PAPAL PULSE: Everyday Catholics reveal their hopes for the next pope
Fox News Digital took to the campus of The Catholic University of America (CUA) in the nation's capital to get a pulse on people's papal preferences ahead of this week's conclave.
"I'm excited for a pope that's going to unite the church, and I think that's what Francis did really well… I hope the legacy of the next pope will also be similar to that," one CUA student named Daniel told the outlet.
Cardinal Dolan Gives Inside Look Into Conclave, Holy Spirit's Role In Selecting A New Pope
The conclave is set to begin Wednesday following a mourning period after the death of Pope Francis last month.
During the conclave, cardinals vote through a secret ballot. A two-thirds majority is required for the election. After each round of submissions, ballots are read aloud and then burned. The ashes are used to notify audiences around the world and onlookers in St. Peter's Square of the election's status.
Read On The Fox News App
Ahead of the cardinals convening to select the next pontiff, Catholics on campus shared their thoughts on whether the next pope would lean more orthodox and conservative, or more pastoral and liberal.
"I actually believe that the Holy Spirit guides us where the Church needs us to be," Father Erdman Pandero told Fox. "I don't think that it is about politics in the Church or that people whose voices are being heard clearly. I always believe that it's the Holy Spirit who knows who to pick."
One Catholic student named John predicted a shift to a more pastoral nature.
"I would say, given the composition of the College of Cardinals, it would lean more, I guess, pastoral, as you would say. But you never know. There's always surprises with the conclave."
A student named Elise responded, "I really don't know, but I just hope that, whoever it is, he does all he can to help out the Catholic Church."Chimney Installed On Sistine Chapel's Roof Ahead Of Conclave To Pick Pope Francis' Successor
Additionally, the Catholics clued Fox News Digital in on the key issues they believe the next pope should address.
One student named Taylor said she wants the new pope to focus on promoting "peace" in the world. "It's probably one of their biggest things, bringing peace to the world and trying to find issues that they can help in as a leader of our faith and just seeing how faith can help bring people together."
"Pope Francis came out with some regulations that aren't very popular among Catholics who prefer the traditional Latin Mass," John remarked. "I think that the next Pope should perhaps be a little bit more understanding of where those Catholics come from and what they prefer liturgically."
Daniel noted how social issues like immigration should be addressed.
"I think more on immigration. I think the area of immigration in terms of what the Trump administration is doing and also where the pope brings in terms of like, Catholic charity… You remember that it's about the dignity of the human person."
Fox also asked the Catholics to give their views on the legacy of the late pope.
"I think Pope Francis left a lot of opinions on either side," John told Fox News Digital. "He was a man who couldn't be captured in one word and was difficult to define, and I think that's part of what made him so great, but also what made him so confusing for Catholics sometimes."
Fox also asked multiple CUA students whether they had a better or worse impression of the Church under Pope Francis.
Click Here To Get To The Fox News App
According to Friar Vincent Mary, "it certainly depends on who you ask."
Some of the students noted that their impression of the Church under Francis was positive.
"I've never seen any bad things or good things that stand out," Taylor said. "I just think that the Church has grown in many different ways and I would say mostly all positive."
John remarked how his impression of Catholicism has remained the same no matter who's been pope over the years. It's "my religious home, and it's where I'll always be," he said, adding, "I will always be faithful to whoever's in charge, but at the same time, that doesn't mean I can't also have opinions about him."
"I think the Church was doing very well when he was in charge," a student named Frank told Fox Digital. " He did a lot of good things for a lot of people, and I think whatever pope we get next should try to embody what he did as well, but change it a little bit to make it even better."
Fox News' Greg Norman also contributed to this report.Original article source: PAPAL PULSE: Everyday Catholics reveal their hopes for the next pope
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
I'm a conservative Catholic. Keep politics out of my church, other houses of worship
As a Catholic and someone who used to work in politics, I have often appreciated that when I step into Mass on Sunday mornings, I can focus on my faith and not the latest polling or candidate endorsements. I support religious liberty and being able to worship without government interference. But that freedom shouldn't allow our sacred places to become overly political. Partisan politics should be kept out of our religious institutions. But now a new ruling will allow religious leaders to endorse political candidates in churches and other religious houses without the risk of losing their tax-exempt status. I hope that doesn't mean I'll be hearing about candidate X from the pulpit. The ruling comes after the evangelical group, National Religious Broadcasters and two Texas churches, filed suit against the Internal Revenue Service last August. They were challenging, on First Amendment grounds, a tax code that defines the tax-exempt status for churches and other nonprofit organizations and prohibits their participation in 'any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.' As a result, the IRS has reversed its previous policy and will now allow religious leaders to endorse political candidates. I'm not alone in my dismay over the thought of hearing about politics during the time I set aside for worship. Faith leaders in Miami told the Herald that they're concerned this ruling could create rifts in religious communities. Houses of worship shouldn't become cogs in political machines. There are those who see this as a victory for religious freedom. Dr. Robert Jeffress, senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, praised the filing and tweeted, 'Government has NO BUSINESS regulating what is said in pulpits!' President Donald Trump also applauded the development. During the first White House Faith Office summit on July 14, he said 'God is once again welcomed back into our public square.' But I see it differently. God has never been absent from the public square — as a Catholic, I bring my values into my civic life every day. The real issue here is whether houses of worship will become extensions of political campaigns. I recognize the frustration some conservative Christians and others feel. In the past, many evangelicals embraced political engagement with enthusiasm, speaking at campaign rallies for Trump and mobilizing voters through explicit endorsements. This change in the law means they will no longer have to risk their tax-exempt status if they want to engage in partisan endorsements. The 'Souls to the Polls' movement, which focuses on Black churches, is one way that that faith communities already have influenced voter turnout. But the Catholic Church is drawing a line when it comes to this latest ruling. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement saying that the 'Church maintains its stance of not endorsing or opposing political candidates.' I've spent enough time in pews and on the campaign trail to know the difference between a sermon and a stump speech. And those lines shouldn't be blurred. When politics enters the pew, division follows. Houses of worship should be places of refuge, reflection and reconciliation. I may differ politically with my fellow congregants, but on Sundays during Mass, we are united in worship under one God. The last thing I want to know is who my priest is voting for or their political affiliation. As a conservative, I believe we should value institutions that transcend politics, not surrender them at the altar of partisanship. Religious leaders have many responsibilities — to guide us on issues of morality and faith, for example. But let's keep politics out of it. Mary Anna Mancuso is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. Her email: mmancuso@
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
DOJ forms Russiagate 'strike force' to investigate declassified Obama-era evidence
Print Close By Brooke Singman Published July 24, 2025 The Justice Department has formed a "strike force" to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard relating to former President Obama and his top national security and intelligence officials' involvement in the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. The DOJ, on Wednesday evening, announced the formation of the "strike force," to investigate potential next legal steps which may stem from Gabbard's recent declassification of records suggesting that Obama administration officials "manufactured" intelligence to form the narrative that then-candidate Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election. Justice Department officials told Fox News Digital that the DOJ takes the alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with "the utmost seriousness." A source familiar with the strike force told Fox News Digital that everything is being reviewed and that no serious lead is off the table. The source told Fox News Digital that the National Security Division of the Justice Department will "likely be involved in the investigation." BRENNAN DIRECTED PUBLICATION OF 'IMPLAUSIBLE' REPORTS CLAIMING PUTIN PREFERRED TRUMP IN 2016, HOUSE FOUND "The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people," Attorney General Pam Bondi said. "We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice," she said. The strike force consists of teams made up of investigators and prosecutors that focus on "the worst offenders engaged in fraudulent activities, including, chiefly, health care fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, money laundering offenses, false statements offenses," and more, according to the DOJ. The formation of the strike force comes after a slew of developments related to the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. RUSSIA SAT ON INTEL OF HILLARY CLINTON'S ALLEGED 'HEAVY TRANQUILIZERS' USE, NEW DOCS CLAIM Earlier this month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe sent a criminal referral for former CIA Director John Brennan to the FBI. The referral came after Ratcliffe declassified a "lessons learned" review of the creation of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). The 2017 ICA alleged Russia sought to influence the 2016 presidential election to help then-candidate Donald Trump. But the review found that the process of the ICA's creation was rushed with "procedural anomalies," and that officials diverted from intelligence standards. It also determined that the "decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment." The dossier — an anti-Trump document filled with unverified and wholly inaccurate claims that was commissioned by Fusion GPS and paid for by Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC — has been widely discredited. Last week's review marks the first time career CIA officials have acknowledged politicization of the process by which the ICA was written, particularly by Obama-era political appointees. Records declassified as part of that review further revealed that Brennan did, in fact, push for the dossier to be included in the 2017 ICA. FBI Director Kash Patel received the criminal referral and opened an investigation into Brennan. Patel also opened a criminal investigation into former FBI Director James Comey. The full scope of the criminal investigations into Brennan and Comey is unclear, but two sources described the FBI's view of the duo's interactions as a "conspiracy," which could open up a wide range of potential prosecutorial options. The FBI and CIA declined to comment. Neither Brennan nor Comey immediately responded to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Days later, Gabbard declassified documents revealing "overwhelming evidence" that demonstrated how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia collusion probe. OBAMA OFFICIALS ADMITTED THEY HAD NO 'EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE' OF TRUMP-RUSSIA COLLUSION: HOUSE INTEL TRANSCRIPTS Gabbard said the documents revealed that Obama administration officials "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise. The new documents name former President Barack Obama, top officials in his National Security Council, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice, then-Secretary of State John Kerry, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others. Gabbard, on Monday, sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department related to those findings. DOJ officials did not share further details on whom the criminal referral was for. And on Wednesday, Gabbard declassified documents that showed that the intelligence community did not have any direct information that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election, but, at the "unusual" direction of then-President Barack Obama, published "potentially biased" or "implausible" intelligence suggesting otherwise. That information came from a report prepared by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence back in 2020. The report, which was based on an investigation launched by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., was dated Sept. 18, 2020. At the time of the publication of the report, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., was the chairman of the committee. The report has never before been released to the public, and instead, has remained highly classified within the intelligence community. Meanwhile, Fox News Digital, in 2020, exclusively obtained the declassified transcripts from Obama-era national security officials' closed-door testimonies before the House Intelligence Committee, in which those officials testified that they had no "empirical evidence" of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election, but continued to publicly push the "narrative" of collusion. The House Intelligence Committee, in 2017, conducted depositions of top Obama intelligence officials, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, among others. OBAMA DENIES TRUMP'S 'BIZARRE ALLEGATIONS' THAT HE WAS RUSSIAGATE 'RINGLEADER' IN RARE STATEMENT The officials' responses in the transcripts of those interviews align with the results of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation — which found no evidence of criminal coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016, while not reaching a determination on obstruction of justice. The transcripts, from 2017 and 2018, revealed top Obama officials were questioned by House Intelligence Committee lawmakers and investigators about whether they had or had seen evidence of such collusion, coordination or conspiracy — the issue that drove the FBI's initial case and later the special counsel probe. "I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election," Clapper testified in 2017. "That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence.... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence." Lynch also said she did "not recall that being briefed up to me." "I can't say that it existed or not," Lynch said, referring to evidence of collusion, conspiracy or coordination. But Clapper and Lynch, and then Vice President Joe Biden, were present in the Oval Office July 28, 2016, when Brennan briefed Obama and Comey on intelligence he'd received from one of Hillary Clinton's campaign foreign policy advisors "to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service." "We're getting additional insight into Russian activities from (REDACTED)," Brennan's handwritten notes, exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital in October 2020, read. "CITE (summarizing) alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service." Meanwhile, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, according to the transcript of her interview to the House Intelligence Committee, was asked whether she had or saw any evidence of collusion or conspiracy. OBAMA ADMIN 'MANUFACTURED' INTELLIGENCE TO CREATE 2016 RUSSIAN ELECTION INTERFERENCE NARRATIVE, DOCUMENTS SHOW Power replied: "I am not in possession of anything — I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community." When asked again, she said: "I am not." Rice was asked the same question. "To the best of my recollection, there wasn't anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause," she said, according to her transcribed interview, in response to whether she had any evidence of conspiracy. "I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw… conspiracy prior to my departure." When asked whether she had any evidence of "coordination," Rice replied: "I don't recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect." Meanwhile, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was not asked that specific question but rather questions about the accuracy and legitimacy of the unverified anti-Trump dossier compiled by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. McCabe was asked during his interview in 2017 what was the most "damning or important piece of evidence in the dossier that" he "now knows is true." McCabe replied: "We have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information." "You don't know if it's true or not?" a House investigator asked, to which McCabe replied: "That's correct." OBAMA OFFICIALS USED DOSSIER TO PROBE, BRIEF TRUMP DESPITE KNOWING IT WAS UNVERIFIED 'INTERNET RUMOR' After Trump's 2016 victory and during the presidential transition period, Comey briefed Trump on the now-infamous anti-Trump dossier, containing salacious allegations of purported coordination between Trump and the Russian government. Brennan was present for that briefing, which took place at Trump Tower in New York City in January 2017. The dossier was authored by Steele. It was funded by Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the law firm Perkins Coie. But Brennan and Comey knew of intelligence suggesting Clinton, during the campaign, was stirring up a plan to tie Trump to Russia, documents claim. It is unclear whether the intelligence community, at the time, knew that the dossier was paid for by Clinton and the DNC. The Obama-era officials have been mum on the new revelations, but a spokesman for Obama on Tuesday made a rare public statement. FBI LAUNCHES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS OF JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES COMEY: DOJ SOURCES "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," Obama spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," Obama's spokesman continued. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." He added: "These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio." Print Close URL
New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
White House says ‘The View' could be cancelled next following Joy Behar's anti-Trump tirade
A White House spokesperson warned 'The View' co-host Joy Behar that her show could be next on the chopping block after her latest tirade against President Donald Trump on Wednesday. During the show, Behar and her fellow hosts responded to Trump's call for former President Barack Obama to be criminally investigated for allegedly manufacturing intelligence that prompted the Trump–Russia collusion narrative. 'First of all, who tried to overthrow the government on Jan. 6?' Behar said. 'Who was that again? That was not Obama. 'The thing about him is he's so jealous of Obama, because Obama is everything that he is not: Trim, smart, handsome, happily married, and can sing Al Green's song 'Let's Stay Together' better than Al Green. And Trump cannot stand it. It's driving him crazy. Green is not a good color.' In a statement to Fox News Digital, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers called out the show's ratings and suggested it could be 'pulled off-air' if Behar didn't stop attacking Trump. 'Joy Behar is an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's no surprise that 'The View's' ratings hit an all-time low last year. She should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off-air,' Rogers said. 3 Behar was responding to Trump's call for Barack Obama to be criminally investigated over the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. ABC 3 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the 'Winning the AI Race' summit hosted by All In Podcast and Hill & Valley Forum at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on July 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images In a response provided to Entertainment Weekly, a spokesperson for 'The View' defended the show by claiming it 'is up in total viewers and women 18-49, versus the comparable weeks last season, to its most-watched in four years' and that 'season to date, 'The View' is ranking No. 1 in households and total viewers among all network daytime talk shows and news programs for the fifth straight season.' Fox News Digital reached out to 'The View' for additional comment. The statement came nearly a week after CBS announced 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' would be canceled next May at the end of its broadcast season. 3 The White House spokesperson said that Behar 'should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off-air.' ABC Though CBS and parent company Paramount said that the choice to cancel the series was 'purely a financial decision,' and the show was reportedly losing the network $40 million a year, many liberal commentators have claimed it was for political reasons because of Colbert's anti-Trump stance. According to a new report, Colbert's manager knew that 'The Late Show' would be canceled at CBS more than two weeks before his client did, and multiple sources said the decision to cancel the show was 'truly driven by financials.'
