N.S. opposition call government out over withholding environmental racism report
Their comments came after Becky Druhan, minister responsible for the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism Initiatives, told reporters Thursday that government has requested a meeting with the environmental racism panel that created the report to 'discuss with them before sharing any additional information.'
The report was completed by an eight-member panel appointed in June 2023 to look at how racism affects a community's natural environment in Nova Scotia. Environmental racism is a form of systemic racism where environmentally hazardous activities like landfills, trash incinerators, coal plants and toxic waste facilities are set up near Black and racialized communities or Indigenous territories.
The report was delivered to the province about a year ago.
'In this instance, the (panel's) mandate didn't include a public report. The mandate was advice to government. So we want to respect the parameters of that,' Druhan said after a cabinet meeting when asked if she will release the report.
Story continues below advertisement
The panel members included community leaders with expertise in subjects such as Mi'kmaw and African Nova Scotian history, law, health and environmental sciences.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'We do know that Nova Scotians want to hear more, and we want to respect the panel and have a conversation with them before we do that,' Druhan said.
Nova Scotia NDP Leader Claudia Chender and Liberal member Derek Mombourquette both said Thursday it's puzzling the province is choosing to withhold this critical information about environmental racism.
'I think they probably don't like what it (the report) says,' Chender said of the provincial government.
'We're talking about a legacy of wrongdoing and harm that this government is now complicit in, because they will not address what it was that came forward' from this panel's work, she added.
The idea for the panel came from the NDP, who proposed it in an amendment to climate change legislation that was passed in the fall of 2023. Chender said it 'was no one's understanding' that this panel's work would be kept from the public.
'That report came from an amendment that was put forward by our caucus that specifically called for the establishment of a panel that would provide recommendations to the province for redress,' Chender said. 'It didn't say that it would privately provide some things that the government might consider, and then not tell anyone about it. That doesn't make any sense.'
Story continues below advertisement
Mombourquette agreed, saying it's 'really shameful' that the report has not yet been made public to Nova Scotians, adding that he represents a constituency that has faced environmental racism in the form of the Sydney tar ponds and coke oven sites in Cape Breton.
'I think that the government should release it immediately. I don't buy this argument that there needs to be a meeting with the panel beforehand. Release the report, let Nova Scotians see what's in it,' he said.
When asked if he thinks the report ought to be made public, Premier Tim Houston did not directly answer.
'We're using that to formulate public policy. It's having a positive impact. There is a meeting being organized with a number of ministers and the panellists to talk about… the ways forward,' he said after Thursday's cabinet meeting.
When pressed on if he is of the opinion that it should be public, he said 'we'll have a discussion with the panels. I think the most important thing is that the work is actually used.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 11, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Alberta won't increase oil sands monitoring funds to keep pace with industry expansion, inflation
Indigenous representatives of an oilsands monitoring program say Alberta won't increase funding to keep pace with oilsands expansion and inflation — and the shortfall risks compromising monitoring work, according to a letter obtained by Canada's National Observer. The joint oilsands monitoring group, composed of industry, provincial, federal and Indigenous representatives, was created in 2013 to monitor the environmental impacts of oilsands development in Alberta. The budget for 2025 is $54.5 million, paid for by industry, but the monitoring program received requests for roughly $76 million worth of monitoring work plans, leaving roughly $21.5 million of work requests unfunded. On March 20, Indigenous representatives on the oversight committee wrote a letter to the provincial and federal co-chairs warning that the budget is not keeping up with inflation or monitoring demands created by oilsands expansion, and this will negatively impact the quality of work. The funding formula that requires industry to pay up to $50 million annually for the program was developed in 2013 collaboratively by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers and the Alberta government. Accounting for inflation, what cost $50 million in 2013 should now cost about $66.5 million, the letter signatories write; 'Thus, the overall purchasing power of oilsands monitoring has shrunk roughly 25 per cent, while the oil sands industry has nearly doubled in size.' The signatories added that this runs contrary to the polluter-pays principle. This principle in Canadian law says companies or people that pollute are responsible to pay the costs they impose on society to protect the public from the cost of pollution, for example, oil spill cleanup and lasting impacts. In 2018, royalty revenues were $3.2 billion. In 2023, that number reached a staggering $16.9 billion, according to the letter. 'Arbitrary cuts to monitoring programs, such as the proposed major reductions in wetlands and biodiversity, put the effectiveness of the monitoring at risk,' according to the letter. Why the oilsands needs monitoring The Indigenous representatives pushed to prioritize fully funding community-based monitoring programs and core monitoring programs which meant cuts to other important programs. 'Arbitrary cuts to monitoring programs, such as the proposed major reductions in wetlands and biodiversity, put the effectiveness of the monitoring at risk,' according to the letter. 'For severely compromised programs, we would rather that no monitoring occur instead of poor monitoring. Poor monitoring does not provide any value to the communities, nor to the public, but instead provides a veneer of having addressed concerns in these areas.' Ryan Fournier, press secretary for Alberta Minister Environment and Protected Areas Rebecca Schulz, said it is 'misleading' to describe it as programming cuts because the request for $73 million in funding encompassed '53 different work plans, including requests that are duplicative, overlapping or even potentially conflicting.' Fournier did not provide specific examples of duplicative or conflicting work plans. There is a $3 million discrepancy between the amount of requested funding Alberta provided and the figure cited in the letter. When asked to respond to the fact that both inflation and oilsands expansion are outpacing the available funding, Fournier said the oil sands monitoring program 'is the biggest program of its kind in the world,' and said its budget 'has risen over $5 million since 2022, and has the funding needed to continue delivering for Albertans.' According to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) spokesperson Hannah Boonstra, the funding was increased by $4.5 million this year "to utilize surplus funds accumulated from underspending in previous years.' The historic underspending is due to a range of factors, including COVID-19 and associated slowdowns on work plan approval, hiring and contracting delays, overestimating costs, consolidating work, approval delays and more, according to the annual reports. ECCC and Alberta Environment and Protected Areas co-chair the oil sands monitoring program but the federal government was in caretaker mode for the 2025 election and did not sign off on the final annual monitoring plan to avoid delays, Boonstra's statement noted. 'Since the Government of Alberta is financially accountable for the program, the province approves the financial elements of the monitoring plan,' Boonstra said. Last year, nearly $540,000 went to Cold Lake First Nation for community-based monitoring to examine how the oilsands industry is impacting a variety of factors, including water quality, berry abundance, fisheries health, muskrats and pitcher plants, to name a few. Interest in community-based monitoring like this is growing, the letter noted, and 'as new communities are onboarded, this forces us to choose between existing Western science initiatives and the needs of Indigenous communities.' This interest will likely keep growing while funding remains stagnant and 'we cannot offer a path forward for those programs and encourage communities to submit proposals, but then largely ignore the requests,' the letter reads.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Letters, July 14
Opinion Canada's fire programs among best I was heavily involved in the wildfire management in Minnesota for about 40 years. During that period, MN DNR Forestry was involved with the Manitoba and Ontario wildfire programs through the Great Lakes Forest Fire Compact and other border agreements. We are quite aware that Canada's wildfire programs are as good or better than any program on the planet. So when I read the letter that some of our politicians wrote that was critical of your forest management, I was embarrassed. It was like the drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. They don't have a clue about what they are talking about. They are just trying to make political points. Please know that the vast majority of Minnesotans strongly support your programs and care deeply about the hardships you are dealing with. Hopefully we can send more fire resources to help you out. Be safe. Doug Anderson Cohasset, Minn. Privatization and profit Re: Cracks begin to appear in Kinew's rock-solid popularity (July 10) Niigaan Sinclair reminds us of that figure of speech used in the 2023 Manitoba election: 'the economic horse pulls the social cart.' It signalled fiscal responsibility and that the NDP adhered to generally accepted views of the current economic reality. Well, the horse and cart did their job! But is it that simple, or is the reverse closer to the truth — that the current capitalist economic structure depends on, and is parasitic on, the underlying social reality, i.e. the social cart actually supports the economy? Some examples: start with unpaid reproductive labour (child care). As well, dependence on government for: workforce education and training; workforce maintenance during unemployment; public provision of health care; infrastructure development and upkeep; government's regulatory functions regarding international trade, electronic media, etc.; and extractive mining activities dependent on liabilities (externalities) falling on the environment and the public. Readers will have additional examples. Yes, of course the economy and society are interrelated, but with the relentless privatizing of profits and socializing of costs, a rebalancing seems past due. The ever-increasing inequality of wealth distribution speaks to the urgency of attending to the kind of society and communities we want. In other words: 'What we desire for ourselves, we wish for all.' Excuse me now while I look for my old 'People Before Profits' T-shirt. Sig Laser Winnipeg A not-so-small difference Re: Encampment realities (Letters, July 10) Thank you for publishing my letter. However, a single word was changed that altered the meaning of a key sentence. In my original submission, I wrote: '…and maybe watching a few tomatoes growing in a yard not shrouded in toxic, carcinogenic wire fire smoke.' You changed it to: '…wildfire smoke.' I did not mean wildfire — I meant wire fire, the toxic result of illegally burning insulated copper wire to remove its plastic coating. The bare copper is then sold for cash, often fuelling addiction. This has become a disturbingly common part of the informal encampment economy, especially along our riverbanks. I'm continually surprised by how many 911 dispatchers, police officers and public officials are unaware of this highly polluting practice. When wire is burned without proper industrial filtration, it releases a cocktail of toxins — dioxins, furans, heavy metals (like lead, arsenic, and cadmium), and carcinogens — into our air, soil and water. The health risks of repeated exposure are well-documented: cancer, neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption and immune system damage, to name a few. Thanks to ongoing encampments, many of us live in a near-constant haze of this smoke. Police acknowledge this practice as a quick way for drug users to fund their habits. Firefighters extinguish the fires but often leave the wire behind, only for the burning to resume once they've gone. I've spoken with officers, city staff, councillors and even the mayor about this issue. The latter two remain silent; others simply shrug and ask, 'What can you do?' Yes, the province has introduced a Scrap Metal Act to curb the sale of obviously stolen or burned metals — but the fires continue. Someone must still be buying. This is a public health and environmental crisis hiding in plain sight. It deserves far more attention, accountability and action than it's currently getting. Howard Warren Winnipeg Better way to paint Re: Drivers warned to be on lookout for peeling licence plates (July 9) The article about peeling licence plates got my ire up. My dad used to hang his old plates on the wall of his garage. None of them were peeling, and, in fact, looked as fresh as they did when new. Today's plates tend to peel after a few years of use, which I find outrageous. Why can't they use painting methods that have proved tried and true? Michael Dowling Winnipeg Smooth travelling A good nation-building project for Canada and all the provinces with the help of their premiers would be to construct overpasses along the Trans-Canada Highway where problematic intersections exist. These problematic intersections where deaths and serious accidents have occurred would become a thing of the past. My friend who travelled extensively on U.S. highways says Canada could copy the U.S. system which has numerous overpasses built into their interstate highway system that reduce high-speed accidents and don't impede vehicle travel. Robert J. Moskal Winnipeg A different air-quality problem Re: Following our noses (July 5) Walking in our city, we have to breathe the disgusting toxic smell of drier sheets flowing out of drier vents on laundry day. Drier sheets are unnecessary laundry additives that pollute our environment. While many chemicals in dryer sheets are generally safe, concerns exist regarding the fragrances and volatile compounds they emit. The production and disposal of dryer sheets contribute to environmental pollution. They are single-use products that generate waste and can release harmful chemicals into the air and water systems. Alternatives to dryer sheets are wool dryer balls (a dollar store buy) or adding vinegar to the rinse cycle. Perfume, air fresheners and cleaning products are also toxic to people who are scent sensitive. Strong odors and scents can be a trigger for headaches, nausea and asthma symptoms. Workplace and gyms have signs reminding people to be scent-free. Let's each do our part to keep our environment cleaner and free of toxins. Sharon Kletke Winnipeg Need for more housing Re: Proposed 16-storey Market Lands tower out of step with Exchange area: city planners (July 8) I am writing in response to your recent article on the proposed 16-storey Market Lands tower — in complete support of it. The City of Winnipeg's prime concern should be adding residential units to its downtown, not limiting the height of such buildings. More residents improves the neighbourhood. It not only increases security in the streets, but provides customers for all of the shops and restaurants in the area and local residential opportunities for those who work in those or in offices in the area, and wish to commute to work on foot or by bicycle. A dynamic and thriving downtown needs one thing more than any other, and that is a resident population, not commuters. I say the taller the better for residential structures for that very reason. If architectural details of the building should be made to conform to the historic character of the area, that would be a much more salient point for the city to make, not its height. Roy C. Dudgeon Winnipeg
Winnipeg Free Press
6 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Takeaways from AP report on Democrats already lining up for the 2028 presidential race
Democrats' political jockeying for the 2028 presidential contest appears to be playing out earlier, with more frequency and with less pretense than ever before. It's only 2025, but several potential candidates are already taking steps to get to know voters in the states that will matter most in the nomination process. And with no clear Democratic front-runner, upwards of 30 high-profile Democrats could ultimately enter the 2028 primary. Here are highlights from The Associated Press' reporting on possible hopefuls' moves in traditional early voting states: South Carolina hot in July Over the span of 10 days this month, three Democratic presidential prospects are scheduled to campaign in South Carolina. The state is expected to host the Democratic Party's opening presidential primary contest in early 2028, although the calendar hasn't been finalized. California Gov. Gavin Newsom was referred to as a presidential candidate at one stop last week, although he insisted he was there simply to strengthen the party for the midterms. Term-limited Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, who acknowledges he's considering a 2028 bid, will spend two days touring South Carolina later this week. He'll focus on the state's Black community, while drawing an implicit contrast with Newsom on cultural issues. California Rep. Ro Khanna, a progressive aligned with the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party, will target union members and Black voters when he's in the state a few days later. And former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is having private conversations about a potential run with key South Carolina Democrats, including Rep. Jim Clyburn. A Kentucky Democrat up next Beshear, Kentucky's 47-year-old two-term governor, is scheduled to make multiple appearances in South Carolina on Wednesday and Thursday in what will be his first visit to the state on political grounds. He'll highlight his appeal among red-state moderates and Black voters in a Thursday speech hosted by the Georgetown County Democrats in a region that voted three times for Trump and has a large African American population. 'Democrats have a huge opportunity to seize the middle and win back the voters who have been increasingly skeptical of the Democratic brand. But it's going to take focus and discipline,' he will say, according to speech excerpts obtained by the AP. Already a sense of urgency Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a rising star in the Democratic party, told the AP that presidential prospects 'need to be more visible earlier' as Democrats work to recover from their disastrous performance in the 2024 election. 'What freaks most Democrats out is not really understanding who's up next. Like, who's got next?' she said. 'And I think that that is really what people want most; they want their presidential nominee now.' Voters and local officials in key states tend to agree. Jody Gaulin, the Democratic chair in South Carolina's deep-red Oconee County, hopes the energy that comes along with potential presidential hopefuls could boost her party's ranks. 'This is exactly what we've been waiting for,' Gaulin said. In New Hampshire, 46-year-old Democrat Jane Lescynski was eager to answer when asked to what extent she's thinking about the 2028 presidential election. 'I can't wait,' she said. Clyburn the kingmaker? Clyburn, South Carolina's only Democratic congressman, told the AP he's had direct contact with Emanuel, Beshear and Khanna. He also appeared with Newsom last week and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore in May. Clyburn said he doesn't have an early favorite in the 2028 Democratic nomination contest and may not endorse at all in what he expects to be a very large field. 'It can be Gavin Newsom, it can be Wes Moore, Andy Beshear, Ro Khanna, whoever it is, I think they're going to have a very good reception amongst the voters,' Clyburn told the AP. 'I feel good about Democrats in general.' Don't sleep on New Hampshire and Iowa New Hampshire Democratic leaders are privately encouraging 2028 prospects to visit the state. Unlike South Carolina, New Hampshire features two competitive House races and a top-tier Senate race in next year's midterms. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, campaigned Friday in the state with Rep. Chris Pappas, who is expected to represent Democrats on the Senate ballot next fall. She insisted her only purpose in visiting was backing Pappas' campaign. Illinois Gov. Pritzker headlined a key state fundraiser in May. And while Iowa may have lost its top spot on the Democrats' primary calendar, with at least two competitive House races it will almost certainly be a top draw for ambitious Democrats. Pete Buttigieg, a former Biden Cabinet member and a 2020 presidential candidate, hosted a town hall in Iowa in May. Others are moving more cautiously. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro has avoided any early state travel this year, focusing instead on his 2026 reelection. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has also focused largely on her day job. Both would be top-tier presidential candidates should they decide to run.
