity traders such as Trafigura and Gunvor made lower net profit in their 2024 financial year, as markets stabilised after a period of turmoil in 2022-2023 as trading houses made record earnings during Europe's energy crisis and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
As well as funding its share buybacks, Vitol has been putting its bumper earnings towards investments in upstream and downstream assets across the globe. In 2024 Vitol acquired Italian refining company Saras.
It has also diversified from its traditionally oil-heavy portfolio, increasing its activities in the natural gas trading business, as well as coal and metals.
The total equity attributable to company owners for the 2024 financial year was $30.6 billion, down from $32.4 billion in 2023 according to the earnings document.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The landlord tax trap stopping home owners renting out their spare rooms
Homeowners looking to earn some extra cash from renting out a room to a lodger are being snared by a tax trap. Households can let out a furnished room and earn up to £7,500 a year tax-free without notifying the tax office. But the allowance hasn't risen in nine years, despite rental prices shooting up in that time as the cost of living has risen. Housing expert Matt Hutchinson, director of house share site SpareRoom, says the freeze on the Rent a Room Scheme's tax-free threshold is putting off would-be landlords. He says that if just one in 20 of Britain's spare rooms were rented out to lodgers, it would add the equivalent of a city the size of Birmingham to the nation's housing stock. Mr Hutchinson says that if the threshold had risen in line with RPI inflation – which includes costs associated with home ownership – it would now be £11,500 and cover 94 per cent of UK postcode areas. He also thinks a higher threshold would mean more rooms coming on to the market. Among those worst affected by the freeze are homeowners for whom lodgers are a useful source of extra income, as the cost of living and mortgage rate rises have added substantially to bills. Alex Hobbs, 29, a manager in the construction industry, took in a lodger when he was looking for a way to help cover his mortgage on a two-bedroom flat in London after the pandemic lockdown. But the tax threshold – and the cost of getting an accountant to check he was correctly declaring his income – has now put him off. He says: 'The cost of living had hit all my different household bills. Interest rates had gone up on residential mortgages, so I was giving myself that security and peace of mind that I wouldn't be stretched too thin. 'So I decided it would be sensible to rent out a spare room. He [the lodger] was quite sociable, so we became friendly, and it was quite nice because it gave me a bit of company sometimes.' Mr Hobbs says that renting out a room covered half his mortgage payments, and the tax-free allowance, which works out at £625 per month, was a major benefit. 'I was charging £750 a month and then he paid separately for a share of the bills. Then I realised you had to pay tax on rent over £625 a month. 'I thought the allowance was quite low. I had to get an accountant and pay their fees, and it was a lot of work. I know that other tax allowances have been frozen too, but the personal income tax allowance has at least changed in the last ten years, and the lodger allowance hasn't.' Mr Hobbs has now moved further out of London and into a one-bedroom home, so he no longer has a spare room to rent. However, he says he would have considered buying a bigger property and relying on one or two lodgers if it hadn't meant completing a tax return each year. The Rent a Room scheme is open to households who let a furnished room in their main home to a lodger. Even tenants can make use of it, although many leases can forbid sub-letting and require special permission from the landlord. Mr Hutchinson campaigned for the threshold to be lifted from £4,250, or £354 a month, to the higher rate in 2016. At this point £7,500 covered average room rents everywhere except London. But data from SpareRoom shows average room rents have increased by 21 per cent across the UK, and by 34 per cent in London over the past nine years. Mr Hutchinson says: 'It's not just the money – people can be really scared about tax and adding complexity to their finances. 'If you look at Office for National Statistics data and the number of houses in England and Wales with one or two spare rooms, there's about 26 million. So even renting out 5 per cent of those rooms would create a city the size of Birmingham but spread out across the country.' Frozen income tax thresholds mean the bill for breaching the allowance can be larger if someone has been dragged into a higher tax bracket by the extra income. Laura Suter, director of personal finance at the investment platform AJ Bell, says: 'It means that, for some, once this tax and other costs of renting a room are taken into account, there isn't sufficient incentive for them to do it.' The question of hiking the tax-free allowance has been raised in Parliament, most recently in February when Baroness Watkins of Tavistock asked if the Government had considered raising it. Replying on behalf of the Treasury, Labour peer Lord Livermore agreed the scheme 'reduces and simplifies the tax and administration burden for those affected and has taken some taxpayers out of self-assessment entirely'. However, he added a rise was not on the cards, saying: 'At present, the Government believes that the Rent a Room Scheme threshold is set at an appropriate level.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
73 Holyrood fat cats paid over £100,000 as satisfaction with public services falls
The number of Scots civil servants earning more than £100,000 a year has soared under the SNP, the Scottish Mail on Sunday can reveal. Taxpayers are footing the bill for a growing army of civil servants - many of whom are predominanty allowed to work from home - as satisfaction with public services plummets. Overall, the Scottish Government now employs an unprecedented 73 mandarins who are officially ranked as Senior Civil Service (SCS) - mostly heads of various departments and directorates. In total, this upper tier of civil servants now costs the public purse an astonishing £8.6m a year in wages, with the vast majority earning in excess of £110,000 - three times the Scottish average annual salary. Earlier this year the SNP administration's finance secretary Shona Robison slashed millions from the budgets for the NHS, mental health and transport, claiming Scotland was facing 'enormous and growing' financial pressure. Despite this, the number of senior civil servants employed to run the country has grown sharply - as has the cost. At the same time, the civil service has come under fire for its refusal to abandon 'working from home' and for a 'sick-note' culture in which government staff take far more days off than workers in the private sector. Critics have attacked the 'out of control' cost to taxpayers and accused the SNP Government of getting its priorities all wrong. Scottish Conservative spokesman for finance and local government Craig Hoy said: 'The civil service, and the cost of it, have ballooned out of control under the SNP's watch, and by far the biggest expansion has been in those on the highest salaries. 'When Scots are paying the UK's highest taxes, but seeing worsening services, there 's no excuse for fat-cat pay packages of this sort.' Callum McGoldrick, researcher at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'At a time when public services are clearly under pressure, it's hard to justify the steady growth in high-paid civil servants at the top of the Scottish government. 'With budgets being squeezed across the board, Scottish taxpayers will be asking whether ministers have got their priorities right. 'The focus should be on improving services for the public, not inflating the salaries bill in Holyrood.' The Scottish Government recently published its annual list of Senior Civil Service staff, reflecting the situation at the end of March. Overall there are now 73 SCS on a wage bill of totalling £8.6m. The number is higher than the 66 staff on six-figure sums last year, which had added up to a total wage bill of £7.5m. In comparison, there were 52 SCS on £100,000 in 2023, 38 in 2021 and just 14 as recently as 2018. The current list includes director generals of government departments - plus heads of directorates including Cladding Remediation, Covid Inquiry Response, Organisational Continuity and Heat In Buildings. The highest paid is Caroline Lamb, director general of the health department and head of the Scottish NHS, whose salary is listed between £205,000 and £209,000 a year. Four other staff are listed as earning over £150,000, including former Permanent Secretary JP Marks who took home £190,000 as the country's most senior civil servant before leaving in April to take up a new job as chief executive of tax agency HMRC. He was replaced by Joe Griffin, who in his former role as the Scottish Government's director general of strategy & external affairs earned £140,000 a year. The official responsible for the country's finances is director general of the Scottish Exchequer Alyson Stafford who takes home £160,000. The list shows a further nine civil servants earning between £120,000 and £150,000 a year. Most are director generals of departments including Communities, Corporate, Economy, Education & Justice, and Net Zero. Overall 45 officials earn between £110,000 and £120,000 a year - including the government's directors of Corporate Transformation, Digital, and Propriety & Ethics. Meanwhile the public are increasingly unhappy with the public services the government provides. A survey published earlier this year by research firm Ipsos shows almost three in four Scots (74 per cent) think public services in their local area have got worse in the last five years. Of those, 62 per cent believe the Scottish Government is mainly responsible for the deterioration. Half of Scots (51 per cent) say they are dissatisfied with the quality of health services, while 28 per cent are dissatisfied with the quality of primary and secondary education, and half (51 per cent) are dissatisfied with the quality of policing. The civil service has also been criticised for clinging to the working from home policies initially imposed in the wake of Covid. Since the pandemic in 2020, working from home or hybrid working has been the default option for many staff. New rules introduced to try and boost productivity mean that, from October, staff will have to turn up at the office at least two days a week. The figure is lower than the equivalent policy for civil servants working for the UK government in Whitehall, which states that civil servants must spend at least 60 per cent of their time working in the office. However the edict has sparked complaints from some Scottish civil servants about the cost of having commute more regularly to government offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow. Some have raised concerns about the environmental impact of driving themselves to work - while others have warned the order to return to the office is 'an attack on their human rights'. Separately it emerged in June that Scotland's civil servants last year took an average of 8.7 days off sick - the worst recorded rate of absence in the government's history, and more than double the rate across the private sector. Although levels of pay for SCS staff are reserved to Westminster, the size and hierarchy of the civil service in Scotland is a matter for the Scottish Government. Responding to the criticism levelled at it, the government argued that its senior civil servants brought valuable expertise - while also vowing to deliver 'optimum value' for taxpayers. A spokesperson said: 'Senior civil servants manage performance and delivery, and ensure the Scottish Government achieves its goals. They bring significant expertise and progress the government's plans for delivering on its Programme for Government. ' It also said its public service reform strategy will 'ensure every pound spent delivers optimum value' and will 'reduce the annual combined corporate costs of the government and Scotland's public bodies by £1 billion over five years'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Warhammer chief queries his own £2m bonus
The publicity-shy boss of the company behind Warhammer miniatures and many video games has cast doubt on a new bonus scheme that has nearly trebled his pay. Kevin Rountree, chief executive of Games Workshop, earned £4.4 million last year at the fantasy figurine maker, up from £1.5 million the previous year. The pay bump, one of the biggest for a FTSE 100 boss, came as the Nottingham-based business entered the blue-chip index. Its shares have continued their stellar rise and are up more than a fifth this year to value Games Workshop at £5.3 billion. Last week it posted a 30 per cent rise in full-year profits to £263 million and promised to open more stores around the world after cashing in on the launch of Space Marine 2, a video game that is based on its hugely successful Warhammer 40,000 franchise, set in the year 40,000AD. Games Workshop staff shared a £20 million cash bonus pot worth £6,000 each, but it was the media-shy Rountree, whose picture has never been published, who was the biggest winner. He landed a 'one-off' bonus worth £2.2 million as a reward for his ten years running the company. Crucially, the award is payable in shares in three years if Rountree is still in the job and hits certain targets. This type of share-based deal is common among other big companies, but it is the first time Games Workshop has made such a payment since it was set up in a London flat in 1975 – and Rountree seemed unconvinced. 'The new policy is a big change,' Rountree wrote in the company's annual report. 'Time will tell whether it improves Games Workshop's performance and whether it is the right change,' he added. Rountree said he would continue to focus on 'what is right for Games Workshop and our long-term success, not on short-term gains'. Kate Marsh, who chairs the company's pay committee, admitted that such one-off payments 'can attract shareholder scrutiny', but felt it was now 'appropriate' when compared to other firms of a similar size.
