logo
New WSU report sheds light on health of Washington's news industry

New WSU report sheds light on health of Washington's news industry

Yahoo04-05-2025
May 3—For more than three decades, journalism advocates worldwide have celebrated May 3 as World Press Freedom Day.
The day marks the anniversary of the Windhoek Declaration of 1991, which promoted a free and independent press in Africa. It is meant to celebrate the importance of a free and independent press and raise awareness of the threats journalists around the world face.
"World Press Freedom Day is a great reminder about the importance of journalism and some of the issues that are facing journalists today," said Jennifer Henrichsen, an assistant professor at the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University. "Whether physical or digital attacks or partisan politics, we know that journalism has been in crisis for a long time, and both at the national and international level."
According to a Pew Research study published in 2021, newsroom employment in the United States has fallen by 26% since 2008. According to data compiled by the Local News Initiative at the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, more than 3,200 newspapers have gone out of business since 2005, with more than two per week folding, on average.
While the decline of the journalism industry nationally has been well-documented, Henrichsen and a group of professors at the Murrow School recently published the most complete review of the health of journalism in Washington.
The report, "From News Deserts to Nonprofit Resilience: Assessing the Health of Washington's Local News Ecosystem," examines the decline of Washington state's news industry, and offers suggestions to policymakers about what could be done to revive it.
"This is the most comprehensive study to date of Washington and is also a benchmark for us in the state," Henrichsen said. "So our intention is to survey outlets moving forward to try to get a sense of trends."
The report surveyed news outlets and interviewed journalists and civic leaders to study the health of journalism in Washington, and found a system in decline.
"Unfortunately, the reports of local news crises across the state, anecdotal or research-based, seem to be mirroring what we found in Washington state as well," said Pawel Popiel, an assistant professor at Murrow College.
According to the findings, only 170 outlets across the state provide daily news coverage, with about half of these outlets running on an annual budget of $250,000 or less.
The report found that two counties — Skamania and Ferry — qualify as news deserts, which means they lack a consistent and credible news source for local information. Additionally, five counties only have one news outlet, while five others only have two outlets.
"So it's actually a problem facing Washington writ large, to a large extent, because the number of outlets is important for understanding the types of media diversity that exist in a particular area," Henrichsen said.
The lack of outlets providing local coverage also means there's a lack of media diversity, according to Popiel. Media diversity, he said, is essential for competitive coverage, a wider array of opinions and to ensure a built-in resilience in the system.
"This is a problem that plagues both rural and sort of sparser areas as much as urban ones," Popiel said.
Other outlets throughout the state, the study found, struggle to hire and retain staff due to declining budgets, which can be partially attributed to a decrease in ad revenue.
The lack of staff to adequately report on a coverage area means that outlets are often left to make tough decisions when deciding what to cover. For example, an outlet may have to choose whether to cover a local school board meeting or report on a car crash that is causing a delay across town.
"You have to make really hard choices when you have so few staff," Henrichsen said. "And that, of course, has implications for the type of information that gets covered and the type of information that people can obtain to go about their daily lives."
The report, which was meant to provide a snapshot of the journalism industry, examined data collected between November 2023 and December 2024, which means a recent announcement that the Cowles family plans to donate The Spokesman-Review to a recently formed Spokane-based community nonprofit organization was not discussed.
"The nonprofit model provides hope and optimism to many who care about the future of local journalism because it can provide a sustainable funding model that allows for enhanced accountability reporting," Henrichsen said.
But the model isn't a "silver bullet," she said.
"Nonprofit outlets also face challenges and closures, as evidenced by the recent shuttering of the prominent nonprofit startup, the Houston Landing, and require ongoing innovation and attention to audiences, if they are going to be sustainable and successful long-term," Henrichsen said.
The plan calls for Publisher Stacey Cowles and his family's Cowles Co. to transfer ownership of the newspaper and award a $2 million matching grant to the nonprofit, called the Comma Community Journalism Lab, which was founded by current Spokesman-Review Executive Editor Rob Curley.
While the report examined the decline in Washington's news industry, it also offered suggestions for policymakers to support it. Those include ensuring that local journalism is "viewed as a public good which is necessary for a healthy democracy," Henrichsen said.
The recommendations also include making news subscriptions and business advertising in local outlets federally tax deductible, providing outlets tax credits to hire reporters, and providing direct subsidies to news outlets.
"When you think about the threats facing local news from resource constraints to dwindling subscriptions to a sort of collapsing talent pipeline that draws journalists in to a public that may not be informed about the journalism crisis to legal and other attacks against journalists themselves and news outlets, the range of solutions has to be comprehensive to fully address what is ultimately a structural, systemic problem," Popiel said.
In recent years, federal and state lawmakers have sought to throw the journalism industry a lifeline, to varying degrees of success.
This year, the Legislature considered imposing a surcharge on large search engines and social media companies with a gross income of $5 million or more, with the tax capped at $6 million a year. The Office of Financial Management estimated the tax would raise $27 million in fiscal year 2027, and an additional $102 million between 2027 and 2031, with the funds distributed to print, digital and broadcast media outlets.
While the proposal died in committee, the report examines "how additional funding mechanisms are necessary to try to ensure that this crisis of resources can be ameliorated so that journalism can be strengthened in the state," Henrichsen said.
A program that has found more support from lawmakers is a two-year fellowship program through the Murrow College.
Under the program, journalists in the early stages of their careers are placed in newsrooms throughout the state, including The Spokesman-Review and Spokane Public Radio, to cover underreported beats, which include voting rights, housing and rural issues, among others.
In 2023, the Legislature appropriated $2.4 million for its operation, and the state budget currently under review by Gov. Bob Ferguson includes additional funds for the program, though it would receive about half of its previous funding level.
"The true measure of journalism isn't whether it pleases people in civic life, but whether it empowers them with information," said Ben Shors, chair of the Department of Journalism and Media Production. "So that's sort of the baseline that we need to understand, that a free and functioning press is not a luxury in civic life in Washington state, it's a necessity, and it requires maintenance, and it requires investment, and it has to not just for the journalists who work in those jobs, but for the citizens who live in those communities."
Editors note: This article has been updated to reflect that Pawel Popiel is an assistant professor, not an associate professor.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is losing support from men as approval rating drops below 50%
Trump is losing support from men as approval rating drops below 50%

Yahoo

time28-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Trump is losing support from men as approval rating drops below 50%

Men are cooling on Donald Trump after making up a significant chunk of the president's 2024 voting bloc. According to a new poll by CBS/YouGov, Trump's approval rating is tanking with men during his second term. It found that 47 percent of men approve of Trump's job, and 53 percent do not. Last October — just before Trump's second electoral victory — a similar CBS/YouGov poll found that 54 percent of men supported Trump and 64 percent said they thought he would be a strong leader. The drop overall reflects a broader disapproval with Trump's second term; DecisionDeskHQ's polling averages showed that the president's overall approval rating was down by about 12 points since January, a drop from 56 percent then to 44 percent this week. According to the new CBS/YouGov poll, 47 percent of men said Trump was focusing "too much" on deportations, while 33 percent said he was showing the "right amount" of focus. In another metric, 65 percent of men said Trump has not done enough to lower prices, and only 29 percent said they felt he had. On February 7, Trump had a 60 percent approval rating with men, but his numbers began to slip in the months that followed, according to the poll. By the end of the month, his favorability had dropped to 56 percent, and by April 11 — just a week after he unveiled his tariff plan — men's approval of the president fell to 49 percent. Trump won big with men in 2024. According to Pew Research, men favored Trump by 12 points in 2024. Men under 50 split their votes almost evenly between former Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump. In 2020, men under 50 backed former President Joe Biden over Trump by 10 points. According to the CBS/YouGov polling data, the big issues driving down Trump's approval with men are his performance on the economy, his seeming inability to curb inflation, and his intense focus on immigration issues. By mid-April, Trump's approval rating among men on the economy dropped to minus 10 points, his approval regarding inflation fell to minus 20, and his immigration approval — one of his strongest areas among men — dropped to just plus six points, The poll found that 49 percent of men believe that the economy is getting worse, and 65 percent said that Trump wasn't doing enough to lower prices for goods and services. Another 60 percent said they believe Trump is focusing too much on tariffs, and 57 percent believe his policies are directly increasing the cost of their groceries. They aren't wrong about their grocery bills; Consumer Price Index data shows that annual inflation rose by 2.7 percent in June, up from 2.4 percent in May. They're also not wrong about Trump's tariffs, according to Yale's Budget Lab. Americans are currently facing an average tariff rate of 18.7 percent, which is the highest it has been since 1933. The three key issues driving down Trump's approval rating were the major issues that attracted men to Trump in the first place, according to the poll. That could spell trouble for Republicans come the midterm elections if they do not adjust their focus and messaging before the election. Trump's dipping approval comes at a difficult time for him, as even some stalwart supporters among his voter base and within his party are questioning him over his handling of the alleged "Epstein client list." The president promised to be transparent about what the government knew of disgraced New York financier and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein — a man who had a long and well-documented friendship with Trump. After U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told the public she had the so-called client list on her desk, the administration backtracked and insisted no such file existed, and confirming previous rulings that Epstein died by suicide in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial. Trump has reacted with dismissal and annoyance toward Republicans — and his own voters — who have asked him questions about his administration's position on the Epstein documents. Since then, Trump has faced questions and criticism from his voting base and within the conservative cultural sphere that helped sell his vision for America to the public — especially men.

Change in Republicans' Thinking Shifts Policy Support in Renewables
Change in Republicans' Thinking Shifts Policy Support in Renewables

Forbes

time25-07-2025

  • Forbes

Change in Republicans' Thinking Shifts Policy Support in Renewables

Americans have been and continue to be hungry for energy, in any effective form they can get it, renewable or not. While a majority of Americans still prioritize renewables in energy policy, a shift is taking place, mostly among younger Republican and Republican-leaning individuals, according to a recent Pew Research Study. This has been changing since the end of Trump's first term in office. While the battle continues for the hearts and minds of Americans over the debate between fossil fuels and renewables, the current Trump administration appears to be responsive to this shift by setting priorities for the development of fossil fuels. Democrats and Democrat-leaning respondents to the Pew poll remain staunchly in favor of renewable priorities, although there is a minor slippage in the numbers there as well. It appears that there needs to be room for all of it. Energy appetites tend to exceed energy sources globally. Maybe Republicans are thinking the next 10 years ahead, rallying behind Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' mantra, while perhaps Democrats are more worried about 25 years from now? The survey is silent on that one. Mizuho Securities thinks there's only 25 more years of oil shale wells left to drill anyway. Regardless of the source, from oil fracking to coal mining, more Americans support fossil fuel development, according to Pew. At the same time, Republicans have weakened their support for renewables since the first Trump administration. Perhaps it's because wind and solar are extraordinarily inefficient compared to fossil fuels, according to the Institute for Energy Research. How inefficient? According to a 2022 study, solar costs ten (10) times as much as gas to generate electricity, and wind costs seven (7) times as much. Hopefully, that will change soon. Either that or the decline in fossil fuel supply will make renewables competitive on price in the future. Something both Republicans and Democrats agree on is that phasing out new gasoline cars by 2035 is unpopular (65% of the entire sample). California and 11 other states have adopted plans to ban new gas cars and trucks by 2035, but the House and Senate have blocked the plan thus far. Another is that more nuclear power is a good thing (both parties have majorities in favor of more development in that area). Several AI plants will be powered by nuclear energy. Maybe we could build a nuclear-powered car with a mini reactor? Well, that was dreamed up in the 1950s with the Ford Nucleon and later fantasized in the 1980s with Doc Brown's DeLorean. In reality, we still have a long way to go on that one.

Cancel Culture Isn't Going Anywhere — Here's How Smart Leaders Respond
Cancel Culture Isn't Going Anywhere — Here's How Smart Leaders Respond

Entrepreneur

time25-07-2025

  • Entrepreneur

Cancel Culture Isn't Going Anywhere — Here's How Smart Leaders Respond

Cancel culture can derail B2C and B2B thought leadership efforts, as public scrutiny gets amplified by social media. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Today's leaders are expected to speak up — not just for business, but for society. According to the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer, 73% of people believe CEOs should step in when governments fail, and 68% feel empowered to pressure organizations into change. This isn't just about leadership — it's about leverage. Public expectations are high, and the cost of silence or missteps can be steep. Thought leadership now exists in a landscape of hypervisibility. Social media amplifies every comment, every slip. There are no warning shots — just consequences. So where does that leave leaders? Caught between the demand to lead and the fear of being "cancelled." This article explores how cancel culture is reshaping the rules of engagement—and how modern leaders can navigate it with clarity, credibility and confidence. Related: Cancel Culture Is Lazy. We Need Revision Culture Instead. Understanding cancel culture At its core, cancel culture is amplified public accountability. It's the collective decision to disengage from individuals or organizations seen as offensive or unethical. Social media often fuels the outrage, which can quickly damage reputations and opportunities. Some see it as justice. Others, as mob rule. A 2022 Pew Research Center study revealed a divide: 58% believe calling out others promotes accountability, while 38% see it as unfair punishment. It's a tense environment for leaders. Share an opinion and risk backlash. Stay silent and risk irrelevance. That hesitation is reshaping thought leadership—and not for the better. Leadership voices on thin ice Public sentiment shifts fast. What's acceptable today might spark outrage tomorrow. That unpredictability keeps leaders in the crosshairs. As a result, many opt for silence —but that's risky too. Diluted ideas turn thought leadership into thought followership: safe, bland and forgettable. The real risk isn't saying the wrong thing. It's saying nothing at all. Modern leadership requires clarity, conviction and the courage to speak from a foundation of values and insight—even as the ground shifts beneath you. Cancel culture and B2B: the hidden impact Cancel culture headlines usually spotlight consumer brands, but the effect in B2B is quieter and more insidious. Imagine this: Business A approaches Business B for a promising deal. Then, Business A backs out over a years-old tweet from Business B's founder. No press, no hashtags — just a lost opportunity behind closed doors. This is micro cancel culture. And for smaller companies without the PR or legal teams to manage reputation risks, it creates serious vulnerability. The result? Companies start choosing "safe" over smart. Innovation suffers. Integrity is replaced with risk aversion. Related: Here's the No. 1 Thing Brands Can Do to Avoid Public Outrage and Cancel Culture Cancel-proof thought leadership strategies In today's climate, it's not just what you say — it's how, when and why. Here's how to lead with courage and credibility: Embrace a micro-program strategy: Skip rigid campaigns that age fast. Break bold ideas into short, agile pieces that can evolve with current events. Test messaging early and often. Stay true to your values: Speak up only on issues that align with your mission. A 2023 Weber Shandwick study found one-third of consumers believe companies should only take stands when it's relevant to their business. Balance instinct with inclusion: Speed matters, but so does perspective. Build diverse voices into your decision-making process and vet your partnerships carefully. Use research as a shield and spotlight: Data makes bold ideas harder to dismiss. Root your opinions in real-world research and trend analysis to shift the conversation from emotion to evidence. Own your mistakes—fast: Perfection isn't required. Accountability is. PwC reports 38% of consumers will forgive a brand that apologizes and takes action. Act quickly, correct transparently and move forward. Final thoughts Cancel culture isn't going anywhere. Public expectations around business responsibility are only rising. The real challenge for leaders isn't avoiding controversy — it's staying relevant and trustworthy in a shifting world. Let values guide your message. Let data back it up. Let courage drive it forward. Cancel culture can feel like a threat — but it can also serve as a filter that pushes leadership toward greater clarity, integrity and long-term credibility. The goal isn't to dodge scrutiny. It's to build a brand that can withstand it. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store